CdnFox Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 6 minutes ago, Fluffypants said: Also make sure you try her in a super red area. Also get a judge to say she was guilty without trial. Preferably one where their daughter will make a mint if she's found guilty Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 On 4/20/2025 at 10:13 AM, CdnFox said: No problem, just change the laws so that it isn't. That's what the democrats did to go after trump You are an lDIOT if you believe that laws can be changed to affect crimes retroactively. Of course you have NO EVIDENCE that any law was changed " to go after trump," Thanks for proving once again you have ZERO understanding of US LEGAL STANDARDS. 7 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Also make sure you try her in a super red area. Also get a judge to say she was guilty without trial. ^More SPECULATION with ZERO EVIDENCE. LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 Lol...Leticia James is being destroyed and the Libbies can't save her. So delicious. 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 10 hours ago, robosmith said: You are an lDIOT if you believe that laws can be changed to affect crimes retroactively. But they did. That is exactly what happened. They changed the law to affect the statute of limitations so that trump could be charged with sexual harassment long after the statute of limitations ran out Did you forget that? This already happened. This isn't a conspiracy theory, everybody knows this to be fact LOL poor robosmith, Work up the courage to talk to me again and in three milliseconds you wind up looking like a Retarded lunatic with short-term memory issues 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 7 hours ago, Nationalist said: Lol...Leticia James is being destroyed and the Libbies can't save her. So delicious. Quote AG is wrongly targeted by Trump AKA, you got BUPKIS. Quote Donald Trump is abusing the levers of government to launch an attack against New York Attorney General Tish James on what seem to be pretty flimsy claims of fraud. .... Pulte points to two instances, one in Virginia, and one in Brooklyn, concerning paperwork discrepancies, both which were corrected. On the Virginia home, which James helped her niece buy in 2023, there is a standard purchase agreement where James attests that she would make the home her principal residence. The home was for the niece and James was not to live there and on the much more important mortgage application for the property, James said correctly that it would not be her primary residence. No mortgage fraud there. .... Regarding a house that James owns in Brooklyn, an incorrect certificate of occupancy held by the city Department of Buildings says it is a five-family structure, but that was an error filed by a previous owner. There are only four units and the James mortgage reflects that. No mortgage fraud there. These patently phony charges, echoed by Trump using a presidential megaphone, are petty payback for James bringing legitimate civil charges against Trump for him actually faking the value of his New York properties to deceive lenders and insurers, real fraud that was proved in a court of law and for which he has been fined hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties. Strike 3, you're OUT. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 The uninitiated might think that @robosmith and his ilk are displaying the ultimate in hypocrisy. They are not. It is not a double standard, it is the standard. They fully believe that the laws should only apply to those that are not on their side. That is the standard. It is a basic tenet of communism/socialism/Marxism. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: The uninitiated might think that @robosmith and his ilk are displaying the ultimate in hypocrisy. They are not. It is not a double standard, it is the standard. They fully believe that the laws should only apply to those that are not on their side. That is the standard. It is a basic tenet of communism/socialism/Marxism. Too bad ^you don't understand the DIFFERENCE between the cases as DETAILED in the cite you DIDN'T READ. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 38 minutes ago, robosmith said: Too bad ^you don't understand the DIFFERENCE between the cases as DETAILED in the cite you DIDN'T READ. LMAO I wasn't talking about differences. I was talking about behavior. But let's do it this way. Trump's case was out of the statute of limitations and James brought the case any way. For Trump, she had NY extend the statute of limitationsfpor fraud to 6 years so she could pursue him. Now she is facing fraud charges for something that happened less than 6 years ago. So, you are correct, the cases are different. "...although the referral also raises questions about James' assertions in loan documents related to her 2023 purchase of a residence in Virginia." The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension. So, James can be convicted for her VA fraud because it is well under the statute of limitations. The other cases can be lumped in as supporting evidence even if she can't be convicted. Trump's case was only allowed to continue because they made up a campaign aspect to make it a felony and then extended the statute of limitations under the excuse of COVID. Then they forum shopped and put the trial in a disgustingly liberal area to ensure conviction despite clear manipulation by James. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 1 hour ago, robosmith said: AG is wrongly targeted by Trump AKA, you got BUPKIS. Strike 3, you're OUT. LMAO Not out at all Tweenkie-Poo. She's done. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 42 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Not out at all Tweenkie-Poo. She's done. ^ZERO evidence from gnat girl. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: The uninitiated might think that @robosmith and his ilk are displaying the ultimate in hypocrisy. They are not. It is not a double standard, it is the standard. They fully believe that the laws should only apply to those that are not on their side. That is the standard. It is a basic tenet of communism/socialism/Marxism. I kind of just thought he was an !diot. But yes it is a severe problem that the left doesn't want to acknowledge when they break a law or change a law but want us to think it's horrible heinous and deplorable when somebody else does exactly the same thing. And they wonder why they lose elections 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted April 23 Report Posted April 23 16 hours ago, robosmith said: ^ZERO evidence from gnat girl. LMAO Done. History. A disgrace. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted April 23 Report Posted April 23 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Done. History. A disgrace. Repeating the same EMPTY claims doesn't make them stronger; it just proves there is NO EVIDENCE. