LIBERAL SOFT ON CRIME STRIKES AGAIN: Man Attacks And Almost Kills Woman After Being Released Earlier In The Day For Another Violence Assault

Legato · April 27

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

No. Going off you just wrote I would suggest you go see a psychiatrist.

Only when you exhibit some sympathy for the victims.

taxme · April 27

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

But you have just described Trump.

Matthew 25

³³He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

³⁴“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. ³⁵For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, ³⁶I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

³⁷“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? ³⁸When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? ³⁹When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

⁴⁰“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

No, i have not described Trump like you have at all. I am describing what the lieberals are and have been doing for the past ten years under Turdeau, and under Corney, the same destruction of Canada will carry on for the next five years. Only imbeciles will vote for lieberals in the next election.

It is obvious to me that you have been asleep for the past ten years. Give me some examples of what the lieberasl have done to try and make Canada great again. I saw sweet nothing being done at all, except lying, stealing and corruption running rampant. You cannot be that stunned to not have noticed all of that happening?

CITIZEN_2015 · April 27

13 minutes ago, taxme said:

I do hope that PP brings back capital punishment, and put a moratorium on immigration. We need a break from the millions of new immigrants coming from the rest of the third world.

He will never do any of these. He doesn't have the balls and all he cares is for himself. Only PPC may do these bur I am not going to waste my vote on a party who has zero chances of forming the next government.

taxme · April 27

8 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

He will never do any of these. He doesn't have the balls and all he cares is for himself. Only PPC may do these bur I am not going to waste my vote on a party who has zero chances of forming the next government.

As far as i am concerned, you will be wasting your vote on another five years of liberalism. Why would you want to vote for a party that has not done a dam thing to try and make Canada great again? The lieberals have pretty much destroyed Canada. Maybe you can tell me as to what the lieberals have done for Canada in the past ten years to make it great?

blackbird · April 27

5 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Matthew 25

³³He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

This section of the Bible is apparently part of what is called the Olivet Discourse. It is prophecy about the future when the Lord returns. You can see that if you read Chapter 24 which precedes the part you posted.

There are three classes of people present: the sheep, the goats, and the brethren.

But the point I am making here is this is prophecy about the future events at the Lord's return after the Great Tribulation. It is not specifically referring to today. It is referring to how the gentile nations treated the brethren, who are the Jews, God's chosen people. This would require some study to understand. I admit I am not up on the details of the Olivet Discourse. But if you want to look into it you can.

Just do a search with words something like: dispensational interpretation of Olivet Discourse.

I would have to do some serious studying to really get into those verses and what they mean.

Edited April 27 by blackbird

blackbird · Sunday at 04:01 AM

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

You people act as if mental illness doesn't exist or that the only way to treat it is harshly and with lots of prejudice.

Nobody said mental illness doesn't exist. That is you making a false accusation.

If someone with mental problems is committing crimes and harming or killing innocent citizens, any sane person would say they should not be on the loose regardless of the offender's mental state. If they are mentally ill, they should be in a mental institution under the watch of security guards 24/7. I don't see that as harsh or prejudicial. It is just common sense. There is no other way to protect society.

eyeball · Sunday at 04:02 AM

3 hours ago, Legato said:

Only when you exhibit some sympathy for the victims.

Been there done that before...did you think this is the first I've tangled with right wing cawksuckers over your disgusting medieval attitudes towards mental illness? Our entire society has been a victim of these attitudes since before medieval times.

Expressions of sympathy from lefties just pisses you people off more. You people use victims as props in your drive to see mental illness treated with vengeance instead of justice never mind with psychiatry.

CdnFox · Sunday at 04:07 AM

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Been there done that before...did you think this is the first I've tangled with right wing cawksuckers over your disgusting medieval attitudes towards mental illness? Our entire society has been a victim of these attitudes since before medieval times.

Expressions of sympathy from lefties just pisses you people off more. You people use victims as props in your drive to see mental illness treated with vengeance instead of justice never mind with psychiatry.

So in other words what you're saying is you don't have any sympathy for the victim, to you it's just a demonstration and it's all just an act one way or another and you don't feel that the ACT gets you where you want to be. I mean it's not like you actually feel sorry and would express that obviously

And what a trash excuse. I mean you know that we're not going to be any happier with the idea that you're expressing sympathy for the killer, but you won't express sympathy for the victim because that might upset us. I would need a research team and a federal grant to think of a dumber excuse than that

You are an absolutely hideous person.

eyeball · Sunday at 04:12 AM

1 minute ago, blackbird said:

Nobody said mental illness doesn't exist.

