gatomontes99 Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 5 hours ago, CdnFox said: Your EVIDENCE is always BUPKIS!! Whatever you post evidence it never says what you think it says. None of your evidence is actually related to what you are talking about. It's kind of a running gag. You claim that trump has been caught selling Russian secrets and then post a link to an article explaining how to correctly use dental floss. And even the floss article is wrong. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted July 13, 2025 Author Report Posted July 13, 2025 5 hours ago, CdnFox said: Your EVIDENCE is always BUPKIS!! Whatever you post evidence it never says what you think it says. None of your evidence is actually related to what you are talking about. It's kind of a running gag. You claim that trump has been caught selling Russian secrets and then post a link to an article explaining how to correctly use dental floss. ^LYING AGAIN, CdnLIAR! Quote
gatomontes99 Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 Just now, robosmith said: ^LYING AGAIN, CdnLIAR! That's all you've got? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted July 13, 2025 Report Posted July 13, 2025 36 minutes ago, robosmith said: You DO NOT KNOW the LAWS of Physics. They are definitive, NOT "conjecture." Duh Definitive... like Newton's law of universal gravity was definitive until it wasn't? Quote
Nationalist Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 Guys... @robosmith's own OP concludes thus... "When methane emissions increase, finding the cause is like solving a complicated algebra problem with too many unknowns" There is no proof, just a lot o' conjecture. Fear-porn designed to scare little dweebs into submission. 2 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 53 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Guys... @robosmith's own OP concludes thus... "When methane emissions increase, finding the cause is like solving a complicated algebra problem with too many unknowns" There is no proof, just a lot o' conjecture. Fear-porn designed to scare little dweebs into submission. You are LYING BY OMISSION. What it says in CONTEXT: Quote It’s difficult for scientists to identify all the sources of methane in the world. It comes from leaking oil and gas operations, from cows belching, from landfills and marshes, and from thawing permafrost in the Arctic. When methane emissions increase, finding the cause is like solving a complicated algebra problem with too many unknowns. They know it comes from many places and it IS INCREASING. Try checking out the other thread on this subject. Arctic Sinkholes: The climate crisis from which there will be no recovery. They KNOW it's coming from melting permafrost and there is a LOT MORE DEEPER DOWN, lDIOT. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 ^ See what I mean? They're not comfortable unless they have something to be scared of. "AAAHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!" They can't deal with free society. They have this uncontrollable need to dictate and rule. So they use fear as a club to beat people into submission. Permafrost, cow farts, oil, gas, illegal aliens, Putin, Orangemanbad. All just tools for generating fear. I tell you guys, these Libbies are trying to tear the world down from its foundations. They won't be happy till global thermonuclear war is upon us and then...then they'll be the first to cower. Indeed...the Devil himself couldn't architect a better gaggle of useful !diots. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: ^ See what I mean? They're not comfortable unless they have something to be scared of. "AAAHHH! WE ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!" They can't deal with free society. They have this uncontrollable need to dictate and rule. So they use fear as a club to beat people into submission. Permafrost, cow farts, oil, gas, illegal aliens, Putin, Orangemanbad. All just tools for generating fear. I tell you guys, these Libbies are trying to tear the world down from its foundations. They won't be happy till global thermonuclear war is upon us and then...then they'll be the first to cower. Indeed...the Devil himself couldn't architect a better gaggle of useful !diots. Unfortunate the ^dropout mistakes KNOWLEDGE and ACTION on a clear and present danger for mere fear. Maybe if you'd finished college, you'd have some RESPECT for EVIDENCE and SCIENCE. You probably still believe in WITCHES, too. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 13 minutes ago, robosmith said: Unfortunate the ^dropout mistakes KNOWLEDGE and ACTION on a clear and present danger for mere fear. Maybe if you'd finished college, you'd have some RESPECT for EVIDENCE and SCIENCE. You probably still believe in WITCHES, too. LMAO Dude it is painfully obvious that the closest you've been to a college or university is the zucchini shop across the street 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Nationalist Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 41 minutes ago, robosmith said: Unfortunate the ^dropout mistakes KNOWLEDGE and ACTION on a clear and present danger for mere fear. Maybe if you'd finished college, you'd have some RESPECT for EVIDENCE and SCIENCE. You probably still believe in WITCHES, too. LMAO I believe you're a m0ron...and the general consensus is that you are...a m0ron. A fearful little sap who laps it up like a dog laps up water after a long run. What clear and present danger? There is no clear and present danger. Except in your warped little mind where man is evil and must be either dictated to, or destroyed. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-will-not-be-dangerous-for-a-long-time/ There's your "SCIENCE" Pookie. A realistic look at man's influence on the climate. So no Pookie....we are not "ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!" We are gonna do what man does. Research...invent...thrive. But thats all assuming dictatorial little dweebs, such as yourself, are treated as the goofs you really are. Yet there is a silver lining in this for the likes of you. Slightly longer grow times will definitely produce more and bigger zucchini. