Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/7/2025 at 4:04 PM, Black Dog said:

sddefault.jpg

I love that you guys have your own extended universe, but I think getting into Warhammer 40K would be a more productive and rewarding use of your time that would significantly reduce the chances of divorce/not seeing your grandkids, plus there are miniatures!

DOGE has a really cool chainsaw. I wonder wich department they're going to hack up next? :D

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I think we can safely say you are a cuck (rule number one). 

My rules bother you. They bother you because they are true.

Your rule is just funny and confirms how right I am.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

My rules bother you. They bother you because they are true.

Your rule is just funny and confirms how right I am.

Your rules are retarded because you made them and you are retarded.

You use these retarded rules to shield your pathetically stupid ideas from scrutiny. 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Your rules are retarded because you made them and you are retarded.

You use these retarded rules to shield your pathetically stupid ideas from scrutiny. 

 

Ah rules 2 and 8 (I moved 6 to add two rules I missed)...the most frequently used debate tactics of the left.

I'm not shielding myself from anything. I'm using the rules as a short cut to illustrate the left's inability to debate.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ah rules 2 and 8 (I moved 6 to add two rules I missed)...the most frequently used debate tactics of the left.

I'm not shielding myself from anything. I'm using the rules as a short cut to illustrate the left's inability to debate.

No it’s quite obvious you use them when you can’t muster a response (that or you just dip out like you did when you were caught lying about RFK he’s anti vaccine statements.)

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

No it’s quite obvious you use them when you can’t muster a response (that or you just dip out like you did when you were caught lying about RFK he’s anti vaccine statements.)

Ah, a version of the new rule 6. I'm glad I added it.

Your assertions were void of reality. You refused to acknowledge the complexity of his argument, the scientific evidence that supported or his true intent. You just took a fragment of a sentence, dropped emotionally charged rants and ignored all evidence to the contrary. Now you are here trying to claim victory.

We can all see what you are doing. The only person you are fooling is yourself.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah I reported the information that you’re a pedophile, I didn’t say anything about you being a homosexual one.

You reported your sexual fantasies again as you always do, and almost all of them are homosexuals so it's a safe bet that that's what was going on in your head.

I mean we both know this is in your head. You don't know me or who I am or anything about me so you're not actually reporting anything. It's just something you Concocted in your head because you're losing an argument and when you're losing an argument you wind up coming up with homosexual fantasies.

And now you're going on about castrating people who abuse children as part of your fantasy, which strongly suggests once again you're imagining me as your father and you're wishing you could do that to him because of what he did to you, 

Look man, this is some messed up stuff you're thinking and it's not the first time.  This is a cry for help from your brain, you need to pay attention and see someone. You can't live your whole life as an angry sunken shell of a man like you are here

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 2/7/2025 at 3:03 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Both USAID And The CIA Were Behind The Impeachment Of Trump in 2019

TLDR: USAID funded a fake news org, planted journalists and approved stories. A CIA analyst, loyal to Obama gave them a story to run then cited it in a whistleblower complaint to setup the first Trump impeachment.

Why?

Trump was looking at the money trail to Ukraine and trying to figure out what exactly was going on. USAID, swampy Dems and swampy Reps couldn't have that. So they launched a counter attack designed to stop Trump from looking into the money because he'd be too busy defending himself.

And it never stopped.

 

Just to get people back on track...

Black Dog can start a pedophilia thread if he wants to talk about his sex life. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Just to get people back on track...

Black Dog can start a pedophilia thread if he wants to talk about his sex life. 

(do not encourage that pls! You KNOW he can't afford real therapy and we'll be stuck trying to fix him....) 

And this is why i'm generally against gov't "Funding" programs such as usaid. It's SO easy to redirect the funds to a different purpose, be it one of corruption or political interference or power peddling or whatever. 

I don't like trumps sovereignty fund for the same reasons actually, whether he misuses it or not at some point someone will. 

It's pretty obvious the dems were misusing this department to funnel money and influence where they wanted it and honestly it's for the best that it's gone. 

