What The Liberals Did To Canada

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Barquentine said:

Another ridiculous lie! Can you quote from his speech where he said any of that?

I literally quoted that above.  "the old Canada-U.S. relationship—built on ever-closer economic integration and military collaboration—is over."

And numerous other quotes that support what she said and she put some above as well

But in constantly consistent liberal left-wing fashion you see lion and demand that the evidence already provided be provided again and again and again even though it's right above in black and white. Not to mention the fact you could have found it with a quick web search

What a pathetic lot you are. "I cant cope with the truth so i'll pretend they never said it over and over again!"

[Legato]

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Another ridiculous lie! Can you quote from his speech where he said any of that?

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney did declare the longstanding relationship with the U.S. is over, stating that deep economic integration has become a "weakness" for Canada. He argued that middle powers must stop relying solely on a U.S.-led, rules-based order, which he claims is no longer functioning as great powers increasingly use economic integration as a weapon. 

 

[Goddess]

Another $100,000,000 to Palestine.

[eyeball]

48 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Another $100,000,000 to Palestine.

Good 👍 they need all the assistance they can get .

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Good 👍 they need all the assistance they can get .

So do our people in this day and age thanks to 11 years of your liberals running the show. You probably could have used that money here

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So do our people in this day and age thanks to 11 years of your liberals running the show. You probably could have used that money here

Except I didn't need it so I don't mind if a portion of my taxes goes towards it.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Except I didn't need it so I don't mind if a portion of my taxes goes towards it.

Except you don't have the right to say if a portion of my taxes goes towards it

So you won't complain if I decide to support something that our taxes go towards that you don't like right? I believe Donald Trump is doing that with ice right now

[Legato]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Except I didn't need it so I don't mind if a portion of my taxes goes towards it.

Okay I need it, so give me your bit, just make sure you remove all the Palestinian sympathiser bullshit first.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Except you don't have the right to say if a portion of my taxes goes towards it

Of course I do, it's not your money. 

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

So you won't complain if I decide to support something that our taxes go towards that you don't like right?

LMAO! You let me know that works out.

[CdnFox]

54 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Of course I do, it's not your money. 

'

Oh right, communist. I forgot.

[Barquentine]

23 hours ago, Legato said:

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney did declare the longstanding relationship with the U.S. is over, stating that deep economic integration has become a "weakness" for Canada. He argued that middle powers must stop relying solely on a U.S.-led, rules-based order, which he claims is no longer functioning as great powers increasingly use economic integration as a weapon. 

But he did not say:

"nobody needs the US and the middle powers should all band against US hegemony. .. our relationship with the US - specifically economically & militarily - OVER."

He said the old relationship is over, to be replaced by a new one, which will of necessity include  a great deal of economic and military cooperation.

In other words the relationship is changing (You heard about Trump and his tariffs?) which is obvious to everyone.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

But he did not say:

"nobody needs the US and the middle powers should all band against US hegemony. .. our relationship with the US - specifically economically & militarily - OVER."

 

But he did.

Now he didn't say the words precisely the way you wrote it but he certainly absolutely did say that our relationship as we have had it with the united states is over, and he absolutely said that any Reliance on the united states is a weakness and we need to band together with the middle powers against the united states hegemony

So why you can pretend to be a lawyer and quibble on the exact details the reality is that is what he said and certainly the message he conveyed.

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

He said the old relationship is over, to be replaced by a new one, which will of necessity include  a great deal of economic and military cooperation.

He didn't say anything about replacing the relationship with a new one

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

In other words the relationship is changing

In other words the relationship is over.

And those were his actual words.

Now I don't think anybody is suggesting but we won't have dealings with the united states and I don't think anyone is suggesting But he claimed we would never speak to the Americans again or something stupid like that.  But he was pretty clear that our days of close partneship in trade and security is "over".  His words. 

So instead of lying and trying to weasel your way out of it why don't you address the point like an adult

[Legato]

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

But he did not say:

"nobody needs the US and the middle powers should all band against US hegemony. .. our relationship with the US - specifically economically & militarily - OVER."

