Can Kamala Harris Still Ditch Walz?

[WestCanMan]

On Fox they were saying that Walz doesn't have to be her pick. She has until the end of the DNC clown circus to officially name her running mate.

I get that the Dem ticket would look ridiculous if they ditched a VP so soon after replacing Biden as well, but the last clusterfork rolled off of them like water off a duck's back. 

What's a harder task for CNN et al:

• dragging Kamala across the finish line with that valour-thieving, pro-riot, boy-tampon dork, or
• explaining why she went with a shiny new DEI running mate?

 

CNN already has a long row to hoe in convincing America that:

1. being pro-riots doesn't matter.
2. Being a defund policer doesn't matter.
3. Failing at the border doesn't matter.
4. Being part of the worst economic policy administration in 40 years doesn't matter.
5. Pimping bail for violent rioters doesn't matter.

Now with Walz they have to add to the list:

1. Being known for wasting money on tampons in boys' bathrooms doesn't matter. 
2. Leaving your citizens and their businesses at the mercy of rioters over and over again doesn't matter
3. Stolen valour doesn't matter.

Not only that, they suddenly have to convince their own cultists that fat old white guys with guns aren't all racists and misogynists anymore.

 

Adding a VP pick isn't supposed to make your job harder, it's supposed to make it easier, and Tim Walz is a PR disaster now. Regardless of how little the avg Demi cares about patriotism, everyone, even anti-American gangsters, understand that pretending to be a veteran when you're not is just plain sickening. You can't convince latinos, blacks, or anyone else that pretending to have fought in a war when you never did is ok. It's just despicable and unforgivable. 

 

If Kamala dumps him, the MSM can distract the cultists from the undemocratic tire-fire that the Dems' nomination process has been. It's what they do for a living, and the cultists have never noticed. They can just switch the focus to "THE DEI DYNAMIC DUO!" and the cultists will instantly make that their campaign slogan. 

 

My question is: do the Dems absolutely have to leave Walz on the ticket - has he been officially chosen for better or worse - or is it still just a suggestion right now with an official carved-in-stone naming to be done later?

[Black Dog]

7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Adding a VP pick isn't supposed to make your job harder, it's supposed to make it easier, and Tim Walz is a PR disaster now. Regardless of how little the avg Demi cares about patriotism, everyone, even anti-American gangsters, understand that pretending to be a veteran when you're not is just plain sickening. You can't convince latinos, blacks, or anyone else that pretending to have fought in a war when you never did is ok. It's just despicable and unforgivable. 

I encourage you guys to run with the line that a guy who served 24 years in the National Guard isn't a veteran. Say it loud, say it proud.

[WestCanMan]

43 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I encourage you guys to run with the line that a guy who served 24 years in the National Guard isn't a veteran. Say it loud, say it proud.

Tim Walz has been 100% busted for pretending to have served in combat, which he did absolutely not do anytime, ever, even for a single second.

Tim Walz uses the term 'veteran' deceptively to create the illusion that he served his country in war when he absolutely did not do that.

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world. 

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world

Is that loud and proud enough for you?

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world. Even members of his former military unit say it publicly.

[impartialobserver]

I guess that she could legally or procedurally. I do not see it happening. He is a rather safe choice. Not the most inspiring but that's how it goes

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Tim Walz has been 100% busted for pretending to have served in combat, which he did absolutely not do anytime, ever, even for a single second.

lol no.

Quote

Tim Walz uses the term 'veteran' deceptively to create the illusion that he served his country in war when he absolutely did not do that.

That's not what the term "veteran" means dipshit. Anyone who puts their time in is a veteran, but please continue to denigrate people who served but did not fight in a war, I'm sure that will go over great

Quote

Tim Walz is an absolute disgrace to combat veterans, current and ex-military personnel all over the world. Even members of his former military unit say it publicly.

And other members of his unit say those other guys are full of shit.

[August1991]

15 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

....

That's not what the term "veteran" means dipshit. Anyone who puts their time in is a veteran, but please continue to denigrate people who served but did not fight in a war, I'm sure that will go over great

...

BD, you're missing the point.

