Jump to content

Tightest Race Ever - despite ALL the insane goings on Harris and Trump are still within a hair's breath of each other. How is this happening?


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Nah, his legacy is a great recovery from the absolute disaster he inherited and some major long-term infrastructure and investment legislation. He's not Lincoln, but history will view him as a welcome and successful return to normal after the Trump debacle. 

And to the second point, returning to office a man who once already tried to illegally seize power and overthrow a democratic election is just giving him another chance to try again--with no reason to expect that he won't. 

Brandon's legacy will be that of an addled old part who's family profited from bribery. We will make fcking sure of that.

Illegally? Has Trump been convicted of this in your little world? Because in the real world he hasn't.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So according to the latest polls looking at the swing States Harris and Trump are so close you'd have a difficult time slipping a barbecued cat hair between them.

They are very well within the margin of errors in the swing states and can only be said to be in an absolute tie. It could go either way so easily it's not funny.

So what this is going to come down to is the getting out the vote. Unless something changes the party who gets their vote out will win.

How is this possible? There has been more going on in this election than any I can remember. There's been debates, candidates have fallen by the wayside, no less than two assassination attempts, elderly men have gone senile, cats have been eaten, foghorn Leghorn accents have been used, conventions have been held featuring giant IUD's and free abortions,  Hulk Hogan has taken an active roll to mobilize the Hulksters and still the two candidates are within 2% of each other or less nationally and in the swing states it's basically a dead heat.

 

So what's going to break this? Are we just going to have an absolute tie right up to the election day? There's no more debates except for the vice presidents, harris obviously isn't going to do any more interviews, trump may very well get shot at again but obviously it doesn't change the numbers, what's going to break this deadlock?

Honestly as I have said before I believe that trump has the advantage in a long game but it's amazing to watch how flat the poles are no matter what happens.

 

(also side prediction, the next attempt on trump will be a drone which will be able to get close enough because it's got an ' eat at Joe's" banner behind it ) 

Softball question, leftists are imbeciles. 

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well one thing that is true is that trump has regularly pulled lower than his actual results. Now if you dig into the numbers a bit that doesn't always mean that he's actually higher than the pole say, but he does seem to be able to get his vote out so his actual results are slightly higher than polling would suggest.

And that may wind up making all of the difference in this election. If people just aren't all that motivated to get out to vote for harris but they are motivated to get out for trump then even if it's a neck and neck tie in the polls trump is going to win

He draws the crowds, that's for sure. He even drew a big crowd in NY recently. 

The biggest concern in all of this is election rigging. How much cheating will the democrats get away with? 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
Just now, Nationalist said:

Brandon's legacy will be that of an addled old part who's family profited from bribery. We will make fcking sure of that.

Illegally? Has Trump been convicted of this in your little world? Because in the real world he hasn't.

You can't "make sure of" anything. Lol. You are miles and miles (or kilometers) from having any influence on the historical view of an administration. 

Yes, illegally. Eastman himself, the architect of the scheme, admitted that it was illegal and ultimately asked for a pardon in advance of the fallout, in case they failed. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

WCM: "only shit comes out of your mouth" 

2 minutes later.....

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Why are you always thinking about shit, did you miss breakfast today?

It's like I have a crystal ball or something.

  • Haha 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

You can't "make sure of" anything. Lol. You are miles and miles (or kilometers) from having any influence on the historical view of an administration. 

Yes, illegally. Eastman himself, the architect of the scheme, admitted that it was illegal and ultimately asked for a pardon in advance of the fallout, in case they failed. 

Sure I can...and will.

Yet no charges...oh well. You failed again.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Bullspit. She completed a coup when she, Obama and Hillary forced out Joe and installed her without any voter input.

Thanks for proving you know next to NOTHING about what happened.

It was the big money donors (incl Clooney) who showed Joe the light.

He could survive without fellow pols backing, but NOT without campaign funds.

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Gawd but you're naive.

You're an IGNORANT Canuck who's far out of touch.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

He didn't try to have him throw out the votes. Why do you have to lie to make your point?

Trump, (more accurately, his lawyers) asked Pence to suspend the certification to complete investigations into cheating.

And you don't understand that is NOT Constitutional. There is a time limit on the certification and Trump was desperately trying to block it past the time limit.

Date for Counting Electoral Votes The date for counting the electoral votes is fixed by law as January 6 following each presidential election (3 U.S.C. §15), unless the date is changed by law.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, sharkman said:

100% on your poll BS comment. And on Harris, she was also of Indian heritage her whole life until it became expedient to be black instead.  