He said the old relationship is over, to be replaced by a new one, which will of necessity include  a great deal of economic and military cooperation.

In other words the relationship is changing (You heard about Trump and his tariffs?) which is obvious to everyone.

Yes he did.

No he didn't.

The other words are yours and yours alone.

[Goddess]

45 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

the reality is that is what he said and certainly the message he conveyed.

Of course it was the message.

There's a reason why every single Liberal cheerleader can't stop talking about how much they hate Trump and the US.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Of course it was the message.

There's a reason why every single Liberal cheerleader can't stop talking about how much they hate Trump and the US.

I wonder if it isn't the other way around. Canadians just like trump so when he's talking to them it's all about how trump is ruptured and relationships with America are a weakness etc etc. He thinks to himself " They'll like me if I say this bad stuff about trump!"

Then when he's in front of trump it's all make America great again, allies forever, we have a few technical things to work out but otherwise things are great! And he's thinking "If I say the stuff about trump trump will like me"

I think he just says whatever the hell he thinks the people he's talking to at that moment want to hear.

There's no doubt that when he's not in front of trump he absolutely Stokes the hatred of trump. Different story when he's actually in front of trump

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I think he just says whatever the hell he thinks the people he's talking to at that moment want to hear.

There's no doubt that when he's not in front of trump he absolutely Stokes the hatred of trump. Different story when he's actually in front of trump

BINGO.

[Goddess]

Look, I found a boomer who still has some brain cells and a firm grasp on reality.

 

 

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

So why you can pretend to be a lawyer and quibble on the exact details the reality is that is what he said and certainly the message he conveyed.

Carney is backpedaling and now the Libtards have to, too.

 

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Look, I found a boomer who still has some brain cells and a firm grasp on reality.

You mean politicians stretch the truth and even lie sometimes?

Wow.

Who knew?

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Carney is backpedaling and now the Libtards have to, too.

 

 

oh he's lying and twisting his ass off right now to be sure. 

And people are starting to notice.  

And they're starting to notice that he's all about the announcement but nothing happens. I'll Sizzle in those steak at the same goes. We will build like never before! Except there's nothing new being built. It's been a rupture we must form a coalition of middle countries! But there's no coalition and he's saddling up to china. We must fix the food problem, and he anmounces spending more money but even he admits it will be years before it makes any difference and in trurth it won't make any difference

Politically he has to start making some significant actual deliveries. He has to achieve something not just announce something and it can't just be his usual taking credit for somebody else's work.

If we get to the fall and things haven't substantially improved on that front I think he's going to start facing some serious headwinds

31 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You mean politicians stretch the truth and even lie sometimes?

 

Yours do. In fact that's all they do when they're they're kind of people you like. They lie their asses off and expect people like you to Lap it up

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Yours do. In fact that's all they do when they're they're kind of people you like. They lie their asses off and expect people like you to Lap it up

Yes, I recall how happy people were voting for Harper after he promised to leave their income trusts alone.

[CdnFox]

Just now, eyeball said:

Yes, I recall how happy people were voting for Harper after he promised to leave their income trusts alone.

Do you? Because he actually went up during the next election and won more seats.

Kind of sounds like you didn't remember at all  

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Do you? Because he actually went up during the next election and won more seats.

Kind of sounds like you didn't remember at all  

I remember.  You guys lapped it up.

LMAO!

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

I remember.  You guys lapped it up.

Lapped what up? Wining the next election with an even greater number of seats and votes?   Kinda sorta i guess? 

You run out of cheap booze and gotten into the nyquil again this weekend?

[Barquentine]

On 6/13/2026 at 1:44 PM, CdnFox said:

Now I don't think anybody is suggesting but we won't have dealings with the united states

So you agree with me on this one. It's just that your bloated ego had to rephrase it so you can do a Charlie Sheen. " Look at me! I'm winning!" Well at least you found the sense to agree with me. That's a start.