Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Just what I expect from a college dropout disciple of Dunning Kruger fallacies.

 

As soon as i stop laughing and can breathe again i am ordering that to be put on a coffee mug :)   We have reacehd peak DK!!!!!

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
32 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Just what I expect from a college dropout disciple of Dunning Kruger fallacies.

You know nothing "now," and never did.

Thanks for confirming you never care about science, let alone understand it. LMAO

Tweenkie-poo.

It is possible that man's actions are causing the average global temperatures to rise some. Only a fool would deny the possibility. 

However...only politicians and other fools, run around proclaiming a "climate crisis".

That's just a fact young padewan.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Tweenkie-poo.

It is possible that man's actions are causing the average global temperatures to rise some. Only a fool would deny the possibility. 

However...only politicians and other fools, run around proclaiming a "climate crisis".

That's just a fact young padewan.

And only the heir to the kingdom of fools would make that claim while flying around on gas guzzling jets and having a carbon footprint the size of a major tire fire. 

  • Thanks 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Tweenkie-poo.

It is possible that man's actions are causing the average global temperatures to rise some. Only a fool would deny the possibility. 

However...only politicians and other fools, run around proclaiming a "climate crisis".

That's just a fact young padewan.

I've asked you before, but no answer. Do you know what a "tipping point" is and how it applies to climate change?

Here's a clue: "permafrost."

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I've asked you before, but no answer. Do you know what a "tipping point" is and how it applies to climate change?

Here's a clue: "permafrost."

You can shove your permafrost, along with all your other excuses for shitting on the pillar of the global economy, right where the sun don't shine.

The cat's out of the bag.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
59 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You can shove your permafrost, along with all your other excuses for shitting on the pillar of the global economy, right where the sun don't shine.

The cat's out of the bag.

There are hundreds of billions of tons of methane locked in permafrost. Methane is a greenhouse gas many times more potent than CO2.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Aristides said:

There are hundreds of billions of tons of methane locked in permafrost. Methane is a greenhouse gas many times more potent than CO2.

And? Do you expect anyone to believe this latest death threat?

Shove it. Go live underground if you like. But do it quietly and out of the way please? We now need to get busy trying to undo all the damage you've already done.

Which includes putting an abrupt end to your war plans...BTW...

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
43 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

And? Do you expect anyone to believe this latest death threat?

Shove it. Go live underground if you like. But do it quietly and out of the way please? We now need to get busy trying to undo all the damage you've already done.

Which includes putting an abrupt end to your war plans...BTW...

Those silly scientists don't know nearly as much as you do. They can go pound sand while you sit in your cozy house with asbestos fireproofing, snacking on lead paint chips and playing with the mercury your barber-dentist gave you as a prize for holding still during your prophylactic tooth extraction. (No problem, he gave you heroin for the pain.)

You'll be damned if science has ever uncovered everyday products that can harm us, the quacks!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

And? Do you expect anyone to believe this latest death threat?

Shove it. Go live underground if you like. But do it quietly and out of the way please? We now need to get busy trying to undo all the damage you've already done.

Which includes putting an abrupt end to your war plans...BTW...

Keep your head up your ass o ignorant one, it seems comfortable there.

 

https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/methane-emissions-are-driving-climate-change-heres-how-reduce-them

https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/unexpected-future-boost-of-methane-possible-from-arctic-permafrost/

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Aristides said:

The geological record indicated we were due for a mini ice age. The fact the opposite is happening doesn’t seem to concern these fools at all.

"the science was wrong, that fact that the science could be wrong again doesn't seem to concern these fools."

Do you even listen to yourself before you talk?

You're not interested in the facts, you're a religious follower. Anyone who knows even the very first thing about science knows that the first rule is to question everything. The first rule of religion is to repeat the dogma.  You're mad at people for questioning while you repeat the dogma. 

You need to look at yourself again and do a little more questioning yourself. 

  • Thanks 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You can shove your permafrost, along with all your other excuses for shitting on the pillar of the global economy, right where the sun don't shine.

The cat's out of the bag.

So you STILL don't know. Just like I said before,

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

So you STILL don't know. Just like I said before,

lol -  i love that you think this is going well for you :) 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

"the science was wrong, that fact that the science could be wrong again doesn't seem to concern these fools."

Do you even listen to yourself before you talk?

