Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

oh-damn.gif&f=1&ipt=2f3b187bef59b8a4d7ca

 

Every

Thing

Democrats

Tell

You

Is

A

Lie!

How many of you sycophants beleived their bullshìt? Trump said he offered 10,000 troops for J6. This post PROVES that an offer was made and turned down. This post PROVES Pelosi turned it down. She lied over and over and over. They made a big lie out of this on the J6 committee. Everything the Democrats do, is a lie. 

The true Big Lie was the Russian Collusion lie combined with the J6 lie. 

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

oh-damn.gif&f=1&ipt=2f3b187bef59b8a4d7ca

 

Every

Thing

Democrats

Tell

You

Is

A

Lie!

How many of you sycophants beleived their bullshìt? Trump said he offered 10,000 troops for J6. This post PROVES that an offer was made and turned down. This post PROVES Pelosi turned it down. She lied over and over and over. They made a big lie out of this on the J6 committee. Everything the Democrats do, is a lie. 

Or Sund is LYING about the Sargent of Arms being stopped by Pelosi, to deflect HIS responsibility. 

Of course, Trump COULD have called out the guard, but HE FAILED TO DO THAT.

23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The true Big Lie was the Russian Collusion lie combined with the J6 lie. 

The Senate Intel Committee report lead by now SoS Marco Rubio says the Trump campaign (Manafort) colluded with Russian agent Kilimnik. Duh

Get that through you thick scull and STOP LYING.

4 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Truly deplorable

Yes you MAGA who believe the LIES are....

Edited by robosmith
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Shady said:

It’s really unbelievable that she still tries to get away with that lie.

YOU are way too quick to JUDGE.

Fact checking Rep. Jordan’s claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6

Quote

Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”

Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.

His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.

 

Edited by robosmith
Posted
5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's typical of her kind to fail in their duty and try and pin it on someone else. Disgusting

You don't know anything about "her kind," which is why you HAVE NO EVIDENCE to substantiate YOUR SPECULATION.

Posted
8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You don't know anything about "her kind," which is why you HAVE NO EVIDENCE to substantiate YOUR SPECULATION.

and you have? Is that because you are "her kind"?

  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

The lady and her husband sure know how to pick stocks....   Keep Nancy Free!!

I'm gonna let you in on a little secret.

You can't weaponize the law and lie to the public endlessly, without consequences. 

Enjoy the consequences. 

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I'm gonna let you in on a little secret.

You can't weaponize the law and lie to the public endlessly, without consequences. 

Enjoy the consequences. 

Sure you can.  Trump is doing it daily.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Sure you can.  Trump is doing it daily.

Lol...enjoy the consequences 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Pelosi belongs in jail.!

YOU belong in jail for your advocacy OF LACK OF CONSEQUENCES FOR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR.

And ALSO the CRIME of foreign election INTERFERENCE. Please let us know when you apply for US citizenship. Thanks.

21 hours ago, Shady said:

It’s really unbelievable that she still tries to get away with that lie.

You guys are still trying to get away with the LIE that Pelosi was responsible for Capitol security.

Quote

And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.

His request, according to Sund, was not approved. Instead, the Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael C. Stenger “suggested I ask (the National Guard) how quickly we could get support if needed and to ‘lean forward’ in case we had to request assistance on January 6,” according to Sund’s testimony.

 

Edited by robosmith
Posted
18 hours ago, robosmith said:

Or Sund is LYING about the Sargent of Arms being stopped by Pelosi, to deflect HIS responsibility. 

Of course, Trump COULD have called out the guard, but HE FAILED TO DO THAT.

The Senate Intel Committee report lead by now SoS Marco Rubio says the Trump campaign (Manafort) colluded with Russian agent Kilimnik. Duh

Get that through you thick scull and STOP LYING.

Yes you MAGA who believe the LIES are....

Or probably not. 

We all know that Pelosi wanted (still wants) to f*ck Trump anywhere she can, so the op is definitely believable. 

Posted
14 hours ago, robosmith said:

You don't know anything about "her kind," which is why you HAVE NO EVIDENCE to substantiate YOUR SPECULATION.

I know all about her kind. I know about your kind too :) 

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Or probably not. 

We all know that Pelosi wanted (still wants) to f*ck Trump anywhere she can, so the op is definitely believable. 

I think robo is just a little triggered

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...