Housing affordability is a crisis in Canada

[CdnFox]

Just now, Black Dog said:

You called a black guy a monkey.

 

And?  YOU might think of black people as monkeys but i dont. And i call lots of people monkeys.

Are YOU saying you think black people are monkeys?

[Black Dog]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And?  YOU might think of black people as monkeys but i dont. And i call lots of people monkeys.

Are YOU saying you think black people are monkeys?

You called a Black guy a monkey which is a pretty well-known racial slur.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You called a Black guy a monkey which is a pretty well-known racial slur.

In your teeny little world maybe.  I guess you think black people are monkeys. 

I used a very common phrase to suggest a fellow poster was in an irrational fashion for my amusement.  The racist here is you. 

Why do you think black people are monkeys?

[Black Dog]

Just now, CdnFox said:

In your teeny little world maybe.  I guess you think black people are monkeys. 

It's like the second most common racial slur after the N word, you can't possibly this dumb.

Quote

I used a very common phrase to suggest a fellow poster was in an irrational fashion for my amusement.  The racist here is you. 
Why do you think black people are monkeys?

So calling Black people monkeys is a common thing for you?

[CdnFox]

Just now, Black Dog said:

It's like the second most common racial slur after the N word, you can't possibly this dumb.

So calling Black people monkeys is a common thing for you?

Why do you think black people are monkeys?

[Black Dog]

14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why do you think black people are monkeys?

See, this doesn't really work when you're the one who called a Black person a monkey.

Edited September 17, 2024 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

Just now, Black Dog said:

See, this doesn't really work when you're the one who called a Black person a monkey.

You're the  only one saying black people are monkeys. 

I get it - you thought you could have a 'gotcha' moment by faking up some bullshit 'racism' that doesn't exist and you're angry it's not going well for you 

the only one here who's suggested black people are monkeys is you. 

[Black Dog]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You're the  only one saying black people are monkeys. 

I didn't call a Black person a monkey, you did.

Quote

get it - you thought you could have a 'gotcha' moment by faking up some bullshit 'racism' that doesn't exist and you're angry it's not going well for you 

I'm not angry and I think it's going very well for me judging by how panicked you are here.

Quote

 

the only one here who's suggested black people are monkeys is you. 

 

Except you actually called a Black person a monkey.

[herbie]

The guy just likes to argue despite how stupid it makes him look.

Someone with a working brain might point out the new first time & new home $1.5M cap on 30 year mortgages might possibly drive prices even higher and worsen housing sffordability.

[CdnFox]

18 minutes ago, herbie said:

The guy just likes to argue despite how stupid it makes him look.

Someone with a working brain might point out the new first time & new home $1.5M cap on 30 year mortgages might possibly drive prices even higher and worsen housing sffordability.

You're talking about your dough's new plan? Yeah, the amusing thing there is that it's the same basic plan that Harper killed when he took over because the Liberals tried it the last time there was a housing affordability issue and we know it doesn't work.

I think this is something that people can agree on regardless of political stripe, if you make it easier to buy you make it easier for people to increase the price. All it does is increase the home prices and make it harder to buy and expose people to more risk because the amortization is longer. This is not the way to solve the housing crisis

[Dougie93]

15 minutes ago, herbie said:

Someone with a working brain might point out the new first time & new home $1.5M cap on 30 year mortgages might possibly drive prices even higher and worsen housing sffordability.

bring it on

I don't have to sell my property to access the equity therein

a million dollar line of credit at 4.5% interest rate

beats using a credit card seven times over

f*ck the Millennials, they're mostly Woke Commie traitors anyways

 

[CdnFox]

51 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I didn't call a Black person a monkey, you did.

I'm not angry and I think it's going very well for me judging by how panicked you are here.

Except you actually called a Black person a monkey.

Whatever racist.  Sorry your big moment didn't work out for you   

[Black Dog]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Whatever racist.  Sorry your big moment didn't work out for you   

I don't know what you think i was expecting but at the bare minimum a normal person would have said "oh geez that was not what I intended but I can see how it looks bad" but you're so socially and mentally retarded you can't even muster that much. Pretty sad!

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Did you post the rights listed at the landlord and tenant board?

There are no rights posted at the landlord tenant board. Those are regulations by and large.  The landlord tenant board is not an instrument of 'rights' in Canada. 

Rights in canada derrive from our charter and constitution. You might argue some are defined by the human rights councils although those can be subject to court challenge. 

Anything else is just a rule or a law that the gov't can set aside at a whim and frequently does. The gov't can decide tomorrow that all landlords charge 3 dollars per sq ft and thats it. And that no tenant can be removed for any reason 

In fact htey regularly change what landlords can charge and whether or not they can evict them. 

You CAN"T change that it's a violation of rights to discriminate against someone because they're gay.  Therefore a gay person has that right. 

But landlords do not have rights. Property rights were specifically excluded from the charter.  

So again. Show  me where a landlord has a 'right'.  they have none. Tomorrow the gov't could very easily and lawfully say they are taking over all rental places and the landlords must turn over their property with no compensation. That would be perfectly legal, no withstanding clause required nothing. 

You claim there are rights. It is on YOU to show there are and i've shown that in the instruments which outline our rights there are none. And i've show that the gov'ts  have on many occasions and without warning simply decided landlords cannot evict, decided what landlords must charge, decided how long people must be alllowed to stay and a bunch of other things that the landlord has no control over and must comply with. 

Tell me ONE thing that's a 'right'.

