The Fraud that CNN and the Dems Perpetrated on the American People

[WestCanMan]

On 6/28/2024 at 8:38 AM, impartialobserver said:

Why do we have these two uninspiring candidates? 

Because wokeness and fear of cancel-culture has castrated and neutered almost all politicians, and Trump was the only guy with enough guts to say so many things that needed to be said. 

If you look at the MSM, every time a conservative wins  they call them "far-right", "populist", etc. CNN was just saying it about France on the weekend:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/30/europe/macron-france-election-first-round-intl/index.html

CNN: "OH MY GOD! SOMEONE TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT SOMETHING! THEY'RE FAR-RIGHT!"

[WestCanMan]

On 6/28/2024 at 5:36 PM, CdnFox said:

I don't know that he has actual dementia. As people get older than mental faculties just slow down.

It's all under the umbrella of dementia. 

Like most people, I used to think of dementia as being limited to when a person thinks they they're someone or somewhere that they're not, but dementia covers the whole range of symptoms of mental deterioration. 

When your fastball has the trajectory of a change-up, that's dementia. Joe absolutely has it, you don't need a medical professional to diagnose dementia. They're just the ones who have to quantify it. 

My mother-in-law is starting to show signs of dementia so her Dr got her tested, she scored 2 or 3 points above the level where she's no longer legally capable of signing a POA. We're just looking into what happens now if she doesn't it signed soon enough so that my wife can legally manage her affairs for her. 

[impartialobserver]

22 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Because wokeness and fear of cancel-culture has castrated and neutered almost all politicians, and Trump was the only guy with enough guts to say so many things that needed to be said. 

If you look at the MSM, every time a conservative wins  they call them "far-right", "populist", etc. CNN was just saying it about France on the weekend:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/30/europe/macron-france-election-first-round-intl/index.html

CNN: "OH MY GOD! SOMEONE TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT SOMETHING! THEY'RE FAR-RIGHT!"

That may be so. However, this is the least inspiring and least interesting election in recent memory. We have dementia on one side and meaningless verbal diarrhea on the other side... it is absolutely perplexing why Americans are showing a profound decline in interest.. 

[WestCanMan]

45 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

We have dementia on one side and meaningless verbal diarrhea on the other side... 

1. the fact that it took this long for the MSM to acknowledge said dementia is a warning sign. He was the POTUS for God's sake, not a sidekick on The Tonight Show. The MSM needs to lose this election badly.
2. You say 'meaningless verbal diarrhea', history says 2016-2019 was the peak of American civilization in a lot of ways, and things were trending up sharply under Trump before covid was unleashed on the world.

[impartialobserver]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. the fact that it took this long for the MSM to acknowledge said dementia is a warning sign. He was the POTUS for God's sake, not a sidekick on The Tonight Show. The MSM needs to lose this election badly.
2. You say 'meaningless verbal diarrhea', history says 2016-2019 was the peak of American civilization in a lot of ways, and things were trending up sharply under Trump before covid was unleashed on the world.

#2... this is purely a matter of opinion on your part. 

Spoiler Alert... this is where you do your usual ad hominem attacks and demeaning my intelligence all because I do not echo your sentiments word for word. BTW.. I vote third party (there are numerous instances of my saying this on this forum).. so that means that I do not vote for Biden nor Trump now or ever. 

as for point #1, numerous polls show that a majority or slightly under (depending on the poll and when it was done) of Americans do not really like EITHER. So in short, they have to vote but if they had their way these two candidates would not be on the ballot. I have never seen a situation where the public had such distaste for both. 

Edited July 2, 2024 by impartialobserver

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

#2... this is purely a matter of opinion on your part. 
as for point #1, numerous polls show that a majority or slightly under (depending on the poll and when it was done) of Americans do not really like EITHER. So in short, they have to vote but if they had their way these two candidates would not be on the ballot. I have never seen a situation where the public had such distaste for both. 

Well, the Dow, and take-home pay, and disposable income, and the border, and the trajectory that America's enemies were on, and the direction that global peace was going, etc all agree with me. Everything's a bit of a dumpster fire with nukes in it right now. 

50% of people don't like Trump because they watch CNN, and CNN wouldn't tell the truth about Trump if they had a gun pointed at their head. 50% of people don't even know that the FBI committed crimes during the show trial ffs.

[impartialobserver]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

Well, the Dow, and take-home pay, and disposable income, and the border, and the trajectory that America's enemies were on, and the direction that global peace was going, etc all agree with me. Everything's a bit of a dumpster fire with nukes in it right now. 

50% of people don't like Trump because they watch CNN, and CNN wouldn't tell the truth about Trump if they had a gun pointed at their head. 50% of people don't even know that the FBI committed crimes during the show trial ffs.

#1... so in short.. you are seeking affirmation. Ok, understood.

Can I challenge you to something... can you leave CNN out of your posts? Your one trick pony game wore thin on the second repetition let alone now on the 28,955th time. The reasons are unimportant.. the data shows that neither is really that popular. Gavin Newsom, while not exactly the best guy, would at least have some new ideas and some charisma. 

