ExFlyer Posted July 7, 2025 Report Posted July 7, 2025 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: I love when you pull [munch munch] Here puppy puppy, come have a little treat LOL Come munch on a little puppy treat 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted July 7, 2025 Report Posted July 7, 2025 3 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Here puppy puppy, come have a little treat LOL Come munch on a little puppy treat Did your mom run out of fruit roll ups and that's all she's given you ***Whack!*** 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted July 7, 2025 Report Posted July 7, 2025 52 minutes ago, CdnFox said: [munch munch] Ha Ha Ha Back again. Ya gotta go out for walkies??? [munch munch] New treats for ya LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted July 7, 2025 Report Posted July 7, 2025 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: Ha Ha Ha Back again. Ya gotta go out for walkies??? [munch munch] New treats for ya LOL Can't your mom at least afford flintstones vitamins for you? She's got to give you dog meds? Did she have you dewormed yet? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted July 7, 2025 Report Posted July 7, 2025 (edited) 39 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Did she have you dewormed yet? You cannot even come up with original insults and have use mine . What a phukin LOSER LOL Ha Ha Ha..did you not get your doggie treats??. LOL Did you mommy rub your nose in the mess you made??? Nice try puppy...don't beg...you will get your treats LOL Everyone has the right to be stupid but you certainly abuse the privilege. Man, you are getting easier and easier to troll Edited July 7, 2025 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted July 8, 2025 Report Posted July 8, 2025 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: You cannot even come up with original insults and have use mine . What a phukin LOSER LOL Ha Ha Ha..did you not get your doggie treats??. LOL Did you mommy rub your nose in the mess you made??? Nice try puppy...don't beg...you will get your treats LOL Everyone has the right to be stupid but you certainly abuse the privilege. Man, you are getting easier and easier to troll Kid, for the last time, i don't really bother insulting you. This isn't a contest, we're not rivals, this isn't a discussion. This is me and others pointing at you and laughing Right now we're laughing because you seem to have become a dog treat connoisseur Sorry your mom can't afford real snacks for you, but at least with the milk bone ones your teeth will stay nice 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted July 8, 2025 Report Posted July 8, 2025 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: Kid, for the last time, i don't really bother insulting you. This isn't a contest, we're not rivals, this isn't a discussion. OK...then go away??? Like I have asked and other suggested to you LOL In the meantime...keep on being the fool we all know you are Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Nefarious Banana Posted July 8, 2025 Report Posted July 8, 2025 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: OK...then go away??? Like I have asked and other suggested to you LOL In the meantime...keep on being the fool we all know you are Are you mentally ill? If not could you just stfu? 1 1 Quote
Moonbox Posted July 8, 2025 Report Posted July 8, 2025 5 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said: Are you mentally ill? If not could you just stfu? Are you pretending that Flyer is actually lowering the level of discourse here? Hilarious. 🤡 1 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
ExFlyer Posted July 8, 2025 Report Posted July 8, 2025 1 hour ago, Nefarious Banana said: Are you mentally ill? If not could you just stfu? Awww, screwed with your sensibility Eh ?? LOL Or should that post have been directed to you??? Talk to your buddy confix... Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 Global news, Jan. 31/25 just after Justice Marie-Josée Hogue released her report on foreign interference, Poilievre’s office revealed he is also refusing to take briefings under CSIS’s “threat reductions measures” (TRM) mandate — which would allow the agency to share some information with the Conservative leader without him first obtaining security clearance. Poilievre has long argued that receiving classified intelligence would prevent him from holding the government to account on foreign interference. But ex-national security officials who spoke to Global News are skeptical of that position. In a statement, Poilievre’s office maintained accepting the briefings would effectively “gag” the Conservative leader. “Officials indicated that should Mr. Poilievre receive the TRM briefing, he would be legally prevented from speaking with anyone other than legal counsel about the briefing and would be able to take action only as expressly authorized by the government, rendering him unable to effectively use any relevant information he received,” Poilievre’s spokesperson, Sebastian Skamski, wrote in a statement. “This is clearly unacceptable, and entirely contrary to the government’s supposed objective of enabling the person briefed to reduce risk.” Skamski added that government officials indicated the