You're not interested in the facts, you're a religious follower. Anyone who knows even the very first thing about science knows that the first rule is to question everything. The first rule of religion is to repeat the dogma.  You're mad at people for questioning while you repeat the dogma. 

You need to look at yourself again and do a little more questioning yourself. 

Based on the geological record, we were due for a mini ice age. The fact the opposite happened because our actions are changing that cycle should make you at least a little concerned. The planet is warming, that is not dogma, it is backed up with actual data and measurements. Blindly denying is not questioning, it is self imposed ignorance.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Based on the geological record, we were due for a mini ice age. The fact the opposite happened because our actions are changing that cycle should make you at least a little concerned. The planet is warming, that is not dogma, it is backed up with actual data and measurements. Blindly denying is not questioning, it is self imposed ignorance.

That's why climate activists everywhere need an exit plan to Mars. I'd love to see all you moonbats out of here by the beginning of 2030. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Based on the geological record, we were due for a mini ice age. The fact the opposite happened because our actions are changing that cycle should make you at least a little concerned. The planet is warming, that is not dogma, it is backed up with actual data and measurements. Blindly denying is not questioning, it is self imposed ignorance.

Explore yes. Monitor yes. Develop reliable alternatives yes.

Dump on the global economy because a bunch of politicians warp scientific conclusions...No!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Explore yes. Monitor yes. Develop reliable alternatives yes.

Dump on the global economy because a bunch of politicians warp scientific conclusions...No!

The Earth doesn't give a crap about politics.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

The Earth doesn't give a crap about politics.

LOL...what a childish thing to try to pass off.

Look...you wanna run about screaming "The Sky Is Falling!"...go ahead.

Just stay the hell outta the way while we pick up the mess you climate-cultists have made...mkay?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...what a childish thing to try to pass off.

Look...you wanna run about screaming "The Sky Is Falling!"...go ahead.

Just stay the hell outta the way while we pick up the mess you climate-cultists have made...mkay?

^Supremely IRONIC that it is carbon POLLUTERS who are MAKING that MESS.

And your SCIENCE IGNORANT who  are so wedded to the carbon economy, it has made YOU BLIND to those who try to explain the science to you.

You acknowledge some of the basics, but then go into denial when the logical extensions threaten your cushy ASSumptions. You whine like a poor person whose life is threatened by minor costs but then destroy that narrative when you brag about your material acquisition accomplishments. Which is it? Are you wealthy, or is taking a minor hit on energy costs going to destroy you?

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Right. So stfu about man-made climate change; it's not real. 

You don't even understand that you have ZERO credibility on the science because you're so IGNORANT, you're UNABLE to even read about it.

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You don't even understand that you have ZERO credibility on the science because you're so IGNORANT, you're UNABLE to even read about it.

My own eyes and personal experience confirm more than your scumbag pseudo-scientists can ever confirm for you. 

Pull your head out of the Left's ass, robowoke. None of it is real. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Deluge said:

My own eyes and personal experience confirm more than your scumbag pseudo-scientists can ever confirm for you. 

Pull your head out of the Left's ass, robowoke. None of it is real. 

Your anecdotal "evidence" means nothing, except that it's another demonstration you KNOW NOTHING about science. Duh 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Supremely IRONIC that it is carbon POLLUTERS who are MAKING that MESS.

And your SCIENCE IGNORANT who  are so wedded to the carbon economy, it has made YOU BLIND to those who try to explain the science to you.

You acknowledge some of the basics, but then go into denial when the logical extensions threaten your cushy ASSumptions. You whine like a poor person whose life is threatened by minor costs but then destroy that narrative when you brag about your material acquisition accomplishments. Which is it? Are you wealthy, or is taking a minor hit on energy costs going to destroy you?

Et voila.

Of course inflation hurts my finance. Yours too numb-nuts.

That's a serious difference between us though. I want what's best for everyone. You're focused on personal effects. Rather shallow.

What I would propose is a realistic compromise. A work that moves in a "green" direction but does not dump on what we use now until a reliable and doable method is perfected.

You appear to need immediate gratification. That's childish.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Look, some of you crazies think man has been polluting the Earth since the start of agriculture; that's 11,000 years ago. Just what in the f*ck do you think is going to happen, and WHEN is it going to happen? 

The UN gives us until sometime around 2030, but they fail to say EXACTLY what will happen. 

Why don't you shed some light on this? I'm all ears. ;) 

Edited by Deluge

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,909
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...