Nationalist Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 (edited) 11 hours ago, Hodad said: Ah, another faux "conservative" saying the quiet part out loud, eager to toss the American experiment in the dumpster and prostrate himself before a dictator. Aaawwwe...Poor Baby! Did Hoe'sDad lose and now needs to lash out with chickensh1t to sooth his achy-wakey? You freaks "experimented" and lost.! Deal with it or don't. But your destructive "experiment" is over. Edited January 13 by Nationalist 1 1 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 19 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Did anyone else watch this? I almost forgot just how freaking awesome this guy is. He's absolutely the best politician that I've ever seen at articulating his position in a way that is unimpeachable. I don't see how he could be stopped in 4 years. It really feels like he will be the next President. My only concern would be that he slips too far into the RINO mindset. He doesn't strike me as a firebrand like Trump is. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 11 minutes ago, Deluge said: My only concern would be that he slips too far into the RINO mindset. He doesn't strike me as a firebrand like Trump is. Well, he's more measured in what he says, but he does talk about a lot of good policies. I'd rather have a Trump type over a RHINO. But I'll take a RHINO over any lib/commie they run. And they have to run someone left of Lenin to energize their base any more, so I like our chances whomever runs. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Well, he's more measured in what he says, but he does talk about a lot of good policies. I'd rather have a Trump type over a RHINO. But I'll take a RHINO over any lib/commie they run. And they have to run someone left of Lenin to energize their base any more, so I like our chances whomever runs. Oh, that goes without saying. Vance eclipses almost everyone. I just wouldn't want to see him regress once he became president. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 6 minutes ago, Deluge said: Oh, that goes without saying. Vance eclipses almost everyone. I just wouldn't want to see him regress once he became president. You mean cave to money and the howling Libbies? Only time will tell. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: You mean cave to money and the howling Libbies? Only time will tell. Exactly. Quote
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 52 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Aaawwwe...Poor Baby! Did Hoe'sDad lose and now needs to lash out with chickensh1t to sooth his achy-wakey? You freaks "experimented" and lost.! Deal with it or don't. But your destructive "experiment" is over. Go read a book. The "American experiment" refers to the creation of a constitutional democracy, a government of, by and for the people--the first of its kind in the world. You clearly want to destroy that experiment, but you should at least know what it means before you throw it away in service to a dictator. 1 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: If you bothered to read what is quoted and understand it, you would understand that his point is that the President should sct unilaterally to replace liberals at all levels in the government. Just replacing the heads of departments isn't good enough. My "may or may not" is in reference to the fact that this article paraphrased him as saying he wanted a dictator. It was not a direct quote. The direct quote uses the word CEO. Oh, that's right. Hitler wasn't like Hitler and Trump isnt like Hitler so that makes Trump just like Hitler. I forgot. Those are quotation marks, not "paraphrase curlies" -- and Yarvin has called for dictatorship multiple times as a part of his half-assed blogger philosophy. Politicizing civil service is just a means to that end. And that's the solution you endorsed--literally the end of American democracy. 1 Quote
Legato Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 12 hours ago, Hodad said: Did anyone tell you that circle jerking is gross? Maybe try to contribute something relevant to any conversation--ever--rather than wasting our time with gibber. I know you guys aren't much into reading, but KSU literally quoted Yarvin calling for dictatorship and applauded it, calling Yarvin "a solution." No spin needed. You dizzy yet? 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 4 minutes ago, Hodad said: Go read a book. The "American experiment" refers to the creation of a constitutional democracy, a government of, by and for the people--the first of its kind in the world. You clearly want to destroy that experiment, but you should at least know what it means before you throw it away in service to a dictator. Let me guess...your "superior intellect" didn't realize the pun...did it. Hey I have to wonder...how does one create a valid "experiment", when you Tweenkies have polluted it so much with your precious refugees? Does your "experiment" include having the American citizen paying the way for these criminals? Ya know...you freaks like to howl about "science", but I don't think a single one of you actually know what "science" is or how it should be conducted. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Let me guess...your "superior intellect" didn't realize the pun...did it. Hey I have to wonder...how does one create a valid "experiment", when you Tweenkies have polluted it so much with your precious refugees? Does your "experiment" include having the American citizen paying the way for these criminals? Ya know...you freaks like to howl about "science", but I don't think a single one of you actually know what "science" is or how it should be conducted. That wasn't a farking pun. You just had no idea WTF the American experiment means. A country of immigrants and refugees is "polluted" by immigrants and refugees? 🤮 I'm just grateful that as much as you wish you were American that your ignorance and hate are still Canada's problem. I'll take an earnest, hardworking immigrant over an entitled, hateful native any day. Edited January 13 by Hodad 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Legato said: You dizzy yet? In the entire time I've been here I don't think you've ever made a relevant, insightful or useful comment. Ever. You are without value and I don't need to see your clutter in the forum anymore. Good luck in all your future endeavors. 1 Quote
Legato Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 3 minutes ago, Hodad said: In the entire time I've been here I don't think you've ever made a relevant, insightful or useful comment. Ever. You are without value and I don't need to see your clutter in the forum anymore. Good luck in all your future endeavors. Everything you write is spun to fit your ideology, including the above. For that you will get called out. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 6 minutes ago, Hodad said: That wasn't a farking pun. You just had no idea WTF the American experiment means. A country of immigrants and refugees is "polluted" by immigrants and refugees? 🤮 I'm just grateful that as much as you wish you were American that your ignorance and hate are still Canada's problem. I'll take an earnest, hardworking immigrant over an entitled, hateful native any day. Hilarious. They allowed millions of people to flood into the States without any real vetting, in a nation that already has over 300 million proper citizens. That's taking the famous "American Experiment" and tossing it out the window. Hense...polluting the experiment by removing all controls. But ya..."BELIEVE THE SCIENCE!" 5 minutes ago, Legato said: Everything you write is spun to fit your ideology, including the above. For that you will get called out. And yes he's dizzy... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Hodad said: I'm just grateful that as much as you wish you were American that your ignorance and hate are still Canada's problem. I'll take an earnest, hardworking immigrant over an entitled, hateful native any day. The problem is that you guys on the left want to keep the raping murdering criminals. 1 hour ago, Hodad said: In the entire time I've been here I don't think you've ever made a relevant, insightful or useful comment. Ever. You are without value and I don't need to see your clutter in the forum anymore. Good luck in all your future endeavors. Why do you pretend to care? You ran away from me when I called out your crap with sound logical responses. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 5 hours ago, Deluge said: My only concern would be that he slips too far into the RINO mindset. He doesn't strike me as a firebrand like Trump is. At some point the republican party is going to have to move a little bit back towards the center. Especially in appearance. Trump currently runs on the very far right, but then governs on the relatively moderate right. And that works when your opponents are on the very far left. But sooner or later the american public is going to get very sick of that kind of conflict and want stability and balance. And there's a good chance the next democrat challenger will move to a more moderate stance to try to bring back those soft left voters who were turned off by Gigglin' harris and 'the squad' but aren't that comfortable with some of the farther right rhetoric of trump and would like an alternative. So it would be good if vance was seen as a strong supporter of the current republican priorities, BUT seen as being less into the 'rhetoric' and divisiveness and more of someone who can bridge the gaps in the american public right now and start uniting people a little more. The actual policies dont' have to change much but the presentation will have to over time. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
NAME REMOVED Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 (edited) 15 hours ago, Hodad said: May or may not? WTF? Are you pretending that you didn't read the quote you posted and applauded as "a solution"? The strategy he PROPOSES to achieve the aim of dictatorship is a farking footnote to the goal of ending a democratic America. Jeebus. The fact that the MAGA hyenas want to end democracy, should be of no surprise to us. After all, these same bad faith actors, were cheering on the January 6 insurrection, to pervert democracy. I'm even willing to bet that they secretly admire the Nazi rise to power in 1930's Germany. They are in a cult, and will gaslight us. Edited January 13 by DUI_Offender 2 Quote