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

#1... so in short.. you are seeking affirmation. Ok, understood.

Can I challenge you to something... can you leave CNN out of your posts? Your one trick pony game wore thin on the second repetition let alone now on the 28,955th time. The reasons are unimportant.. the data shows that neither is really that popular. Gavin Newsom, while not exactly the best guy, would at least have some new ideas and some charisma. 

Whatever.

CNN is a cancer. Biden is only president because of CNN. Leaving CNN out of the equation is like leaving Biden and Trump out of the equation.

You don't understand that because you think that CNN is just a news channel, and that they do a reasonable job. CNN programmed you to think about all of these things the way you do.

I'm basically talking to an empty vessel right now.

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Whatever.

CNN is a cancer. Biden is only president because of CNN. Leaving CNN out of the equation is like leaving Biden and Trump out of the equation.

You don't understand that because you think that CNN is just a news channel, and that they do a reasonable job. CNN programmed you to think about all of these things the way you do.

I'm basically talking to an empty vessel right now.

And now we get your usual case of dementia. I have stated numerous times to you.. yes you that I do not watch CNN and have never really done so. You watch vastly more cable news than I do.. its not even close. Interesting idea on your part.. how someone is programmed by CNN but never watched it. How is this done? Almost like something out of a science fiction movie. 

https://abcnews.go.com/538/americans-hated-candidates-biden-trump/story?id=108655435

[WestCanMan]

8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

And now we get your usual case of dementia. I have stated numerous times to you.. yes you that I do not watch CNN and have never really done so. You watch vastly more cable news than I do.. its not even close. Interesting idea on your part.. how someone is programmed by CNN but never watched it. How is this done? Almost like something out of a science fiction movie. 
https://abcnews.go.com/538/americans-hated-candidates-biden-trump/story?id=108655435

FYI, what's far worse than CNN is TNI, and you guys won't even acknowledge TNI, but you're suckling from their teat. 

Read this to learn about your handlers at TNI.

• Who is involved

  AP, AFP, BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Financial Times, Information Futures Lab, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, The Nation Media Group, Meta, Microsoft, Thomson Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, Kompas – Indonesia, Dawn – Pakistan, Indian Express, NDTV – India, ABC – Australia, SBS – Australia, NHK – Japan.

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

FYI, what's far worse than CNN is TNI, and you guys won't even acknowledge TNI, but you're suckling from their teat. 

Read this to learn about your handlers at TNI.

• Who is involved

  AP, AFP, BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Financial Times, Information Futures Lab, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, The Nation Media Group, Meta, Microsoft, Thomson Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, Kompas – Indonesia, Dawn – Pakistan, Indian Express, NDTV – India, ABC – Australia, SBS – Australia, NHK – Japan.

Hmmm.. more ad hominem attacks. But you are supposedly so smart. 

If you must know .. if I am interested in a topic I generally use a variety of sources and then formulate an opinion after taking the time to filter out the BS. Again.. that does not include CNN. If it is a quantitative topic.. I go straight to the raw data. Do you know what that is? 

[User]

1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

If you must know .. if I am interested in a topic I generally use a variety of sources and then formulate an opinion after taking the time to filter out the BS. Again.. that does not include CNN. If it is a quantitative topic.. I go straight to the raw data. Do you know what that is? 

Except when it comes to "predicting" Presidential debates, it seems... 

LOL

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Hmmm.. more ad hominem attacks. But you are supposedly so smart. 

If you must know .. if I am interested in a topic I generally use a variety of sources and then formulate an opinion after taking the time to filter out the BS. Again.. that does not include CNN. If it is a quantitative topic.. I go straight to the raw data. Do you know what that is? 

It's not ad hominem, it's just on-point.

Say something about TNI io. Man up. 

[impartialobserver]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

It's not ad hominem, it's just on-point.

Say something about TNI io. Man up. 

Honestly.. did not even know they existed. Of the items that you listed that are part of them.. rarely if ever read them. If the topic is quantitative.. unlike you, I do not need someone else to summarize it for me. I can download raw data, create the code to arrange it, and do analysis to come to meaningful conclusions. 

[Nationalist]

23 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Honestly.. did not even know they existed. Of the items that you listed that are part of them.. rarely if ever read them. If the topic is quantitative.. unlike you, I do not need someone else to summarize it for me. I can download raw data, create the code to arrange it, and do analysis to come to meaningful conclusions. 

Here's a meaningful conclusion.

The Libbie media and all the Libbies have been lying for 3.5 years. Brandon is a doddering old fool who has failed at every turn.

Trump presided over a magnificent term of no new wars, a roaring economy, and controlled border.

Trump will be the next POTUS.

[WestCanMan]

25 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Honestly.. did not even know they existed. Of the items that you listed that are part of them.. rarely if ever read them. If the topic is quantitative.. unlike you, I do not need someone else to summarize it for me. I can download raw data, create the code to arrange it, and do analysis to come to meaningful conclusions. 