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I don't know what you think i was expecting but at the bare minimum a normal person would have said "oh geez that was not what I intended but I can see how it looks bad" but you're so socially and mentally retarded you can't even muster that much. Pretty sad!

I might have said if he'd complained, but it was very obvious that you were just being racist in even bringing it up.  He knows damn well that as mad as i am at his foolishness there was no intent to be racist. I know it.  Everyone knows it.  It was pretty obvious you were just being a racebaiting douchebag. 

Sorry you're butthurt i didn't play along with your race games. 

[Dougie93]

22 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Did you post the rights listed at the landlord and tenant board?

no need to rent to Millenials nor Zoomers if you bought before prices went through the roof

Canada's absurd leftist lunatic regulations is the reason why the young people suffer

the mortgage for a luxury bungalow on 12,000 sq ft fully landscaped property

is half what sad sack leftist Millinnials and Zoomers have to pay to rent an apartment

mortgage ; $1200 to $1500 per month

rental ;  $2500 to $3000 per month

just desserts, Generation X ftw

Edited September 17, 2024 by Dougie93

[Moonbox]

20 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Did you post the rights listed at the landlord and tenant board?

I did, which was after he told us that tenants have no rights.  🫠

[Black Dog]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I might have said if he'd complained, but it was very obvious that you were just being racist in even bringing it up

I am fascinated by this mindset that you think my pointing you out saying "dance monkey" to a Black person somehow makes me racist. You should really get an MRI done.

Quote

He knows damn well that as mad as i am at his foolishness there was no intent to be racist. I know it.  Everyone knows it.  It was pretty obvious you were just being a racebaiting douchebag. 

Sorry you're butthurt i didn't play along with your race games. 

LOl so you know it's racist but you can't admit it because i'm the one who brought it up and doing so would hurt your feelings too much.

Edited September 17, 2024 by Black Dog

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Moonbox said:

I did, which was after he told us that tenants have no rights.  🫠

You i expect to be stupid enough not to realize that a regulation or a law is not a right.  A regulation can be changed in an afternoon and laws almost as fast.  That's why we have a charter of rights. Those are actual rights.  That's why we have courts but ALSO a human RIGHTS tribunal. 

But while i'm perfectly aware you're that dumb, i would have expected HIM to know that without being told. 

[CdnFox]

51 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

There are. You simply feel like there aren't any.

SO point to one.  

Quote

I have, and you "refuted" it based on covid-19 shut downs no longer in effect. 

No I refuted it by proving that the government can, at a whim, say it's no longer in effect. Which means it's not a right. It's a regulation at best. It's whatever the government feels it is that day

And I pointed out that it's not just covid. They frequently decide what landlords can or cannot charge, change the rules with contracts already in place not being grandfathered, they can do whatever they like.

So you are absolutely lying your ass off when you claim that that is a right. It's not even  a legal right considering they can change the law all the time never mind an actual right

 

Have no rights. If you are claiming they do then you need to prove that you your statement is accurate. You need to post a right and explain where it's recorded that it's a right. Because it isn't the residential tenancy act, nothing in there is a right

[Moonbox]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You i expect to be stupid enough not to realize that a regulation or a law is not a right.

I'm smart enough to know that laws grant rights.  

You?  We're still waiting to see what the floor is for how dumb you are.  🤡

 

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I'm smart enough to know that laws grant rights.  

LOL then you're pretty stupid   Laws do not grant rights.   People may casually talk about legal rights but it's just a saying. 

The charter and the constitution grant rights. Certain common law rights are recognized by tribunals and such. But no, laws do not grant rights. A law may enforce a right or reflect a right or may be enabled by a right but laws do not grant rights    Some laws are even found to be violations of rights and in such a case the law is considered to lose out and must be changed. 

LOL jeez kid didn't you learn ANY of this in school? 

Quote

You?  We're still waiting to see what the floor is for how dumb you are. 

LOL  your neck must hurt from looking up so much then  

Edited September 18, 2024 by CdnFox

[Moonbox]

11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL  your neck must hurt from looking up so much then  

My neck?  I worry about yours, bending your spine backwards to lick your own butthole, and presenting that as your argument.  

 

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

Like when? Be specific. 

 

Oh look - something i've answered a dozen times in this thread and your only debate technique is to ask me to repeat it for the 13th time. 

Point out the document that gives landlords RIGHTS.  Be specific. 

8 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

A regulatory body, isn't a removal of rights.

True - a regulatory body CANNOT remove rights.  If a right is in place, a regulatory body CAN NOT pass a regulation or law that interferes with that right .

IF the regulatory body passes regulation and law - that means there's no rights being interfered with. 

You just shot your own argument in the foot. 

8 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

You have the freedom to drive where you want,

No you don't - show me the law that says you have the "right" to use gov't owned and maintained roads without their permission. 

You have the PRIVLIDGE of doing so.  not the right. 

 

And i see still not a single cite from you

Where's this document guaranteeing a landlord's rights? Provide it or admit you're a lying sack of shit. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Moonbox said:

My neck?  I worry about yours, bending your spine backwards to lick your own butthole, and presenting that as your argument.  

 

Ahhh yes - more of your weird sexual fantasies about me.   What the hell is it with every guy on the left that as soon as they start to look stupid they start with weird sexual stuff they imagine?

Well they do say lefties are more prone to mental health issues. 

Oh  and nobody can read the little meme picture you made. Font's way too small. I appreciate that you went through all the effort to try to make a picture to impress me but unfortunately i guess you're not that good at it.