Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
 
 I find that all the primarily do to Canadians these days is lie to, deceive us while they scam us and our unborn children to fund their radical BS. so what would make any of you think they wouldn't do such with an election result as well?!
 
 Let's begin with that before Trudeau announced his resignation Canadians have been urging for an election in growing numbers primarily because of MP's being complicit in working against Canadian citizens by supporting the infiltrating WEF agenda primarily with their two party coalition which has proven to be a trojan horse for the WEF agenda here in Canada raining nightmares upon Canadian lives.
 
 What Canadians support making our kids drug addicts under the guise of safe supply?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians support illegal invasion and mass immigration so Canadians can go homeless and be replaced by illegal invaders claiming refugee status and being paid by the federal so called government $224.00 dollars per day for simply being an illegal claiming refugee status meanwhile Canadians on subsidy and homeless only get 340.00 per month?! Replacement happening right in our faces. Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians want to shut down our energy our energy supply and move industries to other countries so Canadians can suffer? Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians support a climate hoax used to turn Canadians into slaves who can barely afford to feed their families and as growing numbers go to food banks are finding illegal invaders claiming refugee status and getting $224.00 per day also clearing out the food banks?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians support Canadians starving? Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians support pipelines being blocked in Canada while the guy infiltrating the PM's chair who to my understanding has ties to a company he was recently CEO of buying pipelines in the USA so they can charge Canada for using their pipelines while the guy currently infiltrating the PM chair, like Trudeau advocates against pipelines in Canada?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians advocate Canadians having to lie for woke zombies such as the lgbt? If you are going to accept such factually proven foundations of lies or advocate such lies or lie for woke zombies such as the lgbt then all you deserve is to be lied to and you have no leg to stand upon in speaking against being lied too because you yourself advocate people to lie by supporting lies such as the lgbt represents period. If they try telling you that being born with a penis makes you a male is your opinion (as these mentally weak and pathetic zombies always try to call fact opinion) to try and make some pathetic argument out of them deliberately ignoring the primary fact that if you are conceived with XY chromosomes then you are born the only kind of human male that exists and if you are conceived with XX chromosomes then you are born the only kind of female that exists. If one of them blubbers to you that the lgbt is weak while trying to get you to go along with their lies, this is because instead of making them strong, they want to use the lgbt to try and make everyone else weak and pathetic because a weak and pathetic population is easier to divide and conquer then a mentally stable one. Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians support newcomers getting away with violent crimes and being let out on the street (catch and release thus deliberately placing Canadians lives in danger) while Canadians defending themselves against violent crime are made out to be criminals and being charged with such thing as excessive force as well being imprisoned for a long time to make the general population of Canadians weak and defenseless?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadians support those infiltrating our government passing legislation to assist them with scamming Canadian citizens while also taking action to make criminals out of Canadians for seeking justice for them scamming Canadians?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadian citizens support billions of tax dollars wasted on government hiring consultants to show them how to scam, lie too, cheat and steal from Canadians and get away with it?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 What Canadian citizens support a media that is so bias and corrupt since 2015 that the most reliable information that comes form them is the weather forecast?! Oh right, those infiltrating our parliament representing the interests of leftist/globalist insiders and those outside the country.
 
 Anyway as I am confident many of you are aware I could go on and on but time to get to the heart of this release.
 
 So Canadians are fed up with them but they still use tax dollars to fund and demand the media to misinform the public to try and make them look like we all live in their delusional world. They use the media to attack conservatives at every turn (when has the main stream media attacked leftist parties since 2015? So extremely bias). They have polls taken in woke infestations to push such rubbish upon the public like it holds any clout in general. They even go so far as to try and dupe Canadians into thinking most Canadians support them when realistically after what they have done to Canada they would be lucky to remain as political parties even winning a couple of seats. Doug Ford said he wouldn't run if Pierre won the election as I recall so he called an early election before the Federal election and one has to wonder is this because he was given insider information that the federal election was poised for being stolen from the start? The last two elections were rigged by conservatives tabling liberal platforms thus leaving Canadians without anyone to represent us, to vote for who could win the PM chair and so with less than 40 percent of the country voting we got stuck with the bottom of the barrel clinging to governing positions. Then we got Ford and his campaign manager Kory going on about what Pierre thinks about the polls when any rational Canadian can see that our system has been sabotaged in many ways and easily understands Pierre's skepticism on any so called polls being even close to ball park numbers.
 