briefings concerned foreign interference being “directed at” parliamentarians, not about the “suitability” of sitting parliamentarians or candidates. Richard Fadden, former CSIS director and national security and intelligence advisor to Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau “One, I think he has a responsibility to the public to ensure that people in his party are worthy of being members of the party and members of the House of Commons, and if there’s a suspicion that they’re not, I’d argue it’s his duty to find out and to do something about it. And I guess secondly, he argues that if he has a clearance and he’s been given a briefing, he can’t argue about it. Well, if he never has a briefing, he’s arguing in a vacuum, so I’m not sure how that helps him in a practical sense.” “But fundamentally, I think any number of people over the years have received this kind of briefing. Other countries do it, other Commonwealth countries provide these kind of briefings to opposition members, and they seem to be able to function.” “It’s accurate in the sense that if he wants to be able to disclose anything not in the House of Commons, then he would still be subject to the (Security of Information Act) … He still has the opportunity, if he so chooses, to hold the government to account based on what he knows on the floor of the House of Commons because of his (legal) immunity from anything he says on the floor of the House of Commons.” “I find his choice interesting because it’s my understanding, for the most part, is that briefings that would be going to him … the information is something that he, because of the threat reduction measure, has to reasonably be believed to take measures to reduce the threat. You can’t just share something as a threat reduction measure because it’s nice to know. The definition of a threat reduction measure is, by sharing this information, we can do something to reduce the threat. So conceivably there is something in his power that he could do to reduce the threat once he has this information.” Ward Elcock, former CSIS director “The whole thing would be a lot simpler if he would just get clearance … What it frankly says to me, listening to Mr. Poilievre’s normal criticism of the government, he likes to make criticisms that are pretty far-reaching without any visible support. I guess I assume he’s afraid that if he gets a briefing, then he will actually know some facts that he can’t criticize on the basis of those facts. It’s hard to criticize when you actually know something. “ Stephanie Carvin, an international relations professor at Carleton University and former CSIS analyst “There’s a clear moving of the goal posts. It went from ‘I should be able to get through this a threat reduction measure,’ finally the government agrees, ‘Okay we’re going to give you a threat reduction measure.’ ‘Oh, okay, now I don’t want to because I can’t talk about the intelligence.’ I don’t know what he would say that hasn’t already been said in the (Hogue) report … I guess my concern is that not taking an intelligence briefing because you can’t turn it into a meme is not the seriousness with which we should be approaching this issue.” Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
herbie Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 Quote If this bugs you so much, talk to your MP Perfect BURN 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 47 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Global news, Jan. 31/25 just after Justice Marie-Josée Hogue released her report on foreign interference, Poilievre’s office revealed he is also refusing to take briefings under CSIS’s “threat reductions measures” (TRM) mandate — which would allow the agency to share some information with the Conservative leader without him first obtaining security clearance. Poilievre has long argued that receiving classified intelligence would prevent him from holding the government to account on foreign interference. But ex-national security officials who spoke to Global News are skeptical of that position. In a statement, Poilievre’s office maintained accepting the briefings would effectively “gag” the Conservative leader. “Officials indicated that should Mr. Poilievre receive the TRM briefing, he would be legally prevented from speaking with anyone other than legal counsel about the briefing and would be able to take action only as expressly authorized by the government, rendering him unable to effectively use any relevant information he received,” Poilievre’s spokesperson, Sebastian Skamski, wrote in a statement. “This is clearly unacceptable, and entirely contrary to the government’s supposed objective of enabling the person briefed to reduce risk.” Skamski added that government officials indicated the briefings concerned foreign interference being “directed at” parliamentarians, not about the “suitability” of sitting parliamentarians or candidates. Richard Fadden, former CSIS director and national security and intelligence advisor to Stephen Harper and Justin Trudeau “One, I think he has a responsibility to the public to ensure that people in his party are worthy of being members of the party and members of the House of Commons, and if there’s a suspicion that they’re not, I’d argue it’s his duty to find out and to do