Years ago I was aboard the HMCS Moncton while it visited Montreal. I bought a hat as a souvenir. Later, I wore it in Vermont. In a cafe, an American asked when I served. I explained that I didn't; who I was. No problem. But I never wore the hat again.

For Americans, this is a big deal.

Edited August 9, 2024 by August1991

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

lol no.

Lol, yeah, dumbass, there's a video of him explicitly saying that he carried guns in war. He absolutely never did that. 

By him saying that, he absolutely pretended to be a combat veteran. He is NOT a combat veteran.

Quote

That's not what the term "veteran" means dipshit. Anyone who puts their time in is a veteran, but please continue to denigrate people who served but did not fight in a war, I'm sure that will go over great

The legal definition of 'veteran' means nothing, dipshit. The fact remains that you can use the word veteran deceptively to fool people into thinking that you are a combat veteran when you are not, and that's what Tim Walz does.

Tim Walz did that multiple times. Multiple times.

In Kamala's selection speech she said about him "Veterans call him CSM Walz". 

He said himself that "he was deployed in 'Operation Something Freedom' and was in the "European theatre" protecting bases from Turkey to England..." So he even used the word theatre deceptively, because no one uses that term aside from "theatre of war". 

Google "European theatre" and all that comes up is references to war. The term is ingrained in us to only refer to areas where there is combat. Tim Walz IS A DECEPTIVE WEASEL. Absolutely. I know you're ok with that, but you're more of a weasel than he is. 

No, sorry, the word veteran should never be used deceptively. That is disgusting. Your defence of it is reprehensible and just adds to your repugnant persona. 

 

FYI I served 3 years in the military: active duty, full-time. I AM NOT A VETERAN. I WILL NEVER TELL ANYONE THAT I AM A VETERAN. I don't care. I just don't care. I'm never going to say or do anything that tricks people into believing that I am a combat veteran. It's just plain disgusting.

If some other 'veteran' wants to call me out for it, good f'ing luck. 

 

The only grey area is where people serve along military fault lines which are within a moment's notice of becoming 'hot' at any minute. The stress is real. The preparation is real. The threat of death is real. 

I served on a shitty destroyer in the Pacific. If there was a war I definitely would have been one of the anonymous casualties of war within months. For sure there were soviet subs that trailed us at times, during the cold war, unbeknownst to us.

So what? I never saw a shot fired in anger. I never stared down a uniformed adversary at Checkpoint Charlie. I am not a veteran, period. 

If an actual vet is talking, I will shut my f'ing mouth and respect them fully. Full stop. I will never compare myself or anything that I did to what they did in any way, shape or form. 

Quote

And other members of his unit say those other guys are full of shit.

The difference between me and Tim Walz is that I will never trick people into believing that I'm a veteran, and no one will ever say that I embarrassed my ship, the navy, combat vets, or vets, or anyone else in the military. 

The fact that a lot of the people who knew Walz and served with him, say those things about him, tells you everything you need to know. 

The fact that actual combat veterans hate him tells you everything you need to know. 

[Black Dog]

6 minutes ago, August1991 said:

BD, you're missing the point.

Years ago I was aboard the HMCS Moncton while it visited Montreal. I bought a hat as a souvenir. Later, I wore it in Vermont. In a cafe, an American asked when I served. I explained that I didn't; who I was. No problem. But I never wore the hat again.

For Americans, this is a big deal.

So you wore the hat and the guy didn't have a problem with your wearing the hat after you explained it? That doesn't sound like it's a big deal. 

Anyway, I think accusing people who served honourably but did not see combat of stealing valour and lying about their veteran status is a great tactic for the Repugs, they need to double-nay! triple!-down on it.

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, August1991 said:

BD, you're missing the point.

Years ago I was aboard the HMCS Moncton while it visited Montreal. I bought a hat as a souvenir. Later, I wore it in Vermont. In a cafe, an American asked when I served. I explained that I didn't; who I was. No problem. But I never wore the hat again.

For Americans, this is a big deal.

I bought an HMCS Qu'Appelle hat for my dad. He wore it, and in my opinion he had every right to. 

I don't see the father or mother or sibling or wife or child of a service member as having any less right to wear that kind of thing than an actual serviceman. Being proud of a family member is perfectly fine, and those people live with the same level of stress as the active duty members. 