That never stops you people from acting like it doesn't.

Your very first inclination when these attacks occur is to start beaking off about crime and punishment, usually severe, and of course lefties. You never pause to consider the reality of mental illness. So naturally when a lefty points it out...you go even more mental yourselves.

CdnFox · Sunday at 04:27 AM

12 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That never stops you people from acting like it doesn't.

This is the man who supports terrorism and has no sympathy for the woman who was beaten near to death

Nobody pretends that it doesn't exist. Everybody says it exists. In fact harper did as much as a federal government could do to address that fact and it was a personal project of his.

But your answer was safe supply and catch and release.

And mental health has nothing to do with whether or not a criminal should be locked up. If you want to say that he should be locked up and while incarcerated receive proper mental health treatment so that one day he might be able to be a part of society again, sure knock yourself out.

But that does not change the fact that if he is out on the street he is going to hurt or kill innocent people and you have no problem with that because you don't give a shit about their rights but you care all day and all night about the rights of a criminal who beats and tries to murder women.

You are such a shoe stain.

eyeball · Sunday at 04:31 AM

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So in other words what you're saying is you don't have any sympathy for the victim, to you it's just a demonstration and it's all just an act one way or another and you don't feel that the ACT gets you where you want to be. I mean it's not like you actually feel sorry and would express that obviously

I notice there isn't a single word of sympathy towards the victim in your OP. Your entire thrust and focus is on demonstrating why lefties are to blame.

It's your signature act and where you want to be with it is center stage, all the time.

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You are an absolutely hideous person.

You people are the bane of human existence. Everything you do makes things suck.

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But that does not change the fact that if he is out on the street he is going to hurt or kill innocent people and you have no problem with that

Pffft... You're just trolling, fùck off.

eyeball · Sunday at 04:43 AM

32 minutes ago, blackbird said:

If someone with mental problems is committing crimes and harming or killing innocent citizens, any sane person would say they should not be on the loose regardless of the offender's mental state. If they are mentally ill, they should be in a mental institution under the watch of security guards 24/7. I don't see that as harsh or prejudicial. It is just common sense.

Except it was harsh and prejudicial and cruel and that's why so many old institutions were shut down.

Judges know perfectly well that prisons are no place to be sending patients.

36 minutes ago, blackbird said:

There is no other way to protect society.

Sure there is, we build a bunch of proper hospitals where mental illness can be treated more effectively than it is now and if required facilities where they can be safely and caringly maintained like any other patient that needs permanent care.

First of all though we need to improve public attitudes and awareness of mental illness.

CdnFox · Sunday at 04:51 AM

12 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I notice there isn't a single word of sympathy towards the victim in your OP. Your entire thrust and focus is on demonstrating why lefties are to blame.

Sure, the topic was about our system, I didn't offer sympathy for the Attacker or the victim in fact I didn't even blame the attacker. I said this happened because the system is broken and the liberals broke it. Which is true.

But you're the one who introduced that subject. You came out and said wait a minute we need to think of the people here and the most important thing is to think about the poor attacker and his rights.

And then when someone said "what about the victim" your answer was essentially "fcuk her. i won't waste my time with sympathy for her"

And once again you try and make your stupidity my fault

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You people are the bane of human existence. Everything you do makes things suck.

Sure, preventing women from being beaten near to death would certainly make things suck more without a doubt.

Of course your claim is that what really makes things suck is that we haven't treated this guy for mental health issues. But your liberals have been in power for 10 years and could have done something at any point during that time other than just releasing them into the public. So the fact that they are being released instead of getting mental help is still your fault

So no, it's still you that makes the world suck

And you can dismiss the facts and the truth as trolling but the end of the day you're a fcuking horrible person who gives a shit more about the rights of a violent offender than the person he beat near to death. Just like you care more about the terrorists than the innocent civilians killed in Israel, just as you're Happy to see a medical executive killed, etc etc. Maybe like them you feel that she had it coming. Does anyone know what she was doing in 1948?