  So why would they be trying to use the bias media and bias pollsters to try and dupe Canadians into making them look formidable? I suspect because they plan to throw your votes in the garbage and announce that Canadians love to be abused by those conspiring against Canadians with the World Economic Forum as they use the main stream media to make five percent of Canadians that support such rubbish (primarily because they are insiders or woke zombies) look like 60 percent while also trying to make themselves look like responsible leaders.
 
 A responsible leader finds ways to generate revenue so they do no have to tax citizens or go into debt. A radically irresponsible leader lies to citizens while stealing 750 billion dollars while using that money to fund media to misinform the public by spinning them in a good light under threat of media outlets losing funding and being cancelled.
 
 I have been as non partisan as I can over the years while doing my job and I must say that especially two parties have made a mockery of themselves with their leaders throwing their own parties under the bus until I made mention that they couldn't give a flying frig about their own party because the WEF agenda takes precedence. Once I stated that then they started to commit to convince their own parties that they actually cared which is when one of them soon after announced his resignation. If Jack Layton (RIP Jack) knew what was going on now I suspect he would likely be rolling in his grave so relentlessly that the friction would probably form a new volcano erupting right here in Canada.
 
 It's sad what has happened to Canada these past ten years and time to end it. Who wants some mentally redundant liars, deceivers and scammers dictating what you can or can't say, what you can or can't share based on their political weak and pathetic bias. They can't handle a level playing field because all these do primarily is lie and deceive, this is why they try and make you out to be haters and criminals for not going with their lies and deceptions. This is why they use the media to slander those who expose their lies and deceptions. This is why they ban you from online platforms to try and make it look like no one opposes their lies and deceptions as well prevent their massive opposition from coming together as much as these pathetic individuals conspiring with the WEF against the citizens of Canada can.
 
 So now you know why I suspect they may be planning to throw your votes in the garbage and make up whatever rubbish they can. Hey they control the now bias media desperately trying to make it look like they can win. They have been forcing the same WEF lies upon Canadians that have been thrust upon several Western countries for decades whish is factual evidence of conspiracy unfolding on international levels. Some of those countries are trying to make criminals out of their opposition like Marine La Penn, or trying to de platform an entire party like in Germany to try and destabilize officials representing citizens instead of turning backs on citizens by representing the WEF agenda so I suspect the worst is possibly in store for Canada and it's looking like fake election results as opposed to a genuine voting system being used in genuine account. As far as I am concerned these parties no longer deserve a chance let alone stand a chance. Hey the previous two elections were rigged as I mentioned but now that the new leader of that party isn't fronting a liberal platform so what is next I am left to wonder because it seems never ending lately?!
 
 Hey Pierre, the more candidates running in your riding the merrier eh ...
 
 Despite my skepticism I do plan on voting in hopes that the tally will be genuine so I urge you all to get out there and do the same if your haven't already.
 
Oh and I have decided to release the heavy hitter I have been working on after the election when contact information is available of which I will then also update my provincial and territorial contacts as well FYI. Normally I would have stayed on that but living in a tent without internet and hydro does slow things down a little.
 
 The Gist, use the media to try and make it look like they are formidable in attempt to use as justification to push fake election results while even asking if leaders will respect the results before hand in the public eye to try and subliminally implement that citizens do the same like a good little herd of brainless sheep.
 
love
 
Primary Factual Fundamentalist
World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Owen Sound Ontario Canada
Ps. Be good, be strong!
  • Like 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted

Are They About To Throw Your Votes In The Garbage And Stage Fake Election Results?

 

No. Probably not.  If you're worried about it volunteer as a scrutineer.  Also, you need to change therapists. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

This is unhinged. 

This is a direct result of government abuse towards Canadians over the past ten years. This is hinged speaking against the unhinged methodology of governing officials conspiring with the WEF against the citizens of Canada. If you refer to those who speak against the credibility of compulsive obsessive lists and deceivers as unhinged then it clearly reveals you as what is clearly unhinged.

