Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And i have no idea what you mean by "all we need".

Seriously? You have no idea what the words all, we and need mean?  Clearly you're an imbecile.

Did you try looking up their definitions with a dictionary?

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

In fact, i'm literally here arguing that we need a budget,

If you recall I said I agree.

 

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Seriously? You have no idea what the words all, we and need mean?  Clearly you're an imbecile.

 

So you can't articulate your point clearly or even ask a question clearly and somehow it's my fault.

So I take it you don't know what you mean either.

Quote

Did you try looking up their definitions with a dictionary?

Those don't seem to matter much to you. Asking you seems like a sensible thing to do because presumably you knew what you were talking about. Sadly that does not seem to be the case   

 

Quote

If you recall I said I agree.

I absolutely recall that you absolutely did not agree and in fact have spent three pages arguing that we don't.
He started off okay saying they have a responsibility to do so but then you said BUUUUTTTT... there is no such thing as a budget anymore, they don't matter in our lives, they're not part of accountability, they're meaningless because "omnibus", and went on and on about how they should NOT produce a budget. 

So no you did not agree in the slightest. Kind of too late now that you've spent three pages arguing against the idea that they should. 

[eyeball]

53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you can't articulate your point clearly or even ask a question clearly and somehow it's my fault.

It's certainly not my fault that short to the point questions asked in clear simple English make your head explode.

53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I absolutely recall that you absolutely did not agree

Sure you do.... LMAO!

Sure they have that responsibility.

Read much? 

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It's certainly not my fault that short to the point questions asked in clear simple English make your head explode.

It's 100% your fault that you can't ask a question clearly whether you ask it short or long.

Hell you don't even know what you mean, you can't even explain it even after your asked. If you don't know I don't know how you can expect anyone else to know

But once again you want your lack of skills and knowledge to be everyone else's fault

Quote

Sure you do...

Of course I do. Unlike you I can remember things that are more than 20 minutes old. You have spent three pages explaining how they don't have to produce a budget.

But I love how you try and pretend that three words beforehand change all that  

You have absolutely defended the fact that they didn't produce a budget, you absolutely do not want to see accountability as long as it's for the liberals. And once again you have proven that you are complete hypocrite every time you even mention the word accountability.

You can't have accountability without accounts     Budgets matter even if you think they don't. 

Find any of them "omnibusses" btw? Are they in the room with you right now?

[eyeball]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's 100% your fault that you can't ask a question clearly whether you ask it short or long.

So now you're going to spend a couple pages explaining that you can't fathom what all, we and need or deserve mean in the context  of holding governments accountable with an x on a piece of paper every 4-5 years?

LMFAO! 🤣🤣🤣

Figures I guess, only a donkey and loser like you could dig yourself into a hole where you end up defending the power of budget accountability even in Carney's hands.

[eyeball]

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure sounds like your defending the Liberals budgeting accountability.

 

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Absolutely 

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

So now you're going to spend a couple pages explaining that you can't fathom what all, we and need or deserve mean

And you're going to spend four or five pages unable to explain what you meant.

I think it means you're a pretentious tard   Did you have another explanation?

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

 

 

So now you're cutting and pasting people out of context in a desperate effort to sound like you have a point somewhere? 😂😂😂

I get it. You realize you've been shown up as being a hypocrite and a loser yet again and exposed as a liberal supporter yet again and you can't come back with anything else yet again so to prop up your own sad little ego so you can sleep tonight you're going to try cutting and pasting out of context because in the end it's all you have  

But you're still a hypocrite, still a liar, still don't believe in accountability at all and you're still a liberal supporter. 

Sweet dreams   

[eyeball]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And you're going to spend four or five pages unable to explain what you meant.

Nope...there's clearly no point - not even a two by four could get thru to you.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nope...there's clearly no point - not even a two by four could get thru to you.

Yeah, it was pretty obvious you had no clue what you were talking about and once again you want it to be my fault. 

At least you're done lying about how the libs shouldn't produce a budget because "ominbus"

[Moonbox]

On 5/17/2025 at 5:19 PM, Army Guy said:

No you wouldn't , if it is not me then it's some other on this forum that you'll attack for endless pages of nonsense...

Then what do I need you for?  

Put me on ignore or stop whining.  You're just embarrassing yourself.  

[eyeball]

41 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

....and once again you want it to be my fault. 

Awww.

[CdnFox]

Just now, eyeball said:

Awww.

Exactly     Awwwww, poor little Eyeball butthurt about making himself look stupid again   maybe try rubbing some omnibus on that?

or just learn to NOT be completely full of bullshit  

 

 

[Army Guy]

23 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Then what do I need you for?  

Put me on ignore or stop whining.  You're just embarrassing yourself.  

Becasue this is all you have, this is why your on this forum, to attack/ insult people....just go back through all your posts maybe 10 % sees you contribute to the conversation the other 90% is insults and you getting angry...