something about it. And I guess secondly, he argues that if he has a clearance and he’s been given a briefing, he can’t argue about it. Well, if he never has a briefing, he’s arguing in a vacuum, so I’m not sure how that helps him in a practical sense.” “But fundamentally, I think any number of people over the years have received this kind of briefing. Other countries do it, other Commonwealth countries provide these kind of briefings to opposition members, and they seem to be able to function.” “It’s accurate in the sense that if he wants to be able to disclose anything not in the House of Commons, then he would still be subject to the (Security of Information Act) … He still has the opportunity, if he so chooses, to hold the government to account based on what he knows on the floor of the House of Commons because of his (legal) immunity from anything he says on the floor of the House of Commons.” “I find his choice interesting because it’s my understanding, for the most part, is that briefings that would be going to him … the information is something that he, because of the threat reduction measure, has to reasonably be believed to take measures to reduce the threat. You can’t just share something as a threat reduction measure because it’s nice to know. The definition of a threat reduction measure is, by sharing this information, we can do something to reduce the threat. So conceivably there is something in his power that he could do to reduce the threat once he has this information.” Ward Elcock, former CSIS director “The whole thing would be a lot simpler if he would just get clearance … What it frankly says to me, listening to Mr. Poilievre’s normal criticism of the government, he likes to make criticisms that are pretty far-reaching without any visible support. I guess I assume he’s afraid that if he gets a briefing, then he will actually know some facts that he can’t criticize on the basis of those facts. It’s hard to criticize when you actually know something. “ Stephanie Carvin, an international relations professor at Carleton University and former CSIS analyst “There’s a clear moving of the goal posts. It went from ‘I should be able to get through this a threat reduction measure,’ finally the government agrees, ‘Okay we’re going to give you a threat reduction measure.’ ‘Oh, okay, now I don’t want to because I can’t talk about the intelligence.’ I don’t know what he would say that hasn’t already been said in the (Hogue) report … I guess my concern is that not taking an intelligence briefing because you can’t turn it into a meme is not the seriousness with which we should be approaching this issue.” How are you so uneducated that you're still bringing this up as an issue? It was proven during the campaign that if he'd signed it he'd be muzzled and couldn't have even talked about it. 29 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Who's Poilievre? The guy that you keep going on and on about and who seems to fill your every waking thought with terror 1 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 Our PM has the authenticity while PP the unwanted populist (authoritarian wannabe) carries the weakness! Credited to Dean Blundell "History is a graveyard of ego-driven authoritarians—men who rose to power on rage, lies, and vanity, only to crumble when faced with reality. From emperors and tyrants to presidents and populists, their legacies fade because they’re built on spectacle, not substance. That’s not politics. That’s physics. That’s science. Because ego is weak, authenticity is strong. And when the two collide, only one survives. It doesn’t matter how loud, angry, or caustic fake leaders become, or how big their lies and self-aggrandizing claims grow. Next to authentic leadership, they CRATER and scream louder to keep you away from finding out who they REALLY are." "Canada Chose the “Authentic” Exit Ramp Poilievre was selling rage. But Carney was offering reassurance. Poilievre promised a fight. Carney promised a plan. Poilievre wanted followers. Carney wanted solutions. And Canadians—quietly, steadily—chose the grown-up. They chose the leader who doesn’t need to lie about golf trophies or tweet memes about “gatekeepers.” They chose the man with global respect, not TikTok rants. That’s the thing about real leadership: you recognize it the second you see it. And when it shows up, the fakes vanish." "Carney is now reshaping Canada’s role in the world with quiet confidence and global credibility, while Pierre Poilievre is seeking a second chance and donations to help him stay alive." ~~Dean Blundell Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 …how can anyone in their right mind want you anywhere near $$ & politics! PROPAGANDA Poilievre’s Post: “Mark Carney’s spending spree is driving inflation back up, core rates rising to 3.4%. Despite big talk of finding savings, year-over-year spending is 8% higher. No wonder inflation is on the rise. Bring down wasteful spending to lower the deficit and cool inflation.” REBUTTAL: Poilievre Blames Carney for Inflation But the Facts Say Otherwise Core inflation is trending around 3%, not a runaway “Carney spending spree.” June’s headline CPI rose to 1.9% YoY, core inflation remains stubbornly close to 3%: reflecting lingering supply and trade pressures, not federal spending