Blinken holding cry sessions at the State Department

[Fluffypants]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blinken-questioned-state-department-hosting-in-house-therapy-sessions-after-trump-win

I hope they are bottling their tears, they are a delicious treat.

Edited November 25, 2024 by Fluffypants

[gatomontes99]

6 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blinken-questioned-state-department-hosting-in-house-therapy-sessions-after-trump-win

I hope they are bottling their tears, they are a delicious treat.

Liberals are all emotion. And remember, they believe the second reincarnation of Hitler is now in charge. Of course they can't cope. It would probably be for their better health to quit and let conservatives take over. You know, those people that will actually follow the constituion and the law. Those types.

[robosmith]

Only an lDIOT still believe FOS LIES and posts their LIES here.

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blinken-questioned-state-department-hosting-in-house-therapy-sessions-after-trump-win

I hope they are bottling their tears, they are a delicious treat.

In-house therapy? Are they retarded? Don't they know that screaming at clouds and emotional support goats are the only known cures for butthurtedness? 

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Only an lDIOT still believe FOS LIES and posts their LIES here.

Prove it is wrong.

[Fluffypants]

15 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Prove it is wrong.

He won't, he just cries FOS Lies and doesn't present anything against it. I have just decided to ignore him, he isn't worth engaging.

[Michael Hardner]

Yet another thread where someone expresses glee over a mythical breakdown of an opponent.

Terrible politics 😔 

[User]

14 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Yet another thread where someone expresses glee over a mythical breakdown of an opponent.

Terrible politics 😔 

Nothing mythical about it. The ral point being made here is not that folks are breaking down, it is that the state agency they work for is holding therapy sessions for them. 

Even more, if these are career state employees, they have no place serving in government if they are so unhinged at the election of a president they disliked so much they need therapy sessions. 

 

[Fluffypants]

17 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Yet another thread where someone expresses glee over a mythical breakdown of an opponent.

Terrible politics 😔 

This, from the side telling people that the reason Kamala lost was because people were too stupid to vote for her. Blaming the voters is like blaming going bankrupt and blaming the consumers for not buy your product.

I think America will vote for a female President and I don't think Kamala or Hilary lost because the were women. Why? Because there were probably far more people voting for them simply because they were women than were voting against them because they were women.

You want a woman President? Find a candidate that people actually like. Nobody liked Hilary when she was first lady and it didn't get better. Kamala was the most unpopular VP in history and they put her in and then hid her for over month. When they finally let her out she never answered a question and people really didn't know what her policies were. It began with Joy and ended up just being attack after attack on Trump without any substance about why we should vote for her.

Either way the sheer smugness this election by Democrats is what sealed the mockery. Its not all of them but the prominent ones and their subsequent public meltdowns that opened a door too wide not to just walk through.

 

[Deluge]

18 hours ago, robosmith said:

Only an lDIOT still believe FOS LIES and posts their LIES here.

robosore is still smarting from the presidential election. 

Have you found a good cry basement yet? 

[Michael Hardner]

53 minutes ago, User said:

Nothing mythical about it. The ral point being made here is not that folks are breaking down, it is that the state agency they work for is holding therapy sessions for them. 

Even more, if these are career state employees, they have no place serving in government if they are so unhinged at the election of a president they disliked so much they need therapy sessions. 

 

Ok, so why be happy about that?

And you're posting to me again... Do now think that I DON'T play games?

17 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

This, from the side telling people that the reason Kamala lost was because people were too stupid to vote for her.  

Your first sentence pivots into a view few people hold, certainly not me...

So there's no discussion there then.

 

[User]

16 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Ok, so why be happy about that?

Not happy. I am mocking the people and the culture that created this. I am frustrated our government agencies are fostering this culture and tolerating it. 

[Hodad]

On 11/25/2024 at 10:45 AM, gatomontes99 said:

Liberals are all emotion. And remember, they believe the second reincarnation of Hitler is now in charge. Of course they can't cope. It would probably be for their better health to quit and let conservatives take over. You know, those people that will actually follow the constituion and the law. Those types.

Sure. The only way to "follow the constitution" is to occasionally suspend the constitution or otherwise go around it. 🙄

[CdnFox]

On 11/25/2024 at 7:45 AM, gatomontes99 said:

Liberals are all emotion. And remember, they believe the second reincarnation of Hitler is now in charge. Of course they can't cope. It would probably be for their better health to quit and let conservatives take over. You know, those people that will actually follow the constituion and the law. Those types.

