Nationalist Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 UCLA last night. https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2024/05/01/ucla-protests-wednesday-ldn-vpx.cnn Columbia and others. https://www.npr.org/2024/05/01/1248401802/columbia-university-protests-new-york Lol...dumb little Libbies. Professional protestors all over the place. Now I wanna know who's been funding this crap. This is going to get really uncomfortable for Libbies. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted May 1 Author Report Share Posted May 1 (edited) Lol... Ya gits wut ya pays fer. This is gonna tear even more votes from Brandon. Edited May 1 by Nationalist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted May 1 Author Report Share Posted May 1 As of yesterday, Trump leads Brandon handily. He takes most...if not all...toss-up states. After this fiasco over the Palis and Heebs...Brandon will likely lose even more votes. The economy...the border...the wars...the lawfare...the lawlessness. Not to mention Hunter and the Biden family business. Lol...it's like watching a chicken drown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 Eventually, many of these same violent protestors will become professors themselves, and the cycle of lunacy will continue. Pretty sad. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 Thread is yet another proof that right wingers not only love state violence, it is the central pillar of their ideology. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 49 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Thread is yet another proof that right wingers not only love state violence, it is the central pillar of their ideology. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. Enforcing laws != "State Violence" otherwise the term is near meaningless as the enforcement of laws always requires violence to those who resist. It is the folks on the left who want to selectively punish and target those they disagree with here, and ignore the folks they support when they do it. Perhaps your position will have more merit in another thread where folks on the right are arguing against enforcing the laws like this on folks on the right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted May 1 Author Report Share Posted May 1 2 hours ago, Black Dog said: Thread is yet another proof that right wingers not only love state violence, it is the central pillar of their ideology. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. Well that's certainly BS. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: UCLA last night. https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2024/05/01/ucla-protests-wednesday-ldn-vpx.cnn Columbia and others. https://www.npr.org/2024/05/01/1248401802/columbia-university-protests-new-york Lol...dumb little Libbies. Professional protestors all over the place. Now I wanna know who's been funding this crap. This is going to get really uncomfortable for Libbies. Can you prove that this is being funded? Spare me the impassioned opinions. Lets see a source, a dollar amount, names of recipients (actual names not simply libbies). Links to articles that agree is not sufficient either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 33 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Well that's certainly BS. Nope, you've shown your true colours here cheerleading a violent state crackdown against people peacefully escerccsing their first amendment rights. 17 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Can you prove that this is being funded? Spare me the impassioned opinions. Lets see a source, a dollar amount, names of recipients (actual names not simply libbies). Links to articles that agree is not sufficient either. Right-wing causes are exclusively backed by billionaire dark money so the can't wrap their heads around the idea of genuine organic grassroots actions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 2 hours ago, User said: Enforcing laws != "State Violence" otherwise the term is near meaningless as the enforcement of laws always requires violence to those who resist. The enforcement of laws always requires violence or the threat of violence, you're so close to getting it! Quote It is the folks on the left who want to selectively punish and target those they disagree with here, and ignore the folks they support when they do it. Empty sloganeering. Quote Perhaps your position will have more merit in another thread where folks on the right are arguing against enforcing the laws like this on folks on the right. I'm sure it would be easy enough to find that sentiment with regards to the Convoy Kooks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 3 minutes ago, Black Dog said: The enforcement of laws always requires violence or the threat of violence, you're so close to getting it! Empty sloganeering. I'm sure it would be easy enough to find that sentiment with regards to the Convoy Kooks. My response was no more empty than what I was responding to... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 (edited) 2 minutes ago, User said: My response was no more empty than what I was responding to... A reply even less substantial than your first. you could have replied with an actual example supporting your claim that "It is the folks on the left who want to selectively punish and target those they disagree with" instead of more trite nonsense. Edited May 1 by Black Dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: UCLA last night. https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2024/05/01/ucla-protests-wednesday-ldn-vpx.cnn Columbia and others. https://www.npr.org/2024/05/01/1248401802/columbia-university-protests-new-york Lol...dumb little Libbies. Professional protestors all over the place. Now I wanna know who's been funding this crap. This is going to get really uncomfortable for Libbies. It's about time they took out the trash 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 9 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Nope, you've shown your true colours here cheerleading a violent state crackdown against people peacefully escerccsing their first amendment rights. Right-wing causes are exclusively backed by billionaire dark money so the can't wrap their heads around the idea of genuine organic grassroots actions. I am not sold on that idea either. Everybody makes these conspiratorial claims but when pressed for specifics, the usual response is "how else do you explain it. you must be stupid to not see the obvious". My response is then.. "if if it so obvious why can't you furnish details such as dollar amounts, who funds it, how they get the funds, etc?". For example, if I claim that player x is the reason that team x wins an NBA playoff game.. I can find a box score and it gives me specifics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 29 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Can you prove that this is being funded? Spare me the impassioned opinions. Lets see a source, a dollar amount, names of recipients (actual names not simply libbies). Links to articles that agree is not sufficient either. