Deluge Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Just because you FAIL to understand the science behind GHG warming the planet, and how permafrost melting is a tipping point, does not mean those who do are "the sky is falling crowd." How about you demonstrate what you do understand about it? Show us how permafrost melting will NOT cause runaway warming when all that methane is released into the atmosphere. Activism drives global warming, comrade. It's yet another reason why voters can't stand you guys. Quote
Nationalist Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 18 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: No, that it's a crisis 🤣 Do I misinterpret your post here? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Nationalist Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, robosmith said: IT's NOT just a "premise," it is a FACT that people are dying from unprecedented extreme weather events, like 100MPH winds in Los Angeles which cause $200B in damages. You not believing that is a CRISIS just illustrated the DEPTH of YOUR DENIAL. And you STILL don't understand what will happen when your permafrost melts. Just about anything REASONABLE. Duh "The poor" will suffer the most from the tragedy in the making because they are living in the flood plains and islands that will be swamped by sea level rise. Dissidents must be EDUCATED. Except you are IMMUNE to FACTS. You will EVENTUALLY UNDERSTAND when your IGNORANCE FAILS to PREPARE YOU for the permafrost melt. Unprecedented my a55. Are you trying to say LA has never seen 100mph winds? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, Legato said: Lies you mean? Many stories. Duh Citing multiple places that warm more than average doesn't make them lies. Can't you figure out why? Quote
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 15 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Unprecedented my a55. Are you trying to say LA has never seen 100mph winds? I have lived in So Cal for45 years and never seen nor heard of 100MPH winds in LA. Sometimes they blow hard in the valleys between mountains, BUT NOT in the flatness which is the CITY. Higher winds occurred in Pasadena and Altadena, which is NOT Los Angeles city What are the strongest winds in Los Angeles history? The strongest Santa Ana winds yet recorded occurred in early December 2011. An atmospheric set-up occurred that allowed the towns of Pasadena and Altadena in the San Gabriel Valley to get whipped by sustained winds at 97 mph (156 km/h), and gusts up to 167 mph (269 km/h). 1 Quote
Legato Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 28 minutes ago, robosmith said: Many stories. Duh Citing multiple places that warm more than average doesn't make them lies. Can't you figure out why? Each one came out as singular event "than the rest of the world", so which one is not a lie? 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 3 hours ago, eyeball said: Time will tell. Time has already told. As you yourself claim people have been Crying about the end of the world due to climate change for many decades now and yet here we are. The powers that be that have access to all of the information are very obviously not worried about this. They exploited for political reasons but they don't do anything, and that includes the liberals going all the way back to Kyoto. The climate will change slowly, we will adapt slowly, life will go on same as always. If that wasn't the case you'd have done something over the last decade Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 13 minutes ago, CdnFox said: As you yourself claim people have been Crying about the end of the world due to climate change The climate changes all the time, WTF do you mean by the end of the world exactly? 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: The climate will change slowly, we will adapt slowly, life will go on same as always. AGW is changing the environment to rapidly for many things to adapt. 17 minutes ago, CdnFox said: If that wasn't the case you'd have done something over the last decade My personally? I certainly did what I could but I'm just one guy. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Legato said: Each one came out as singular event "than the rest of the world", so which one is not a lie? Until you explain why you believe ANY are lies, NONE ARE. Your story format is unreadable. Quote
Legato Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 (edited) 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Until you explain why you believe ANY are lies, NONE ARE. Your story format is unreadable. every one contradicts the others, why cant you see that. Is this your thought process.... Edited March 18 by Legato Quote
Michael Hardner Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Do I misinterpret your post here? Yeah maybe? I've all missed the obvious part.... Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
robosmith Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 17 minutes ago, Legato said: every one contradicts the others, why cant you see that. Is this your thought process.... No it's YOUR TROLL PROCESS and irrelevant to your mashup of newspaper stories. