Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

A double standard?

It depends on an in-depth analysis of the issue. Perhaps he was able to find other ways that didn't contradict the law? It merits a good in depth analysis but probably in another topic. Should it be found that he openly defied a standing order of a court as in this case, it would certainly be a matter of concern.

So on the balance:

Trump's administration openly defied a standing court order. This is a fact now, and a precedent in the erosion of justice.

Biden's acts and actions need further analysis specifically in understanding: has he defied a standing order? Or changed his policies in a way that complies with the law? This can be an essential difference.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
11 hours ago, myata said:

Judiciary, on its own will not stand the onslaught and would fold, opening a clear path to dictatorship. America doesn't have two years. Those were fairy tales by the scared, fools and/or corrupted.

Democrat leadership failed to organize the resistance and is fading away. Mass citizen action is the only mean to halt the slide into tyranny; and it has to happen now.

It may just be the final warning.

What is your plan? Mass rioting and destruction daring Trump to commit genocide?

Posted
59 minutes ago, myata said:

Trump's administration openly defied a standing court order. This is a fact now, and a precedent in the erosion of justice.

False. 

The only fact here is that you refuse to provide any specifics or actual arguments beyond baseless assertions. 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, robosmith said:

What is your plan? Mass rioting

What an amazingly succinct illustration of the very core of the problem. The corruption has set in, and all healthy what still remains is weak and dumbfounded. What do we do? Where to run, who will help/save now?

Bullsh*t. Just bull. Evolution doesn't work this way, it couldn't care less about excuses, all of them and to be zillions power. You have to face the challenge, get over it and overcome it. This is how it's done, but you forgot. No ways no squeaks and waving hands, nothing else works. Get over or fail those are the choices, in the evolution not squeaking and screaming. Nobody's listening std, but some are sure laughing.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
15 hours ago, ironstone said:

A double standard?

https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/17/remember-when-biden-bragged-about-defying-scotus-and-corporate-media-shrugged/

Former President Joe Biden openly admitted to defying the Supreme Court multiple times during his administration — and the media barely blinked. But when President Donald Trump challenges a lower court ruling by an activist judge, the media frames it as a “constitutional crisis.” The glaring double standard isn’t accidental; it’s part of a calculated effort by the left-wing corporate media to peddle the phony narrative that Trump is an authoritarian threat.

Biden didn’t just defy the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling on student debt — he bragged about it.

“I promised to ease student debt for millions of folks. The Supreme Court blocked me, but it didn’t stop me,” Biden posted on X.

“The Supreme Court tried to block me from relieving student debt. But they didn’t stop me.” Biden doubled down months later. “I’m going to keep going.”

By Biden’s own admission, he was defying the Supreme Court. But the propaganda press’ response was nothing more than a shrug.

Axios’ Sareen Habeshian downplayed the Supreme Court’s ruling as a mere “setback,” noting that Biden was able to provide “relief” by “circumventing the need for Congressional or court approval.”

CNN’s Katie Lobosco reported how Biden “found ways” to continue canceling “student loan debt despite Supreme Court ruling.”

This is another case where it's hard to tell if you are being disingenuous, or whether you really don't know how any of this works. 

The SCOTUS didn't rule on the virtue of an objective. Rather, they rule on the legality of the means of execution.

Biden didn't "defy" or disregard their ruling, he applied other legal actions as a result of their ruling. 

Your argument is silly and self defeating. If he had defied the court he wouldn't have needed to find alternative ways to pursue his objective. Q.E.D.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

This is another case where it's hard to tell if you are being disingenuous, or whether you really don't know how any of this works. 

The SCOTUS didn't rule on the virtue of an objective. Rather, they rule on the legality of the means of execution.

Biden didn't "defy" or disregard their ruling, he applied other legal actions as a result of their ruling. 

Your argument is silly and self defeating. If he had defied the court he wouldn't have needed to find alternative ways to pursue his objective. Q.E.D.

