The Woke Mind Virus

[Nationalist]

33 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. "Vermin" IS inhuman.  Calling people scum, animals, vermin... is saying they're not people.
2. How am *I* warping reality when you think that somebody put that much money and reputation on the line as "a form of insurance".... my god you are stubborn
3. Reality like.... DeSantis ran for President as "insurance" ?  
4. I only have an aire [sic] over my spelling prowess.
5. Once again - dullard - I JUST SAID that I never said I was sharp.  btw all those red squiggly lines in your browser are misspelt words...
 

1. Except I didn't say any of those.

2. Mike...you don't know why DeSantis ran and neither do I.

3. IMO...yes. But that's my opinion. You have an opinion too. But it's just that...an opinion.

4. Yu spel good...marvie...

5. Lol...no, you're not. 

[Michael Hardner]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. Except I didn't say any of those.

2. Mike...you don't know why DeSantis ran and neither do I.

3. IMO...yes. But that's my opinion. You have an opinion too. But it's just that...an opinion.

4. Yu spel good...marvie...

5. Lol...no, you're not. 

1. "Filth" also inhuman.  If you hear "filth" you think of something that must be removed, cleaned away.  Not an appropriate term and thus equated to fascism.
2. But to save yourself from having to perhaps say - gasp - "maybe you're right" or "you might have a point there" you came up with a reason that surely isn't valid.  Ok.
3. I don't even believe you think that.
4. Ha...
5. I won't contest it.  It's not for me to say if I"m sharp.  You don't think so... 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. "Filth" also inhuman.  If you hear "filth" you think of something that must be removed, cleaned away.  Not an appropriate term and thus equated to fascism.
2. But to save yourself from having to perhaps say - gasp - "maybe you're right" or "you might have a point there" you came up with a reason that surely isn't valid.  Ok.
3. I don't even believe you think that.
4. Ha...
5. I won't contest it.  It's not for me to say if I"m sharp.  You don't think so... 

It appears a tippy-toe through history is in order...

@Deluge posted to me...

Quote

I'm glad that you mentioned your kids, because kids are who these scumbags are going after. We have to keep pouring it on until that filth is in the underground where it belongs. 

The very idea that the use of the term "filth" here is somehow fascist is...childish nonsense. Tell me...would it bother you to here someone call a serial rapist "filth"?

Lets bring this to today. This was Stormy Daniels in her hayday...

Now...lets imagine you find out that this person is telling your grandchildren at school that they can make a lot of money being a porn star. That its OK to make explicit sex flix. Would "filth" be an appropriate adjective then? Probably huh...

So...

5. No I don't. I think you're a pompous ass who has a "hate-on" for anything or anyone who has the nerve to question and doubt the established order. I think that "hate-on" of yours, forces you to make asinine posts like...

Quote

Why don't you just imprison the woke?  Or better yet kill them?

 

[Deluge]

27 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

It appears a tippy-toe through history is in order...

@Deluge posted to me...

The very idea that the use of the term "filth" here is somehow fascist is...childish nonsense. Tell me...would it bother you to here someone call a serial rapist "filth"?

Lets bring this to today. This was Stormy Daniels in her hayday...

Now...lets imagine you find out that this person is telling your grandchildren at school that they can make a lot of money being a porn star. That its OK to make explicit sex flix. Would "filth" be an appropriate adjective then? Probably huh...

So...

5. No I don't. I think you're a pompous ass who has a "hate-on" for anything or anyone who has the nerve to question and doubt the established order. I think that "hate-on" of yours, forces you to make asinine posts like...

 

Wokeism is 100% filth. 

Mike simply lacks the courage to roll up his sleeves and go to work on these scumbags. He'd rather just sit peacefully and watch them sledgehammer society with their satanic agenda. 

Edited April 11, 2024 by Deluge

[eyeball]

6 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. "Chuds" is like "clowns" or "idi0ts".  It's an insult but not calling someone inhuman.

They're simply the old Deplorables which was a badge of honour amongst chuds not that long ago. They even have merch.

https://www.amazon.com/proud-be-deplorable/s?k=proud+to+be+deplorable

 

[Michael Hardner]

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

They're simply the old Deplorables which was a badge of honour amongst chuds not that long ago. They even have merch.

https://www.amazon.com/proud-be-deplorable/s?k=proud+to+be+deplorable

 

Why is it in B&W? 🤔

[Deluge]

14 hours ago, eyeball said:

They're simply the old Deplorables which was a badge of honour amongst chuds not that long ago. They even have merch.

https://www.amazon.com/proud-be-deplorable/s?k=proud+to+be+deplorable

 

Well, when something like this calls you deplorable:

You just laugh at it and roll out merchandise.  

[Deluge]

The woke mind virus is very much within the government as well:

FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Advances Equality and Visibility for Transgender Americans

And f*ck everyone else, right perverts? 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/31/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-advances-equality-and-visibility-for-transgender-americans/

[CdnFox]

The biggest problem with "woke" is that by its very nature it HAS to affect other people's lives against their will. Otherwise it's just not woke.