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 hour ago, eyeball said: The climate changes all the time, WTF do you mean by the end of the world exactly? Exactly that. You claim the world is going to end. Mankind will be destroyed. The end of days due to climate change. Sorry, was there too many words in that sentence for you to follow along? You seem extra slow today Quote AGW is changing the environment to rapidly for many things to adapt. Okay, so let's see the scientific data on that. Seems that things are adapting fine to me but by all means let's look at the data together and see where we're at. You know, like the last thousand times I've asked you and you couldn't. Quote My personally? I certainly did what I could but I'm just one guy. You did nothing. Zero zilch nothing Worse you defended the people doing less than nothing, the liberals huge supporter of their carbon tax as I recall. Said they were way better than the conservatives when the conservatives are the only ones who have actually lowered emissions despite the liberals lying about it since Kyoto If you gave a crap you had 10 years to do something and you did nothing Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 4 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Exactly that. You claim the world is going to end. Mankind will be destroyed. The end of days due to climate change. Sorry, was there too many words in that sentence for you to follow along? You seem extra slow today No it's just that I never said any of these things. These are silly figments of your imagination. 4 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Okay, so let's see the scientific data on that. Seems that things are adapting fine to me but by all means let's look at the data together and see where we're at. You know, like the last thousand times I've asked you and you couldn't. You'll find everything you've ignored right here https://www.ipcc.ch/ 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You did nothing. Zero zilch nothing I spent thousands upgrading the insulation in my buildings including swapping out old inefficient windows. 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Worse you defended the people doing less than nothing, No, I've criticized people like you all along. 9 minutes ago, CdnFox said: the liberals huge supporter of their carbon tax as I recall. No, I've always supported Ralph Klein's and the Conservatives institution of carbon pricing back in 2007. 11 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Said they were way better than the conservatives when the conservatives are the only ones who have actually lowered emissions despite the liberals lying about it since Kyoto Yeah but Conservatives gave up...Liberals are no better. Neither is Eby btw. 13 minutes ago, CdnFox said: If you gave a crap you had 10 years to do something and you did nothing I spent thousands upgrading the insulation in my buildings including swapping out old inefficient windows. I've told you that many times too but you're a sea lion or sea donkey or something. 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 hour ago, eyeball said: No it's just that I never said any of these things. These are silly figments of your imagination. You have absolutely said all of those things. And more on top, claims that millions or billions will die from flooding at the coastlines because apparently they can't outrun the rise in water, as well as cleaning will have to have troops at the border to stop people from crossing into our land as they die of thirst. These are the things you claim. Quote You'll find everything you've ignored right here https://www.ipcc.ch/ There's absolutely nothing there. If you have a research paper somewhere then that's great but this is not a link to any kind of research at all. It would be like posting Wikipedia's address and saying the answer to your questions in there somewhere Quote I spent thousands upgrading the insulation in my buildings including swapping out old inefficient windows. That's about your heating cost, it doesn't do anything for climate change Quote No, I've criticized people like you all along. It's common to see people criticize their betters but all I'm doing is nothing. You support the people that do worse than nothing Quote No, I've always supported Ralph Klein's and the Conservatives institution of carbon pricing back in 2007. Ralph klein never did that. You realize long before implementation that it was the stupidest idea ever and would do nothing for climate change. The liberals dusted it off and realize they could use it to line their pockets and you supported them for over a decade Quote Yeah but Conservatives gave up...Liberals are no better. Neither is Eby btw. Conservatives never gave up. They were just honest about it. Quote I spent thousands upgrading the insulation in my buildings including swapping out old inefficient windows. I've told you that many times too but you're a sea lion or sea donkey or something. It's got nothing to do with climate change. That's the lower your heating bills and to make your living environment more comfortable. Not that there's anything wrong with that but it has absolutely nothing to do with you doing anything for climate change. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 hour ago, eyeball said: No it's just that I never said any of these things. These are silly figments of your imagination. You really should pay more attention: https://www.foxnews.com/science/10-times-experts-predicted-the-world-would-end-by-now GLOBAL WARMING TO WIPE NATIONS "OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH" IF CLIMATE CHANGE NOT ADDRESSED BY YEAR 2000 In 1989, the Associated Press relayed a warning from a U.N. official: "A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000." MASS STARVATION BY 1975 In 1967, a best-selling book came out called “Famine 1975! America’s Decision: Who Will Survive?” GLOBAL FREEZING AS DANGEROUS AS NUCLEAR WAR Global cooling was once a worry to many, such as University of California at Davis professor Kenneth Watt, who warned that present trends would make the world “eleven degrees colder in the year 2000 ... about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” MASSIVE WARMING BY THE YEAR 2000 The same U.N. official who predicted the loss of entire nations by the year 2000 also claimed: "the most conservative scientific estimate [is] that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years.” ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHE WILL CAUSE “NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST” BY THE YEAR 2000 In 1982, U.N. official Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program, warned: “By the turn of the century, an environmental catastrophe will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible, as any nuclear holocaust.” MASS EXTINCTION BY 1995 In 1970, Sen. Gaylord Nelson, D-Wisc., – often considered the “father of Earth Day” – cited the secretary of the Smithsonian, who “believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You really should pay more attention: https://www.foxnews.com/science/10-times-experts-predicted-the-world-would-end-by-now GLOBAL WARMING TO WIPE NATIONS "OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH" IF CLIMATE CHANGE NOT ADDRESSED BY YEAR 2000 In 1989, the Associated Press relayed a warning from a U.N. official: "A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000." MASS STARVATION BY 1975 In 1967, a best-selling book came out called “Famine 1975! America’s Decision: Who Will Survive?” GLOBAL FREEZING AS DANGEROUS AS NUCLEAR WAR Global cooling was once a worry to many, such as University of California at Davis professor Kenneth Watt, who warned that present trends would make the world “eleven degrees colder in the year 2000 ... about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” MASSIVE WARMING BY THE YEAR 2000 The same U.N. official who predicted the loss of entire nations by the year 2000 also claimed: "the most conservative scientific estimate [is] that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years.” ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHE WILL CAUSE “NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST” BY THE YEAR 2000 In 1982, U.N. official Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program, warned: “By the turn of the century, an environmental catastrophe will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible, as any nuclear holocaust.” MASS EXTINCTION BY 1995 In 1970, Sen. Gaylord Nelson, D-Wisc., – often considered the “father of Earth Day” – cited the secretary of the Smithsonian, who “believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” Precisely. And those kinds of claims echo very closely the claims you yourself have made @eyeball. And you have still to produce a single research paper or any science to back up your claims. Just like the fine folk mentioned above. Even in this thread you've claimed things will get so bad so soon that people will be forced at gun point to take action. It's all bullshit bud, and we can smell that you've rolled in it from here. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 18 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You have absolutely said all of those things. You are absolutely full of shit. 19 minutes ago, CdnFox said: And more on top, claims that millions or billions will die from flooding at the coastlines because apparently they can't outrun the rise in water, as well as cleaning will have to have troops at the border to stop people from crossing into our land as they die of thirst. These are the things you claim. LMAO! You should lay off the shrooms. 20 minutes ago, CdnFox said: There's absolutely nothing there. If you have a research paper somewhere then that's great but this is not a link to any kind of research at all. It would be like posting Wikipedia's address and saying the answer to your questions in there somewhere Yup, that would be a good place to look too. 23 minutes ago, CdnFox said: That's about your heating cost, it doesn't do anything for climate change I use less energy which is better than using more. I doubt Danielle Smith would think so but she's a dingbat. 24 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It's common to see people criticize their betters but all I'm doing is nothing. That's obvious. 26 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You support the people that do worse than nothing No I don't. 28 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Ralph klein never did that. Yes he did...check wiki yourself if you don't believe me. 29 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You realize long before implementation that it was the stupidest idea ever and would do nothing for climate change. So Ralph was just virtue signalling? 30 minutes ago, CdnFox said: The liberals dusted it off and realize they could use it to line their pockets and you supported them for over a decade No I just supported carbon pricing is all. 32 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Conservatives never gave up. They were just honest about it. They've never given up virtue signalling. They could signal they have by being honest about the fact they don't give a shit but they're cowards. Probably losers too judging by the latest polls. 35 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It's got nothing to do with climate change. That's the lower your heating bills and to make your living environment more comfortable. Not that there's anything wrong with that but it has absolutely nothing to do with you doing anything for climate change. I also voted for the Greens. 