Global Warming: Man-Made or Natural?

[Deluge]

21 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Wind and solar energy don't work....?   or are you concerned about the birds like Trump is?

Shouldn't you be concerned about birds too? I mean, animal rights has been central to your ldiot cause for decades. What gives? 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Sure you do....  Yours is one man's (Roger Pielke) opinion piece from 2022.

The number of natural weather disasters with damages of more than a billion dollars has increased over the last forty years. From 1980 to 2024, the US averaged 9 events per year, while the annual average for the most recent 5 years is 23.

https://usafacts.org/articles/are-the-number-of-major-natural-disasters-increasing/

 

No.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/extreme-weather-hype-the-myth-of-increasing-disasters/

 

[LinkSoul60]

27 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/extreme-weather-hype-the-myth-of-increasing-disasters/

 

The site is managed and edited by Thomas Richard, a freelance semi-retired writer who has been published in LifeZette, Breitbart, the now-defunct Examiner.com, Blasting News (before it got hijacked by the Left), and more.

"before it got highjacked by the left'..... enough said 😂

54 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Shouldn't you be concerned about birds too? I mean, animal rights has been central to your ldiot cause for decades. What gives? 

What cause?   This is about the SPCA now...

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

What cause?   This is about the SPCA now...

That's right so stop killing birds with your windmills. 

[LinkSoul60]

13 minutes ago, Deluge said:

That's right so stop killing birds with your windmills. 

My wife donates regularly to the SPCA, so I'll mention to her to add a bit more next time for the birds.  Climate change is killing people during extreme weather events...  can you donate to this cause please. 

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

The site is managed and edited by Thomas Richard, a freelance semi-retired writer who has been published in LifeZette, Breitbart, the now-defunct Examiner.com, Blasting News (before it got hijacked by the Left), and more.

"before it got highjacked by the left'..... enough said 😂

What cause?   This is about the SPCA now...

Ur reachin' now.

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

My wife donates regularly to the SPCA, so I'll mention to her to add a bit more next time for the birds.  Climate change is killing people during extreme weather events...  can you donate to this cause please. 

Your wife's donations aren't saving the birds, so we're just going to have to tear down all the windmills and dispose of them. 

Climate change is not my fault so you're just going to have to go f*ck yourself.  

Edited August 15, 2025 by Deluge

[LinkSoul60]

49 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ur reachin' now.

Reaching how.... It's obviously a biased point of view.  Everyone has an opinion but in this case, I'll go with what ~97% of scientists agree with.  Makes me wonder about the 3% who differ....  Either the most brilliant of the profession, looking for notoriety, want financial gain, or just totally inept.  Got to be one those???

[LinkSoul60]

39 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Your wife's donations aren't saving the birds, so we're just going to have to tear down all the windmills and dispose of them. 

Climate change is not my fault so you're just going to have to go f*ck yourself.  

Bam, got me there....  What makes you believe the 3% of scientists and not the 97% who agree it's man made....  Cause Trump said so?

 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Bam, got me there....  What makes you believe the 3% of scientists and not the 97% who agree it's man made....  Cause Trump said so?

 

Because the 3% are activists. How else can you explain 120 years of crying & threatening with practically zero results? 

We're all still here, living our lives just like we did in the 19th century!  

[LinkSoul60]

25 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Because the 3% are activists. How else can you explain 120 years of crying & threatening with practically zero results? 

We're all still here, living our lives just like we did in the 19th century!  

Activists...?  They're most likely inept wannabe scientists looking for notoriety and attention. 

I've attached a link and have given stat's and all you got is 'we're still here'?  😂

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. Activists...?  They're most likely inept wannabe scientists looking for notoriety and attention. 

2. I've attached a link and have given stat's and all you got is 'we're still here'?  😂

1. That too. But I think they're mostly crybaby activists. 

2. Come see me when New York is up to its ass in sea water. You can tell me "I told ya so!".  

[LinkSoul60]

5 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. That too. But I think they're mostly crybaby activists. 

2. Come see me when New York is up to its ass in sea water. You can tell me "I told ya so!".  

3. What are you talking about?

You got nothing....   Curious though about NY up to its ass in water.  Is this a natural phenomenon that's coming?

