The Young Republicans are our future -- also our present

[Chrissy1979]

27 minutes ago, Shady said:

Literally random kids that signed up.  There are thousands of the same thing all over the country.  Did you even say a word about the texts from the .Democrat running lieutenant governor of Virginia?  Or is this just selective outrage?

You’re just going to keep lying? They’re Young Republican leaders between the ages of 24 and 35. 

[herbie]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

"NAZIS!"

Gawd you're a pathetic goof.

Goof? By the man who thinks calling people who love Hitler Nazis is bad?
No f*cking wonder threads on this forum have to ask why we should hate Nazis.....

You arrive at your opinion because UR1

[Shady]

32 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You’re just going to keep lying? They’re Young Republican leaders between the ages of 24 and 35. 

Yep, random unelected people that signed up.  You have selective outrage.

[Chrissy1979]

Just now, Shady said:

Yep, random unelected people that signed up.  You have selective outrage.

They’re part of the leadership of their respective organizations. So you’re saying you have no problem with what was said by the Democrat you cited, or is your outrage even more “selective”?

[Shady]

22 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

They’re part of the leadership of their respective organizations. So you’re saying you have no problem with what was said by the Democrat you cited, or is your outrage even more “selective”?

I have no context in which it was said.  Jokes involving kids in a private text chain of random people are pretty much irrelevant.  Sorry Karen.

[Chrissy1979]

35 minutes ago, Shady said:

I have no context in which it was said.  Jokes involving kids in a private text chain of random people are pretty much irrelevant.  Sorry Karen.

You consider people in their late 20s and mid 30s to be kids? It’s representative of how Republicans talk amongst themselves when they think no one else is listening, which makes it an issue.

[Shady]

8 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You consider people in their late 20s and mid 30s to be kids? It’s representative of how Republicans talk amongst themselves when they think no one else is listening, which makes it an issue.

Again.  I don’t know the context of what was said.  Either do you.  People making tasteless jokes doesn’t concern me.  Especially unelected nobodies.  You should care more of the texts of elected officials.  But you have selected outrage.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

Goof? By the man who thinks calling people who love Hitler Nazis is bad?
No f*cking wonder threads on this forum have to ask why we should hate Nazis.....

You arrive at your opinion because UR1

Lol...so pathetic.

Hitler is dead and I dont remember anyone saying they love him. Do you?

What NAZIS? The Ukrainian Neo-NAZIS? I'm no fan of them. Are you?

Again...your name calling only shows you have no argument and no intellect. Fact is...you're just a pathetic little boy.

And...a goof.

Edited October 16, 2025 by Nationalist

[Chrissy1979]

24 minutes ago, Shady said:

Again.  I don’t know the context of what was said.  Either do you.  People making tasteless jokes doesn’t concern me.  Especially unelected nobodies.  You should care more of the texts of elected officials.  But you have selected outrage.

I’m sure if a prominent young Democrat said “I love Hitler” and this was accepted discourse in a Dem groupchat, you wouldn’t care at all…LOL!

Edited October 16, 2025 by Chrissy1979

[Shady]

12 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I’m sure if a prominent young Democrat said “I love Hitler” and this was accepted discourse in a Dem groupchat, you wouldn’t care at all…LOL!

Like you not saying a word about the Democrat lieutenant governor in Virginia? LOL!  Regardless I don’t take morality lessons from the side that cheered on the assassination in Charlie Kirk.

[Chrissy1979]

7 minutes ago, Shady said:

Like you not saying a word about the Democrat lieutenant governor in Virginia? LOL!  Regardless I don’t take morality lessons from the side that cheered on the assassination in Charlie Kirk.

No, if it’s true he said that, I condemn it. Such language is unacceptable.

See how easy it is not to be a pathetic hypocrite?

[Hodad]

7 hours ago, Shady said:

Who’s defending anything?  It’s a leaked conversation of random nobody’s.  Sorry if I don’t care all that much.  The leaked text messages of the Democrat running for lieutenant governor in Virginia is much more relevant.  You know the ones where he wants to kill his opponent?

Not nobodies. Serious players in Republican politics, state senators, someone from the Trump admin. 

 

You don't care because you don't care. That's really the issue. The sitting VP brushes it off as, essentially, more "locker room talk." You people are whatabouting it like crazy. Still, nobody can manage to condemn what should be condemned. Defense of the indefensible.

[Shady]

1 minute ago, Hodad said:

Not nobodies. Serious players in Republican politics, state senators, someone from the Trump admin. 