hikes. Global forces are the real driver. Rising auto, clothing and vehicle prices, trade tariffs, and supply disruptions are raising prices in Canada, and they are global trends affecting other G7 countries. Trade uncertainty and tariffs matter more than domestic spending. Bank of Canada notes that U.S. and Canadian tariffs are pushing up cost, this is a supply-side effect, not Carney’s doing. No Carney budget yet, it’s too early to assign responsibility. Carney was sworn in March 2025 and hasn’t tabled a full budget. Inflation is tracing decisions from earlier governments and global pressures, not his fiscal policies. Bank of Canada holds rates steady at 2.75%. They’re monitoring trade disruptions and core inflation, not reacting to domestic deficits. Cutting spending too soon could tip the economy into recession. OECD says Canada’s inflation peak is behind us. The OECD forecasts core inflation will ease back toward 2% in 2026 once tariffs and global supply tighten up, again highlighting external over domestic causes. Bottom line: Inflation trends are driven by global supply pressures, trade and tariff shocks, and pandemic after-effects, not by any new spending from Carney. Blaming him now is misleading and politically timed. Sources: • Reuters: Canada’s inflation rises to 1.9% in June • Reuters: BoC warns inflation could persist due to trade shocks • WSJ: Core inflation keeps BoC cautious, not government spending • OECD Economic Outlook 2025: Canada • Parliamentary Budget Office: Spending projections • Financial Post article Poilievre cited: Editorial commentary, not a neutral news report • Bank of Canada Monetary Policy Report, July 2025 • Reuters: US-Canada tariff disputes fuel inflation. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted July 17, 2025 Report Posted July 17, 2025 1 minute ago, ExFlyer said: …how can anyone in their right mind want you anywhere near $$ & politics! PROPAGANDA Poilievre’s Post: “Mark Carney’s spending spree is driving inflation back up, core rates rising to 3.4%. Despite big talk of finding savings, year-over-year spending is 8% higher. No wonder inflation is on the rise. Bring down wasteful spending to lower the deficit and cool inflation.” REBUTTAL: Poilievre Blames Carney for Inflation But the Facts Say Otherwise Core inflation is trending around 3%, not a runaway “Carney spending spree.” June’s headline CPI rose to 1.9% YoY, core inflation remains stubbornly close to 3%: reflecting lingering supply and trade pressures, not federal spending hikes. Global forces are the real driver. Rising auto, clothing and vehicle prices, trade tariffs, and supply disruptions are raising prices in Canada, and they are global trends affecting other G7 countries. Trade uncertainty and tariffs matter more than domestic spending. Bank of Canada notes that U.S. and Canadian tariffs are pushing up cost, this is a supply-side effect, not Carney’s doing. No Carney budget yet, it’s too early to assign responsibility. Carney was sworn in March 2025 and hasn’t tabled a full budget. Inflation is tracing decisions from earlier governments and global pressures, not his fiscal policies. Bank of Canada holds rates steady at 2.75%. They’re monitoring trade disruptions and core inflation, not reacting to domestic deficits. Cutting spending too soon could tip the economy into recession. OECD says Canada’s inflation peak is behind us. The OECD forecasts core inflation will ease back toward 2% in 2026 once tariffs and global supply tighten up, again highlighting external over domestic causes. Bottom line: Inflation trends are driven by global supply pressures, trade and tariff shocks, and pandemic after-effects, not by any new spending from Carney. Blaming him now is misleading and politically timed. Sources: • Reuters: Canada’s inflation rises to 1.9% in June • Reuters: BoC warns inflation could persist due to trade shocks • WSJ: Core inflation keeps BoC cautious, not government spending • OECD Economic Outlook 2025: Canada • Parliamentary Budget Office: Spending projections • Financial Post article Poilievre cited: Editorial commentary, not a neutral news report • Bank of Canada Monetary Policy Report, July 2025 • Reuters: US-Canada tariff disputes fuel inflation. Everything you accuse others of why is up being a confession about your own behavior But I do love that you're using lies and Propaganda to try and suggest other people are using lies and propaganda And once again we see that Poilievre lives rent free in your head 1 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
taxme Posted July 18, 2025 Report Posted July 18, 2025 On 7/2/2025 at 6:59 AM, Barquentine said: So he's running in a Conservative seat in Alberta. 1: Makes him look like a coward to play it so safe. 2: Fortifies the idea the Cons are a Western grievance party. 3: Hell have to pander to the far right. 4: He'll have to talk about Alberta separation a lot. 5: He may get a lower percentage than that riding got in the general election. This guy just doesn't have good political instinct. Whatever it takes to get those gawd dam communist Lieberal globalists out of power works for me. If PP did what Trump did and say that if elected as the PM of Canada he will eliminate the GST, no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, and no taxes on OAS. he would probably be the PM of Canada today. The money saved by eliminating at least 50% of the federal government, end foreign aid and pandering to special interest woke groups, end multiculturalism/diversity, is not our strength nonsense, and end massive 3rd world immigration, all those lieberal programs and agendas would pay for the loss of those revenues mentioned above plus would create more revenue for Canada. PP would be the PM of Canada today. And stop trying to make it appear as though those corrupt and lying liberals are a bunch of sweethearts. They have become a corrupt and lying and bullshitting machine for decades now. Carnage is a lieberal disaster. 🤮 1 Quote