[Nationalist]

11 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

The site is managed and edited by Thomas Richard, a freelance semi-retired writer who has been published in LifeZette, Breitbart, the now-defunct Examiner.com, Blasting News (before it got hijacked by the Left), and more.

"before it got highjacked by the left'..... enough said 😂

https://ourworldindata.org/disaster-database-limitations

I can do this all day. The fact is, there is no real reliable data.

Edited August 15, 2025 by Nationalist

[Deluge]

9 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

3. What are you talking about?

You got nothing....   Curious though about NY up to its ass in water.  Is this a natural phenomenon that's coming?

3. I'm talking about those pretenders you call scientists - the 97%. That community has been compromised. 

I've got everything. I've got over 100 years of moonbats screaming over nothing.

You lunatics think you can control the climate. I mean how stupid does a cult have to be? lol

Edited August 15, 2025 by Deluge

[LinkSoul60]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

https://ourworldindata.org/disaster-database-limitations

I can do this all day. The fact is, there is no real reliable data.

The facts say otherwise, but let's assume there is no 'reliable' data...   Same question I had for Deluge - why do you trust the opinions of ~3% of scientists when ~97% of them present the case it's man made?  

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

3. I'm talking about those pretenders you call scientists - the 97%. That community has been compromised. 

I've got everything. I've got over 100 years of moonbats screaming over nothing.

You lunatics think you can control the climate. I mean how stupid does a cult have to be? lol

So only 3 in 10 of these scientists are legit?  I find that hard to believe....  If I was betting I'd take the longer odds.

You got nothing except 'they're activists'.  I'm more inclined to think they're attention seekers or outright contrarians.  

We can control what we put into the atmosphere, that affects the climate.  That's not lunacy....

'How stupid does a cult have to be?'....  I don't know.  The mindlessness of your cult never ceases to amaze me....

[Deluge]

17 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. So only 3 in 10 of these scientists are legit?  I find that hard to believe....  If I was betting I'd take the longer odds.

2. You got nothing except 'they're activists'.  I'm more inclined to think they're attention seekers or outright contrarians.  

3. We can control what we put into the atmosphere, that affects the climate.  That's not lunacy....

4. 'How stupid does a cult have to be?'....  I don't know.  The mindlessness of your cult never ceases to amaze me....

1. The non-climate scientists have a better chance of being legit than the climate scientists, so there is that to consider. 

2. No, YOU'VE got nothing. I have over 100 years of moonbat tears. I also live in a great atmosphere where not one goddamn thing that has to do with the climate negatively affects it.

You're not inclined to think anything aside from what TDS dictates. 

3. Haven't we already been doing that since Reagan? What more do you crybabies want? Do you need a complete habitation regression system that puts everyone in caves? Everyone but the globalist snobs?

4. There's only one cult in this country, and it's the democrat party.  

 

Edited August 15, 2025 by Deluge

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

1. The non-climate scientists have a better chance of being legit than the climate scientists, so there is that to consider. 

2. No, YOU'VE got nothing. I live in a great atmosphere, and not one goddamn thing that has to do with the climate negatively affects it. You're not inclined to think anything aside from what TDS dictates. 

3. Haven't we already been doing that since Reagan? What more do you crybabies want? Do you need a complete habitation regression system that puts everyone in caves? Everyone but the globalist snobs?

4. There's only one cult in this country, and it's the democrat party.  

 

What???  That's like a physicist having a better chance of being right about the study of ocean life than a marine biologist.  

You 'live in a great atmosphere'.... with clear signs of oxygen depravation.  Damn you're funny!  

I don't know if we're been doing this since the Reagan days...  No need to go into caves though.  Maybe we start with a radical idea like putting less emissions into the atmosphere?  Just a thought....

Them damn democrats....

[Deluge]

32 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. What???  That's like a physicist having a better chance of being right about the study of ocean life than a marine biologist.  

2. You 'live in a great atmosphere'.... with clear signs of oxygen depravation.  Damn you're funny!  

I don't know if we're been doing this since the Reagan days...  No need to go into caves though.  Maybe we start with a radical idea like putting less emissions into the atmosphere?  Just a thought....

3. Them damn democrats....

1. what do you mean "What???" Stay the f*ck out of climate science  - it'll just turn you into a screaming activist. 

