Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Very interesting. 

Well...now we find out what the Russians and Chinese think.

I think they think that he should keep their mouth shut. Definitely Putin, he won't have any interest in this at all, and basically gave the US his blessings already. And I think that China is going to make a very serious effort not to even glance at Taiwan for the next little while

What will be interesting to see is what happens within Iran. They really have no friends right now who are of any use. Even Hezbollah has basically said, "Have fun with that." We don't know how severe the damage was, but I think we can assume, for the sake of this discussion, that there isn't much left of any of those sites and Iran's nuclear plan is on the rocks for quite a while. That sends a pretty Strong message to all of the parties in the middle east and around the world that the united states is not here to f around, and those players who step out of line may very well find themselves on the receiving end of something extremely heavy and loud.

Frankly this is probably the best thing that could have happened and it will move a long way towards de-escalating potential conflicts moving forward. Groups in the middle east now clearly know where America stands when it comes to Israel and their willingness to use force, groups around the world will understand that when pushed the US doesn't mess around and taco is a bit of a myth.

  • Downvote 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 minutes ago, Aristides said:

What happened to Trump staying out of wars?

 

Don't know anything about them but let's bomb them anyway.

 

IRAN WAS DAYS AWAY FROM A NUKE THAT THEY WOULD USE!

There is not getting into regional conflicts and then there is preventing nuclear holocaust. 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 minutes ago, Aristides said:

What happened to Trump staying out of wars?

 

Don't know anything about them but let's bomb them anyway.

 

This war's been going on for quite a while and frankly trump has been talking about how it's absolutely imperative to prevent Iran from having nukes since before his first term, all the way through his first term, in between his first and second term and now in his second term he's decided to bomb them because they were getting close. I think we can safely say this is in keeping with his stated position. :) But Iran in Israel bombing each other has been going on for quite some time. And Trump said he would end wars and not start wars, and I suspect this one just ended for a while.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
17 minutes ago, Aristides said:

What happened to Trump staying out of wars?

 

Don't know anything about them but let's bomb them anyway.

 

It's really too bad that Obama dropped billions of dollars on a wooden pallet into Iran. Today would have been totally unnecessary

Posted

20250621_202058.thumb.jpg.edf61b2bf8fca21e0d997b66b269f4c9.jpg

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

IRAN WAS DAYS AWAY FROM A NUKE THAT THEY WOULD USE!

There is not getting into regional conflicts and then there is preventing nuclear holocaust. 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iran-nuclear-capabilities-analysis-1.7565848

Bibi has been claiming Iran is weeks away from having nukes every five years since 2012.

You guys didn't learn FA from Iraq having weapons of mass destruction in 2003. When in doubt bomb the f*ckers.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Aristides said:

Bibi has been claiming Iran is weeks away from having nukes every five years since 2012.

You guys didn't learn FA from Iraq having weapons of mass destruction in 2003. When in doubt bomb the f*ckers.

It is not just him claiming this as if there is no other evidence. 

But hey... if Iran was not doing anything, I guess they won't miss their 3 massively fortified underground bunker facilities that nothing was happening at. 

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iran-nuclear-capabilities-analysis-1.7565848

Bibi has been claiming Iran is weeks away from having nukes every five years since 2012.

You guys didn't learn FA from Iraq having weapons of mass destruction in 2003. When in doubt bomb the f*ckers.

Not BN...the IAEA...with PROOF that Iran was running secret nuclear enriching that they just found. 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Trump  cancelled the Iran nuclear agreement over the objections of all your allies and this is the result. 

So you're saying iran WAS developing nukes. 

You need to make up your mind. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

The only D that supports preventing nuclear holocaust:

 

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
Just now, User said:

It is not just him claiming this as if there is no other evidence. 

But hey... if Iran was not doing anything, I guess they won't miss their 3 massively fortified underground bunker facilities that nothing was happening at. 

 

Who else is claiming, Donald Rumsfeld or his latest iteration?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_(film)

Good movie, you should watch it. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Not BN...the IAEA...with PROOF that Iran was running secret nuclear enriching that they just found. 

Naw, it should be pretty obvious that the most oil rich country in the universe desperately needs civilian nuclear power generation 🙄  I mean their leader is SUCH a notorious environmentalist, of course he'd want them to move away from the one source of power they have in vast abundance. what else could it be?  I head greta thunberg came in a close second when the current guy seized power, they're that worried about climate change over there. 

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Not BN...the IAEA...with PROOF that Iran was running secret nuclear enriching that they just found. 

Well why wouldn't they? Trump shitcanned the deal that had them giving it up and dumped a bunch of sanctions on them instead. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Well why wouldn't they? Trump shitcanned the deal that had them giving it up and dumped a bunch of sanctions on them instead. 

That is not what the deal was. 

You need to go educate yourself and then come back and try to talk with us when you know what you are talking about. 

 

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Well why wouldn't they? Trump shitcanned the deal that had them giving it up and dumped a bunch of sanctions on them instead. 

Like User said, you don't understand just how bad the deal was. The JCPOA lifted economic sanctions for nuclear sanctions. 

The problem with that was that the money that flowed in from the lifted sanctions allowed Iran to build reactors and enrich uranium that they wouldn't have been able to afford. Further, they didnt follow the restrictions on their nuclear program. 

The JCPOA was worth less than the paper they were written in. Far less. 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
10 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Who else is claiming, Donald Rumsfeld or his latest iteration?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_(film)

Good movie, you should watch it. 

Iran themselve's the day before Israel started dropping the bombs. 

Iran’s supreme leader slams US nuclear proposal, says it will continue to enrich uranium

"

Iran’s supreme leader added on Wednesday that his country has been “able to achieve a complete nuclear energy cycle,” a feat only achieved by a few countries.

“Uranium enrichment is an essential part of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program, and we will not abandon it,” Khamenei said."
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/04/middleeast/iran-nuclear-enrichment-deal-trump-intl

8 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Great, you posted links... try reading them. 

 

 

 

Posted

Democrats are so stùpid:

They are literally trying to make the case that STOPPING A NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST is an IMPEACHABLE offense. 

 

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
58 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I think they think that he should keep their mouth shut. Definitely Putin, he won't have any interest in this at all, and basically gave the US his blessings already. And I think that China is going to make a very serious effort not to even glance at Taiwan for the next little while

What will be interesting to see is what happens within Iran. They really have no friends right now who are of any use. Even Hezbollah has basically said, "Have fun with that." We don't know how severe the damage was, but I think we can assume, for the sake of this discussion, that there isn't much left of any of those sites and Iran's nuclear plan is on the rocks for quite a while. That sends a pretty Strong message to all of the parties in the middle east and around the world that the united states is not here to f around, and those players who step out of line may very well find themselves on the receiving end of something extremely heavy and loud.

Frankly this is probably the best thing that could have happened and it will move a long way towards de-escalating potential conflicts moving forward. Groups in the middle east now clearly know where America stands when it comes to Israel and their willingness to use force, groups around the world will understand that when pushed the US doesn't mess around and taco is a bit of a myth.

Perhaps. We're gonna find out soon.

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Democrats are so stùpid:

They are literally trying to make the case that STOPPING A NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST is an IMPEACHABLE offense. 

 

 

Lol...more impeachment?

Way t'go Libbies.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,921
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheUnrelentingPopulous
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

×
×
  • Create New...