 

You don't care because you don't care. That's really the issue. The sitting VP brushes it off as, essentially, more "locker room talk." You people are whatabouting it like crazy. Still, nobody can manage to condemn what should be condemned. Defense of the indefensible.

LOL @ serious players! 🤣

Nobodies.  Which state senators?  Which Trump admin members?

12 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

No, if it’s true he said that, I condemn it. Such language is unacceptable.

See how easy it is not to be a pathetic hypocrite?

I already said that they were tasteless jokes.

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You’re just going to keep lying? They’re Young Republican leaders between the ages of 24 and 35. 

Between 18 and 40. 

Just look at this young whippersnapper, a mere 31 years of age. 

 

He'll probably grow out of being a rabid racist. 

When Luke Mosiman, the chair of the Arizona Young Republicans, asked if the New Yorkers in the chat were watching an NBA playoff game, Giunta responded, “I’d go to the zoo if I wanted to watch monkey play ball.” Giunta elsewhere refers to Black people as “the watermelon people.”

21 minutes ago, Shady said:

LOL @ serious players! 🤣

Nobodies.  Which state senators?  Which Trump admin members?

I already said that they were tasteless jokes.

You could try reading the article before pretending you know what's in it. 🙄

[Shady]

Just now, Hodad said:

Between 18 and 40. 

Just look at this young whippersnapper, a mere 31 years of age. 

 

He'll probably grow out of being a rabid racist. 

When Luke Mosiman, the chair of the Arizona Young Republicans, asked if the New Yorkers in the chat were watching an NBA playoff game, Giunta responded, “I’d go to the zoo if I wanted to watch monkey play ball.” Giunta elsewhere refers to Black people as “the watermelon people.”

You could try reading the article before pretending you know what's in it. 🙄

Just as I thought.  I complete nobody.  Cool, he should be terminated.  But I thought you said state senators and members of the Trump admin?  

[Hodad]

5 minutes ago, Shady said:

Just as I thought.  I complete nobody.  Cool, he should be terminated.  But I thought you said state senators and members of the Trump admin?  

Read the article, dumbass. 

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, Shady said:

Who’s defending anything?  It’s a leaked conversation of random nobody’s.  Sorry if I don’t care all that much.  The leaked text messages of the Democrat running for lieutenant governor in Virginia is much more relevant.  You know the ones where he wants to kill his opponent?

Except they ARE NOT "random nobodies." They are the top Republican leaders in waiting. Bet you're one of THEM.

8 hours ago, Shady said:

They’re complete nobodies.  

Only the ones who got FIRED from their Republican leadership jobs. LMAO

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Meh. Why should I care? Leftist teachers say worse shit every day. 

Democrats and liberals have openly normalized anti-White rhetoric and scapegoating throughout institutions and mainstream media. There are very few moderates speaking up and rarely any consequences or condemnation for it. You have no ground to stand on here.

YOUR LIES don't make our ground unsolid.

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Still, nobody can manage to condemn what should be condemned. Defense of the indefensible.

Really?

10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I will acknowledge it is possible or even likely they inappropriately used those words. If they did, they should be condemned. We don't tolerate intolerance. 

I literally used the word condemned. And you reacted to that post:

I guess you were laughing at the thought of killing a politician and his family? 

[Hodad]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Really?

I literally used the word condemned. And you reacted to that post:

I guess you were laughing at the thought of killing a politician and his family? 

You didn't condemn it. You kinda hedged that maybe, possibly, in some scenario, it should be condemned. 

Yet still couldn't bring yourself to do so. 

The spineless weaseling is what made me laugh. 

[gatomontes99]

22 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You didn't condemn it. You kinda hedged that maybe, possibly, in some scenario, it should be condemned. 

Yet still couldn't bring yourself to do so. 

The spineless weaseling is what made me laugh. 

No, I condemned it on the condition that your source didnt lie about it. I made that very clear. I don't trust you or your source. 

Edited October 16, 2025 by gatomontes99

[herbie]

Our resident brownshirts rush again to their defence.

[gatomontes99]

Just now, herbie said:

Our resident brownshirts rush again to their defence.

Do you ever plan on contributing to the discussion? Or is that to much to ask? 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

No, I condemned it on the condition that your source didnt lie about it. I made that very clear. I don't trust you or your source. 

Maybe you should read your quote again. Then when you two have sorted things out, come back to us with a consensus viewpoint. Hell, maybe actually condemn them. That would be novel. 

[herbie]

18 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Do you ever plan on contributing to the discussion? Or is that to much to ask?

There's nothing to discuss. Your circle jerk of tongue-bathing agreement with every authoritarian act is not discussion.
As is your point over sources when every damn source reported the issue,