2. Reagan addressed all that environment shit back in the 80's. It's time for you woketards to take your activism to the real offenders. 

3. The woke virus is a serious condition, comrade. May you find peace from it one day. 

 

Edited August 15, 2025 by Deluge

[LinkSoul60]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. what do you mean "What???" Stay the f*ck out of climate science  - it'll just turn you into a screaming activist. 

2. Reagan addressed all that environment shit back in the 80's. It's time for you woketards to take your activism to the real offenders. 

3. The woke virus is a serious condition, comrade. May you find peace from it one day. 

 

You make very compelling arguments.... 

A more serious infliction is TDS - Trump Deification Syndrome.  It requires no thinking, just believing what a serial liar and grifter says.  Some have suggested that those who suffer from this, may wake up one day with an orange hue to their complexion.  Scary sh*t....

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. You make very compelling arguments.... 

2. A more serious infliction is TDS - Trump Deification Syndrome.  It requires no thinking, just believing what a serial liar and grifter says.  Some have suggested that those who suffer from this, may wake up one day with an orange hue to their complexion.  Scary sh*t....

1. Yet there you hunch, foamy mouth and all, still arguing with me. lol

2. There's no such thing as Trump Deification Syndrome, but there IS Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's what cost you woketards the election.  

[robosmith]

22 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Not sure i have to.

Your article simply claims says natural disasters have increased. My article SHOWS that's just not true.

@LinkSoul60 ... ummm...do you mind if I swat this minor annoyance?

YOU are asking someone else, BECAUSE YOU CANNOT DO IT. LMAO

Every time you're caught with BUPKIS, you have to resort to DEFLECTION to hide your IGNORANCE.

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

The facts say otherwise, but let's assume there is no 'reliable' data...   Same question I had for Deluge - why do you trust the opinions of ~3% of scientists when ~97% of them present the case it's man made?  

Because I've read those papers and they say basically what I'm saying.

Man-made climate change is likely happening but not to the extent that we should freaking out.

[robosmith]

21 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/extreme-weather-hype-the-myth-of-increasing-disasters/

 

Your naked link PROVES NOTHING.

Spreading climate misinformation is fast becoming a shortcut to popularity across right-wing media. This man’s rise proves it.

Quote

Wielicki’s post was misleading, as he did not include the full context of the IPCC passage, and even the oldest climate models accurately predicted the rate of warming that scientists have actually observed. Despite this misinformation, his post was amplified by right-wing psychologist and commentator Jordan Peterson, a budding climate denier himself who has nearly 4 million followers.

...

Wielicki again discussed his resignation and thoughts on climate change a bit more on the February 1 edition of far-right outlet One America News Network’s OAN News, in a segment about the debunked “World Climate Declaration,” which falsely claimed that “experts” agreed that there is no climate crisis. Wielicki, who was among the declaration’s signatories, admitted to OAN that “I don't really work in climate science per se” and said that his background in geochemistry “would allow me to take an objective view” on the climate issue. He then stated that “if we take an objective look at the data, it's very difficult to see any metric that would allow us to explain the state of the climate as an emergency or in a crisis.” Later in the interview, he also complained about being labeled a climate denier and compared it to being labeled a Holocaust denier.

...

In addition to these TV appearances, Wielicki was interviewed by the climate-denying and fossil fuel-backed Heartland Institute in late January and was invited to the group’s upcoming climate denial conference.

His climate misinformation and DEI-bashing is getting rewarded by right-wing media

Wielicki has been caught numerous times spreading falsehoods about climate-related data or documents to support his climate denial narrative. An excellent round-up of some of his worst offenses has been compiled by a climate scientist on Twitter:

But it doesn’t matter that Wielicki is being debunked; it doesn’t matter that he is dead wrong when he says there is no consensus on global warming; and it doesn’t matter that he admitted that he doesn’t even work in climate science. Notably, Wielicki and his conservative media allies coupled this climate denial with complaints railing against DEI and the supposed scourge of too much wokeness on college campuses, a grievance narrative that right-wing circles have been fearmongering about for years. 

 

 

8 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Because I've read those papers and they say basically what I'm saying.

Man-made climate change is likely happening but not to the extent that we should freaking out.

NO ONE is advocating "freaking out" and your HYPERBOLE just REVEALS YOUR DESPERATION.