I can't it's like watching a train wreck...only you never stop wrecking....

[Moonbox]

23 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Becasue this is all you have, this is why your on this forum, to attack/ insult people....just go back through all your posts maybe 10 % sees you contribute to the conversation the other 90% is insults and you getting angry...

To have you of all people complaining about insults is a laugh.   90% of your posts are clueless, buffoonish b*tching and ranting, and then inevitably lashing and insulting the people who contradict or correct you.  Meanwhile, you bounce around high-fiving the insults and tantrums of the biggest no-life troll this forum has ever seen

Put me on ignore, or quit being a crybaby.  Whining and moaning about the fight you keep running straight back to is babyshit.  You're a joke.  

Edited Thursday at 08:15 PM by Moonbox

[Politics1990]

On 5/19/2025 at 5:54 PM, taxme said:

Corney will come thru for himself. What will change if you go back to the NDP socialists? I know? Not a dam bloody thing will change. The NDP are even worse than the lieberals. Canada will surely go communism with the NDP imbeciles in power. All the NDP will do is raise and create more new taxes, create more big government and freedom will slowly be eliminated. NDP stunned people like you are truly insane. Look at those countries that have gone socialist. They are bankrupt and totally corrupt. Give your socialist head a shake, will ya comrade. 🤡 

well after todays news i may not be voting for either one unless the ndp get a leader i like heather mcpherson maybe.. i got letter to apply for canada free dental plan.. but apparently because i  turned down my companys health pharmacare/dental plan which takes 70$ off each cheque i don't qualify for this bogus free canada  dental plan they been advertising lol..🤣  that combined with tax break for middle class which i miss by 4-5k  and screwing me on my income taxes this year  is the last straw  very well may be voting con next time even if i dislike PP. 

Edited 12 hours ago by Politics1990

[Legato]

15 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

well after todays news i may not be voting for either one unless the ndp get a leader i like heather mcpherson maybe.. i got letter to apply for canada free dental plan.. but apparently because i  turned down my companys health pharmacare/dental plan which takes 70$ off each cheque i don't qualify for this bogus free canada  dental plan they been advertising lol..🤣  that combined with tax break for middle class which i miss by 4-5k  and screwing me on my income taxes this year  is the last straw  very well may be voting con next time even if i dislike PP. 

Had breakfast with friends this morning. Some are staunch NDP supporters who this time voted Liberal.

When asked, they couldn't give a solid reason as to why. One lady said the TV coverage was the main reason.

Now they're pissed.

 

[CdnFox]

On 5/22/2025 at 1:15 PM, Moonbox said:

To have you of all people complaining about insults is a laugh.   90% of your posts are clueless, buffoonish b*tching and ranting, and then inevitably lashing and insulting the people who contradict or correct you. 

Literally 90 percent of your posts are you running around the forum after losing a discussion with me trying desperately to randomly insult me.  It's really all you bring to the forum. 

You never start any posts, you rarely respond intelligently to discussions, you're mostly insults except for those occasions where you're posting evidence you're wrong or demonstrating your complete lack of basic math skills. 

Watching you claim someone ELSE is all about insults is like watching Hitler complain about someone being intolerant of the jews. You're a useless twat and a hypocrite. Get some self awareness.  Nobody respects you on this forum because you're like this. 

Edited 11 hours ago by CdnFox

[CdnFox]

 

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

Had breakfast with friends this morning. Some are staunch NDP supporters who this time voted Liberal.

When asked, they couldn't give a solid reason as to why. One lady said the TV coverage was the main reason.

Now they're pissed.

 

 

The best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter. 

[Politics1990]

31 minutes ago, Legato said:

Had breakfast with friends this morning. Some are staunch NDP supporters who this time voted Liberal.

When asked, they couldn't give a solid reason as to why. One lady said the TV coverage was the main reason.

Now they're pissed.

 

i wouldn't say i am staunch NDP but i usually vote for them 100% of time in provincial  .  

[blackbird]

1 hour ago, Politics1990 said:

i wouldn't say i am staunch NDP but i usually vote for them 100% of time in provincial  .  

Voting NDP is voting for Socialism.  All forms of Socialism are theft.   Socialism also is a failure where it has been tried.   

Our health care system is an example of a failure of Socialism.   Government runs it but can't put enough money into it to run it successfully.  Millions of people don't have their own doctor.  Thousands of people have died on waiting lists.   ERs close periodically.  Politicians don't have enough money at their disposal to fund it and the health care system is another government  bureaucracy likely over bloated with high-paid bureaucrats.  Politicians oversee it in a very broad sense as they determine the funding and are under other demands for every kind of service imaginable.  It is naive to think government can provide everything.  Is is also naive to think things will get better as time goes on.  

The Bible Prohibits Socialism — Knowing Scripture

There are many reasons why we should believe the Bible.

Edited 10 hours ago by blackbird