AOC Ran Her Lying Mouth About Charlie Kirk in Congress, and Voted Against Bipartisan Condemnation of Kirk's Assassination and Honouring Him.

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

the evidence is right there and AOC is completely wrong. Well done, you managed to be 100% incorrect in just one sentence. Very efficient of you

You know the history of that quote right? You know damn well that's not an incentive to violence right? Why do you insist on lying like that? The whole point of that conversation was she wouldn't be so eager to call for men to go to war if she was the one who was going to get shot. If anything it's the opposite of a call to violence it's saying that people wouldn't be calling for violence if they were the ones suffering it

Michael Hardner is lying because that's all the left has to stand on right now is doubling-down on their lies. 

They feel like if they all tell the same lie loudly enough, and often enough, it becomes the truth. Goebbels would be proud of Michael and his fellow leftists

Edited September 22, 2025 by WestCanMan

[Michael Hardner]

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 an example of Trump exposing Cheney's hypocrisy...

😉

So, it's ok then.  Got it.

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So, it's ok then.  Got it.

Go read the whole comment in its entirety, Michael, instead of taking a snippet out of context and trying to assign a false meaning to it.  

What was clearly meant by Trump's comment was "If it was her own life that was going to be put at risk, instead of just the lives of a bunch of random soldiers, Liz Cheney would be far more judicious about what she considers 'worthy of sending troops to war over'."

To this point, Trump has always shown great reluctance to send US troops into harm's way, while Liz is always pushing for it.

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

You mean good for assassin culture. 

It's okay for Trump though, right...?   

But Trump now seems to have drawn a very fine line – one that isn’t so much between violence and nonviolence, but between what he casts as evil violence and righteous violence.

He drove that home Friday during an interview on Fox News.

“I’ll tell you something that’s going to get me in trouble, but I couldn’t care less,” he said. “The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don’t want to see crime. … They’re saying we don’t want these people coming in.”

Trump added: “The radicals on the left are the problem. And they’re vicious. And they’re horrible. And they’re politically savvy.”

The president seemed to be saying that extremists on the right had legitimate motivations, unlike those on the left.

[herbie]

Hardner, post that the sky is blue.

I want to see the mor0ns from the peanut gallery call you a liar because they can't dispute that but compulsively must because you said it.

[User]

1 minute ago, herbie said:

Hardner, post that the sky is blue.

I want to see the mor0ns from the peanut gallery call you a liar because they can't dispute that but compulsively must because you said it.

I see you are speaking from your own irrational behavior experience 

[LinkSoul60]

12 minutes ago, herbie said:

Hardner, post that the sky is blue.

I want to see the mor0ns from the peanut gallery call you a liar because they can't dispute that but compulsively must because you said it.

The loyal minions are waiting for Trump to say it first.  Once that happens, the sky will be whatever colour the wannbe dictator chooses. I'm guessing Orange.

[Michael Hardner]

If these people were conservatives they would apologize when they were wrong about something.  I do that.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

Hardner, post that the sky is blue.

I want to see the mor0ns from the peanut gallery call you a liar because they can't dispute that but compulsively must because you said it.

Herbie, say something stupid, and tell a lie. That is an order.

Thanks in advance.  

15 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

If these people were conservatives they would apologize when they were wrong about something.  I do that.

I notice that you're not even trying to deny I'm right. Seems like you're the one who should apologize.

 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's okay for Trump though, right...?   

Nope. Trump's not an assassin, nor is he a part of the assassin culture - that's 100% you cultists. 

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Nope. Trump's not an assassin, nor is he a part of the assassin culture - that's 100% you cultists. 

Double standard Deluge.... kind of flows doesn't it.  

Back to my earlier comment....  Political divisiveness isn't going anywhere. Your President and you loyal minions will be sure of that.

[Michael Hardner]

49 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

I notice that you're not even trying to deny I'm right.  

You're wrong. 

Trump's. refusal to follow rules of decorum is part of his appeal.  That includes claiming he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and his fans would love it.

[User]

6 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Well... but... but... the Democrats ?

Ok, seriously is ANY Trump supporter willing to admit the Truth that this is incentive to violence ?  

Can you explain how it is "incentive" to violence?

He was clearly talking about sending her to fight the war, criticizing her for being a war hawk. He was not calling on anyone to actually shoot her.

Trump says a lot of stupid and downright distasteful things; there are so many examples to choose from, but folks like you still have to pick the dumbest ones to mischaracterize or lie about. 

 

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Go read the whole comment in its entirety, Michael, instead of taking a snippet out of context and trying to assign a false meaning to it.  

What was clearly meant by Trump's comment was "If it was her own life that was going to be put at risk, instead of just the lives of a bunch of random soldiers, Liz Cheney would be far more judicious about what she considers 'worthy of sending troops to war over'."

To this point, Trump has always shown great reluctance to send US troops into harm's way, while Liz is always pushing for it.

Its just painful to watch someone try to pass that off as 'pro violence' 

When did liberals become so pro war?

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

It's okay for Trump though, right...?   

 

But Trump now seems to have drawn a very fine line – one that isn’t so much between violence and nonviolence, but between what he casts as evil violence and righteous violence.