It's arguably better to be someone who died in a war than to be a mother, father, wife, child, etc. 

If there was a button hanging off of the hat, it had better belong to that immediate family member though. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

I encourage you guys to run with the line that a guy who served 24 years in the National Guard isn't a veteran. Say it loud, say it proud.

I think Tampon Tim and Rachel Levine would hit it off immediately. 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Lol, yeah, dumbass, there's a video of him explicitly saying that he carried guns in war. He absolutely never did that. 

By him saying that, he absolutely pretended to be a combat veteran. He is NOT a combat veteran.

The legal definition of 'veteran' means nothing, dipshit. The fact remains that you can use the word veteran deceptively to fool people into thinking that you are a combat veteran when you are not, and that's what Tim Walz does.

Tim Walz did that multiple times. Multiple times.

In Kamala's selection speech she said about him "Veterans call him CSM Walz". 

He said himself that "he was deployed in 'Operation Something Freedom' and was in the "European theatre" protecting bases from Turkey to England..." So he even used the word theatre deceptively, because no one uses that term aside from "theatre of war". 

Google "European theatre" and all that comes up is references to war. The term is ingrained in us to only refer to areas where there is combat. Tim Walz IS A DECEPTIVE WEASEL. Absolutely. I know you're ok with that, but you're more of a weasel than he is. 

No, sorry, the word veteran should never be used deceptively. That is disgusting. Your defence of it is reprehensible and just adds to your repugnant persona. 

 

FYI I served 3 years in the military: active duty, full-time. I AM NOT A VETERAN. I WILL NEVER TELL ANYONE THAT I AM A VETERAN. I don't care. I just don't care. I'm never going to say or do anything that tricks people into believing that I am a combat veteran. It's just plain disgusting.

If some other 'veteran' wants to call me out for it, good f'ing luck. 

 

The only grey area is where people serve along military fault lines which are within a moment's notice of becoming 'hot' at any minute. The stress is real. The preparation is real. The threat of death is real. 

I served on a shitty destroyer in the Pacific. If there was a war I definitely would have been one of the anonymous casualties of war within months. For sure there were soviet subs that trailed us at times, during the cold war, unbeknownst to us.

So what? I never saw a shot fired in anger. I never stared down a uniformed adversary at Checkpoint Charlie. I am not a veteran, period. 

If an actual vet is talking, I will shut my f'ing mouth and respect them fully. Full stop. I will never compare myself or anything that I did to what they did in any way, shape or form. 

The difference between me and Tim Walz is that I will never trick people into believing that I'm a veteran, and no one will ever say that I embarrassed my ship, the navy, combat vets, or vets, or anyone else in the military. 

The fact that a lot of the people who knew Walz and served with him, say those things about him, tells you everything you need to know. 

The fact that actual combat veterans hate him tells you everything you need to know. 

Look just because you have some obvious deep feelings of inadequacy about your stint in the military doesn't change the fact that "veteran" doesn't mean "combat veteran" no matter how much you whine about it.

 

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

 Anyway, I think accusing people who served honourably

It's perfectly fine to say that someone served. 

It's a complete and total lie for you to pretend that Tim Walz did not try to deceive people. 

He explicitly said "The guns that I carried in war". 

He's scum. Pure scum. As an ex-military man myself I would say that to his face. He is a disgrace. 

[Black Dog]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's perfectly fine to say that someone served. 

It's a complete and total lie for you to pretend that Tim Walz did not try to deceive people. 

He explicitly said "The guns that I carried in war". 

People misspeak, your own doped up leader can barely string a complete sentence together. This is only an issue for hyperpartisan psychos like you.

Quote

He's scum. Pure scum. As an ex-military man myself I would say that to his face. He is a disgrace. 

I love how you oscillate between "I was totally useless I'm not a veteran" and invoking your veteran status for clout here.

Edited August 9, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Look just because you have some obvious deep feelings of inadequacy about your stint in the military doesn't change the fact that "veteran" doesn't mean "combat veteran" no matter how much you whine about it.

Oh there you go with your snotty accusations again. Get a life you scumbag.

The fact remains that despicable conduct which meets/exceeds your ultra-low standards does not meet mine. 

I don't think there's any other way to see this topic. 

