gatomontes99 Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 (edited) Quote The Supreme Court on Wednesday denied the Trump administration's request to block a lower court's order for the administration to pay nearly $2 billion in foreign aid money, delivering a near-term reprieve to international aid groups and contractors seeking payment for previously completed projects. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/scotus-rules-nearly-2-billion-frozen-usaid-payments I'm going to shock the world. I agree with this ruling. At the heart of the ruling was contract law. We (the US government) signed a contract for work and that work was completed. We have to pay. I haven't seen the whole ruling, but I suspect it only pertains to contracts that are signed, active and not delinquent. If it goes beyond that, that would be a travesty. Edited March 5 by gatomontes99 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 24 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: I'm going to shock the world. I agree with this ruling. At the heart of the ruling was contract law. We (the US government) signed a contract for work and that work was completed. We have to pay. I haven't seen the whole ruling, but I suspect it only pertains to contracts that are signed, active and not delinquent. If it goes beyond that, that would be a travesty. Hopefully that department gets dissolved completely. The world has gotten more than enough from US tax payers. Quote
herbie Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 What did you expect from a Bronze Bozo known to tear up even his own contracts at whim? Of course all the greedy bastards among you don't support helping other countries. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted March 5 Report Posted March 5 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I'm going to shock the world. I agree with this ruling. At the heart of the ruling was contract law. We (the US government) signed a contract for work and that work was completed. We have to pay. I haven't seen the whole ruling, but I suspect it only pertains to contracts that are signed, active and not delinquent. If it goes beyond that, that would be a travesty. I have to agree with you...and the ruling. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.