Woke lawmakers in Colorado state that parents must medically castrate their children or risk apprehension by the state who will do it for them

[West]

How sick must you be to support and vote for mutilating children against the will of their parents? The state of Colorado is a very sick place. 

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, West said:

How sick must you be to support and vote for mutilating children against the will of their parents? The state of Colorado is a very sick place. 

That is absolutely awful. Forcing parents to abuse their kids is the final straw. That state government should be dissolved and reestablished by the federal government.

[Nationalist]

It's insanity. That adults would vote for this shows 2 things.

1. These people have no morals.

2 These people actually want war.

[Hodad]

Holy shit. You clowns don't even care if a story is even remotely true before you kick off the circle jerk. Hell, there's not even a story to react to, and Mr. Velcro Shoes is ready to ride his rascal scooter to war.

It's like when one monkey starts howling and shaking the cage and then all the rest join in. But none of them even know what they're howling about. 

Get off the internet. It's not safe for you lot. 

Edited May 17 by Hodad

[User]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Get off the internet. It's not safe for you lot. 

Or... just hide from facts like you do...

[robosmith]

11 hours ago, West said:

How sick must you be to support and vote for mutilating children against the will of their parents? The state of Colorado is a very sick place. 

^More lies from West.

 

Quote

No, Colorado state law does not require parents to medically castrate their children. 

Explanation:

• The claim that Colorado requires or mandates the medical castration of children is false.
• There are discussions and concerns surrounding legislation in Colorado, specifically House Bill 25-1312, regarding parental rights and gender-affirming care for transgender individuals, but these do not translate to forced medical procedures.
• HB 25-1312 focuses on defining "coercive control" in the context of child custody disputes and potentially including a parent's refusal to affirm a child's gender identity as a form of "coercive control".
• This bill could have implications for parents' rights in custody cases if they do not affirm their child's transgender identity, but it does not mandate medical castration or any other specific medical procedure.
• It's important to distinguish between legal discussions and proposed legislation from actual laws and mandates. 

In summary:

Colorado law does not require parents to medically castrate their children. The information circulating regarding potential legal implications for parental rights in relation to gender-affirming care should not be misinterpreted as a mandate for medical castration. 

 

[West]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^More lies from West.

 

 

The coerced control is on the parent you dummy. 

Lefties love to medically castrate kids because they are sick in the head. 

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, West said:

The coerced control is on the parent you dummy. 

Lefties love to medically castrate kids because they are sick in the head. 

You don't even have a cite (not even a tweet, LMAO), so you're NOT CREDIBLE.

No, Colorado state law does not require parents to medically castrate their children. 

[Aristides]

Bill 25-1253

I don't know where the hell he gets the idea it mandates castration. Using his usual nut bar sources probably.

[User]

37 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Bill 25-1253

I don't know where the hell he gets the idea it mandates castration. Using his usual nut bar sources probably.

Well... you are quoting the wrong law for starters. That is the one proposed to protect children from the trans madness, not the one discussed related to punishing parents for daring to disagree with the trans madness being applied to their own children. 

 

[Aristides]

59 minutes ago, User said:

Well... you are quoting the wrong law for starters. That is the one proposed to protect children from the trans madness, not the one discussed related to punishing parents for daring to disagree with the trans madness being applied to their own children. 

 

Got a link for it?

[User]

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

Got a link for it?

I do. 

[Aristides]

14 minutes ago, User said:

I do. 

Then where is it?

[User]

10 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Then where is it?

Do you not know how the internet works?

 

[Aristides]

1 hour ago, User said:

Do you not know how the internet works?

 

So you don't have one. Thanks. Obviously neither does West.

Edited May 17 by Aristides

[User]

Just now, Aristides said:

So you don't have one. Thanks

I do. What does any of this have to do with your sharing the wrong bill?

[Aristides]

1 minute ago, User said:

I do. What does any of this have to do with your sharing the wrong bill?

So show us the right one. 

[User]

1 minute ago, Aristides said:

So show us the right one. 

Why? We already know the one you shared was wrong. 

[Aristides]

5 minutes ago, User said:

Why? We already know the one you shared was wrong. 

Thought not. You are just full of shit.

[User]

9 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Thought not. You are just full of shit.

Just pointing out facts. You don't need me to provide you a link to just click on the one you did to see it was wrong. 

[CdnFox]

 

8 hours ago, Aristides said:

Bill 25-1253

I don't know where the hell he gets the idea it mandates castration. Using his usual nut bar sources probably.

It does seem pretty clear that The law does not expressly demand castration, but that if a court finds that denying chemical castration in the form of gender affirming drugs is Part of denying gender affirming care then they will be found guilty of coercive control and therefore child abuse, and the state can take action to require the treatment. 

And he's right, you're quoting the wrong law. 

Here's a deeper dice. 

Bill_Analysis_-_Analysis_of_House_Bill_25-1312-_Legal_“Protections”_For_Transgender_People.pdf

The information provided by Robo wrong is misleading. It's true that the law does not specifically state that it require parents to provide surgery or chemical castration.  But what it does say is that if they don't they could be guilty of child abuse and the state will take the appropriate steps which would include such gender treatments against the will of the parents. 

 

Sorry, but the lp is actually closer to the truth

 

[West]

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 

It does seem pretty clear that The law does not expressly demand castration, but that if a court finds that denying chemical castration in the form of gender affirming drugs is Part of denying gender affirming care then they will be found guilty of coercive control and therefore child abuse, and the state can take action to require the treatment. 

And he's right, you're quoting the wrong law. 

Here's a deeper dice. 

Bill_Analysis_-_Analysis_of_House_Bill_25-1312-_Legal_“Protections”_For_Transgender_People.pdf

The information provided by Robo wrong is misleading. It's true that the law does not specifically state that it require parents to provide surgery or chemical castration.  But what it does say is that if they don't they could be guilty of child abuse and the state will take the appropriate steps which would include such gender treatments against the will of the parents. 

 

Sorry, but the lp is actually closer to the truth

 

It boils down to the woke not wanting to call it by its proper name which is medical castration. 

[robosmith]

30 minutes ago, West said:

It boils down to the woke not wanting to call it by its proper name which is medical castration. 

It boils down to you not understanding the difference between reversible medicinal castration and irreversible physical castration.

 

[User]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It boils down to you not understanding the difference between reversible medicinal castration and irreversible physical castration.

 

Well, I can certainly use the right term: Medical, not "medicinal"

It is also "reversible" in the sense that you can stop the medication, but the long-term impacts do not reverse themselves when we are talking about the bone density loss, among other harmful impacts. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, User said:

Well, I can certainly use the right term: Medical, not "medicinal"

It is also "reversible" in the sense that you can stop the medication, but the long-term impacts do not reverse themselves when we are talking about the bone density loss, among other harmful impacts. 

Or the castration part. In most cases they are infertile for life. Many trans have commented that they wish they had not done that later on when they realize they would have liked to have the option for children