 

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Are They About To Throw Your Votes In The Garbage And Stage Fake Election Results?

 

No. Probably not.  If you're worried about it volunteer as a scrutineer.  Also, you need to change therapists. 

You so eagerly embrace trusting compulsive obsessive liars and deceivers which is another clear indication you have WEF sock puppet written all over your face. Unlike you I don't have a therapist.

 

 I am the worlds top therapist in the good fight for the well being and sanity of current and future generations of the life on this planet more like it there Sonny Bunch.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Political Smash said:

You so eagerly embrace trusting compulsive obsessive liars and deceivers 

Nonsense, I've never embraced you even once

Quote

I don't have a therapist.

I think we may have detected part of your problem :)  

Quote

 I am the worlds top therapist in the good fight for the well being and sanity of current and future generations of the life on this planet more like it there Sonny Bunch.

I think we may have detected the rest of your problem :)  

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

If you look at the level of lying and gaslighting coming at us from the federal government and MSM these days, it's hard to imagine why elections would be any less bogus. 

What would be the point of putting all that time and money into disinformation for 4 years just to chance it all on an election? 

I'll admit that I couldn't read the OP because I don't do manifestos, but I did see a majority of Canadians welcome fascism in 2021, and I still don't see any of those maggots showing signs of remorse.

Given the option to have 1-party rule does anyone think that eyeball, exflyer, aristedes, M Hardner, myata, etc would blink? 

If Carney just called off the election tonight and announced himself emperor, they'd be high-fiving and lining up to kiss the ring. 

  • Haha 2

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
28 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you look at the level of lying and gaslighting coming at us from the federal government and MSM these days, it's hard to imagine why elections would be any less bogus. 

What would be the point of putting all that time and money into disinformation for 4 years just to chance it all on an election? 

I'll admit that I couldn't read the OP because I don't do manifestos, but I did see a majority of Canadians welcome fascism in 2021, and I still don't see any of those maggots showing signs of remorse.

Given the option to have 1-party rule does anyone think that eyeball, exflyer, aristedes, M Hardner, myata, etc would blink? 

If Carney just called off the election tonight and announced himself emperor, they'd be high-fiving and lining up to kiss the ring. 

The process just doesn't allow for it nearly as much. We don't have nearly the holes that the American system has. And every riding hasn't scrutineers to make sure exactly that kind of thing doesn't happen. This is why we've never moved to electric tally machines.

I'm sure many people here haven't done screwed nearing, although every single person should have at least once, but they're just aren't a lot of opportunities to interject or tamper with balance as long as the parties send out scrutineers. Sure, we have a certain level of election fraud every election but it is tiny, it is easy to detect, and it never amounts to anything substantial. And if the vote is close a recount will happen And any irregularities would tend to be picked up.

I mean it's theoretically sort of possible but not really, and would require massively coordinated efforts to happen on any kind of substantial scale. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
57 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you look at the level of lying and gaslighting coming at us from the federal government and MSM these days, it's hard to imagine why elections would be any less bogus. 

What would be the point of putting all that time and money into disinformation for 4 years just to chance it all on an election? 

I'll admit that I couldn't read the OP because I don't do manifestos, but I did see a majority of Canadians welcome fascism in 2021, and I still don't see any of those maggots showing signs of remorse.

Given the option to have 1-party rule does anyone think that eyeball, exflyer, aristedes, M Hardner, myata, etc would blink? 

If Carney just called off the election tonight and announced himself emperor, they'd be high-fiving and lining up to kiss the ring. 

Bullshit. I always support whoever wins because I want them to do a good job for the country. That's all that really matters. I've voted for enough losers in my time not to get upset about it or take it personally. I'm not too concerned if either one of them wins. 

 

As far as an election being fixed is concerned, no party has ever made that accusation, ever. And this bullshit about pencils. FFS we have been using pencils since Christ was a cowboy regardless of who won. 

A Trump supporter accusing others of supporting fascism. That's rich.

  • Like 3
Posted
12 hours ago, Aristides said:

A Trump supporter accusing others of supporting fascism. That's rich.