Deluge Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 24 minutes ago, CdnFox said: At some point the republican party is going to have to move a little bit back towards the center. Especially in appearance. Trump currently runs on the very far right, but then governs on the relatively moderate right. And that works when your opponents are on the very far left. But sooner or later the american public is going to get very sick of that kind of conflict and want stability and balance. And there's a good chance the next democrat challenger will move to a more moderate stance to try to bring back those soft left voters who were turned off by Gigglin' harris and 'the squad' but aren't that comfortable with some of the farther right rhetoric of trump and would like an alternative. So it would be good if vance was seen as a strong supporter of the current republican priorities, BUT seen as being less into the 'rhetoric' and divisiveness and more of someone who can bridge the gaps in the american public right now and start uniting people a little more. The actual policies dont' have to change much but the presentation will have to over time. Oh, if all he did was tone down the divisiveness then I'd be just fine with a Vance presidency. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 13 Author Report Posted January 13 27 minutes ago, CdnFox said: At some point the republican party is going to have to move a little bit back towards the center. Especially in appearance. Trump currently runs on the very far right, but then governs on the relatively moderate right. And that works when your opponents are on the very far left. But sooner or later the american public is going to get very sick of that kind of conflict and want stability and balance. And there's a good chance the next democrat challenger will move to a more moderate stance to try to bring back those soft left voters who were turned off by Gigglin' harris and 'the squad' but aren't that comfortable with some of the farther right rhetoric of trump and would like an alternative. So it would be good if vance was seen as a strong supporter of the current republican priorities, BUT seen as being less into the 'rhetoric' and divisiveness and more of someone who can bridge the gaps in the american public right now and start uniting people a little more. The actual policies dont' have to change much but the presentation will have to over time. Explain to me how Trump is on the far right? He isn't afraid of spending, he isn't on board with abortion bans and he is putting former Democrats in cabinet positions. He'll, he's a former Democrat himself. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 28 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: The fact that the MAGA hyenas want to end democracy, should be of no surprise to us. This is not a fact. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 1 minute ago, User said: This is not a fact. It is if you drink enough. Apparently. 2 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Legato Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 36 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: The fact that the MAGA hyenas want to end democracy, should be of no surprise to us. After all, these same bad faith actors, were cheering on the January 6 insurrection, to pervert democracy. I'm even willing to bet that they secretly admire the Nazi rise to power in 1930's Germany. They are in a cult, and will gaslight us. It's only a fact if you misread the fine print on a Guinness can. Have you ever wondered why all the hyenas are laughing. Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 21 hours ago, herbie said: With the bar being set so low with Donnie's incoherent ramblings you've forgotten just about every other politician that ever existed. Are you forgetting about Joe, who can't even articulate that he needs to go potty? And Kamala, who's world famous for sputtering meaningless drivel? The squad, who can only talk about their lust for seeing "Palestinian justice"? 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
CdnFox Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Explain to me how Trump is on the far right? He isn't afraid of spending, he isn't on board with abortion bans and he is putting former Democrats in cabinet positions. He'll, he's a former Democrat himself. I didn't say he was. I said his rhetoric is. He 'runs' on the far right. He runs on kicking out all the mexicans and cleansing the woke and picking fights with his allies and so on and so on. That's all pretty far right stuff. As i also noted, how he actually runs his gov'ts are another matter. His actual deeds aren't that far right at all. They're just mostly moderate right. His deficit spending definitely was bad but in fairness his premise was 'slash taxes, we'll run a deficit but business activity will improve and we'll fill that gap pretty quick". And that started to happen, but then covid. Obviously we'll never know for sure if it would ahve worked but it was definitely moving in the right direction. That will probably be his playbook this time too. Massive cuts hoping to spur economic activity. Basically more people and business paying less taxes individually but more revenues over all given time. We'll see. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
NAME REMOVED Posted January 13 Report Posted January 13 (edited) 4 hours ago, Hodad said: In the entire time I've been here I don't think you've ever made a relevant, insightful or useful comment. Ever. You are without value and I don't need to see your clutter in the forum anymore. Good luck in all your future endeavors. I just reviewed his posting history, and you are correct. @Legato contributes absolutely nothing to this forum. I will go back further, to see if he has made any constructive contributions to this forum. Edited January 13 by DUI_Offender 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.