You think it's ok to say things like "the weapons that I carried in war" when you never "carried weapons in war" is fine. I know for a fact that it isn't. 

The people who "carried weapons in war" and saw their friends' heads get blown off don't appreciate it. 

There are many many millions of Americans whose standards are just as high as mine, and not even one of them will vote for Walz. It's a mistake to have an anti-veteran like Walz on the ticket, but I hope he stays there. A vote against Walz is a vote for respectability and the free world. 

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

People misspeak, your own doped up leader can barely string a complete sentence together. This is only an issue for hyperpartisan psychos like you.

I love how you oscillate between "I was totally useless I'm not a veteran" and invoking your veteran status for clout here.

Oops...people misspeak.

Lol...Timmy is gonna find himself in the tampon machine business soon.

He'll love it. Getting to go in both boys and girls washrooms. 

Hey! How long do you think it'll take before he's caught sniffing toilet seats?

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Oops...people misspeak.

Lol...Timmy is gonna find himself in the tampon machine business soon.

He'll love it. Getting to go in both boys and girls washrooms. 

Hey! How long do you think it'll take before he's caught sniffing toilet seats?

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

People misspeak, your own doped up leader can barely string a complete sentence together. This is only an issue for hyperpartisan psychos like you.

I love how you oscillate between "I was totally useless I'm not a veteran" and invoking your veteran status for clout here.

No. No one ever "misspoke", and made a blatant claim of being a military veteran like that, and didn't notice it. He's been trying to walk the fine line between deceit and decent all his life and sometimes he crosses it. 

If he was a better man there'd never be any doubt whatsoever. 

 

BD, I don't know what happened to you or how unfortunate you've been since birth, but I don't think that gives you the right to inflict yourself on others. FYI you're not garnering sympathy or respect here, you're just a bad advertisement for everything that you advocate for. 

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Oh there you go with your snotty accusations again. Get a life you scumbag.

The fact remains that despicable conduct which meets/exceeds your ultra-low standards does not meet mine. 

I don't think there's any other way to see this topic. 

You think it's ok to say things like "the weapons that I carried in war" when you never "carried weapons in war" is fine. I know for a fact that it isn't. 

The people who "carried weapons in war" and saw their friends' heads get blown off don't appreciate it. 

 

Hey shiteater, do you collect any benefits from your time in service?

Quote

There are many many millions of Americans whose standards are just as high as mine, and not even one of them will vote for Walz. It's a mistake to have an anti-veteran like Walz on the ticket, but I hope he stays there. A vote against Walz is a vote for respectability and the free world. 

None of the stupid a$$holes who think like you would have voted for the Dems anyway so it's no actual loss.

[Black Dog]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No. No one ever "misspoke", and made a blatant claim of being a military veteran like that, and didn't notice it. He's been trying to walk the fine line between deceit and decent all his life and sometimes he crosses it. 

If he was a better man there'd never be any doubt whatsoever. 

He's a military veteran, cope and seethe, cracker.

Quote

BD, I don't know what happened to you or how unfortunate you've been since birth, but I don't think that gives you the right to inflict yourself on others. FYI you're not garnering sympathy or respect here, you're just a bad advertisement for everything that you advocate for. 

Do you think I'm interested in sympathy or respect from a bunch of lead-poisoned Boomers who worship a blob of semi-sentient ooze? My good b!tch my only goal here is to make one of you cretins mad enough that you have a heart attack and die and frankly my money right now is on you.

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

My good b!tch my only goal here is to make one of you cretins mad enough that you have a heart attack and die and frankly my money right now is on you.

And my goal is to keep people like you publicly "representing" the dems and libs for reasons which I won't elaborate. 

Quote

cracker.

See what I meant above? 

I think you don't, but that's ok, carry on, you great little representative of the Democrat party 😘

[Black Dog]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

And my goal is to keep people like you publicly "representing" the dems and libs for reasons which I won't elaborate. 

 

Quote

 

See what I meant above? 

I think you don't, but that's ok, carry on, you great little representative of the Democrat party 😘

 

the funny thing is I'm much further to the left than the Dems could ever be, while you, an actual insane and stupid person whose brain has been pickled by too much FoxNews grievance and conspiracy theories, represent the mainstream of the GOP and the contemporary right which is why the "weirdo" thing is working so well on you freaks. Like i said, keep saying shit like "a guy who served for 24 years isn't a veteran", I guarantee it will resonate with exactly zero people outside your bubble of fellow Trump cultists.

