Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

You know she was labelled a Russian asset back when she was a Democrat, right?

After crossing Hillary Clinton and raised concerns about wars and what she saw in the US military. Yeah I'm aware..

Probably the reason she left the party. It's basically a cult much like scientology 

Edited by West
Posted

Tulsi Battle Angel

United States Army Lt. Colonel

Graduate Officer Candidate School, Alabama Military Academy

12 Month Tour in Iraq during the Global War On Terrorism

awarded the Meritorious Service Medal

scourge of the Democrat Party Plantation Aristocracy traitorous to the republic

sic semper tyrannis

171106_r30844.jpg

tuls-gabbard-x.jpg?width=860

  • Like 1
Posted

I am sure she also raped some woman and is racist.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

You know she was labelled a Russian asset back when she was a Democrat, right?

you're nothing but a useful id!iot for the Liberal & Democrat Party traitors, you pathetic f*cking Cuck

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I am sure she also raped some woman and is racist.

I was just making a list of high profile Republicans who've been accused of being a Russian agent/rapist/financial crimes. 

Right now I'm around 18. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, West said:

I was just making a list of high profile Republicans who've been accused of being a Russian agent/rapist/financial crimes. 

Right now I'm around 18. 

The irony is Russia got the most from the Clintons and Bidens.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

You are demented  because you STILL believe FOS LIES. 

And you don't know anything about the evidence of Gabbard supporting US adversaries. 🤮

1 hour ago, West said:

After crossing Hillary Clinton and raised concerns about wars and what she saw in the US military. Yeah I'm aware..

Probably the reason she left the party. It's basically a cult much like scientology 

^Says the MAGA CULTIST....

You guys only started calling Democrats a cult because the MAGA CULT is real and you needed a deflection. 🤮

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

you're nothing but a useful id!iot for the Liberal & Democrat Party traitors, you pathetic f*cking Cuck

 

You're talking about yourself.

8 minutes ago, West said:

I was just making a list of high profile Republicans who've been accused of being a Russian agent/rapist/financial crimes. 

Right now I'm around 18. 

Keep going. It's become dejeur with Trump in charge. He's signaled it's A-OK to be in bed with Russians. 🤮

Posted (edited)

Another classic Trump pick: someone with no experience or qualification to earn an interview for this job, let alone an appointment. 

Worse still, in this case he's trying to give every intelligence secret America has to a woman who thinks those secrets should be leaked. 

Classic Trump clown car. Except, you know, putting American lives at risk.

Edited by Hodad
Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You are demented  because you STILL believe FOS LIES. 

And you don't know anything about the evidence of Gabbard supporting US adversaries. 🤮

^Says the MAGA CULTIST....

You guys only started calling Democrats a cult because the MAGA CULT is real and you needed a deflection. 🤮

Lmao...everything he doesn't like is FOS lies...what ever FOS is. He told me once but it was too stupid to remember.

Just now, Hodad said:

Another classic Trump pick: someone with no experience or qualification to earn an interview for this job, let alone an appointment. 

Worse still, in this case he's trying to give every intelligence secret America has to a woman who thinks those secrets should be leaked. 

Classic Trump clown car.

If he picked a black woman with 15 total cases tried and some political experience, would that be good enough for you?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...everything he doesn't like is FOS lies...what ever FOS is. He told me once but it was too stupid to remember.

If he picked a black woman with 15 total cases tried and some political experience, would that be good enough for you?

No. Why the hell would any sane person think that experience as a prosecutor qualifies someone to run all of America's intelligence agencies?

A serious appointment would be someone with deep experience in intelligence work. You know, someone who has an advanced understanding of the incredibly serious job they'd be accepting. 

Trump obviously prioritizes VERY different credentials: namely personal loyalty and media reach. 

We're just watching the worst season of The Apprentice ever. But America voted for a reality TV huckster, so nobody can be surprised that we got President Camacho.

Edited by Hodad
Posted
Just now, Hodad said:

No. Why the hell would any sane person think that experience as a prosecutor qualifies someone to run all of America's intelligence agencies?

A serious appointment would be someone with deep experience in intelligence work. You know, someone who has an advanced understanding of the incredibly serious job they'd be accepting. 

Trump obviously prioritizes VERY different credentials: namely personal loyalty and media reach. 

We're just watching the worst season of The Apprentice ever. 

https://nypost.com/2024/11/02/us-news/how-many-cases-has-kamala-harris-actually-prosecuted/

Harris's qualification to be VP was that she had prosecuted 15 cases and had some local and national political experience.

Check

Mate

 

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're talking about yourself.

Keep going. It's become dejeur with Trump in charge. He's signaled it's A-OK to be in bed with Russians. 🤮

^^^ no reason to believe this MSNBChina bot. Duh. ^^^

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

https://nypost.com/2024/11/02/us-news/how-many-cases-has-kamala-harris-actually-prosecuted/

Harris's qualification to be VP was that she had prosecuted 15 cases and had some local and national political experience.

Check

Mate

 

 

You're being deliberately stupid. 