So you believe having a Jamaican father doesn't make her black? LMAO

You need to stop believing the pathological LIAR Trump.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ur an id1ot. Brandon had no intention of giving up. They were gonna declare him unfit had he not agreed to step aside. They also had plenty of time to re-run the proper primaries and let real Democracy function.

There's a reason you post NO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT. One is you're Canuck ignorant about US DNC primary rules.

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...such stupidity...such nativity. 

I've known and worked with numerous politicians and know they do not just step aside from power.

Politics is not the business of representing the electorate. It is the business of gathering power to one's self.

Don't be such a goof.

^Spoken like a true MAGA TrumpubliCON. "EVERY MAN FOR HIMSELF!" is their motto. 🤮

Posted
5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

In both of our last elections, the Liberals were supposed to get the popular vote and they never did. The 2016 election in the US was way off.

The 2020 election was the biggest fraud ever perpetuated on democracy, for all we know democracy is already over in the US. 

You need to stop believing FOS LIES. They are LIARS.

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

His legacy is already trashed and will be trashed even more.

Now you can explain how a 2nd Trump term would sell democracy down the river?

I'll wait...

He didn't GET THE VOTES, no matter how many right wing propaganda sites tell you he did. Duh

Posted
5 hours ago, sharkman said:

Just another leftwing conspiracy theory…

which was corroborated by the SWORN TESTIMONY of WH INSIDERS at the House hearing.

You seem to believe you can just wave your hand and make that go away.

Here's a clue for you: sworn testimony trumps everything else. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Donald tried to expose Democrat cheating. Which they did.

Remember...Hunter's laptop turned out to be real...didn't it.

Who told you the CONTENTS were NOT tampered with?

And how could they KNOW when the chain of custody was completely trashed once Rudy took possession?

Now be a good little MAGA CULT b1tch and report your FAILURE to der leader.

Posted
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

He draws the crowds, that's for sure. He even drew a big crowd in NY recently. 

The biggest concern in all of this is election rigging. How much cheating will the democrats get away with? 

You are so IGNORANT you don't know that it's the RepubliCONS who are planning to withhold vote certification if Trump doesn't win their district.

Jun 6, 2024  A ghost from recent election cycles — controversies over certification of results — is beginning to re-emerge as the nation heads closer to ...
 
Posted
32 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for proving you know next to NOTHING about what happened.

It was the big money donors (incl Clooney) who showed Joe the light.

He could survive without fellow pols backing, but NOT without campaign funds.

You're an IGNORANT Canuck who's far out of touch.

Who do you think convinced Clooney? All I know is, I was raised in a middle class family. I grew up in a neighborhood where people took pride in their lawns.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
46 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sure I can...and will.

Yet no charges...oh well. You failed again.

You missed all the INDICTMENTS. Those are CHARGES so you're WRONG. LMAO

Aug 22, 2023  Eastman was indicted last week alongside Trump and 17 others, who are accused by District Attorney Fani Willis of scheming to subvert the ...
 
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And so did Trump as they refused to endorse either.

Which was expected, as they haven't endorsed a Republican in 30 years. 

The point is, your candidate lost a legacy endorsement of the democrat party because she's a complete f*ckup. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And you don't understand that is NOT Constitutional. There is a time limit on the certification and Trump was desperately trying to block it past the time limit.

Date for Counting Electoral Votes The date for counting the electoral votes is fixed by law as January 6 following each presidential election (3 U.S.C. §15), unless the date is changed by law.

USC is not the constitution.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Who do you think convinced Clooney? All I know is, I was raised in a middle class family. I grew up in a neighborhood where people took pride in their lawns.

Don't quit your day job cause you suck at stand up.

Just now, Deluge said:

Which was expected, as they haven't endorsed a Republican in 30 years. 

The point is, your candidate lost a valuable endorsement because she's a complete f*ckup. 

No, it's cause truck drivers are lDIOTS. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You are so IGNORANT you don't know that it's the RepubliCONS who are planning to withhold vote certification if Trump doesn't win their district.

Jun 6, 2024  A ghost from recent election cycles — controversies over certification of results — is beginning to re-emerge as the nation heads closer to ...
 

No, stupid. If they do withhold it's because the democrats rigged the election. The simple fix to this is don't cheat in the first place.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. ;) 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...