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 1 minute ago, eyeball said: You are absolutely full of shit. LMAO! You should lay off the shrooms. Oh look, it's your usual little habit when you're admitting you lose Always cute to watch Quote Yup, that would be a good place to look too. So we agree there's nothing posted at your link and you can't provide any documentation that makes your point. Still no science after all this time Quote I use less energy which is better than using more. I doubt Danielle Smith would think so but she's a dingbat. Nothing to do with climate change. British Columbia's electricity runs on water. All you did was make yourself more comfortable but you haven't done anything to fight climate change. You're still using energy and it's energy that was already environmentally friendly. You did nothing Quote That's obvious. No I don't. It is when you're around and yes you do Quote Yes he did...check wiki yourself if you don't believe me. Well let's look if you're lying again or not Environment minister drops carbon tax proposal | CBC News He opposed it. As for his own taxes, nope. He put a tax and limits on large industry (more closely related to a cap and trade system, emisssions under a certain amount no prob over was penalized) so it was actually an emissions tax and it only applied to large producers. It was nothing remotely close to the carbon tax we have today. Yep. Lying. I'm shocked. Was anyone else shocked? I was shocked. Quote No I just supported carbon pricing is all. No you supported the carbon tax Quote They've never given up virtue signalling. They could signal they have by being honest about the fact they don't give a shit but they're cowards. Probably losers too judging by the latest polls. It never virtual signal at all they just do things. That's why you left a lie about them after the fact, you can't actually criticize them with the truth Quote I also voted for the Greens. Well that absolutely proves my point that you did less than nothing Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So we agree there's nothing posted at your link and you can't provide any documentation that makes your point. Still no science after all this time No we don't agree at all. 6 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Nothing to do with climate change. British Columbia's electricity runs on water. I heat my house with wood in a modern low emission stove. 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It is when you're around and yes you do No it isn't and no I don't. 9 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It was nothing remotely close to the carbon tax we have today. It was a price on carbon. It was a start. 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yep. Lying. I'm shocked. Was anyone else shocked? I was shocked. LMAO! Well, Ralph was also Progressive so, I'm not surprised you're disavowing him. Remember that talk we had about the right wing being a direction? This is what I mean. That's okay I realize nuance is way over your head. 13 minutes ago, CdnFox said: No you supported the carbon tax Yup, it's a superior evolution of carbon pricing. 14 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It never virtual signal at all they just do things. Why if they think it's all bullshit? 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: That's why you left a lie about them after the fact, you can't actually criticize them with the truth The word lie is an utterly meaningless term the way you use it...like woke... Anti-Semitism...racism...on and on it goes because you have nothing else. 18 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Well that absolutely proves my point that you did less than nothing It's a start, remember that talk we had about the Titanic? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Nationalist Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 4 hours ago, eyeball said: The climate changes all the time, WTF do you mean by the end of the world exactly? AGW is changing the environment to rapidly for many things to adapt. My personally? I certainly did what I could but I'm just one guy. Lol... "Who me?" Twenties... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 3 minutes ago, eyeball said: No we don't agree at all. We obviously do you're just not very happy about it. You can't pass right anything to support your position, you wind up alternatively agreeing and disagreeing as you try and avoid the fact that I'm right and there is absolutely nothing in your link in the way of a scientific document. So you obviously know you're wrong. But you're a little buthurt about it and I get that Quote I heat my house with wood in a modern low emission stove. So you're cutting down forests and releasing carbon. In a province that produces electricity for heat with zero emissions. Tell me again how you're fighting climate change? Quote No it isn't and no I don't. Sure kid Quote It was a price on carbon. It was a start. You said he invented a carbon tax. But he didn't and it was really a price on emissions more than it was a price on carbon. So you lied to try and support your point and now it's falling apart on Quote LMAO! Well, Ralph was also Progressive so, I'm not surprised you're disavowing him. Remember that talk we had about the right wing being a direction? This is what I mean. That's okay I realize nuance is way over your head. Ralph klein, the guy who used to get drunk and water into homeless shelters and call them all lazy bums who should get to work That Progressive? But nobody's disavowing him. I never said anything negative about him in the slightest. You made a claim that he did something and all I did was point out that he didn't do that something But I can see why you'd like to try and change the topic like that You're stupidity must be very embarrassing for you Quote Yup, it's a superior evolution of carbon pricing. So I was right all along and all of this dodging was just to try and avoid it. And we have already explored the fact that carbon pricing was a complete another failure and worse than nothing Quote Why if they think it's all bullshit? They think making it a crisis worth destroying our economy for it his bullshit. That doesn't mean they think emissions are good. Of course they're going to reduce them if they have the opportunity, pollution is bad. Even harper was a big fanatic about that he was hardly a fanatic about anything. Quote