Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, User said:

That is not all you said. 

You keep ignoring my repeated comments like this one:

"Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. "

 

Right...the fact train stations exist is what you consider to be physical proof...lol

Posted
1 minute ago, Five of swords said:

Right...the fact train stations exist is what you consider to be physical proof...lol

Again:

They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this.

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol, again, I really hope the GPP makes this message a core part of their pitch to the electorate.

 

That dividing people is bad and bringing people together is good?

Yeah, me too, about time a politican said that out loud.  It's pretty telling that you seem to feel that would be a BAD message :)  

 

3 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Right...the fact train stations exist is what you consider to be physical proof...lol

Did you think it was one of those 'mental' train stations, not physical? :P 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, User said:

Again:

They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this.

So I'm curious. Do you think train stations would exist if the holocaust did not happen?

Edited by Five of swords
Posted
22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That dividing people is bad and bringing people together is good?

Yeah, me too, about time a politican said that out loud.  It's pretty telling that you seem to feel that would be a BAD message :) 

No I'm talking about your message that Black women are stupid. It's a winner for sure.

Also if you honestly believed "dividing people is bad" you wouldn't support the party you support.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

So I'm curious. Do you think trains stations would exist if the holocaust did not happen?

Is a train station the only thing I said? No. When we are talking about moving Jews into concentration camps via... checks notes... trains, well, guess what, having those is certainly part of the evidence for how the Nazi's moved so many Jews as claimed. 

You continue to be dishonest. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

No I'm talking about your message that Black women are stupid. It's a winner for sure.

 

You're the only one who's said that.  Pretty sexist of you if you ask me 

Quote

Also if you honestly believed "dividing people is bad" you wouldn't support the party you support.

What on earth made you think i was a democrat?

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
30 minutes ago, User said:

Is a train station the only thing I said? No. When we are talking about moving Jews into concentration camps via... checks notes... trains, well, guess what, having those is certainly part of the evidence for how the Nazi's moved so many Jews as claimed. 

You continue to be dishonest. 

And yet again...concentration camps aren't the holocaust. Death camps are.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

And yet again...concentration camps aren't the holocaust. Death camps are.

The concentration camps had gas chambers in them and killed jews. 
The fact of that has already been established here. 

So are you claiming there were no gas chambers? Or are you going to continue to stay silent on that like a good little hitler worshipper?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

And yet again...concentration camps aren't the holocaust. Death camps are.

Same difference. 

Just like the game you played when you tried to claim the gas chamber used to kill Jews was not a gas chamber. 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

Same difference. 

Just like the game you played when you tried to claim the gas chamber used to kill Jews was not a gas chamber. 

Lol...not same difference. Thr holocaust 'revisionists' do not claim that jews weren't sent to camps. And they don't claim that there existed rooms in thr camps (just not rooms specifically designed to gas a massive number of people)...so all of those observations are perfectly consistent with the claims of holocaust 'revisionists'. So...it means nothing.

 

One thing you could do to refute the claims of revisionists is exhumed an actual body near treblinka and use forensics science to show it is a jew who died during the period of the holocaust. But oh...you actually cant do that.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Lol...not same difference.

Yes, same difference. You are playing stupid semantics games to make some kind of dishonest point. 

It doesn't matter if I call it a concentration camp or a death camp or an extermination camp - the point remains the same, Jews were sent there to be killed. 

Just like Jews were killed in the gas chamber you lied trying to call it a delousing chamber as if they were not killed by gas inside. 

This is all just some dumb game for you. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, User said:

Yes, same difference. You are playing stupid semantics games to make some kind of dishonest point. 

It doesn't matter if I call it a concentration camp or a death camp or an extermination camp - the point remains the same, Jews were sent there to be killed. 

Just like Jews were killed in the gas chamber you lied trying to call it a delousing chamber as if they were not killed by gas inside. 

This is all just some dumb game for you. 