 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
18 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ah, a version of the new rule 6. I'm glad I added it.

Your assertions were void of reality. You refused to acknowledge the complexity of his argument, the scientific evidence that supported or his true intent. You just took a fragment of a sentence, dropped emotionally charged rants and ignored all evidence to the contrary. Now you are here trying to claim victory.

We can all see what you are doing. The only person you are fooling is yourself.

Bro you literally lied about him not saying words he said. Again: your argument was not "oh no you're taking him out of context", you literally said he didn't say things he said. And when confronted with that fact and the fact that your position is objectively pro-disease, you vanished.

Posted
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You reported your sexual fantasies again as you always do, and almost all of them are homosexuals so it's a safe bet that that's what was going on in your head.

I mean we both know this is in your head. You don't know me or who I am or anything about me so you're not actually reporting anything. It's just something you Concocted in your head because you're losing an argument and when you're losing an argument you wind up coming up with homosexual fantasies.

And now you're going on about castrating people who abuse children as part of your fantasy, which strongly suggests once again you're imagining me as your father and you're wishing you could do that to him because of what he did to you, 

Look man, this is some messed up stuff you're thinking and it's not the first time.  This is a cry for help from your brain, you need to pay attention and see someone. You can't live your whole life as an angry sunken shell of a man like you are here

You're crying about people making stuff about you while making stuff up about people. No one is ever going to accuse you of being too smart or too self-aware that's for sure.

And leave the little boys alone you gross freak.

Posted
4 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Bro you literally lied about him not saying words he said. Again: your argument was not "oh no you're taking him out of context", you literally said he didn't say things he said. And when confronted with that fact and the fact that your position is objectively pro-disease, you vanished.

Another great way to tell that you know you're wrong is that you generally wait for some amount of time to pass and then try and restart the argument that you've already lost when  you think people won't be bothered to go back and see you're full of shit. 

I don't even need to know what you two were talking about and i can tell you know you're full of it :)  

4 hours ago, Black Dog said:

You're crying about people making stuff about you while making stuff up about people.

I'm not making anything up. You actually literally do the things I said that you did and you do it all the time. Everybody is aware of this. I frequently pointed out and make fun of it.

And it happens so often with such fervor it's impossible not to believe that you've got some serious mental health issues over it, probably stemming from some sort of event or confusion in your life that you can't reconcile.

Which is fine, everybody's got their problems. But it'd be great if you could make your problems not be our problem :) 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 2/9/2025 at 3:36 PM, Black Dog said:

Your rules are retarded because you made them and you are retarded.

You use these retarded rules to shield your pathetically stupid ideas from scrutiny. 

 

Says the a55 who hides behind sick sexual innuendo and insults.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You wanna try that again without being a total hypocrite?

No. What I said stands. You post disgusting sh1t.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
59 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Cry to your momma about it.

No. I'll just keep posting how disgusting you're posts are for all to see.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

You wanna try that again without being a total hypocrite?

He didn't say that he never insults anyone, he said you were a hypocrite For accusing others of what you do

And he's right :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

He didn't say that he never insults anyone, he said you were a hypocrite For accusing others of what you do

And he's right :) 

If I wanted to hear a pedophile’s opinion, I’d ask nationalist directly.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

If I wanted to hear a pedophile’s opinion, I’d ask nationalist directly.

And then listen to the sound of your own voice presumably :) 

And I'm only a pedophile in your fantasies. In the real world I suspect the pedophile in your life was your father, possibly an uncle

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
9 hours ago, Black Dog said:

If I wanted to hear a pedophile’s opinion, I’d ask nationalist directly.

Right on que.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And then listen to the sound of your own voice presumably :) 

And I'm only a pedophile in your fantasies. In the real world I suspect the pedophile in your life was your father, possibly an uncle

No it's you.

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

No it's you.

LOL sure kid :)

Given your level of humour i assume you got picked on a lot in elementary school. And by that i mean, like, yesterday :)  

 

image.jpeg.42909aae5da5e7abba5678e2fc7e67e5.jpeg

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...