Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Raskin Says They Won't Certify Trump and It Will Be Civil War

gatomontes99
 Share

Recommended Posts

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted

 

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Grand Master

Nationalist

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

 

Lol...are they gonna all scream at the sky for us too?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

 

It's only a civil war or insurrection if republicans start it. If the democrats started it's only "Intense Activism"

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Deluge Grand Master

Deluge

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

Certified or not, if Trump wins the election he IS going into the WH. We go by the will of the people, not the will of the democrats. ;)

  • Like 1
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's only a civil war or insurrection if republicans start it. If the democrats started it's only "Intense Activism"

In this case, he actually used the words civil war to desceibe the actions.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

 

Your video DOES NOT SHOW Raskin saying anything about refusal to certify nor STARTING a civil war. Duh

He's talking about the Trump mob "rampaging."

He does say that the SCOTUS left enforcement of the 14th Section 3 UP TO CONGRESS which is true.

Congress ACTING is NOT "insurrection." Duh

Edited by robosmith
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your video DOES NOT SHOW Raskin saying anything about refusal to certify nor STARTING a civil war. Duh

He's talking about the Trump mob "rampaging."

He does say that the SCOTUS left enforcement of the 14th Section 3 UP TO CONGRESS which is true.

Congress ACTING is NOT "insurrection." Duh

 

21 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The actions of defending against the rampaging Trump mob attacking Congress. Duh

He's not saying it but he is...your words.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

But it would be mostly peaceful.

Fires are peaceful because campfires are pretty!

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Grand Master

robosmith

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

He's not saying it but he is...your words.

You're LYING AGAIN.

DEFENDING against a Trump MOB RAMPAGE, IS NOT starting a civil war. Duh

Edited by robosmith
Legato Grand Master

Legato

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're LYING AGAIN.

DEFENDING against a Trump MOB RAMPAGE, IS NOT starting a civil war. Duh

There would be no civil war, nobody is making pink rifles with rainbow red dots for the Dems.

WestCanMan Grand Master

WestCanMan

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

It's called "selective outrage". 

If Trump sniffs a flower it means that he's a pedophile, but if Biden makes out with his granddaughter, kisses little boys on the mouth, showers with his young teen daughter, and sniffs all the children that he comes close to, it's harmless. 

  • Downvote 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

In this case, he actually used the words civil war to desceibe the actions.

That just means it's the republican's fault because they made him do it :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

WestCanMan Grand Master

WestCanMan

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I thought the left saw insurrection as awful? Now they are going to start civil war over the results?

The weasel in the video is trying to say that Jan 6th was an insurrection, and that Trump led that insurrection, which means that sec 3 of the 14th amendment prohibits Trump from being elected to public office. 

Just because weasel-man is effeminate and wears a bowtie doesn't mean that he knows what an insurrection is, or what it would take for someone to be found guilty of leading one. 

He's trying to say that:

  • the US gov't should allow Trump to run for POTUS and then inform his 90M (or whatever) voters that he can't take office, and that wouldn't constitute 1-party rule or anything, and that he'd be comfortable with the resulting civil war conditions which would ensue at that point. We all know that mamby-pamby little b1tch wouldn't be taking part of any of the hostilities at that point though: he'd sit in a gated community, isolated from all of the violence, and if anyone came near his house that would be a war crime. 

It doesn't have to make sense, he's a leftard cultist. 

 

For the sake of argument: if you go by the watered-down definition of insurrection then the assault on the WH, the overtaking of various police stations, and other gov't buildings all constitute "insurrections" which no one was ever charged for. 

Even if you pretend that none of that other stuff happened, it's hard to pretend that there was an unarmed insurrection on Jan 6th, which was orchestrated by Trump, and yet there's still no evidence of him leading it anywhere.

And how does: "Hey, use 10K national guards on Jan 6th, I've already authorized it" work with the "I'm gonna overthrow the gov't on Jan 6th" narrative? 

And why were the insurrectionists so peaceful when they were inside the capitol? Man, I bet that Nancy wishes that footage from inside the capitol was never released... We'd all be left to assume that it was a warzone in there. 

The weaselly boy in that video knows that all the insurrection BS doesn't pass the sniff test, and that's why Trump was never put on trial. "But let's use Sec 3 of the 14th amendment..." 🤣

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403
    AlembicoEMR
    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...