You always consistently show no care for the people who are hurt and side with the people who are doing the violence consistently. Maybe you should think about that

If you were not on this planet it would be a better place. If you're kind were not on this planet it would be a fantastic place

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Except it was harsh and prejudicial and cruel and that's why so many old institutions were shut down.

Judges know perfectly well that prisons are no place to be sending patients.

So it's not cruel and harsh to allow them the freedom to beat women to death on the streets? You wouldn't say that's cruel and harsh at all?

And no actually it was not the judges who shut down those places.

CdnFox · Sunday at 10:27 AM

5 hours ago, eyeball said:

Except it was harsh and prejudicial and cruel and that's why so many old institutions were shut down.

Man accused of trying to kill Vancouver visitor has been released | News

Oh look you got your wish! They're respecting his rights and letting him go back out on the street to attack the next person. No problem with that at all right? That's what you wanted to see, so there you go. I'll let you know if he attacks anyone else so you can get in touch with them and explain how it's all their fault. Assuming they're not dead of course

blackbird · Sunday at 01:14 PM

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure there is, we build a bunch of proper hospitals where mental illness can be treated more effectively than it is now and if required facilities where they can be safely and caringly maintained like any other patient that needs permanent care.

That is exactly what I am talking about. You can call it a hospital or a mental institution. But that is where they need to be kept. Who says a person with mental illness cannot be treated in a mental institution? You? You think a hospital can treat them better? I don't think you understand. A mental institution is for treating patients with mental problems. That is where the psychiatrists and mental health workers work. That is why it is called a mental institution.

The normal definition for a hospital is a place where sick people are treated. People with long term or life long mental problems have to have a place that is designed for their requirements. There never was anything wrong with mental institutions. They were built and staffed by people who were specifically trained to deal with the mentally ill. Hospitals are staffed by medical doctors and nurses and they are not the same profession as people trained to deal with mental patients.

We just had an man drive a car into a Filipino celebration in Vancouver and killed at least nine people. The guy who did this was known to police. Is this another example that shows what I am talking about? Is this a man who killed all these people another one who was out on the loose with mental problems because of the Liberal/NDP soft-on-crime laws? We will see.

The bottom line is we need to protect society from dangerous people who harm other people. They can't be left out on the streets to endanger others.

Edited Sunday at 01:19 PM by blackbird

Legato · Sunday at 02:44 PM

10 hours ago, eyeball said:

Been there done that before...did you think this is the first I've tangled with right wing cawksuckers over your disgusting medieval attitudes towards mental illness? Our entire society has been a victim of these attitudes since before medieval times.

Expressions of sympathy from lefties just pisses you people off more. You people use victims as props in your drive to see mental illness treated with vengeance instead of justice never mind with psychiatry.

After that foul misguided diatribe it's demonstrably clear where your sympathies lie.

Radiorum · Sunday at 05:23 PM

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So in other words what you're saying is you don't have any sympathy for the victim,

He didn't say that. Any act of violence is a tragedy for both the victim and the perpetrator.

CdnFox · Sunday at 05:32 PM

4 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

He didn't say that.

He did say that.

And people who say that kind of thing often caveat with "of course any violence is a tragedy, BUT....." which is what happened here

And no any violence isn't a tragedy to the perpetrator. The victim, yes but the perp is not a 'tragic figure'. They are a violent person who hurts and or kills other people. They must be confined until that is permanently addressed one way or another and right now when they are arrested they are allowed back on the street to commit crimes again for months until their trials come up.

This guy was out on bail from committing another violent offense. If you let a rabid dog play with your children, it's a tragedy for the children when they are bitten and die but for you it's extreme negligence and for the dog it's irrelevant because it has rabies and there's only one answer and that's a bullet in the head.

Will you tell the next woman he beats up or kills how tragic it is for him?

Get your head on straight. There is absolutely no excuse in the slightest for pretending that this person is some sort of victim himself or that he shouldn't have been locked up where he couldn't hurt other people. If you want to go on to say as a society we should be looking at better ways to provide mental health services then fine but that does not change what I have said

Your kind always goes on about what a poor terrible fate the perpetrator who beat a woman near to death is suffering. The victim here is the woman. It's pathetic I need to tell you that

WestCanMan · Sunday at 06:42 PM

Leftists: "That man was a VICTIM, dammit. This story is a testament to his tragedy, and the woman who was almost killed is an afterthought. In fact, she was probably just a CPC racist who deserved it. We need more victims like him released, not less. ALL HAIL CARNEY!"

eyeball · Sunday at 10:39 PM

9 hours ago, blackbird said:

That is exactly what I am talking about. You can call it a hospital or a mental institution. But that is where they need to be kept. Who says a person with mental illness cannot be treated in a mental institution? You? You think a hospital can treat them better? I don't think you understand. A mental institution is for treating patients with mental problems. That is where the psychiatrists and mental health workers work. That is why it is called a mental institution.