No, the 'experts' do not agree with you. Jews were not sent to concentration camps to be killed. This is not revisionism, it is ordinary history. 

 

https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/types-of-camps/

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

No, the 'experts' do not agree with you. Jews were not sent to concentration camps to be killed. This is not revisionism, it is ordinary history. 

 

https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/types-of-camps/

I haven't been following this whole discussion, but are you saying that all these Jews who saw their peers be taken to these innocuous "rooms" and never return are lying?

Edited by CouchPotato
  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

No, the 'experts' do not agree with you. Jews were not sent to concentration camps to be killed. This is not revisionism, it is ordinary history. 

 

https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/types-of-camps/

Oh, so you believe these experts when they say:

"The Nazis used a variety of camps throughout their time in power to persecute, control and, eventually, murder their opponents."

...

"Approximately one million people died in concentration camps over the course of the Holocaust. This figure does not include those killed at extermination camps."

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

Oh, so you believe these experts when they say:

"The Nazis used a variety of camps throughout their time in power to persecute, control and, eventually, murder their opponents."

...

"Approximately one million people died in concentration camps over the course of the Holocaust. This figure does not include those killed at extermination camps."

 

I believe this is an assertion, which still lacks physical evidence. All we are arguing about is the meaning of physical evidence.

 

Do you remember back in like 2012 when atheists would argue with Christians and ask for physical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus? Then Christians would say...'it is in the bible'...and atheists would say that isn't physical evidence? Did you have any idea what that was all about?

Posted
27 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I believe this is an assertion

LOL, so you provided a source that you do not even believe to be true. Brilliant. 

Almost as bad as when you tried to provide a source to back your claim that there were not gas chambers because they lacked blue walls, but you didn't actually read it and see that it explained how they were in fact gas chambers. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, herbie said:

Already heard YouTubers referring to Donald as Mr. Maxipad. Here's Mr Porko himself..

image.thumb.jpeg.793521ac29f1963ace1e3a49b6f79ee4.jpeg

Obviously -  lefties are always the first to revel in violence as long as it's against someone they don't like. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 hours ago, User said:

LOL, so you provided a source that you do not even believe to be true. Brilliant. 

Almost as bad as when you tried to provide a source to back your claim that there were not gas chambers because they lacked blue walls, but you didn't actually read it and see that it explained how they were in fact gas chambers. 

Really? You think I didn't know it said that?

Posted
10 hours ago, User said:

LOL, so you provided a source that you do not even believe to be true. Brilliant. 

Almost as bad as when you tried to provide a source to back your claim that there were not gas chambers because they lacked blue walls, but you didn't actually read it and see that it explained how they were in fact gas chambers. 

You are so weird. You think people have to believe 100% of what a source says on order to cite it? Lol...and you think people can't admit that they believe something for which no physical evidence exists? All of mathematics would be gone...you really have some defect in your logical reasoning.

Posted
2 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Really? You think I didn't know it said that?

Obviously not, based on why you posted it and your response once this was pointed out to you.

2 hours ago, Five of swords said:

You are so weird. You think people have to believe 100% of what a source says on order to cite it? Lol...and you think people can't admit that they believe something for which no physical evidence exists? All of mathematics would be gone...you really have some defect in your logical reasoning.

No, it is weird that you cite a source that you would then turn around and denounce. 

There is physical evidence, I have outlined this to you many times now. Repeating yourself doesn't make it true or discount what I have provided. 

 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Really? You think I didn't know it said that?

It is painfully obvious you didn't know. 

3 hours ago, Five of swords said:

You are so weird. You think people have to believe 100% of what a source says on order to cite it? Lol...and you think people can't admit that they believe something for which no physical evidence exists? All of mathematics would be gone...you really have some defect in your logical reasoning.

AHAHHHAAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!  

LOL - oh man...  never leave and keep posting here as much as you can :)   LOLOL!!! 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...