If I were these guys I would be more worried about getting a list of names of people who needed treatment. Anybody who actually emotionally breaks down because there's a new president is not fit to be doing the job. If you are so emotionally broken up about a new president that you are emotionally just over it the correct course of action is to quit immediately

[WestCanMan]

18 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I would be more worried about getting a list of names of people who needed treatment. Anybody who actually emotionally breaks down because there's a new president is not fit to be doing the job.

TBH, you could make the case that anyone who voted for Kamala needs treatment.

The only "approximately good" reason for voting for her is "I'm a black woman and I'm a racist, so I'm ok with this decision even if it causes WWIII".

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Sure. The only way to "follow the constitution" is to occasionally suspend the constitution or otherwise go around it. 🙄

Just making shìt up for the fun of it now?

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Just making shìt up for the fun of it now?

No, I'm not you. Jeebus be praised.

[robosmith]

On 11/26/2024 at 5:29 AM, Fluffypants said:

He won't, he just cries FOS Lies and doesn't present anything against it. I have just decided to ignore him, he isn't worth engaging.

I don't have to prove anything wrong that LACKS EVIDENCE.

Your OPINIONS are easily refuted by MINE.

Your problem is you still believe FOS LIES is evidence when they've been PROVEN LIARS.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

I don't have to prove anything wrong that LACKS EVIDENCE.

Your OPINIONS are easily refuted by MINE.

Your problem is you still believe FOS LIES is evidence when they've been PROVEN LIARS.

You don't have opinions, you have hysterics

[robosmith]

On 11/26/2024 at 6:57 AM, Fluffypants said:

This, from the side telling people that the reason Kamala lost was because people were too stupid to vote for her. Blaming the voters is like blaming going bankrupt and blaming the consumers for not buy your product.

I think America will vote for a female President and I don't think Kamala or Hilary lost because the were women. Why? Because there were probably far more people voting for them simply because they were women than were voting against them because they were women.

You want a woman President? Find a candidate that people actually like. Nobody liked Hilary when she was first lady and it didn't get better. Kamala was the most unpopular VP in history and they put her in and then hid her for over month. When they finally let her out she never answered a question and people really didn't know what her policies were. It began with Joy and ended up just being attack after attack on Trump without any substance about why we should vote for her.

Either way the sheer smugness this election by Democrats is what sealed the mockery. Its not all of them but the prominent ones and their subsequent public meltdowns that opened a door too wide not to just walk through.

You don't know what you're talking about. Harris lost because 14M Democratic voters that turned out in 2020 stayed home.

IF they'd turned out, Trump would have lost in a landslide.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You don't know what you're talking about. Harris lost because 14M Democratic voters that turned out in 2020 stayed home.

Dead people frequently do that

With the situation with mail-in ballots and such ballot harvesting was a lot easier in 2020. The democrats had a tougher time stealing the election this time

[robosmith]

On 11/25/2024 at 1:55 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Prove it is wrong.

That's NOT the way debate works. YOU have to provide EVIDENCE before anything needs to be PROVEN WRONG.

FOS LIES is NOT EVIDENCE because they are PROVEN LIARS. Duh

[robosmith]

On 11/26/2024 at 3:43 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Just making shìt up for the fun of it now?

^This from the guy who's in DENIAL about Trump's incitement of violence to stop the EC vote certification. 🤮

Are you EVER going to read the SWORN testimony by WH insiders AGAINST Trump about Jan 6th?

I guess you won't because you cannot stand knowing the TRUTH.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

That's NOT the way debate works. YOU have to provide EVIDENCE before anything needs to be PROVEN WRONG.

FOS LIES is NOT EVIDENCE because they are PROVEN LIARS. Duh

That's exactly how debate works. What's the matter robo,  Just realized he's telling the truth and can't prove that he isn't?

If you want to just count his evidence then I'm afraid you have to provide counter evidence. That is absolutely the way that debate works

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

^This from the guy who's in DENIAL about Trump's incitement of violence to stop the EC vote certification. 🤮

Are you EVER going to read the SWORN testimony by WH insiders AGAINST Trump about Jan 6th?

I guess you won't because you cannot stand knowing the TRUTH.

Sorry, your opinion is useless without proof

[NAME REMOVED]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You don't know what you're talking about. Harris lost because 14M Democratic voters that turned out in 2020 stayed home.

IF they'd turned out, Trump would have lost in a landslide.

As of today, Trump received 76.9 million votes, opposed to Harris 74.6 million.

So realistically, 6.7 million people who voted for Biden in 2020, either did not voted, switched over to Trump or a third party candidate. The 14 million figure was at the end of Election night, and did not account for all the votes, especially in California and the West Coast states, where the Democrats won. 

Edited November 28, 2024 by DUI_Offender