[WestCanMan]

32 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

the funny thing is

The funny thing is that you think people are positively motivated by your racism, lies, deceit, unsubstantiated accusations, and complete lack of insight and honesty.

Sorry but they're not. Only other angry racists are motivated by you. Good luck with that. The human race isn't as shitty as you'd like to believe. 

Quote

I'm much further to the left than the Dems could ever be,

No one is surprised to "find out" that you're an extremist and a racist. I have a knack for outing people like you though. You're probably about the 4th or 5th person I've done that to here, unless of course this is just your 4th or 5th alt acct here. Is that you jacee?

Quote

while you, an actual insane and stupid person

We both know that I tower over you intellectually 😉 

That's why I always have facts and cites while you have to resort to racism and lies.

Quote

whose brain has been pickled by too much FoxNews grievance and conspiracy theories,

TBH I'm fresh out of conspiracy theories - they're all just truths now. Go figger.

Quote

represent the mainstream of the GOP and the contemporary right

Thanks.

Quote

which is why the "weirdo" thing is working so well on you freaks.

Your "rubber - glue" debate tactic isn't working on people who've evolved past gr 3 emotionally and intellectually.

Everyone on the planet knows how 'weird' tampons in boys' bathrooms is. 

Quote

Like i said, keep saying shit like "a guy who served for 24 years isn't a veteran",

Like I said, keep the straw-man arguments coming little boy. 

As long as over 50% of Americans understand that Tim Walz was impersonating a combat veteran, your ship is sunk, and almost no one is as dumb as you.

Quote

I guarantee it will resonate with exactly zero people outside your bubble of fellow Trump cultists.

Are you saying that everyone with an IQ over 70 is going to vote for Trump now? ❤️

 

Keep "repruhzentin" bruh. Hugs and kisses. 

Edited August 9, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Nationalist]

57 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh come on pup. You're the resident scat expert. How long do ya figure?

[Black Dog]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The funny thing is that you think people are positively motivated by your racism, lies, deceit, unsubstantiated accusations, and complete lack of insight and honesty.

I'm not hear to motivate anyone, I'm here to gawk at the freaks like you,

Quote

Sorry but they're not. Only other angry racists are motivated by you. Good luck with that. The human race isn't as shitty as you'd like to believe. 

Yeah I know and that's why you freaks are gonna lose. You represent the bottom of the barrel, the absolute dregs of America.

Quote

No one is surprised to "find out" that you're an extremist and a racist. I have a knack for outing people like you though. You're probably about the 4th or 5th person I've done that to here, unless of course this is just your 4th or 5th alt acct here. Is that you jacee?

LOL because I called you a cracker? LMAO! You're definitely one salty b!tch.

Quote

We both know that I tower over you intellectually 😉 

You don't even tower over the fire hydrants you lick, intellectually or otherwise.

Quote

That's why I always have facts and cites while you have to resort to racism and lies.

TBH I'm fresh out of conspiracy theories - they're all just truths now. Go figger.

Thanks.

Your "rubber - glue" debate tactic isn't working on people who've evolved past gr 3 emotionally and intellectually.

Everyone on the planet knows how 'weird' tampons in boys' bathrooms is. 

Like I said, keep the straw-man arguments coming little boy. 

LOL you're so mad rn.

Quote

As long as over 50% of Americans understand that Tim Walz was impersonating a combat veteran, your ship is sunk, and almost no one is as dumb as you.

I have a low opinion of Americans in general, but even I doubt 50% of Americans are stupid enough to fall for this obvious misinformation.

Quote

Are you saying that everyone with an IQ over 70 is going to vote for Trump now? 

 

That would be a first.

Just now, Nationalist said:

Oh come on pup. You're the resident scat expert. How long do ya figure?

You're talking about that other guy who was asking people to give him turds, TrashCan or whatever his name is.

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You're talking about that other guy who was asking people to give him turds, TrashCan or whatever his name is.

No...I'm asking you. How long d'ya figure?