1. Aaaand there you go... I just gave you extremely important and relevant information and you completely failed to process it, then you wrapped it up in an unwarranted ad hominem attack lol.
2. Now your head is firmly in the sand about TNI
3. So weird that the people who regularly regurgitate leftist talking points always deny watching CNN, and I mean always, but they'll never say where they get their info from. 

Now say something meaningful about TNI, indicating that you some form of understanding of it, if you could.

[Aristides]

On 6/28/2024 at 8:38 AM, impartialobserver said:

I watched Jon Stewart last night and even he was making fun of Biden's feebleness. This is a failure of the American people though.. Why do we have these two uninspiring candidates? Because Americans like known, predictable, consistent and are not willing to take a chance on new, different, or gasp... innovative. Plenty of GOP candidates could do a better job than Trump and would be 20 to 30 years younger. 

330 million people these two ancients are the best America can do. Sad and scary. 

At least it makes me feel not so bad about the mediocre choices we have in Canada.

 

[WestCanMan]

50 minutes ago, Aristides said:

330 million people these two ancients are the best America can do. Sad and scary. 

What's really sad is that Biden truly is the best candidate that the Dems can belch out right now. That whole party is a dog's breakfast of unelectable weasels.

There are a lot of candidates that the GOP could run whose biggest negative is "a bunch of drivel made up by CNN."

[impartialobserver]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Aaaand there you go... I just gave you extremely important and relevant information and you completely failed to process it, then you wrapped it up in an unwarranted ad hominem attack lol.
2. Now your head is firmly in the sand about TNI
3. So weird that the people who regularly regurgitate leftist talking points always deny watching CNN, and I mean always, but they'll never say where they get their info from. 

Now say something meaningful about TNI, indicating that you some form of understanding of it, if you could.

Hmmm.. I am completely honest and like always.. you can't handle it. Of the sources that you listed to be a part of TNI.. I rarely if ever read them. Not so sure what is so complex about that. 

"head in the sand"... this is internet forum poster epitomized. I could say that your head is in the sand because you do not know the intricacies of us federal reporting. You must be willful ignorant to not know exactly down to the last number how the ETA 218 report is formulated. I am willing to say that I do not know something... nobody knows everything. 

serious question... why do you not produce a podcast or a blog? It seems as if you would get a greater audience than the 10 or so on here. 

Edited July 2, 2024 by impartialobserver

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Hmmm.. I am completely honest and like always.. you can't handle it. Of the sources that you listed to be a part of TNI.. I rarely if ever read them. Not so sure what is so complex about that. 

Wrong. You just keep babbling and changing course. Nothing that you say bears repeating. You can't even name a "source" that you respect. Your contribution to meaningful dialogue remains at zero, as usual.

Let me guess.... This is another topic that you don't care about 😂

[impartialobserver]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Wrong. You just keep babbling and changing course. Nothing that you say bears repeating. You can't even name a "source" that you respect. Your contribution to meaningful dialogue remains at zero, as usual.

Let me guess.... This is another topic that you don't care about 😂

Ok.. here are some. The economist, American Economic Review, Wall Street Journal, raw data such as QCEW, CES, LAUS, and PCE, Econometrica, High Country News, and Journal of Human Capital. Rarely do I only use one source.. you tend to have to read a variety of sources and then add some personal real life perspective. 

[User]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

330 million people these two ancients are the best America can do. Sad and scary. 

At least it makes me feel not so bad about the mediocre choices we have in Canada.

 

The voting population is only about 250 Million. Only about 165 Million Voted. Even less in the party primaries to nominate these two...

But, your point still stands. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Ok.. here are some. The economist, American Economic Review, Wall Street Journal, raw data such as QCEW, CES, LAUS, and PCE, Econometrica, High Country News, and Journal of Human Capital. Rarely do I only use one source.. you tend to have to read a variety of sources and then add some personal real life perspective. 

HCN is beaut, ain't she?

I just looked at the major stories online and there are eleven about gays, climate change and indigenous issues and nothing about anything substantial. 

The Economist was actually a decent magazine way back before I got married, but it's been trash for at least a decade now.

There's no excuse for Journal of Human Capital:

That's their most recent 'contribution' to humanity...

Buddy, how many genders are you, currently?

[impartialobserver]

48 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

HCN is beaut, ain't she?

I just looked at the major stories online and there are eleven about gays, climate change and indigenous issues and nothing about anything substantial. 

The Economist was actually a decent magazine way back before I got married, but it's been trash for at least a decade now.

There's no excuse for Journal of Human Capital:

That's their most recent 'contribution' to humanity...

Buddy, how many genders are you, currently?

And I thought that you were capable of civilized discussion.. well, apparently not

"Buddy, how many genders are you, currently?"

[Michael Hardner]

51 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

And I thought that you were capable of civilized discussion.. well, apparently not

"Buddy, how many genders are you, currently?"

I fail to see what's wrong with those articles...