Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

@Michael Hardner

Do you have a comment on the post that I made earlier, about Obama's horrible insinuations regarding the Trayvon Martin incident? 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

@Michael Hardner

Do you have a comment on the post that I made earlier, about Obama's horrible insinuations regarding the Trayvon Martin incident? 

No.  I didn't read that.

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. You commented that Don Jr was uncivil, so I'd love to know if you can name a Demonrat who displays a level of civility that meets your standards.

VoteMcCrackin.thumb.png.8e500c5150dfe65252802f5e7ffbeb1a.png

2. Maybe a Rhode Island senator?

1. I didn't make any general statements about Democrats or Republicans.

2. No idea.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. No, not trying to say that.  I don't remember what he's said, but that stood out in my memory.

2. Are you asking me for any instance of civility that a Democrat has engaged in?  Or asking me which Democrats have never been uncivil maybe?  I'm not sure.

I was commenting on Donald Trump Jr's disgusting comment.  Any wider inference is yours.

3. So ?  This is a nothing statement.

Why are you even talking to me on this?  Seems weird that you care what I think about Democrats.  I'm not one.

Man - i haven't seen that much dodging since they tried to draft the hippies in the 70's. 

Do you not realize how bad and dishonest that makes you look? You constantly claim you want civil discourse - then you play the 'I can't remember what i said" game followed by the obfuscation game etc etc. 

It was an honest and reasonable question - why can't you just answer it mr "honest discourse"?

  • Like 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Man - i haven't seen that much dodging since they tried to draft the hippies in the 70's. 

Do you not realize how bad and dishonest that makes you look? You constantly claim you want civil discourse - then you play the 'I can't remember what i said" game followed by the obfuscation game etc etc. 

It was an honest and reasonable question - why can't you just answer it mr "honest discourse"?

I don't remember much of what Donald Jr has said. 

You think that's a game? 

Then you think I'm diabolically dishonest and deceptive. The poster I am actually talking to seems to be willing to ask me questions, which I assume means they want to hear answers. 

As to why you're talking to me, a diabolical person who plays these crazy games like pretending to not remember what Donald Jr. Has said? 

I will ask God to explain that in my prayers tonight.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I don't remember much of what Donald Jr has said. 

You think that's a game? 

 

You claimed you didn't remember what YOU said!  You made him repeat YOUR statement of just a few posts earlier.  

And yes it's very clearly a game to you, including this little fake misunderstanding about what i was talking about. 

Just taking the opportunity to point out to you and everyone else that you're a dishonest poster and the LAST thing you're interested in is civil discourse. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 

Just taking the opportunity to point out to you and everyone else that you're a dishonest poster and the LAST thing you're interested in is civil discourse. 

Me asking people to requote what I said and offering to look at it again. Me admitting I'm wrong, and you can search for the term meya culpa to see who uses it on here. 

I don't know what makes you tick, but it's really not my concern. 

I think the casual reader is going to wonder why posters are coming on here and asking me to give an opinion on whether Democrats are civil or not when I wasn't even talking about that. 

Clearly you lot are pretty bored. 

Just don't have time to play. Sorry.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

The majority of the political violence can be traced right back to Barack Obama.

Obama's lies about Trayvon Martin laid the foundation for all the political violence that followed.

 

Obama pretended to know that racism was the reason Trayvon was killed, but he wasn't there, so he had no clue. He was just lying. 

Obama insinuated that this scenario couldn't have been avoided by Martin, but again, he had no way of knowing that. 

Zimmerman actually sounded quite calm on the phone. Not angry, not hostile, not afraid, not combative... Yet mere seconds after his phone call, an extremely violent event took place. 

Eyewitnesses said that Martin was on top of Zimmerman, beating him up, when Martin got shot.

Does that mesh with Obama's story at all?

 

It was Demi/CNN lies about M Brown and G Floyd that incited the riots and kept them going, and in both instances video which leant insight and clarity to those shootings were withheld by The Dems and or CNN. The Dems kept the beginning of the Floyd video under wraps, which showed officers calmly taking George into custody, and George yelling that he was unable to breathe when no one was touching him, and CNN wasn't showing the video of Brown's violent robbery while they were trying to portray him as a gentle giant. 

The Dems and CNN et al (I don't know how late other American outlets were to show the Brown robbery video, so I'm only naming CNN in this part) absolutely lied, withheld video, and did everything that they could to incite violence. They did it when they knew the violence and burning was out of control, and they did it for years. 