Harris was the AG of our nation's largest state and a US senator. Which is pretty normal resume for a VP pick. In fact, about half of all VP picks have come out of the Senate. Vance, being only the latest example, and with a lot less relevant experience.

Additionally, even if you weren't lying about Harris's qualification--which you most certainly are--it would not in any way rationalize or justify the Gabbard nomination nor the seemingly endless parade of Trump nominees who have no business doing the job for which they're being considered. Your argument, such as it is, is that Biden picked someone underqualified, so Trump should try to top that by picking people entirely out of let field. 

Eventually some lucky, pimple-faced teen will make Trump the "Best Milkshake of All Time" and end up nominated for a cabinet position.

 

I don't think you know how chess works. And checkmate is one word, FYI.

 

Edited by Hodad
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, West said:

^^^ no reason to believe this MSNBChina bot. Duh. ^^^

The REASON is one of which you are IGNORANT. Trump has had 7 private convos with Putin since leaving the WH. 🤮

Oct 8, 2024  Bob Woodward writes in his new book “War” that Donald Trump has had as many as seven private phone calls with Vladimir Putin since leaving ...
Missing: least ‎| Show results with: least
 
Oct 8, 2024  Former President Donald Trump has spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin as many as seven times since he left the White House, ...
Oct 8, 2024  Former President Trump has stayed in touch with Russian President Vladimir Putin since leaving the White House, according to journalist Bob ...
Missing: least private
Oct 9, 2024  Bob Woodward writes in his new book “War” that Donald Trump has had as many as seven private phone calls with Vladimir Putin since leaving ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by robosmith
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You're being deliberately stupid. 

Harris was the AG of our nation's largest state and a US senator. Which is pretty normal resume for a VP pick. In fact, about half of all VP picks have come out of the Senate. Vance, being only the latest example, and with a lot less relevant experience.

Additionally, even if you weren't lying about Harris's qualification--which you most certainly are--it would not in any way rationalize or justify the Gabbard nomination nor the seemingly endless parade of Trump nominees who have no business doing the job for which they're being considered. Your argument, such as it is, is that Biden picked someone underqualified, so Trump should try to top that by picking people entirely out of let field. 

Eventually some lucky, pimple-faced teen will make Trump the "Best Milkshake of All Time" and end up nominated for a cabinet position.

 

I don't think you know how chess works. And checkmate is one word, FYI.

 

Gaetz was a lawyer, a representative and served on the Judiciary Committee. How is that functionally different? He actually has experience in the field that he's supposed to be working in. She had no military experience, no economic management experience, and no foreign diplomacy experience.

But she was a black (or South Asian woman in other press releases) so she had that privilege going for her.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You're being deliberately stupid. 

Harris was the AG of our nation's largest state and a US senator. Which is pretty normal resume for a VP pick. In fact, about half of all VP picks have come out of the Senate. Vance, being only the latest example, and with a lot less relevant experience.

Additionally, even if you weren't lying about Harris's qualification--which you most certainly are--it would not in any way rationalize or justify the Gabbard nomination nor the seemingly endless parade of Trump nominees who have no business doing the job for which they're being considered. Your argument, such as it is, is that Biden picked someone underqualified, so Trump should try to top that by picking people entirely out of let field. 

Eventually some lucky, pimple-faced teen will make Trump the "Best Milkshake of All Time" and end up nominated for a cabinet position.

 

I don't think you know how chess works. And checkmate is one word, FYI.

 

the election is over, bro

we control all the levers of power now

chaos is a ladder ; it's payback time

keep crying about it tho, little b1tch

we love it

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The REASON is one of which you are IGNORANT. Trump has had at least 7 private convos with Putin since leaving the WH. 🤮

Oct 8, 2024  Bob Woodward writes in his new book “War” that Donald Trump has had as many as seven private phone calls with Vladimir Putin since leaving ...
Missing: least ‎| Show results with: least
 
Oct 8, 2024  Former President Donald Trump has spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin as many as seven times since he left the White House, ...
Oct 8, 2024  Former President Trump has stayed in touch with Russian President Vladimir Putin since leaving the White House, according to journalist Bob ...
Missing: least private
Oct 9, 2024  Bob Woodward writes in his new book “War” that Donald Trump has had as many as seven private phone calls with Vladimir Putin since leaving ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

So? What did Putin get from Trump?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
47 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I don't think you know how chess works. And checkmate is one word, FYI.

 

Not if you wear cor-blimey trousers and live in a council flat.

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

No. Why the hell would any sane person think that experience as a prosecutor qualifies someone to run all of America's intelligence agencies?

A serious appointment would be someone with deep experience in intelligence work. You know, someone who has an advanced understanding of the incredibly serious job they'd be accepting. 

Trump obviously prioritizes VERY different credentials: namely personal loyalty and media reach. 

We're just watching the worst season of The Apprentice ever. But America voted for a reality TV huckster, so nobody can be surprised that we got President Camacho.

There is no point in listening, let alone debate with these people. They are the same people who would believe their cab driver, over a 20 year expert of infectious diseases, when it comes to COVID.

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...