You lived, breathed, supported and loved fascism, and you still look back on it with a warm glow. 

It's the epitome of hypocrisy for you to look down your nose at Hitler's minions with contempt. You woulda been front and center if you were there in that moment. 

 

If you seriously think about all the support that Trudeau got from the MSM when he was doing all his lying, committing his scandals, and asking Canadians if the unvaxed should even be tolerated, and then all the support that Carney got despite his lying and questionable connection to this country, and all the billions of dollars that the MSM got from the LPOC within 2 months of the last 4 elections, what makes you think our MSM would follow a legitimate story about election cheating? Why would they do that if their party 'won'? They'd only be one more false narrative away from victory. Why wouldn't they just keep lying?

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You lived, breathed, supported and loved fascism, and you still look back on it with a warm glow. 

It's the epitome of hypocrisy for you to look down your nose at Hitler's minions with contempt. You woulda been front and center if you were there in that moment. 

 

If you seriously think about all the support that Trudeau got from the MSM when he was doing all his lying, committing his scandals, and asking Canadians if the unvaxed should even be tolerated, and then all the support that Carney got despite his lying and questionable connection to this country, and all the billions of dollars that the MSM got from the LPOC within 2 months of the last 4 elections, what makes you think our MSM would follow a legitimate story about election cheating? Why would they do that if their party 'won'? They'd only be one more false narrative away from victory. Why wouldn't they just keep lying?

Why do you assume I voted for the Liberals under Trudeau? I'm a fiscal conservative and he certainly wasn't. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Why do you assume I voted for the Liberals under Trudeau? I'm a fiscal conservative and he certainly wasn't. 

Everyone assumes it because you constantly defend the liberal position. The same reason everybody else that tries to pretend that they're not liberals and yet spends their time defending the liberal position gets called the liberal. I think we could all understand if it was once in awhile and it was regarding a specific issue but you and many like you are pretty consistently on the liberal side of things.

Are you telling us now that you voted conservative during those votes? Are you voting conservative now because considering that the current liberals including Carney are the same liberals that have been in power for ages?

No? you're not saying that? hmmmmmm

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Why do you assume I voted for the Liberals under Trudeau? I'm a fiscal conservative and he certainly wasn't. 

Same reason I assume that Donald Trump Jr voted for Trump. 

I didn't see him mark the ballot, or put it in the box, but I'm pretty sure...

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The process just doesn't allow for it nearly as much. We don't have nearly the holes that the American system has. And every riding hasn't scrutineers to make sure exactly that kind of thing doesn't happen. This is why we've never moved to electric tally machines.

I'm sure many people here haven't done screwed nearing, although every single person should have at least once, but they're just aren't a lot of opportunities to interject or tamper with balance as long as the parties send out scrutineers. Sure, we have a certain level of election fraud every election but it is tiny, it is easy to detect, and it never amounts to anything substantial. And if the vote is close a recount will happen And any irregularities would tend to be picked up.

I mean it's theoretically sort of possible but not really, and would require massively coordinated efforts to happen on any kind of substantial scale. 

You have a point here but, like several here, I have lost all trust in "the institutions".

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

You have a point here but, like several here, I have lost all trust in "the institutions".

Sure, although i think  you know me well enough to know i'm going to say "well then volunteer to scruitineer" :) 

There's nothing wrong with a healthy level of distrust. As long as you don't let it cloudy judgment

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Same reason I assume that Donald Trump Jr voted for Trump. 

I didn't see him mark the ballot, or put it in the box, but I'm pretty sure...

That's just f*cking stupid. I've never met any of the leaders, let alone be one of their sons.

Posted
54 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sure, although i think  you know me well enough to know i'm going to say "well then volunteer to scruitineer" :) 

There's nothing wrong with a healthy level of distrust. As long as you don't let it cloudy judgment

So how does the chain of command over vote totals work?

So 1 guy watches a bunch of ballots get counted, and then they get to follow that vote count right to the point where it gets put on the official total that gets put on TV? 

How do they know if the votes that were dropped before he dropped he got there to drop his off were all legit? Maybe he's the first one, but there are already a few boxes there?