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 On 4/23/2025 at 11:05 AM, robosmith said: Repeating the same EMPTY claims doesn't make them stronger; it just proves there is NO EVIDENCE. You literally do that every day. Why would you discredit yourself? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 On 4/16/2025 at 3:25 PM, Radiorum said: Lol! The investigation stems from "media reports" - not any type of evidence. So blatantly corrupt! So transparently scummy. “Based on media reports,” federal housing director William J. Pulte wrote, “Ms. Letitia James has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire government backed assistance and loans and more favorable loan terms.” He listed several statutes he said James “could” have violated and urged the Justice Department to consider “criminal prosecution.” What are you getting at? Was this supposed to be based on an anonymous source, close to the AG? Is that the lofty level of corroboration that you need? 🤣 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 On 4/21/2025 at 11:55 PM, robosmith said: You are an lDIOT if you believe that laws can be changed to affect crimes retroactively. Of course you have NO EVIDENCE that any law was changed " to go after trump," Thanks for proving once again you have ZERO understanding of US LEGAL STANDARDS. ^More SPECULATION with ZERO EVIDENCE. LMAO Your tears aren't having the desired effect, but wipe your nose please. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 On 4/23/2025 at 9:05 AM, robosmith said: Repeating the same EMPTY claims doesn't make them stronger; it just proves there is NO EVIDENCE. The Russian collusion case just called. And Adam Schiff. And CNN. And Beave. They wanna know what you don't like about their formula. Apparently they take your opinion pretty seriously, because you're one of their most diehard cultists. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
robosmith Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: The Russian collusion case just called. And Adam Schiff. And CNN. And Beave. They wanna know what you don't like about their formula. Apparently they take your opinion pretty seriously, because you're one of their most diehard cultists. Apparently you STILL don't understand the STRONG evidence detailed in the Republican led Senate Intel Committee Report that's been posted for YOU here many times. Your denial won't make it go away. LMAO 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Your tears aren't having the desired effect, but wipe your nose please. ^DRIVEL. 1 Quote
User Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 8 hours ago, robosmith said: Apparently you STILL don't understand the STRONG evidence detailed in the Republican led Senate Intel Committee Report that's been posted for YOU here many times. Your denial won't make it go away. LMAO No, unlike you, I have read the report. You just read left-wing bloggers opinions and regurgitate them here half assed. 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 (edited) Rumor is that there is about to be a James perp walk. Edited April 27 by gatomontes99 1 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
West Posted April 27 Author Report Posted April 27 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: Rumor is that there is about to be a James perp walk. Hey ohhhhhhh 👋 👋 👋 1 Quote
Fluffypants Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 (edited) On 4/22/2025 at 1:27 PM, gatomontes99 said: I wasn't talking about differences. I was talking about behavior. But let's do it this way. Trump's case was out of the statute of limitations and James brought the case any way. For Trump, she had NY extend the statute of limitationsfpor fraud to 6 years so she could pursue him. Now she is facing fraud charges for something that happened less than 6 years ago. So, you are correct, the cases are different. "...although the referral also raises questions about James' assertions in loan documents related to her 2023 purchase of a residence in Virginia." The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension. So, James can be convicted for her VA fraud because it is well under the statute of limitations. The other cases can be lumped in as supporting evidence even if she can't be convicted. Trump's case was only allowed to continue because they made up a campaign aspect to make it a felony and then extended the statute of limitations under the excuse of COVID. Then they forum shopped and put the trial in a disgustingly liberal area to ensure conviction despite clear manipulation by James. Your thinking of the wrong case, that particular case was Braggs bs felony case with the judge that said pick whatever felony you want. Leticias case was the one where the judge determined Trump was guilty before there was a trial and then had a trial where the judge decided how much James was gonna take. Where at the initial appeals hearing the prosecutors essentially were begging not to be censured by the courts because the case was so bad. Either way, i warned the libiots that you take a shot at him you better actually hit. They opened this box and now its time to pay. There is a reason Biden pardoned so they couldn't get prosecuted. They thought if they get him legally he won't be able to win but the exact opposite happened. Edited April 27 by Fluffypants Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 (edited) 3 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Your thinking of the wrong case, that particular case was Braggs bs felony case with the judge that said pick whatever felony you want. Leticias case was the one where the judge determined Trump was guilty before there was a trial and then had a trial where the judge decided how much James was gonna take. Where at the initial appeals hearing the prosecutors essentially were begging not to be censured by the courts because the case was so bad. Either way, i warned the libiots that you take a shot at him you better actually hit. They opened this box and now its time to pay. There is a reason Biden pardoned so they couldn't get prosecuted. They thought if they get him legally he won't be able to win but the exact opposite happened. Oh Frick. There's so many bogus cases I get confused. Edit... No no. I'm thinking of the right one. It was just Bragg's case but similar in that it was bringing cases that ran out by bundling and upgrading. Edited April 27 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 On 4/22/2025 at 10:04 AM, CdnFox said: LOL poor robosmith, Work up the courage to talk to me again and in three milliseconds you wind up looking like a Retarded lunatic with short-term memory issues It's uncanny how similar he looks to the guy in the dictionary beside "ret4rded lunatic with memory issues". 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 Honestly, there's nothing better than seeing a slimy, deceitful aggressor getting hoisted on their own petard. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.