Supreme Court rules in favor of J6 defendant https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-favor-jan-6-capitol-riot-participant-challenged-obstruction-convictio

[West]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-favor-jan-6-capitol-riot-participant-challenged-obstruction-conviction

One down and now the floodgates will open. 

[User]

I have been following a lawyer defending J6 defendants for the last year + now and he made this prediction a while back and was one of the ones making this case to the Federal Judge in the trials he was in... but they all kept ruling in favor of the government here. 

This is exactly the kind of vindictive lawfare this DOJ has been engaged in, where they have been trying to find any obscure law they can to push and stretch it as much as they can to trump up charges even more on people. 

Glad the SCOTUS knocked this down. 

This is exactly why I am 100% on board with Trump turning the DOJ over to be this vindictive to the political left now. 

 

[West]

5 hours ago, User said:

I have been following a lawyer defending J6 defendants for the last year + now and he made this prediction a while back and was one of the ones making this case to the Federal Judge in the trials he was in... but they all kept ruling in favor of the government here. 

This is exactly the kind of vindictive lawfare this DOJ has been engaged in, where they have been trying to find any obscure law they can to push and stretch it as much as they can to trump up charges even more on people. 

Glad the SCOTUS knocked this down. 

This is exactly why I am 100% on board with Trump turning the DOJ over to be this vindictive to the political left now. 

 

Merrick Garland and members of congress ruined many lives by promoting these sentencing enhancements.

 

Last night Joe Biden cried about Trump potentially going after him. Today Adam Schiff is crying about the potential for being imprisoned. A this after they abused human rights. 

[Nationalist]

Brandon, Garland and Schiff belong in jail.

[West]

10 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Brandon, Garland and Schiff belong in jail.

They violated article 9 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights. I think this is going to be more serious for these people especially given all the treason talk

[robosmith]

39 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Brandon, Garland and Schiff belong in jail.

You're ^FOS. They have violated NO LAWS and you cannot even cite a law under which they'd be prosecuted.

SO PATHETICALLY BANKRUPT. LMAO

28 minutes ago, West said:

They violated article 9 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights. I think this is going to be more serious for these people especially given all the treason talk

You can't even make a case for ^this BULLSHIT.

[robosmith]

58 minutes ago, West said:

Merrick Garland and members of congress ruined many lives by promoting these sentencing enhancements.

Only 346 were affected, and only the ones who weren't convicted of another felony MIGHT have their sentence reduced.

See tonight's PBS News Hour.

IOW, you know NOTHING about the law, and proved that again.

[West]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're ^FOS. They have violated NO LAWS and you cannot even cite a law under which they'd be prosecuted.

SO PATHETICALLY BANKRUPT. LMAO

You can't even make a case for ^this BULLSHIT.

You are okay with a violation of human rights. No surprises

Edited Friday at 11:51 PM by West

[robosmith]

37 minutes ago, West said:

You are okay with a violation of human rights. No surprises

You are OK with posting ^BULLSHIT with NO EVIDENCE.

Criminals VIOLATE human rights and NEED to be DISSUADED by punishment. Duh.

There is NOTHING criminal about prosecuting people for a violation that is found unConstitutional by a SCOTUS. Duh

Edited Saturday at 12:28 AM by robosmith

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're ^FOS. They have violated NO LAWS and you cannot even cite a law under which they'd be prosecuted.

SO PATHETICALLY BANKRUPT. LMAO

You can't even make a case for ^this BULLSHIT.

What comes around...goes around. 

[User]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Criminals VIOLATE human rights and NEED to be DISSUADED by punishment. Duh.

Where was this robosmith when all the Hamas supporters violated the law blocking people from moving and trespassing?

 

[Fluffypants]

Weirdest thing about this ruling was a liberal supreme court judge and a conservative supreme court judge switched places in the ruling with Barret against it and Jackson for it.

[West]

55 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Weirdest thing about this ruling was a liberal supreme court judge and a conservative supreme court judge switched places in the ruling with Barret against it and Jackson for it.

Jackson knows this likely gets alot of black people out of prisons as well. Not a bad thing to dismantle the prison industrial complex either

[Legato]

20 hours ago, robosmith said:

You are OK with posting ^BULLSHIT with NO EVIDENCE.

Criminals VIOLATE human rights and NEED to be DISSUADED by punishment. Duh.

There is NOTHING criminal about prosecuting people for a violation that is found unConstitutional by a SCOTUS. Duh

Your interpretation of the constitution requires fourTEEN LEMONS sixTEEN DUH'S and a large bag of LMAO'S. It's on page 2, article eleventy two subjunction nineTEEN  just below the green brownies recipe.