May everyday be a wonderful secret . . .

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...my sources are very broad. The problem you have is that you will only believe what fits the narrative you have chosen. Fir instance, I wanted the Elstein Client List to be real. It is not. I can and have accepted that. Can you ever do the same?

You're naïve to believe ANYTHING from Trump et al.

Blondi said it was ON HER DESK, so either she was LYING THEN or LYING NOW.

And Trump said he would release the Epstein files, but then it turned out there was MORE he said that FOS LIES cut out where he back tracked. 

So why do you believe one thing when they immediately turn around and say the OPPOSITE? LMAO

 

 

Edited July 19, 2025 by robosmith

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You're naïve to believe ANYTHING from Trump et al.

You are naive to think anyone can lie 100% of the time.

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Blondi said it was ON HER DESK, so either she was LYING THEN or LYING NOW.

She was trying to say the files were on her desk. Bongino and Patel both said there is no list nad that Epstain killed himself. They were two people that would never hide this kind of information, not even for Trump.

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And Trump said he would release the Epstein files, but then it turned out there was MORE he said that FOS LIES cut out where he back tracked. 

You are very desperate.

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So why do you believe one thing when the immediately turn around and say the OPPOSITE? LMAO

Because I can admit when I am wrong. The over whelming evidence is that the Epstein conspiracy was just a theory.

[CdnFox]

I have a difficult time believing trump wrote this. I'm at least 80% sure he doesn't know what the word enigma means.

[Deluge]

9 hours ago, Aristides said:

Making a man like Trump your champion certainly doesn’t speak well of people who claim to be Christian. 

Sure it does. We voted for the best man available. 

See you're so bent on destroying the best man available, that you'd rather have a babbling pronoun user who hates her country enough to leave our borders wide open. 

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, Deluge said:

Sure it does. We voted for the best man available. 

See you're so bent on destroying the best man available, that you'd rather have a babbling pronoun user who hates her country enough to leave our borders wide open. 

this is the biggest challenge that they had right there.

Recently, and by recently i mean the last 8 years or more,  the democrats have done nothing but explain why the republicans and their candidate is bad. 

They have done almost nothing to say why THEIR candidate is GOOD.  Hillary ran on 'repressing the deplorables and stealing guns", she did not present any kind of vision for the future.  Biden won by basically hiding in his basement and scaring people over covid and then did nothing which is why he was losing so bad.  Kamala spent half her campaign giggling to get into power and the other half calling trump and his supporters nazis. 

Not once and all that time do they actually paint a vision of America and explain why it would be better than what the republicans were offering. It was all just vote for me I'm not a Republican and I'm not Donald Trump and that should be good enough. And it wasn't.

Say what you like about Obama, he put forward a vision especially in his first campaign of a new America that would overcome some of the challenges of the past and lead to a better life for everybody. Whether he delivered or not is irrelevant, his focus was on how good he was not how absolutely terrible Mitt Romney was so to speak.

And I see the democrats are no better today. I don't know how they think they're going to get elected

[User]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're naïve to believe ANYTHING from Trump et al.

OK, and we are more so to believe anything from you. 

You lie more on the forum per capita your total comments here than Trump does as President. 

 

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, User said:

OK, and we are more so to believe anything from you. 

You lie more on the forum per capita your total comments here than Trump does as President. 

 

Obviously. Trump is a mere amateur hobbyist at lying, robofib hopes to take the silver for it at the next Olympics. (says he'd be happy with bronze but i don't believe him). 

Edited July 19, 2025 by CdnFox

[User]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Obviously. Trump is a mere amateur hobbyist at lying, robofib hopes to take the silver for it at the next Olympics. (says he'd be happy with bronze but i don't believe him). 

He could identify as a woman and 100% take the gold on their podium. ROFL

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, User said:

He could identify as a woman and 100% take the gold on their podium. ROFL

He may self identify as a woman (or zucchini or whatever)  but he's BEEN identified as a  twat for some time now by everyone else   

[SpankyMcFarland]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I have a difficult time believing trump wrote this. I'm at least 80% sure he doesn't know what the word enigma means.

Best not to underestimate this guy. 
 

Quote

“Carson’s an enigma to me,” Trump said at a rally in 2015, using the word with confidence when describing then-candidate Ben Carson. “Carson’s an enigma.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/maga-bizarrely-claims-trump-never-163358186.html

 

Edited July 19, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Best not to underestimate this guy. 

 

That would be almost impossible

 

 

Quote

https://www.yahoo.com/news/maga-bizarrely-claims-trump-never-163358186.html

Oh you mean when you had speech writers working for him?   

I 100% believe that his speech writers would know what the word meant. I strongly doubt that trump was using it in casual conversation

 

[SpankyMcFarland]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

That would be almost impossible

Dems found out otherwise. 

 

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Oh you mean when you had speech writers working for him?   

I 100% believe that his speech writers would know what the word meant. I strongly doubt that trump was using it in casual conversation

I can’t think of anyone less constrained by speechwriters. And not to defend this reprehensible weirdo too much, but just because he usually plays a character worthy of pro wrestling doesn't mean that’s all there is to him. People are often surprised by the private man. His background is deeply elite. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

I find it very difficult to imagine that Trump would testify during discovery and expose himself, so to speak, to possible questions about his long relationship with Epstein and indeed his entire sexual history. I’m presuming he still has enough insight to fear the many pitfalls there. 

