Far left activists and politicians look to bully, intimidate, harass Christian music artist and parishioners from exercising right to practice religion

[User]

3 hours ago, herbie said:

Like I have to point out about you every time you post is your dumb.

Can you try typing this again, but in English this time?

3 hours ago, herbie said:

A - the guy is not an immigrant

Yeah... but if he was, then you would be totes cool with him staying! Especially if he was there illegally. 

Edited August 3, 2025 by User

[herbie]

8 hours ago, herbie said:

Like I have to point out about you every time you post is your dumb. entirely self made up conclusions

Your brain just stops dead when you see a period typo instead of a comma? And then go on to compound your error in logic with 'but if he was'.

I can stop ragging on you, maybe if I answer with "excuse me User, you made this logical error here but you still get a participation ribbon" if that helps you learn something.

[User]

8 hours ago, herbie said:

I can stop ragging on you...

So... like I said then, you would be just fine with him being there as long he was doing so as an illegal immigrant. 

[Barquentine]

On 8/1/2025 at 1:31 PM, CdnFox said:

Did you support the lockdowns or did you feel that they were an overreach

Living in Nova Scotia at the time. When the first variant (the deadliest) was rampant the Maritimes were called "The Safest Place in the World" because of a very efficient lockdown. So of course I supported the lockdown. Only an id!ot wouldn't!

I worked in construction, one of the few industries that kept going to keep the economy from total collapse. We masked, kept our distance, went home and stayed in.

If the right wing A-holes had had their way (no lockdown, no masks,  gatherings allowed, etc... we would have had a lot more deaths! To say otherwise is STUPID!

 

On 8/1/2025 at 12:23 PM, User said:

"And yet he's so special he gets to do it any way?"

"Break the law - pay the consequence!"

Glad you agree with me.

[User]

6 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

Glad you agree with me.

I clearly did not... did you already forget your demand and why I provided those quotes?

 

[Venandi]

On 8/3/2025 at 11:43 AM, eyeball said:

I predict you and the other asshats  with you will continue to ignore that.

Well, you are easy to ignore...

[User]

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

I worked in construction, one of the few industries that kept going to keep the economy from total collapse. We masked, kept our distance, went home and stayed in.

Wow, it is incredible how the disease somehow knew that Construction was a "safe" industry to avoid. 

 

[Venandi]

17 minutes ago, User said:

Wow, it is incredible how the disease somehow knew that Construction was a "safe" industry to avoid. 

Aviation was like that too, remember the quote "Covid isn't easily spread on aircraft?" 

We still laugh about that on occasion. 

I've done several deployments with the navy (can't keep a job) so the whole "cruise ship containment" concept was humorous too, in reality, if someone sneezes in the heads the port and starboard lookouts get a cold. The first night out you can't sleep because of the ventilator noise, the first night back you can't sleep because it's so damn quiet. 

Have you ever been  to sea Herb?

 

Edited August 4, 2025 by Venandi

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Living in Nova Scotia at the time. When the first variant (the deadliest) was rampant the Maritimes were called "The Safest Place in the World" because of a very efficient lockdown. So of course I supported the lockdown. Only an id!ot wouldn't!

Well then quit effing around and actually own up to it when asked.  Yeash. 

As to lockdowns and social distancing, There is a great body that suggests it made little to no difference overall and in fact had a price tag that may have made it not worth it

This is one example: Five years on: The countries that never locked down for Covid-19

Lockdowns may have helped in the very beginning but at a huge financial cost and a huge social cost. And very quickly countries with lockdowns actually experienced higher rates than countries that did not. They also experienced significantly stronger economic impacts as well as mental health impacts.

It turns out the ones people understood the dangers the vast majority of people voluntarily took steps to minimize exposure etc and that was extremely effective and that the lockdowns other than during the very initial. Just made things worse.

Now you can make your argument one way or another but I assume that you're not trying to say that the majority of the world's scientists are !diots.   Because they don't agree with you at all, the vast majority say that it's at BEST unclear if there was a benefit that outweighed the costs. 

The problem with people like you is you get an idea in your head and then you marry it and any research or data or information that contradicts that idea is the enemy to you no matter how true or accurate or relevant it is.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Venandi said:

Well, you are easy to ignore...

No I'm not. LMAO!

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

No I'm not. LMAO!

Sorry who were you again??  

[Aristides]

5 hours ago, User said:

Wow, it is incredible how the disease somehow knew that Construction was a "safe" industry to avoid. 

 

Depends on the type of construction, working outdoors was pretty safe.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Depends on the type of construction, working outdoors was pretty safe.

Then why bother with a lockdown? Why not just restrict indoor activities?

[User]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Depends on the type of construction, working outdoors was pretty safe.

-------------------------------POINT--------------------------------->

                                                Your Head

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Then why bother with a lockdown? Why not just restrict indoor activities?

That’s pretty much what happened. But hey, you guys knew everything about this disease before the experts, with no data or training.

[User]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

That’s pretty much what happened. But hey, you guys knew everything about this disease before the experts, with no data or training.

