Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, User said:

No, you were trying to say Trump would move on to the next thing as if to distract people...

Yes, and I'm still saying that.  It's what he does to distract peoples attention....throw something else into the news cycle to take your attention away from news he doesn't want you focusing on.  It's an effective strategy that has worked very well for him.  He's also dealing with a generally simple minded support base so of course 'distracting' is rather easy from that side, a bit more difficult for his detractors.

Posted
On 7/8/2025 at 3:10 PM, Nationalist said:

No. Instead he shut everything down and left it that way till the damage was done. It was not necessary. But...

YOU ARE LYING. NOTHING was shut down here by the Federal government.

Any shutdowns were at the state level.

ONLY non-essential stores were closed here in CA. All grocery and home improvement stores were OPEN.

The worst part was my gym was closed and I had to go back to working out at home. Of course that would not affect you. LMAO

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Like Kennedy's remains...we will never know if there's a list and who might be on it.

Epstien used sex to chain a lot of very powerful people. That much is obvious. He's dead because of it.

End of story.

We know that Trump's been getting very nervous whenever HE talks, or is asked, about Epstein.

Might as well wear a sign on his forehead that says "I'm guilty." LMAO

Posted
4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, and I'm still saying that.  It's what he does to distract peoples attention....throw something else into the news cycle to take your attention away from news he doesn't want you focusing on.  It's an effective strategy that has worked very well for him.  He's also dealing with a generally simple minded support base so of course 'distracting' is rather easy from that side, a bit more difficult for his detractors.

And I already responded to that...

Um... no conspiracy yet again, Trump is just always doing something, and folks on the left and mainstream media always overreact to it. 

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

We know that Trump's been getting very nervous whenever HE talks, or is asked, about Epstein.

Might as well wear a sign on his forehead that says "I'm guilty." LMAO

Does that tinfoil hat itch?

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, User said:

And I already responded to that...

Um... no conspiracy yet again, Trump is just always doing something, and folks on the left and mainstream media always overreact to it. 

Bet me last nickel if it was Biden you wouldn't be saying no conspiracy 😂

And it's not the left pushing this, it's your Maga peeps.  Agree though, Trump is always doing 'something', and it's usually something stupid.

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Like Kennedy's remains...we will never know if there's a list and who might be on it.

Epstien used sex to chain a lot of very powerful people. That much is obvious. He's dead because of it.

End of story.

That's funny....  You imply he's dead because of retribtuion from 'very powerful people' then immediately say 'end of story'.  The funniest part of this is your comment on the DOJ looking at Brennan and Comey as being "delicious'. 😂

So if I got this straight....  let's move on from Epstein because that could possibly implicate Trump, but let's have some fun seeing them go after political enemies from 9 years ago. Makes sense....

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

So if I got this straight....  let's move on from Epstein because that could possibly implicate Trump, but let's have some fun seeing them go after political enemies from 9 years ago. Makes sense....

I don't see where he said that. 

Is that what you think?

22 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Bet me last nickel if it was Biden you wouldn't be saying no conspiracy 😂

And it's not the left pushing this, it's your Maga peeps.  Agree though, Trump is always doing 'something', and it's usually something stupid.

Looks like you are doing an awful lot of pushing right now... 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, being a Trump and Maga guy I think that's what he meant - and why I said it.

Seems more like projection on your part for as much as you are pushing this. 

 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

That's funny....  You imply he's dead because of retribtuion from 'very powerful people' then immediately say 'end of story'.  The funniest part of this is your comment on the DOJ looking at Brennan and Comey as being "delicious'. 😂

So if I got this straight....  let's move on from Epstein because that could possibly implicate Trump, but let's have some fun seeing them go after political enemies from 9 years ago. Makes sense....

I'm being realistic. Are you?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I'm being realistic. Are you?

Where or how does 'realistic' apply to this...?   I commented that you appear to imply that someone was eliminated by 'very powerful people', and said let's close that book and move on to the fun stuff of political retribution.  That's hilarious!  Wouldn't be because of the affection you have for the orange grifter would it?

Posted
On 7/8/2025 at 4:30 PM, Deluge said:

to happen, so why are you stamping your feet?

The normal god (not you deeply fked up parody) tells us the reality can work in mysterious ways. So I wouldn't say that, and even stOmping feet wouldn't help in these cases. We already know who could have been the predumbent of the great states. And some time, one day we may just find out who was.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
39 minutes ago, myata said:

The normal god (not you deeply fked up parody) tells us the reality can work in mysterious ways. So I wouldn't say that, and even stOmping feet wouldn't help in these cases. We already know who could have been the predumbent of the great states. And some time, one day we may just find out who was.