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/evidence-paid-anti-israel-protesters-canada https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-who-is-behind-funding-for-pro-palestinian-protesters Many of them aren't even students, so it stands to reason that they must be funded by some outside source. Qatar, Saudi and UAE do give billions to American universities so that would partially explain the hatred of Jews and Israel on campuses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 (edited) 16 minutes ago, ironstone said: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/evidence-paid-anti-israel-protesters-canada https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-who-is-behind-funding-for-pro-palestinian-protesters Many of them aren't even students, so it stands to reason that they must be funded by some outside source. Qatar, Saudi and UAE do give billions to American universities so that would partially explain the hatred of Jews and Israel on campuses. Can you prove who the source is? Must be.. is not sufficient. Can you furnish the name of the source, the dollar amount, and some evidence of the transaction (check number).. or are you just guessing and can't just say that? the usual narrative is that folks roam around and are paid to protest something. They are like traveling magazine salesmen and get into character at each new protest. Your links do not support that narrative. They show folks protesting and then some non profit coming in after and aiding in their ability to continue their protest. lastly.. can you prove that in every protest that there are paid protestors who simply go from to town regardless of topic? Edited May 1 by impartialobserver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 9 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Can you prove who the source is? Must be.. is not sufficient. Can you furnish the name of the source, the dollar amount, and some evidence of the transaction (check number).. or are you just guessing and can't just say that? the usual narrative is that folks roam around and are paid to protest something. They are like traveling magazine salesmen and get into character at each new protest. Your links do not support that narrative. They show folks protesting and then some non profit coming in after and aiding in their ability to continue their protest. If they're not students, and they don't live where the protests are taking place, are you suggesting they are paying their own way to go and protest? Who pays to make up all those signs? You think they pay for it out of their own pockets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 (edited) 40 minutes ago, ironstone said: Qatar, Saudi and UAE do give billions to American universities so that would partially explain the hatred of Jews and Israel on campuses. Because you believe the deaths of 34,000 Palestinians, their starvation, and the leveling of their homes is not enough? American and Canadian Palestinians have relatives suffering there. Do you not have any idea about the terrorism which was used by Israelis to establish their state? It WASN'T a negotiated nor democratic decision. Edited May 1 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 21 minutes ago, ironstone said: If they're not students, and they don't live where the protests are taking place, are you suggesting they are paying their own way to go and protest? Who pays to make up all those signs? You think they pay for it out of their own pockets? Making signs is chump change. If your relatives are suffering from persecution and starvation in a foreign nation, you MIGHT even pay your way to protest that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 23 minutes ago, ironstone said: If they're not students, and they don't live where the protests are taking place, are you suggesting they are paying their own way to go and protest? Who pays to make up all those signs? You think they pay for it out of their own pockets? Again.. you give no specifics. Failed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 31 minutes ago, ironstone said: If they're not students, and they don't live where the protests are taking place, are you suggesting they are paying their own way to go and protest? Who pays to make up all those signs? You think they pay for it out of their own pockets? Who funded the Convoy protests? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 11 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Who funded the Convoy protests? You should direct that question to Chrystia Freeland since she and Trudeau de-banked them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 25 minutes ago, robosmith said: Because you believe the deaths of 34,000 Palestinians, their starvation, and the leveling of their homes is not enough? What starvation? If all the aid isn't getting through, it is 100% the fault of Hamas. Hamas controls the amount of aid that gets to civilians. First in line for the aid are the Hamas terrorists, then eventually some of it will reach the actual civilians. All of this after Hamas takes its usual cut of course. The IDF always gives advance warning to civilians to get out, and they will also deliver aid. Your beloved Hamas gives no quarter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 11 minutes ago, ironstone said: What starvation? If all the aid isn't getting through, it is 100% the fault of Hamas. Hamas controls the amount of aid that gets to civilians. First in line for the aid are the Hamas terrorists, then eventually some of it will reach the actual civilians. All of this after Hamas takes its usual cut of course. The IDF always gives advance warning to civilians to get out, and they will also deliver aid. Your beloved Hamas gives no quarter. LOL imagine posting an IDF propaganda video and thinking that has any legitimacy. Man oh man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted May 1 Report Share Posted May 1 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: A reply even less substantial than your first. you could have replied with an actual example supporting your claim that "It is the folks on the left who want to selectively punish and target those they disagree with" instead of more trite nonsense. And yet you did not offer anything substantive to support your original worthless assertion either... But, since you asked, lets take a look at these campus protests in support of Hamas or otherwise blocking the roads. You find that in the more liberal Democrat run places they are hesitant to arrest and even when they do, likely not to even bother with pressing charges after. (See San Francisco Bridge) Yet, we all know if it were the Proud Boys camping out in the middle of a campus shutting things down and harassing black students, folks on the left would be screaming bloody murder, mobilizing the National Guard to beat them with rifles and drag them all away coming up with every charge in the book they could throw at them and then some. (See January 6th, See Targetting of Pro-Life demonstrators) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.