How does a scrutineer know if all the people on the voter roll that came to drop off ballots were legit? Where I drop mine off there's only 1 person there scratching off names. What if 50 people all come along and say "I'm Tony Soprano" and they all get in to vote? 

How do they know if a different couple of scrutineers are really "us and them" groups, or if leftards just posed as humans to get in on a fake vote count? 

How do they know if other polling stations are legit? What if there are a bunch of votes come in from MLK elementary but there wasn't even a polling station there? 

What if you're working with this guy?

"Hey, who voted for Bugsy?"

If it works on this guy below, it will work on Aristedes, myata, eyeball, exflyer, etc:

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
13 minutes ago, Aristides said:

That's just f*cking stupid. I've never met any of the leaders, let alone be one of their sons.

No, what's stupid is how far up Trudeau's ass your head has been for 9 years. 

If you're not one of his sons or his mom then you have no excuse for your ridiculous blind loyalty. 

  • Sad 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:

So how does the chain of command over vote totals work?

So 1 guy watches a bunch of ballots get counted, and then they get to follow that vote count right to the point where it gets put on the official total that gets put on TV?

 

Kind of. Except it's not one guy.

The sealed boxes are openedone election person and then one person from each of the parties review the ballots one by one and do a tally. They agree on whether or not a valid is spoiled and they agree on the final count. This number is accorded officially and they can keep a copy of what each of the writing ballots came in at.

That information will be forwarded but can be reviewed in the event of any discrepancy and any of the scrutineers can report any Shenanigans or differences that they feel may exist.

Further the ballot numbers are recorded and even though we don't have the names associated with the ballot we do have whether or not it was a, a process which is also subject to the scrutineers and verification. So every party is watching over this to the point where the record is finalized and that can be double checked later if necessary. 

And as you know each riding has several ballot areas, so if conservative scruitineers come back to their riding And they all agreed that the candidate won in each of their ballot areas or even most of the valid areas and suddenly it's posted as a loss for that candidate they will be very aware of the fact that something is wrong. 

It is theoretically possible that some of the advanced poles could be tampered with. But that would involve duplicating an official elections Canada sealed box along with all of the seals, duplicated all of the correct ballots with their numbers in it, and then falsely marking them. You have to count all the ballots, then decide how many you would need to alter in order to change the outcome to your favor, and then either duplicate or modify those ones. And it is not really possible to take an eraser to them and erase the check mark without it being fairly obvious somebody did that which would be caught by the scrutineers when the ballots were counted. The effort would be insane, very likely you would be caught. And it would involve the cooperation of several levels of Elections Canada staff which is severely unlikely.

The amount of work necessary Would be vast and you'd have to do it on a fairly large scale for it to make any real difference. Again, not technically impossible but so difficult and so easy to be caught has to be improbable to an extremely high degree.

But they could always use more scrutineers for sure. There's never quite enough

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, what's stupid is how far up Trudeau's ass your head has been for 9 years. 

If you're not one of his sons or his mom then you have no excuse for your ridiculous blind loyalty. 

I'll say this just once. I have never voted for the Liberals under Trudeau. Now go f*ck yourself, you are in no position to accuse others of blind loyalty.

Edited by Aristides
  • Haha 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I'll say this just once. I have never voted for the Liberals under Trudeau. Now go f*ck yourself.

So you voted him into power you're saying. And then you didn't vote into elections and now you'll be voting for the same liberals that were under Trudeau now and pretend it's different.

I love that you try to win on some sort of weird technicality but it's pretty obvious that you support the liberals under Trudeau or not

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

No one watches CNN, and now no one votes for Trudeau 🤣

He kinda reminds me of that guy here who swears that he's a conservative, but who also thinks that Trudeau walks on water. 

  • Thanks 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No one watches CNN, and now no one votes for Trudeau 🤣

He kinda reminds me of that guy here who swears that he's a conservative, but who also thinks that Trudeau walks on water. 

Your own loyalty is so blind that you can't understand how anyone could vote according to their own principles instead of blind party loyalty. Just because I'm not  a fan of the Conservatives under PP doesn't make me a Trudeau loyalist, which I never have been. The one time I voted for a Trudeau led party was for his old man the first time during Trudeamania, the first federal election I was eligible to vote in. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Your own loyalty is so blind that you can't understand how anyone could vote according to their own principles instead of blind party loyalty.