Oh look, another of your lies that you repeat and repeat even after being corrected. I've shown you multiple times that CNN and Fox started airing the M. Brown robbery video on the same day: the day the police released it. 

Why do you think you can get away with these blatant and easily disprovable lies and not get called out? So Trumpy. 

Your thesis is absurd, but the underlying evidence is even crazier.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Me asking people to requote what I said and offering to look at it again.

 

It's a game.  It's your weird verson of sealioning. Like you honestly cant' remember what he said one post earlier. 

It's you dodging the question in a fashion that you feel you can PRETENED is reasonable later when you get called on it. But it's not.  Might fly with the preschoolers you debate with but anyone else is going to see it for the bullshit it is. 

Oh and look - you got called on your dishonestly but go on to explain how it's all OUR fault again!  Tsk tsk what a naughty group we are. 

Your dishonest discourse is your own doing, not anyone else's. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
On 7/20/2024 at 2:49 PM, User said:

I swear... do you guys even care one bit at all about being honest?

Don't worry, it was all super discrete, and no one was disturbed... 

FBI Searches Trump's Florida Home Mar-a-Lago in Document Investigation - WSJ

mar-a-lago-raid-police-gty-220_hpMain_20

Trump-and-Raid2.jpg

 

Wrong again pal

 

1) The search was executed at 8:39am and concluded at 4:33pm, with final agents vacating the property with boxes at 6:30 pm  Your images are clearly taken at night. 

2) Your pics are clearly images of local law enforcement…you might be hopelessly unaware that FBI doesn’t drive around in cars that say “PALM BEACH POLICE” and don’t have  County Sheriff badges on their uniforms

3) You’ll recall that Trump cultists made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-lago to protest the search in the presence of their deity’s temple, and some counter-protesters then appeared…hence the LLE presence 

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You claimed you didn't remember what YOU said!  You made him repeat YOUR statement of just a few posts earlier.  

And yes it's very clearly a game to you, including this little fake misunderstanding about what i was talking about. 

Just taking the opportunity to point out to you and everyone else that you're a dishonest poster and the LAST thing you're interested in is civil discourse. 

Typically followed by threats to put you on ignore... 

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

FALSE. He ONE $15 donation when he was 17 years old….he registered as a republican well after that. 

No, the donation was in 2020 which is significantly after he was registered.  Swing and a miss. 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You commented that Don Jr was uncivil, so I'd love to know if you can name a Demonrat who displays a level of civility that meets your standards.

VoteMcCrackin.thumb.png.8e500c5150dfe65252802f5e7ffbeb1a.png

Maybe a Rhode Island senator?

It may not be dignified but it’s not “uncivil” 

You post this so many times I gotta wonder how many times have you jerked to that twerk?

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

It may not be dignified but it’s no uncivil 

You post this so many times I gotta wonder how many times have you jerked to that twerk?

I'm guessing a LOT. 

The only people so obsessively hateful and full of rage are the incels.

Posted
14 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, the donation was in 2020 which is significantly after he was registered.  Swing and a miss. 

 

1) He is would have turned 21 this year and was 17 in 2021 when he made the donation…do the math. He was not old enough to  to vote  or register as a Republican 

2) It was ONE donation of $15….

3)The donation was made in response to a Democrat/aligne PAC fundraising email asking recipients if they planned to watch Biden’s  inauguration, and Crooks unsubscribed from the group's email list two years ago

4) He registered as a Republican a week after turning 18

5) He was obsessed with guns and gun culture, unlikely for a liberal progressive 

 

So you are definitely WRONG. Now, whenever you think someone is wrong you like to say something like “You’re such a disgusting liar, how do you luve with yourself notice how you always resort to lies and I am always telling the truth”. LOL…even though you’re a prime internet bullshitter and you’re caught bullshitting YET AGAIN 

9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I'm guessing a LOT. 

The only people so obsessively hateful and full of rage are the incels.

He must have to keep ice packs in his underwear due to all the chafing from constant rage masturbation 

Posted
2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

It may not be dignified

"Not dignified" lol. That may be the understatement of the century.

Quote

You post this so many times I gotta wonder how many times have you jerked to that twerk?

Can't let you forget what the Demonrats are. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
3 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

1) Just because you hate them doesn’t make them Democrats

 

Just because  you eat denial with your breakfast cereal doesn't mean they weren't. 

Quote

2) Just because they’re not Republicans doesn’t make them Democrats 

Just because it doesn't fit your narrative doesn't mean they weren't. 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Just because  you eat denial with your breakfast cereal doesn't mean they weren't. 