In the grand tapestry of ontological whirligigs, the epistemic marmalade of thought elasticity binds the noumenal croutons of reality with a viscosity only understood by sentient paraboloids. One must not underestimate the syntactical gravitas of a well-placed quantum adverb, for in the oscillating shadow of dialectical entropy, even the most recalcitrant ideas may transmogrify into post-liminal gelatin. Thus, as the metaphysical weather veers sharply toward hyper-contextual drizzle, we are left with no choice but to ruminate upon the chromatic taxonomy of unspoken paradigms and the recursive ambiguity of their aural tofu.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Deluge said:

In the grand tapestry of ontological whirligigs, the epistemic marmalade of thought elasticity binds the noumenal croutons of reality with a viscosity only understood by sentient paraboloids. One must not underestimate the syntactical gravitas of a well-placed quantum adverb, for in the oscillating shadow of dialectical entropy, even the most recalcitrant ideas may transmogrify into post-liminal gelatin.

That would be the dumb chat, the brainless edition. The very first word tells it all.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
3 minutes ago, myata said:

That would be the dumb chat, the brainless edition. The very first word tells it all.

Keep in mind, this was the dumb comment you started off with...

"The normal god (not you deeply fked up parody)..."

 

 

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, myata said:

That would be the dumb chat, the brainless edition. The very first word tells it all.

It's straight from your playbook, jackass. Do you not understand your own work? 

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It's straight from your playbook, jackass. Do you not understand your own work? 

Nope. 

Before myata ran away a bit ago, I was using Chat GPT to generate responses, asking it to give me an equally non-sensical response. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, User said:

Nope. 

Before myata ran away a bit ago, I was using Chat GPT to generate responses, asking it to give me an equally non-sensical response. 

 

I was doing the same thing. lol

Posted
On 7/8/2025 at 10:27 AM, Deluge said:

Oh, I still believe the files existed, it's just that Pam Weakest Link Bondi was ordered to water that shit down.

I'm hearing that Trump's name is being tossed around but that he had only travelled with Epstein, and his family was with him during those travels. 

Trump and Epstein partied together for almost 2 decades in NewYork, in Florida,  on Epstein’s Lolita Island and on his Lolita Express airplane. There are numerous photos and videos of them together   It’s not in dispute that Trump and Epstein were good friends for a long time. The only question is what did Trump know and when did he know it.  Whether Trump himself was ever directly involved will always be a matter of politically motivated speculation. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

It's straight from your playbook

The thing is, you can only reflect and parrot things that are dumb and stupid - this is how far your intelligence-less goo extends. So no, no luck for mirroring "equivalence". Even a bazzillion of mindless vibes will do the trick.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
13 minutes ago, myata said:

The thing is, you can only reflect and parrot things that are dumb and stupid - this is how far your intelligence-less goo extends. So no, no luck for mirroring "equivalence". Even a bazzillion of mindless vibes will do the trick.

No, the thing is, English is your 2nd language and you've already given up on it. That, of course, is a stupid idea, so I'm going to help you. 

We'll start with the following resource: 

https://www.dinolingo.com/learn-english-for-kids/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21179459214&gbraid=0AAAAADkK1Cqe42uOVjLv8D1Xap6_pmhPG&gclid=CjwKCAjw7MLDBhAuEiwAIeXGIQJLGX-zMISWRIXSQd40prFrRDSReeSlX7q5PyUDEKLkdZv67XQtWhoC-HgQAvD_BwE

Good luck. ;) 

Posted
3 hours ago, Deluge said:

In the grand tapestry of ontological whirligigs, the epistemic marmalade of thought elasticity binds the noumenal croutons of reality with a viscosity only understood by sentient paraboloids. One must not underestimate the syntactical gravitas of a well-placed quantum adverb, for in the oscillating shadow of dialectical entropy, even the most recalcitrant ideas may transmogrify into post-liminal gelatin. Thus, as the metaphysical weather veers sharply toward hyper-contextual drizzle, we are left with no choice but to ruminate upon the chromatic taxonomy of unspoken paradigms and the recursive ambiguity of their aural tofu.

^Must be ChatGPT cause we know DELUGINAL doesn't have that big a vocabulary. LMAO 

Posted
12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Must be ChatGPT cause we know DELUGINAL doesn't have that big a vocabulary. LMAO 

Maybe not, but he does have large constabulary.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...