The word lie is an utterly meaningless term the way you use it...like woke... Anti-Semitism...racism...on and on it goes because you have nothing else. I know you'd like to believe that's true. I know that you'd like to believe that if you lie it really doesn't mean anything. That lying is perfectly fine and acceptable. But it isn't and that's why absolutely nobody here has any respect for you and they say it on a relatively consistent basis the more you're around. Quote It's a start, remember that talk we had about the Titanic? You mean like the green party is like the titanic? Sunk to the deepest depths of the bottom of the ocean and people who try to get close to it tend to implode? I mean I see the connection but it's still proof that you've done less than nothing and it's not a start to anything other than your own weak ass attempted virtue signaling Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 10 minutes ago, eyeball said: No we don't agree at all. I heat my house with wood in a modern low emission stove. No it isn't and no I don't. It was a price on carbon. It was a start. LMAO! Well, Ralph was also Progressive so, I'm not surprised you're disavowing him. Remember that talk we had about the right wing being a direction? This is what I mean. That's okay I realize nuance is way over your head. Yup, it's a superior evolution of carbon pricing. Why if they think it's all bullshit? The word lie is an utterly meaningless term the way you use it...like woke... Anti-Semitism...racism...on and on it goes because you have nothing else. It's a start, remember that talk we had about the Titanic? Low emissions wood burning stove? Lmao. I believe you. Hey, while we are at it, I have this piece of property just outside of Phoenix, beautiful view of the Gulf of America, but I have a tax issue and I need to unload it on the cheap. Can you help me out? It's right next door to Emma Watson. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
eyeball Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 3 minutes ago, CdnFox said: We obviously do you're just not very happy about it. You can't pass right anything to support your position, you wind up alternatively agreeing and disagreeing as you try and avoid the fact that I'm right and there is absolutely nothing in your link in the way of a scientific document. So you obviously know you're wrong. But you're a little buthurt about it and I get that This is just your usual hee haw donkey talk. 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So you're cutting down forests and releasing carbon. In a province that produces electricity for heat with zero emissions. Tell me again how you're fighting climate change. I'm contributing less to it. I burn a lot of wood from my property that would otherwise just rot and release CO2. 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Hee haw 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You said he invented a carbon tax No I didn't. This what I said... 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: it was really a price on emissions more than it was a price on carbon. Correct. 11 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So you lied....blah blah blah 12 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Ralph klein, the guy who used to get drunk and water into homeless shelters and call them all lazy bums who should get to work That Progressive? Hey we have conservatives who need to call themselves Liberals out here to get any respect so go figure. 14 minutes ago, CdnFox said: So I was right all along and all of this dodging was just to try and avoid it. And we have already explored the fact that carbon pricing was a complete another failure and worse than nothing I said it wasn't as good as a carbon tax. You do realize the tax is based on the price of carbon right? 17 minutes ago, CdnFox said: They think making it a crisis worth destroying our economy for it his bullshit. That doesn't mean they think emissions are good. Of course they're going to reduce them if they have the opportunity, pollution is bad. Even harper was a big fanatic about that he was hardly a fanatic about anything. Meh they just want to get elected and will say whatever they need to do so. 19 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I know you'd like to believe that's true. I know that you'd like to believe that if you lie it really doesn't mean anything. That lying is perfectly fine and acceptable. You should practice what you preach but I doubt you could keep up the effort any more than Conservatives and Liberals can stick with the program. 21 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You mean like the green party is like the titanic? Sunk to the deepest depths of the bottom of the ocean and people who try to get close to it tend to implode? No I meant the Titanic that couldn't steer out of the way of disaster. It couldn't adapt in time otherwise it would have magically materialized a bow thruster to tighten up it's turning radius. It's a boat thing but that's okay I don't except you to understand. 24 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I mean I see the connection but it's still proof that you've done less than nothing and it's not a start to anything other than your own weak ass attempted virtue signaling. It didn't look to me like you saw the connection but if you say you did it's proof you simply don't give a shit. 26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Low emissions wood burning stove? Lmao. I believe you. No you don't. Who are you trying to kid? LMAO! Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
gatomontes99 Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 8 minutes ago, eyeball said: No you don't. Who are you trying to kid? LMAO! You. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.