My loyalty to whom?

And how could your "principles" lead you to vote for Carney?

  1. He's not Canadian
  2. He even calls himself a European
  3. He tells huge lies with alarming regularity... Several/most of his most important statements have been 100% false.
  4. He tries to pretend that his government would constitute some kind of huge change, but he was the LPOC economic advisor during this nosedive, and 150 of the Lib MPs are still the same. Including the 9 who colluded with China (colluding with a foreign gov't is suddenly ok now. Just ask @BeaverFever)
  5. His ties to the Chinese gov't, and those of his MP's, are quite deep and sinister. Even lucrative.

I'll just stop there for now.

Pray tell what "principles" are guiding you? From where I stand you look like you have all the morality of an asteroid. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted

Poilievre may lose his Ottawa-area riding as Liberals poised to sweep the region
 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is at risk of losing his Ottawa-area riding as the party scrambles to send in volunteers to save the seat he has held since 2004, two federal and two provincial Conservative sources say.

With several polls showing the Liberals poised to win the election, the loss of Mr. Poilievre’sCarleton riding would make it difficult for him to hang on to his federal party leadership post.

Federal election 2025 platform guide: Compare where the parties stand on major issues from Trump to housing

Party headquarters has for the past two weeks been sending workers into Mr. Poilievre’s riding, including experienced campaigners who would normally be assigned to tight races across the country, the four sources told The Globe and Mail.

The Globe is not identifying the Conservative sources, two of whom are from the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, because they were not authorized to discuss the Conservative campaign or internal polling.

They say the Poilievre Conservatives are also deploying troops from the party’s Ottawa war room to Conservative-held ridings, a sign in the final days of the campaign that the party may be poised to lose seats to the Mark Carney-led Liberals. It is standard practice in the final week of a campaign for war-room staff to be sent to ridings that are either vulnerable or have the chance of an upset victory.

The two sources from the Ontario party, and a senior federal Liberal, all with access to internal polling, say that Mr. Poilievre is in a dead heat with Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy in Carleton, a riding the Conservative Leader won with 52 per cent of the vote in 2021 and 46 per cent in 2019.

…..

 

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-federal-election-2025-pierre-poilievre-seat-ottawa-carleton-riding/
 

 

😂😂😂😂😂😂

Posted
2 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Poilievre may lose his Ottawa-area riding as Liberals poised to sweep the region
 

 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is at risk of losing his Ottawa-area riding as the party scrambles to send in volunteers to save the seat he has held since 2004, two federal and two provincial Conservative sources say.

With several polls showing the Liberals poised to win the election, the loss of Mr. Poilievre’sCarleton riding would make it difficult for him to hang on to his federal party leadership post.

Federal election 2025 platform guide: Compare where the parties stand on major issues from Trump to housing

Party headquarters has for the past two weeks been sending workers into Mr. Poilievre’s riding, including experienced campaigners who would normally be assigned to tight races across the country, the four sources told The Globe and Mail.

The Globe is not identifying the Conservative sources, two of whom are from the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, because they were not authorized to discuss the Conservative campaign or internal polling.

They say the Poilievre Conservatives are also deploying troops from the party’s Ottawa war room to Conservative-held ridings, a sign in the final days of the campaign that the party may be poised to lose seats to the Mark Carney-led Liberals. It is standard practice in the final week of a campaign for war-room staff to be sent to ridings that are either vulnerable or have the chance of an upset victory.

The two sources from the Ontario party, and a senior federal Liberal, all with access to internal polling, say that Mr. Poilievre is in a dead heat with Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy in Carleton, a riding the Conservative Leader won with 52 per cent of the vote in 2021 and 46 per cent in 2019.

…..

 

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-federal-election-2025-pierre-poilievre-seat-ottawa-carleton-riding/
 

 

😂😂😂😂😂😂

We addressed this in another thread. 

Turns out it was a false report. They based it on a "leaked" document from a pollster who has now said that he never did any polling at all like that. 

Sorry kiddo :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...