Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is some interesting stuff:

Quote

https://nypost.com/2024/08/23/opinion/kamalas-brother-in-law-fleeced-taxpayers-for-billions-to-give-to-left-wing-groups-and-lawyers/

Then, in 2009, Tony West took over the department’s Civil Division, the division that litigates and settles lawsuits.

Once West arrived, his deputy emailed colleagues asking “can you explain to Tony the best way to allocate some money toward an organization of our choosing?”

Settlements became the vehicle for paying off political allies.

For example, in late 2010, after a Supreme Court victory, DOJ lawyers were on the cusp of winning a decade-long fight against discrimination claims by 91 Hispanic and female farmers.

That’s when West intervened and, as The New York Times put it, “engineered a stunning turnabout.”

DOJ agreed to a $1.33 billion settlement which included thousands of farmers who had never claimed bias.

The deal was made over the “vehement objections” of the department’s career lawyers.

The Times’s investigative report described West’s settlement as a “runaway train, driven by racial politics . . . and law firms that stand to gain more than $130 million in fees.”

The projected settlement size ballooned to over $4.4 billion as additional plaintiffs were added, including Native American farmers.

The government’s statistical expert was appalled: “‘If they had gone to trial, the government would have prevailed . . . It was just a joke. . . . I was so disgusted. It was simply buying the support of the Native Americans.’”


 

Quote

But West did not just bilk taxpayers. He shook down corporations, too.

In a series of bank settlements, his team added increasingly aggressive provisions requiring the institutions to make nearly a billion dollars in mandatory donations to Democrat-supporting activist groups.

Donations were given double credit against required targets, incentivizing these payments over direct relief to victims of the housing crises.

West’s team specifically structured the terms to ensure that they would benefit only their political allies while leaving conservative groups ineligible.

An internal email shows West deputies rewording a settlement’s donation provisions to ensure the bank could not select a “conservative” property rights organization as a recipient.

 

Quote

A 2016 Volkswagen settlement required the company to fund a $2 billion White House electric car initiative that Congress had specifically rejected.

The largesse delighted liberal groups.

An email circulated saying they ought to build a “statue” to West and “bow down to this statue each day after we receive our $200,000+.”

In this legal shakedown, California’s attorney general at the time, Kamala Harris, was an active participant, cosigning the agreements for her state.

I split these out into three separate allegations from the same article.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Oh look, a female democrats candidate for president whose Corrupt and sells influence. We've never seen that before

I don't think there's any big shocks here. She's scum

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I split these out into three separate allegations from the same article.

Seems you've mistaken an Opinion article for news reporting.

Since it's Murdoch's National Enquirer equivalent, that makes it just BULLSHIT.

Not saying there aren't SOME facts, it's the OPINIONS that are BULLSHIT.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Seems you've mistaken an Opinion article for news reporting.

Since it's Murdoch's National Enquirer equivalent, that makes it just BULLSHIT.

Not saying there aren't SOME facts, it's the OPINIONS that are BULLSHIT.

Ok, then pay to read it at the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/us/farm-loan-bias-claims-often-unsupported-cost-us-millions.html

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Oh boy.

So Kamala has to win or be charged and prosecuted.

For the ALLEGED crimes of her BROTHER IN LAW?

You've been drinking early today.

Of course, Trump's list of revenge "crimes" and "criminals" is long, so you might be right, since SCOTUS ruled that he can order the AG to prosecute ANYONE for sham crimes. 🤮

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Didn't have to pay to copy this:

Quote

U.S. Opens Spigot After Farmers Claim Discrimination
Share full article


265

Black farmers held a protest outside the Agriculture Department in Washington in 2002 tied to litigation about farm loan discrimination.Credit...Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
By Sharon LaFraniere
April 25, 2013
In the winter of 2010, after a decade of defending the government against bias claims by Hispanic and female farmers, Justice Department lawyers seemed to have victory within their grasp.

Ever since the Clinton administration agreed in 1999 to make $50,000 payments to thousands of black farmers, the Hispanics and women had been clamoring in courtrooms and in Congress for the same deal. They argued, as the African-Americans had, that biased federal loan officers had systematically thwarted their attempts to borrow money to farm.

But a succession of courts — and finally the Supreme Court — had rebuffed their pleas. Instead of an army of potential claimants, the government faced just 91 plaintiffs. Those cases, the government lawyers figured, could be dispatched at limited cost.

None of the OPINION from NYP

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

For the ALLEGED crimes of her BROTHER IN LAW?

You've been drinking early today.

Of course, Trump's list of revenge "crimes" and "criminals" is long, so you might be right, since SCOTUS ruled that he can order the AG to prosecute ANYONE for sham crimes. 🤮

I told you...

What comes around...goes around.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And him promoting VIOLENCE is why people are trying to kill Donald. They are "fight like hell" at his command.

Karma!

So you're excusing the assassination attempts.

Lol...what a worm.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You're excusing HIS FRAUDS and attempts to destroy democracy. Karma!

Fine. You go with that.

See you at the finish line...slaver.

 

 

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
21 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

This is some interesting stuff:


 

 

I split these out into three separate allegations from the same article.

I heard a rumour from a complete random stranger that her cousin’s neighbour’s mailman’s sister’s former roommate’s boyfriend had an overdue library book.

 

LOCK HER UP!!!!

Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're excusing HIS FRAUDS and attempts to destroy democracy. Karma!

You forgot the Sutra.

Posted
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're excusing HIS FRAUDS and attempts to destroy democracy. Karma!

That's a lie of course, and you seem to be excusing his assassination attempts.  You've lost any right to claim anyone ELSE is trying to steal democracy. 

Just now, CdnFox said:

That's a lie of course, and you seem to be excusing his assassination attempts.  You've lost any right to claim anyone ELSE is trying to steal democracy. 

His Sutra is still at the cleaners.  That's why he's barking like a little dogma. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,916
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    juliewar3214
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...