[CdnFox]

57 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Dems found out otherwise. 

Almost.  Impossible.     ANd lets face it, they had to work damn hard and spend a lot of money to pull off screwing up that bad. 

 

Quote

I can’t think of anyone less constrained by speechwriters.

He actually uses them quite a bit, he just doesn't stick to the topic as much and he will read what they say and then throw in his own stuff as well.

He's not exactly a teleprompter guy but he absolutely does have speechwriters

Trump hires policy-focused head speechwriter - Live Updates - POLITICO

Vince Haley - Wikipedia

Stephen Miller (advisor) - Wikipedia

And there's a number that the Government won't currently admit to or name rather

He does practice runs with these guys, and generally speaking you can tell when it's his speech writers talking or when he has decided to continue talking and starts to go off track.

To say that he is constrained by speech writers would be absolutely laughable, but he absolutely is strongly influenced by them and he appreciates how they try and make him sound clever. This feels like that

 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

I find it very difficult to imagine that Trump would testify during discovery and expose himself, so to speak, to possible questions about his long relationship with Epstein and indeed his entire sexual history. I’m presuming he still has enough insight to fear the many pitfalls there. 

He won't. It's just a distraction and he'll drop it like the hot potato it is.

[Michael Hardner]

I had never heard of this until today.. 

Trump jokes to a 10-year-old girl that he he's going to be " dating her in 10 years".

Such strange behavior, I don't know anyone who would say that.

[Nationalist]

Speaking of lies...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14919801/obama-conspiracy-trump-russia-hoax-tulsi-gabbard-documents.html

Oops...Barry might just find he's up the creek.

[SpankyMcFarland]

4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I had never heard of this until today.. 

Trump jokes to a 10-year-old girl that he he's going to be " dating her in 10 years".

Such strange behavior, I don't know anyone who would say that.

That was well known enough for me to hear about it. Somehow these constant violations of societal norms, from bad manners to crimes, were ignored by the party that has been lecturing us about our moral failings since time immemorial. 

[Michael Hardner]

41 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

That was well known enough for me to hear about it. Somehow these constant violations of societal norms, from bad manners to crimes, were ignored by the party that has been lecturing us about our moral failings since time immemorial. 

That's led me to add laugh emojis to MAGA tribesmen who absolutely wail about the immortality of immigration, climate change mitigation and bike lanes.

 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Speaking of lies...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14919801/obama-conspiracy-trump-russia-hoax-tulsi-gabbard-documents.html

Oops...Barry might just find he's up the creek.

Of course there is a reason you provide NOTHING but a naked link, cause your cite is BULLSHIT.

Quote

Gabbard released a 114-page document on Friday she says shows the Obama administration was aware that there was no threat of Russia 'directly' manipulating the vote in 2016. 

Obama never said there was direct vote manipulation. 

It is ILLEGAL to accept political campaign aid from a foreigner, esp a foreign GOVERNMENT.

And Trump's campaign manager Manafort was directly colluding with Russian agents (Kilimnik) to gain Russian aid for the campaign per the Senate Intel Committee Report.

Of course, you know that and posted your BULLSHIT cite anyway.

[gatomontes99]

35 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Of course there is a reason you provide NOTHING but a naked link, cause your cite is BULLSHIT.

If I use the link feature and don't give you the full link you act like a Lil biťch. He gives you the full link and you act like an aṣs. Is there anything anyone can do that to which you will react like a normie?

 

Edited July 20, 2025 by gatomontes99

[Deluge]

On 7/18/2025 at 9:47 AM, Boges said:

Oh really? So why all the hate for homosexuals? 

The truth is that Trump doesn't admit to any sins. He's egotistical and hateful. 

Read any of his social media posts, they're all just hateful screeds of perceived slights. 

It's not hate, but they do have an agenda that needs to be destroyed. 

Trump certainaly needs work, but so do you. 

You see pervert, in situations like this, it's best to keep your finger pointed at yourself.  

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Of course there is a reason you provide NOTHING but a naked link, cause your cite is BULLSHIT.

Obama never said there was direct vote manipulation. 

It is ILLEGAL to accept political campaign aid from a foreigner, esp a foreign GOVERNMENT.

And Trump's campaign manager Manafort was directly colluding with Russian agents (Kilimnik) to gain Russian aid for the campaign per the Senate Intel Committee Report.

Of course, you know that and posted your BULLSHIT cite anyway.

Lol...not this time. Barry, Brandon, Hilary-Billary...I hope they all finally get what they deserve. 

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...not this time. Barry, Brandon, Hilary-Billary...I hope they all finally get what they deserve. 

Which is the BUPKIS that you posted. 

[User]

4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

That's led me to add laugh emojis to MAGA tribesmen who absolutely wail about the immortality of immigration, climate change mitigation and bike lanes.

 

"Immorality of immigration"

Did you dishonestly leave off ILLEGAL there or was that an oversight?