ExFlyer Posted July 18, 2025 Report Posted July 18, 2025 (edited) 13 hours ago, CdnFox said: Everything you accuse others of why is up being a confession about your own behavior But I do love that you're using lies and Propaganda to try and suggest other people are using lies and propaganda And once again we see that Poilievre lives rent free in your head "History is a graveyard of ego-driven authoritarians—men who rose to power on rage, lies, and vanity, only to crumble when faced with reality. From emperors and tyrants to presidents and populists, their legacies fade because they’re built on spectacle, not substance. That’s not politics. That’s physics. That’s science. Because ego is weak, authenticity is strong. And when the two collide, only one survives. It doesn’t matter how loud, angry, or caustic fake leaders become, or how big their lies and self-aggrandizing claims grow. Next to authentic leadership, they CRATER and scream louder to keep you away from finding out who they REALLY are." "Canada Chose the “Authentic” Exit Ramp Poilievre was selling rage. But Carney was offering reassurance. Poilievre promised a fight. Carney promised a plan. Poilievre wanted followers. Carney wanted solutions. And Canadians—quietly, steadily—chose the grown-up. They chose the leader who doesn’t need to lie about golf trophies or tweet memes about “gatekeepers.” They chose the man with global respect, not TikTok rants. That’s the thing about real leadership: you recognize it the second you see it. And when it shows up, the fakes vanish." "Carney is now reshaping Canada’s role in the world with quiet confidence and global credibility, while Pierre Poilievre is seeking a second chance and donations to help him stay alive." Dean Blundell Edited July 18, 2025 by ExFlyer 1 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted July 18, 2025 Report Posted July 18, 2025 EH CANADA, EH USA: GOOD, BAD, & UGLY! · Emma Thompson-Klotz · optreSnods1128912313h6u0m1tg0uag7c4i0g39h5hmu5c8g82i2219c9lu · …does amnesia come and go?? I don’t want someone in charge who forgets things… On at 4:28pm July 16, 2025 Pierre Poilievre (@PierrePoilievre): “What is government doing for our canola farmers hit with Chinese tariffs? We must fight these tariffs and support the Canadian farm families who are under attack.” REBUTTAL: Poilievre Helped Trigger the Crisis Then Fought the Fixes China blocked Canadian canola in March 2019 after Canada arrested a top Huawei executive. This was retaliation. They banned Richardson and Viterra. Farmers saw it coming. Poilievre supported getting tough with China. He backed Meng Wanzhou’s arrest. He said Canada should “stand up to China no matter the cost.” He demanded Magnitsky sanctions and called for a boycott of Chinese goods. Farmers warned this would risk their markets: he ignored them. The government responded fast. March 2019: $1B in loan support. Filed a trade complaint. Opened new markets like Japan and Europe. By 2022, China reopened some access. In March 2025, China hit Canada again with 100% tariffs on canola oil and meal. Why? Because Canada put tariffs on Chinese EVs and steel in 2024. This is tit-for-tat retaliation again. Poilievre voted against the very trade deals that helped farmers survive. VERY SIMPLE: CETA = trade deal with Europe CPTPP = trade deal with Japan and others Both helped farmers sell canola after China blocked it Poilievre voted against both He cheered the conflict, blocked the trade deals, and now wants credit for complaining. Sources: Canola Council March 2025, WTO case DS589, CBC March 2019, Reuters Sept 2024 and March 8 2025, Global Affairs Canada, Commons Hansard 2019–2021, Parliamentary voting records CETA and CPTPP. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
taxme Posted July 18, 2025 Report Posted July 18, 2025 On 7/8/2025 at 8:09 AM, Moonbox said: Are you pretending that Flyer is actually lowering the level of discourse here? Hilarious. 🤡 The flyer troll is lowering the intelligence and common sense here. STFU flyer bug. LOL. 1 1 Quote
taxme Posted July 18, 2025 Report Posted July 18, 2025 22 hours ago, herbie said: Perfect BURN What? We have communist MP's in Canada that will talk too we the sheeple? I did not know that. Interesting indeed. 😁 21 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Who's Poilievre? Who's Carney? 1 Quote
herbie Posted July 18, 2025 Report Posted July 18, 2025 Quote We have had communist MP's in Canada FTFY We don't now and haven't has for years. And what's sick is people thinking there's something wrong with that. F*cking fascists. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.