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 43 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I believe you're a m0ron...and the general consensus is that you are...a m0ron. A fearful little sap who laps it up like a dog laps up water after a long run. What clear and present danger? There is no clear and present danger. Except in your warped little mind where man is evil and must be either dictated to, or destroyed. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-will-not-be-dangerous-for-a-long-time/ There's your "SCIENCE" Pookie. A realistic look at man's influence on the climate. So no Pookie....we are not "ALL GONNA DIIIEEE!" We are gonna do what man does. Research...invent...thrive. But thats all assuming dictatorial little dweebs, such as yourself, are treated as the goofs you really are. Yet there is a silver lining in this for the likes of you. Slightly longer grow times will definitely produce more and bigger zucchini. A real scientist would not embarrass themselves by posting a 10 yo article by a journalist that cites as EVIDENCE much older data. 2024 WARMEST ON RECORD LMAO Current data: Climate change: global temperature Quote Global temperature in 2024 According to the annual report from NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2024 was the warmest year since global records began in 1850. The global average surface temperature was 2.32 Fahrenheit (1.29 degrees Celsius) above the 20th-century average (57.0 degrees Fahrenheit, or 13.9 degrees Celsius) and 2.63 degrees Fahrenheit (1.46 degrees Celsius) above the pre-industrial average (56.7 degrees Fahrenheit, or 13.7 degrees Celsius), which NOAA defines as the period from 1850-1900. Global temperatures in 2024 were above the 1991-2020 average (red) across most of the planet. Yearly temperatures compared to the 20th-century average (bar chart) show that it has been 48 years since Earth had a cooler-than-average year. NOAA Climate.gov image, based on data from NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. The 2024 global temperature anomaly (anomaly means “difference from average”) is 0.18 degrees F (0.10 degrees C) warmer than the previous record, set the year before, in 2023. The ten warmest years in the 175-year record have all occurred during the last decade (2015–2024). When the new century started in 2000, the first year to set a new high-temperature record was 2005. Now, 2005 is just the 13th-warmest year on record. Other 2024 rankings included... warmest year on record for both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres individually, warmest year on record for land and ocean areas individually, upper ocean heat content was highest on record. For more regional details and 2024 climate statistics, see the 2024 Global Climate Report from NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: A real scientist would not embarrass themselves by posting a 10 yo article by a journalist that cites as EVIDENCE much older data. 2024 WARMEST ON RECORD LMAO Current data: Climate change: global temperature Yes dear... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: Yes dear... Pu$$y ^whipped EMPTY reflex. Quote
WestCanMan Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 Whenever a left4rd says the word "science", you know that pure BS is going to follow. 1 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: Whenever a left4rd says the word "science", you know that pure BS is going to follow. How would you know? Statistics is math, NOT science. LMAO So are you ever going to admit you work for a fossil fuel company since you're always gratuitously trashing global warming? Edited July 14, 2025 by robosmith Quote
CdnFox Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 20 minutes ago, robosmith said: How would you know? Statistics math, NOT science. LMAO From Google AI Yes, statistics is generally considered a science. It is the science of collecting, organizing, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data. While it has strong ties to mathematics, particularly probability, statistics is considered a separate field that applies mathematical principles to understand and draw conclusions from data. LOLOLOL so now we've had to explain how computers work to you, how law works to you, how electrics work to you and finally what the word science means LOL When you say you went to school, i can only assume you mean that there were a lot of other fish swimming around with you. 2 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 20 minutes ago, CdnFox said: From Google AI Yes, statistics is generally considered a science. It is the science of collecting, organizing, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data. While it has strong ties to mathematics, particularly probability, statistics is considered a separate field that applies mathematical principles to understand and draw conclusions from data. LOLOLOL so now we've had to explain how computers work to you, how law works to you, how electrics work to you and finally what the word science means LOL When you say you went to school, i can only assume you mean that there were a lot of other fish swimming around with you. Google's AI beats the shit out of your unattributed AI LMAO Quote Yes, statistics is fundamentally a branch of mathematics. It utilizes mathematical principles and tools, particularly those from probability theory, to collect, analyze, interpret, and present data. While it's applied in diverse fields like science, social science, and economics, the underlying methodology relies heavily on mathematical concepts. Here's why statistics is considered math: Theoretical Basis: . Many statistical concepts, like estimators and hypothesis tests, are developed and proven using mathematical theorems and proofs. Mathematical Modeling: . Statistics uses mathematical models to represent real-world phenomena and make predictions, a core aspect of many mathematical disciplines. Mathematical Foundations: . Statistics is built upon mathematical theories and concepts, especially probability, which provides the framework for understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Mathematical Tools: . Statistical analysis often involves mathematical techniques like calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations. While some argue that statistics is distinct due to its focus on data and interpretation rather than pure mathematical abstraction, it's undeniable that mathematics forms its core. The application of statistical methods relies on a solid understanding of mathematical principles, making it a mathematical science. Quote