Except, he did defy them, because he attempt to circumvent them was also ruled against. 

His plan b was abandoned as he was failing in the courts again. 

Pushing one obviously illegal debt forgiveness plan to immediately push another obviously illegal plan only to abandon it because it was bogged down in legal fights... is hardly anything to brag about Biden being some virtuous law abiding President. 

No, he kept pushing something illegal. 

2 hours ago, myata said:

What an amazingly succinct illustration of the very core of the problem. The corruption has set in, and all healthy what still remains is weak and dumbfounded. What do we do? Where to run, who will help/save now?

Bullsh*t. Just bull. Evolution doesn't work this way, it couldn't care less about excuses, all of them and to be zillions power. You have to face the challenge, get over it and overcome it. This is how it's done, but you forgot. No ways no squeaks and waving hands, nothing else works. Get over or fail those are the choices, in the evolution not squeaking and screaming. Nobody's listening std, but some are sure laughing.

The end is near! The end is near!

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Hodad said:

This is another case where it's hard to tell if you are being disingenuous, or whether you really don't know how any of this works. 

The SCOTUS didn't rule on the virtue of an objective. Rather, they rule on the legality of the means of execution.

Biden didn't "defy" or disregard their ruling, he applied other legal actions as a result of their ruling. 

Your argument is silly and self defeating. If he had defied the court he wouldn't have needed to find alternative ways to pursue his objective. Q.E.D.

It is CLEAR that Canucks are profoundly IGNORANT about many areas of US governance.

In part because the right wingers still believe FOS LIES. 🤮

  • Haha 1
Posted

Several episodes today confirming factually that Maga/Republican hybrid cult has began an all-out assault on the independent judiciary. Where the rule of law is gone, what "elections"? It can be the last, final call to wake up.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
28 minutes ago, myata said:

Several episodes today confirming factually that Maga/Republican hybrid cult has began an all-out assault on the independent judiciary. Where the rule of law is gone, what "elections"? It can be the last, final call to wake up.

Like what? What episodes and how did the confirm this?

Once again, you offer no substance. 

 

 

Posted

Laws can be ignored with impunity. Checks are meaningless. The American Constitutional Republic is dead - done for. The fact and the precedent.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
On 3/17/2025 at 6:09 AM, User said:

Your posts are little more than the crazed ramblings of a roadside doomsday preacher. 

You can't actually see it on the internet but he's actually naked and wearing nothing but a placard that says "the end is nigh" 

 

3 hours ago, myata said:

Several episodes today confirming factually that Maga/Republican hybrid cult has began an all-out assault on the independent judiciary. Where the rule of law is gone, what "elections"? It can be the last, final call to wake up.

By 'episodes' you mean when the voices talk to you right?

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, myata said:

Laws can be ignored with impunity. Checks are meaningless. The American Constitutional Republic is dead - done for. The fact and the precedent.

What are you talking about?

Again, nothing of substance. 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, robosmith said:

The SCOTUS didn't rule on the virtue of an objective. Rather, they rule on the legality of the means of execution.

And with Doge, as far as I can see, that's all the judges are doing, which is their role, but Jabba the Hutt and his Maga miscreants can't understand this.

  • Like 1
Posted

"When...". The paradise is always somewhere in the hazy future, but now you have to let go of anything you kept sound and normal. This is how it worked. It's in the books. There are no naives this time around. This can very well be the last line, and warning.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

What I find concerning, is the Libbie willingness to use violence in order to get their way.

On 3/17/2025 at 8:57 AM, myata said:

Mass citizen action is the only mean to halt the slide into tyranny; and it has to happen now.

And provide excuses for their craving for violent revolution. 

On 3/17/2025 at 11:01 AM, Aristides said:

The last barrier to dictatorship is being dismantled and it is being done without a peep from the nation that continually bragged about its constitution and checks. All a myth.