Just because it doesn't fit your narrative doesn't mean they weren't. 

 

So again you offer no proof for your BASELESS claims….or as you would say “Omg you’re the worstest most  vile LIAR in all history AHHHHHHHH!!!”  🤣🤣🤣

[note for readers with special needs, smiley faces denote humour]
 

Seriously though funny how when you see video of KKK and Nazis supporting Trump or even the J6 attack where Trump is continuing to tweet election lies and hatred towards Pence after he knows the attack is already underway….republicans are  like ‘how dare you suggest all republicans are like that!’  But any random black person rioting over the latest high profile racist incident du jour and you guys are like AlLL THE DEMOCRATS were rioting and supporting it!”

 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

So again you offer no proof for your BASELESS claims….or as you would say “Omg you’re the worstest most  vile LIAR in all history AHHHHHHHH!!!”  🤣🤣🤣

 

I've offered plenty of proof.  You just had a bit of a hissy and i replied to your points directly :)   

And now apperently you're hearing my voice in your head when i'm not even there.  Weird :) 

 


 

Quote

Seriously though funny how when you see video of KKK and Nazis supporting Trump or even the J6 attack where Trump is continuing to tweet election lies and hatred towards Pence after he knows the attack is already underway….republicans are  like ‘how dare you suggest all republicans are like that!’  But any random black person rioting over the latest high profile racist incident du jour and you guys are like AlLL THE DEMOCRATS were rioting and supporting it!”

Kid, like every dem supporter it seems you literally did what you're accusing others of doing ,  In fact i was the one who kept it to dem party members specifically, Then YOU started posting random pictures and insisting "all republicans".   And when i said fine, we'll include dem and republican supporters if you like and demonstrated there's a HELL of a lot more of them who are violent and hate filled you freak out and try to pretend that I was the one who started that :) 

EPIC fail kid.  If you paint yourself into a corner with bad arguments, you can't just try to hand me the brush and say it's my fault  :)  

Dems are far and away more hatefilled both as a party and by supporters. They revel in the idea that trump almost got killed, they've rioted and killed far more police and people during the riots than trump's people ever did with many deaths and 700 cops injured. Even here  i have NEVER seen a conservative supporter call for a person to kill themselves with any seriousness and i've seen TWO on the left do so more than once.  

I"m sure not all dem supporters are hate filled violence advocates  but a hell of a lot of them seem to be and the party and it's supporters are extremely tolerant of that. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

 

You post this so many times I gotta wonder how many times have you jerked to that twerk?

That's Gross kid! Why would you even think about that? Why would you WANT to know how many times he 'jerks'? 

Why is it all of you on the left always wind up talking about ass sex or jerking off by the end of a thread?  You are easily the most sexually repressed group i've ever seen,

Go get a damn girlfriend/boyfriend/furry/whatever and stop thinking about what's in online people's spank bank.  

Yeash  i can't believe we even need to have this conversation. 

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
11 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

FALSE. He ONE $15 donation when he was 17 years old….he registered as a republican well after that. 

How is that false? You saying it was "one" donation doesn't make it false that it was his most recent donation to the left. 

 

11 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

1) Just because you hate them doesn’t make them Democrats

2) Just because they’re not Republicans doesn’t make them Democrats 

Yeah... and?

It was the political left and Democrats who cheered on the "protests" and did just as much to incite violence as Trump ever did. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

That’s not a denial LOL

Buddy, the Demonrats have set the bar lower than any other political party on earth.

No class, no integrity, no patriotism, no morals, no virtues whatsoever. Just a ruthless dedication to personal wealth and power.

They'd nominate a snake if they thought it could win (kinda like they did with Weekend at Bernie's).

When scum-suckers like Pelosi or Biden use their office to amass personal wealth, it's A-OK by their ultra-low standards. 

They'll even advocate for violent, destructive riots as long as it's working for them in the polls. Their AG's and DA's will unilaterally release violent rioters to go back into low/middle-class neighbourhoods whenever they can, and when they can't they get lowlife wh0res like Kamala Harris to raise bail money for them. "Mo' riots, mo' votes!"

The Demonrats never saw a violent riot they didn't love - even at the WH - until the rioting got personal for them. They subjected US citizens to violent riots for years like it was a huge celebration, but when unarmed rioters got within 100 yards of them, suddenly "RIOTS CAUSE PTSD! WE'RE VICTIMS! EVERYBODY WITNESS OUR TRAGIC MOMENT! RIOTERS DESERVE TO BE KILLED OR JAILED FOR DECADES!"

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,909
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...