I actually did. 

We were outright lied to. You know that, right? Outright lied to twice, even more so if you want to count all the other half-truths. 

Absolute Lie #1 the WHO told us, government officials echoed:

Don't wear masks. 

At the start of the pandemic, before they even had enough ability to really know anything, they lied and told us not to wear masks. Why? So they could protect the government supplies and supplies for health care workers. 

I happen to keep N95 masks on hand at all times long before this pandemic as well as other respirators. As soon as they start closing things down and they were telling us not to wear masks, I was wearing a mask. 

 

 

 

[herbie]

Yet another thread hijacked by Covid1ots who think that because they survived it wasn't a serious threat.
Shuddup already the people that died are dead and they pretty much can fix it you if you get it. Move on already.

This one about the butthurt who weren't going to see some stupid singer whining that someone else couldn't either.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

That’s pretty much what happened.

Well that's not what he said at all. He said there was a strict lockdown Which he absolutely supported. So no that's not what happened

It's also largely not what happened anywhere else too, the long-term lockdowns that we saw even in British Columbia we're strict to the point where there were demonstrations bordering on riots.

And the indications are they didn't really achieve much except maybe at the very beginning. And yet they caused significant harm and financial damage, and if you're in British Columbia you know damn well that a lot of families split up over the conflicts that arose from this.

 

Perhaps what you meant to say is that's what should have happened. People should have been told the best information we had and then allowed to make decisions. But that's not what happened.

Quote

But hey, you guys knew everything about this disease before the experts, with no data or training.

I don't know who you mean by you guys? I live in the middle of the woods so I djdn't even notice much of a difference as far as lockdowns went, and because i'm in an at risk group i was vaxxed and boosted  

But it turns out the people who felt that younger people shouldn't be taking it (males under 40 for example) were DEAD RIGHT, and actually DID know more than the 'experts'.  The research (and more than one) now shows that to be absolutely true beyond a doubt. 

And that's before you get into those who have long covid. Which the government just shut down treatment for despite the fact there are many still suffering.

What do you say to those people? What do you say to those who have developed health issues or died as a result of the vaccine who were under the vulnerable age range but practically forced to take it? Do you want to tell them all about how it was more important to you to appear right than be right and that they didn't deserve a choice?

I don't know about knowing more about the vaccines or covid, but I can say with 100% certainty that I know more than you about freedom and what it means to be responsible. Which is a sad thing. It shouldn't be this hard, I shouldn't have to explain it to you

Edited August 5, 2025 by CdnFox

[CdnFox]

 

8 minutes ago, herbie said:

Yet another thread hijacked by Covid1ots who think that because they survived it wasn't a serious threat.
Shuddup already the people that died are dead and they pretty much can fix it you if you get it. Move on already.

This one about the butthurt who weren't going to see some stupid singer whining that someone else couldn't either.

As the saying goes, people are chained one link at a time. Covid was a link in the chains restricting people's freedom. This is another.

You are pro authoritarianism, you are pro communism, and you are antifreedom. So none of this gets you terribly worried. In your mind a lack of freedom is how the world should be.

But for those who do care about such things we see the connection

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, User said:

I actually did. 

We were outright lied to. You know that, right? Outright lied to twice, even more so if you want to count all the other half-truths. 

Absolute Lie #1 the WHO told us, government officials echoed:

Don't wear masks. 

At the start of the pandemic, before they even had enough ability to really know anything, they lied and told us not to wear masks. Why? So they could protect the government supplies and supplies for health care workers. 

I happen to keep N95 masks on hand at all times long before this pandemic as well as other respirators. As soon as they start closing things down and they were telling us not to wear masks, I was wearing a mask. 

 

 

 

Next pandemic you should be on your own as you know everything.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Next pandemic you should be on your own as you know everything.

Yeah. That's the point. And if he's wrong he's going to face the consequences of his actions.

Turns out the government was wrong and had no business forcing their actions on other people. So maybe next time we don't do that

[eyeball]

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Turns out the government was wrong and had no business forcing their actions on other people. So maybe next time we don't do that

Sure kid, you'll still stop at the red traffic light even when there isn't another car in sight.

You'll dutifully keep stopping until the day they impound your car because you're to old to drive it. LMAO!

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Sure kid, you'll still stop at the red traffic light even when there isn't another car in sight.

You'll dutifully keep stopping until the day they impound your car because you're to old to drive it. LMAO!

Sigh.  We've talked about not posting while you're drunk   LOLOL 

[Barquentine]

17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Lockdowns may have helped in the very beginning

DUH!

When the first variant (the deadliest) was rampant the Maritimes were called "The Safest Place in the World" because of a very efficient lockdown. So of course I supported the lockdown. Only an id!ot wouldn't!

[Barquentine]

18 hours ago, User said:

Wow, it is incredible how the disease somehow knew that Construction was a "safe" industry to avoid.

Colleagues got Covid. But being young and healthy they didn't die. And they stayed home so they didn't pass it on.