Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

He thinks he's an internet warrior but he's actually the internet clown.

So basically he's Harley Quinn then :) 

Tim Levins | Harley Quinn made her debut on this day in 1992. Happy  birthday, you wild and crazy gal! This is a drawing I did for "How to Draw  Batman,... | Instagram

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
16 hours ago, robosmith said:

YOU'RE LYING, AS USUAL.

I obviously told the truth. Everyone knows that you're that dumb.

Quote

We collected plenty of intel by recovering that balloon. Duh

  1. China collected intel about the US, for certain
  2. you were told that the US gained intel from it, but I think they already know how balloons work. Except maybe Biden. And OAC. And Kamala. And Omar. NVM, you're right: 40% of Americans learned something from that. 
  • Haha 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
Just now, WestCanMan said:
Quote

We collected plenty of intel by recovering that balloon. Duh

  1. you were told that the US gained intel from it, but I think they already know how balloons work. Except maybe Biden. And OAC. And Kamala. And Omar. NVM, you're right: 40% of Americans learned something from that. 

This is got to be one of my favorite replies from him of all times :)   China flies a balloon over the US, the US shoots it down, and he thinks we recovered Intel. They were surveilling the united states for god's sake, the united states already knows about the united states  :)  

Does he really think that they opened up the balloon and there were intelligence experts there reviewing the footage and saying things like "Did you know we had tanks?"  or  "My God! There's a macdonalds on 4th and Elm? I had no idea,,,,,

You get Intel when you look at footage about OTHER countries, not your own you twit!!! 

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
17 hours ago, Aristides said:

I think that on the Eastern Seaboard you would be hard pressed not to be.

You can fly OVER major airports at 2500+ feet, but not at takeoff/landing altitudes.

Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I obviously told the truth. Everyone knows that you're that dumb.

What you "know" is ALWAYS BULLSHIT.

You still DON'T KNOW that Trump LIED or MISLED 30,000+ times during admin 1.

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
  1. China collected intel about the US, for certain

No one said they didn't, dummy. However it is entirely possible that some data was stored and NOT transmitted on that balloon.

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
  1. you were told that the US gained intel from it, but I think they already know how balloons work. Except maybe Biden. And OAC. And Kamala. And Omar. NVM, you're right: 40% of Americans learned something from that. 

We got intel about the electronics which was recovered, lDIOT.

Do you even know what the Open Skies Treaty was?

There was a world wide treaty which ALLOWED overflights of foreign nations until just a few years ago, cause it wasn't that big a deal.

Edited by robosmith
Posted
15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You can fly OVER major airports at 2500+ feet, but not at takeoff/landing altitudes.

Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

So? You sure as hell can't do it without contacting the terminal and being radar identified. 

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You can fly OVER major airports at 2500+ feet, but not at takeoff/landing altitudes.

Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

In a recent survey 10 out of 10 pilots said that they regularly take off and land when flying

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 hours ago, robosmith said:

You can fly OVER major airports at 2500+ feet, but not at takeoff/landing altitudes.

Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

That's not what that says. You have zero understanding of what you are posting. You should quit now.

What you posted was a speed limit. It has nothing to do with overflight, landing or anything we are talking about.

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

In a recent survey 10 out of 10 pilots said that they regularly take off and land when flying

9 out of 10 wouldn't be very good, but it is an A in high school.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

The drones are part of a Canadian Govt Survey assessing state by state whether the USA is worthy of being annexed as our 11th province.
We know you're so paranoid you'd be distracted looking for Iranian mother ships offshore you'd miss the real conspiracy.

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...