CdnFox Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 Just now, robosmith said: Google's AI beats the shit out of your unattributed AI LMAO That WAS google AI Sorry kiddo. Statistics can be considered mathematical but it is also considered to be a science The problem with you is that you ask the wrong questions. Garbage in garbage out has anyone who actually understands computers knows Here's the actual question you should have asked, is statistics math or science Here's Google's answer Statistics can be considered both a branch of mathematics and a science. It relies on mathematical principles and tools, but its applications extend to diverse fields, making it a scientific discipline as well. is statistics math or science - Google Search So sorry to tell you, but my original answer was the correct one. You said that statistics was not science. I said the statistics is a science And it turns out I was right. While it is true that you can call statistics mathematics, it is also generally regarded as being a science even though it's a branch of mathematics LOLOLOL!!! You looked stupid once, THEN you DOUBLED DOWN to look even MORE stupid! So not only do we have to explain statistics to you, we have to explain why you are understanding of it was wrong yet again LOL No wonder you like zucchini so much, you share a common intelligence Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Michael Hardner Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 A thread with insults in every post is not very inviting. 😕 1 Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted July 14, 2025 Author Report Posted July 14, 2025 11 minutes ago, CdnFox said: That WAS google AI Sorry kiddo. Statistics can be considered mathematical but it is also considered to be a science The problem with you is that you ask the wrong questions. Garbage in garbage out has anyone who actually understands computers knows Here's the actual question you should have asked, is statistics math or science Here's Google's answer Statistics can be considered both a branch of mathematics and a science. It relies on mathematical principles and tools, but its applications extend to diverse fields, making it a scientific discipline as well. is statistics math or science - Google Search So sorry to tell you, but my original answer was the correct one. You said that statistics was not science. I said the statistics is a science And it turns out I was right. While it is true that you can call statistics mathematics, it is also generally regarded as being a science even though it's a branch of mathematics LOLOLOL!!! You looked stupid once, THEN you DOUBLED DOWN to look even MORE stupid! So not only do we have to explain statistics to you, we have to explain why you are understanding of it was wrong yet again LOL No wonder you like zucchini so much, you share a common intelligence It's NOT a physical SCIENCE like CLIMATE, or ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY/PHYSICS. Like every other science, it is MATH used to IN SCIENCE. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: It's NOT a physical SCIENCE like CLIMATE, or ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY/PHYSICS. Like every other science, it is MATH used to IN SCIENCE. Can we just discuss one-on-one what this quibble is about statistics being a scientist? I can't see how this would have any impact on a discussion of climate change. There's this thing called correlation, used in linear regression to make predictions. And they use it fairly well to predict temperatures. So it's not like statistics negates climate change. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
CdnFox Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 25 minutes ago, robosmith said: It's NOT a physical SCIENCE like CLIMATE, or ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY/PHYSICS. It's a science, and it plays a valuable role in all of those other ones you just mentioned So it is absolutely a science that involves physical sciences as well. Or did you not know that statistical models were critical to climate and atmospheric chemistry and predictions? I mean.. what did you THINK climate forecasts were made of? It's all possible due to the science of statistics. Next time do some research before you try and tell people what is and is not science Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
WestCanMan Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: A thread with insults in every post is not very inviting. 😕 You just insulted everyone who posted in this thread 😭 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
Nationalist Posted July 14, 2025 Report Posted July 14, 2025 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: Can we just discuss one-on-one what this quibble is about statistics being a scientist? I can't see how this would have any impact on a discussion of climate change. There's this thing called correlation, used in linear regression to make predictions. And they use it fairly well to predict temperatures. So it's not like statistics negates climate change. https://www.survivalworld.com/outdoors/33-climate-predictions-that-never-happened-a-history-of-inaccuracy/ 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.