He drove that home Friday during an interview on Fox News.

“I’ll tell you something that’s going to get me in trouble, but I couldn’t care less,” he said. “The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don’t want to see crime. … They’re saying we don’t want these people coming in.”

Trump added: “The radicals on the left are the problem. And they’re vicious. And they’re horrible. And they’re politically savvy.”

The president seemed to be saying that extremists on the right had legitimate motivations, unlike those on the left.

The radicals on the right want to stop people from breaking the law. That's why they're considered radical

The radicals on the left want to shoot and kill people. THat's why THEY are considered radical

They are not the same thing. 

[Michael Hardner]

19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What was clearly meant by Trump's comment was "If it was her own life that was going to be put at risk, instead of just the lives of a bunch of random soldiers, Liz Cheney would be far more judicious about what she considers 'worthy of sending troops to war over'."

You don't give the other side the benefit of the doubt.  As such, you will excuse almost anything Trump says - even violent metaphors, as you have framed it.

So many examples of Trump promoting violence... against protesters, against prisoners in custody...

You will excuse all of it.

[User]

11 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

You don't give the other side the benefit of the doubt. 

Says the guy calling people greedy at the memorial service for selling stuff to memorialize Kirk. 

12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

As such, you will excuse almost anything Trump says - even violent metaphors, as you have framed it.

As such, you will frame it as "incentive" to violence, ignoring the context. 

12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So many examples of Trump promoting violence... against protesters, against prisoners in custody...

You will excuse all of it.

Then give us real examples and not the ones you have to contort. 

 

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

You're wrong. 

Trump's. refusal to follow rules of decorum is part of his appeal.  That includes claiming he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and his fans would love it.

So you're still not trying to deny that you lied, Michael. 

That's pathetic.

In case you forgot, you tried to pretend that Trump was making some kind of violent threat against Liz Cheney when all he was doing was saying that she would be less of a warhawk if it was her own ass on the line. 

That's no small thing, MH, to tell lies like that. That's not even a small lie, it's a big lie, and a slanderous one to boot. 

You call yourself a conservative out of one side of your mouth, then you tell lies to slander conservatives out of the other...

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You don't give the other side the benefit of the doubt.  As such, you will excuse almost anything Trump says - even violent metaphors, as you have framed it.

So many examples of Trump promoting violence... against protesters, against prisoners in custody...

You will excuse all of it.

There's no "giving him the benefit of the doubt": he clearly called Cheney out for being a warhawk from the comfort of her own living room. 100.0% that, and nothing else. Stop f'n lying.  

People call Trump a coward for the bone spur thing, but no one can call him a hypocrite about it. He doesn't send kids to war, period. 

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Its just painful to watch someone try to pass that off as 'pro violence' 

What don't liberals lie about?

Take as much time as you need. 

[Deluge]

On 9/20/2025 at 1:35 PM, robosmith said:

^ZERO EVIDENCE for your claims nor what AOC said IS FALSE. Do you even know how to post a link and quote? LMAO

False? Well don't just stand there, stupid. SHOW us what's false. 

[Deluge]

On 9/20/2025 at 3:07 PM, robosmith said:

You're the one who is LYING. She said NOTHING about "condoning/supporting" violence.

You can't even prove what she said is FALSE.

What the silly cultist is really saying is that there is no unity until the Right gets on her side of the argument. And if there is no unity there's what? That's right, there's violence - as evidenced by Charlie Kirk's assassination. 

Now, stupid, how is America supposed to "unify" with a b*tch like AOC when she is a goddamn communist? 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

What don't liberals lie about?

 

I recall one time that Michael noted in his comment that it was Thursday. It was indeed Thursday. 

Other than that I've got nothing  

[Nationalist]

On 9/22/2025 at 7:20 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Well... but... but... the Democrats ?

Ok, seriously is ANY Trump supporter willing to admit the Truth that this is incentive to violence ?  

So both sides want the other dead. One must wonder which side started the hatred.

Any guesses?

[Nationalist]

13 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

You don't give the other side the benefit of the doubt.  As such, you will excuse almost anything Trump says - even violent metaphors, as you have framed it.

So many examples of Trump promoting violence... against protesters, against prisoners in custody...

You will excuse all of it.

I dont remember Trump inviting 10s of millions of people into the USA...do you?

I dont remember Trump starting or advocating for any wars...do you?

I dont remember Trump dumping the economy...do you?

I dont remember Trump surrendering to a bunch of men in dresses...either in the USA or Afghanistan...do you?

Mike...please try to be serious. 

[Nationalist]

On 9/22/2025 at 11:20 PM, LinkSoul60 said:

Double standard Deluge.... kind of flows doesn't it.  

Back to my earlier comment....  Political divisiveness isn't going anywhere. Your President and you loyal minions will be sure of that.

Because conservatives have assassinated so many insane, green haired Libbies.

Oh wait...

[LinkSoul60]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Because conservatives have assassinated so many insane, green haired Libbies.

Oh wait...

You can't go there... there's as much or more to cite for those conservatives going after liberals.  Regardless, everyone is right and nobody is wrong. Don't see that changing anytime soon.