@Michael Hardner - Hey Mike. Is this the endgame of the culture war? A real war started by the Libbies? 

The population put up with surrenders, draconian Rona rules, the POTUS inviting an invasion through the borders, the war on fuel and the resulting inflation, the lies and deception. Trump wins the Whitehouse handily, begins to enact his promised agenda, and the Libbies get violent.

All rather...educational...eh Mike?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, myata said:

"When...". The paradise is always somewhere in the hazy future, but now you have to let go of anything you kept sound and normal. This is how it worked. It's in the books. There are no naives this time around. This can very well be the last line, and warning.

No, this is the last last last line, really this time, it really is the last line! 

  • Haha 1

 

 

Posted
On 3/17/2025 at 7:50 AM, myata said:

If Americans watch passively the demise of judicial independence, they can as well say farewell to their democracy, flawed and imperfect as it was. There are no such miracles in the entire universe. This may just be the final call.

Judges want illegal aliens IN, not OUT. This is why Trump wants SCOTUS to step in. 

Posted

This is an all-out assault on the rule of law. It's is not that they don't understand it, no. They will consciously and deliberately remove and dismantle all that stands in the way of an absolute, uncontested rule.  Democrat leaders are beyond naive - their helpless complacency borders on plain, senile dementia, insanity.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
17 minutes ago, myata said:

This is an all-out assault on the rule of law. It's is not that they don't understand it, no. They will consciously and deliberately remove and dismantle all that stands in the way of an absolute, uncontested rule.  Democrat leaders are beyond naive - their helpless complacency borders on plain, senile dementia, insanity.

The end is near! The end is near!

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, myata said:

This is an all-out assault on the rule of law. It's is not that they don't understand it, no. They will consciously and deliberately remove and dismantle all that stands in the way of an absolute, uncontested rule.  Democrat leaders are beyond naive - their helpless complacency borders on plain, senile dementia, insanity.

The problem is the rule of law was defeated under the democrats and no longer really exists. So this isn't an assault on the rule of law, this is just stepping over its dead body

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 3/17/2025 at 8:57 AM, myata said:

Judiciary, on its own will not stand the onslaught and would fold, opening a clear path to dictatorship. America doesn't have two years. Those were fairy tales by the scared, fools and/or corrupted.

Democrat leadership failed to organize the resistance and is fading away. Mass citizen action is the only mean to halt the slide into tyranny; and it has to happen now.

It may just be the final warning.

Let's see. President Trump took a GANG of illegal aliens WHO WERE COMMITTING CRIMES IN THIS COUNTRY.

He ordered them DEPORTED, which by law they are SUPPOSED TO BE. And the plane was outside of US airspace, headed to the El Salvador prison that those animals deserved.

A judge tries to inferfere with US Foreign Policy, which is what Trump's actions amounted to.

I agree there is a dictatorship on the horizon. It's coming from judges.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's not that cultists wouldn't understand the notion of law, no. They really, genuinely want to get rid of it for them it's an obstacle, "nasty" unnecessary and troublesome thing. They want to make the law whatever their idol says today, and then tomorrow. This is what they want and work toward and it's as simple as that.

You don't have two years. If everyone sits and waits patiently they'll bring it under in months. This is exactly what Germans did in 1933.

  • Thanks 1

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
51 minutes ago, myata said:

It's not that cultists wouldn't understand the notion of law, no. They really, genuinely want to get rid of it for them it's an obstacle, "nasty" unnecessary and troublesome thing. They want to make the law whatever their idol says today, and then tomorrow. This is what they want and work toward and it's as simple as that.

You don't have two years. If everyone sits and waits patiently they'll bring it under in months. This is exactly what Germans did in 1933.

Now we have months! OMG, The end is near, this is really really really going to be the last line!

 

  • Haha 1

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, User said:

Now we have months! OMG, The end is near, this is really really really going to be the last line!

 

The end is nigh-ish! 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,908
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...