You get it, good for you.

9 hours ago, blackbird said:

The normal definition for a hospital is a place where sick people are treated. People with long term or life long mental problems have to have a place that is designed for their requirements. There never was anything wrong with mental institutions. They were built and staffed by people who were specifically trained to deal with the mentally ill. Hospitals are staffed by medical doctors and nurses and they are not the same profession as people trained to deal with mental patients.

They were hell-holes not that long ago, underfunded, understaffed, out of sight and concern of a largely uncaring ignorant society. Finally it couldn't be ignored any longer as court cases involving human and patient rights mounted along with pressure on governments to do something.

So governments started shutting them down without thinking through the consequences of doing so. This is a decades old problem.

9 hours ago, blackbird said:

We just had an man drive a car into a Filipino celebration in Vancouver and killed at least nine people. The guy who did this was known to police. Is this another example that shows what I am talking about? Is this a man who killed all these people another one who was out on the loose with mental problems because of the Liberal/NDP soft-on-crime laws? We will see.

It looks more like another example of not having adequate facilities for the treatment and housing of people who are suffering serious mental illness.

This facet of the tragedy is entirely an issue of soft-on-health-spending by governments, politicians and of course the most ignorant supporters of right wing conservative governments that would rather punish people for their illness instead of treating them. Treatment is just too much like coddling which plays into the opportunity to continue stigmatizing mental illness, pumping up the desire for punishment over treatment and of course demonizing the left.

9 hours ago, blackbird said:

The bottom line is we need to protect society from dangerous people who harm other people. They can't be left out on the streets to endanger others.

That's right, we do. The problem is we can't leave them in underfunded understaffed hell-holes that are out of sight and concern of society. Jurisprudence and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms won't stand for it. Neither will most lefties I'm afraid.

Edited Sunday at 10:41 PM by eyeball

eyeball · Sunday at 10:42 PM

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Man accused of trying to kill Vancouver visitor has been released | News

Oh look you got your wish! They're respecting his rights and letting him go back out on the street to attack the next person. No problem with that at all right? That's what you wanted to see, so there you go. I'll let you know if he attacks anyone else so you can get in touch with them and explain how it's all their fault. Assuming they're not dead of course

No problem at all if we find out it's you he attacks, I'll definitely be LMAO.

blackbird · Sunday at 10:48 PM

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

the most ignorant supporters of right wing conservative governments that would rather punish people for their illness instead of treating them.

Funny how the BC Conservative Party said they support compulsory treatment. So it looks like you are just making things up. The never said anything about punishing them. If they have committed crimes, then perhaps they do need punishment and treatment.

WestCanMan · Sunday at 11:00 PM

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No problem at all if we find out it's you he attacks, I'll definitely be LMAO.

Of course you'd laugh.

You're still laughing at the people who were injured or killed by the covid jabs, you vile little piece of sh1t. You're still laughing at people who lost their jobs because they didn't want to put snake oil in their veins.

Ironically enough, you're still butthurt about something that happened to your distant kin from back in Scotland over 330 years ago.

That's called "a pathetic (even psychotic) mix of hypocrisy and amorality".

The reality is that you and exflyer are the posters here who have to hope that karma isn't really a thing.

CdnFox · Sunday at 11:46 PM

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No problem at all if we find out it's you he attacks, I'll definitely be LMAO.

Of course, because you don't care about violence. You were laughing your ass off when it was the woman. All you care about is what your echo chamber tells you is important if people have to die in order to support that then you're perfectly fine with that. You've made that quite clear.

Radiorum · Thursday at 01:07 AM

On 4/27/2025 at 1:32 PM, CdnFox said:

If you let a rabid dog play with your children

People unable to function peacefully in society are not rabid dogs. Should they be kept out of society? Yes, of course. There's the safety of all the rest to consider. But crazy things can happen to the human mind, and I am not here to judge.