For example - vegetarianism is often associated as left wing. But the vast majority of vegetarians are happy to just go about their lives eating vegetables. And the meat eaters eat their meat and both are happy.

But you get something like transgenderism which goes full woke - and it's not enough that they get to choose what they're going to do with their lives. You MUST acknowledge their pronouns, you MUST celebrate pride, you MUST do all these things or you can be charged with fired if you're lucky or subject to criminal hate crime charges if you're not. 

I literally worry about speaking to co-workers, because if you say the wrong thing it could have very serious consequences. Clients can accuse you of being racist or sexist or whatever for the flimsiest of reasons and you better be able to defend yourself because it's a job killer if you can't.

It's gone way too far.

[eyeball]

41 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

For example - vegetarianism is often associated as left wing. But the vast majority of vegetarians are happy to just go about their lives eating vegetables. And the meat eaters eat their meat and both are happy.

Not the right wing meat eaters. They simply didn't have the word woke back then when they associated hippies and freaks with vegetarianism.

But of course that was way back when Archie Bunker made chuds seem cute.

[CdnFox]

53 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Not the right wing meat eaters.

Yes, the right wing ones.

Quote

They simply didn't have the word woke back then when they associated hippies and freaks with vegetarianism.

Yes they did - they just didn't care.

Quote

But of course that was way back when Archie Bunker made chuds seem cute.

Well it was only a matter of time till you broke down and gave in to your hatred.

Sorry kid - nobody on the right cared or cares what other people do as long as it doesn't affect them. It's you with your hatred and intolerance that demands others bow to your wishes. Which even the hippies would have though was wrong.

[CdnFox]

56 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Not the right wing meat eaters. They simply didn't have the word woke back then when they associated hippies and freaks with vegetarianism.

But of course that was way back when Archie Bunker made chuds seem cute.

As ab additional -

It just occurred to me that your biggest fear in life is that just as it was under harper Polievre will actually come up with some ideas that make sense that either reduce emissions or allow us to live with the changes. Not only will you have been proven wrong in that your idea didn't work, but now you'll have to live with the shame that someone else got it right.

 

Imagine someone being so messed up that they are rooting for climate change to win just to avoid political embarrassment. You should be ashamed. But you won't be because your woke is more important than the world.

[Venandi]

On 4/11/2024 at 7:57 PM, eyeball said:

They're simply the old Deplorables which was a badge of honour amongst chuds not that long ago. They even have merch.

Can I assume from this that you actually approve of Democratic machinations south of the border and Liberal ones here?

Being something of a political agnostic I tend to look at policy in terms of potential efficacy and compare its objectives to likely (and observed) unintended consequences. For me it's a simple matter of following good ideas in the absence of party affiliations... or at least it used to be.

Even at a rudimentary level of consideration the liberal capacity to do the worst possible thing at the worst possible time is breathtaking to me.

I've arrived at a point where doing the exact opposite of a Biden / JT plan suddenly becomes the first option to be tested against potential outcomes. Do liberal minded folks ever do a brief QA assessment of their thoughts or actions?

Do they ever ask "what could possibly go wrong with my excellent plan? 

Much of what I read in the news makes little sense to me. I tend to divide crises (especially emergencies) into two categories because it helps decide on follow up action once the fire is out.

They become "awe s--- emergencies" or "holy f--- emergencies based on the degree of severity. It helps prioritize immediate actions, concentrate on solutions in a changing environment, and avoid the pitfalls that attend "strength of an idea."  

When you take strength of an idea to the current hight's of absurdity it becomes a religion.  Never before, in my entire life BTW, have I mumbled "holy f--- under my breath more times than in the last three and a half years.  

I'm now conjuring up a t-shirt design that says "vote em out and crush em" on the bottom rocker.

Since it took a lot of hard work to get me there I'm starting to think that congratulations are in order.

Edited April 15, 2024 by Venandi

[Deluge]

12 hours ago, eyeball said:

Not the right wing meat eaters. They simply didn't have the word woke back then when they associated hippies and freaks with vegetarianism.

But of course that was way back when Archie Bunker made chuds seem cute.

Most vegetarians (and vegans) are democrats, and that would make 90% of those democrats woke cultists. 

That's how many hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of democrats infected with the Woke Mind Virus? 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, Venandi said:

Can I assume from this that you actually approve of Democratic machinations south of the border and Liberal ones here?

Nope. I have no use whatsoever for government/political machinations no matter who does it.  Nor do I have much sympathy for people who imagine any without hard evidence - a very high-ranked whistle-blower like Jody Wilson-Raybould for example.

I think closed-door in-camera lobbying should be illegal.

[eyeball]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well it was only a matter of time till you broke down and gave in to your hatred.

Hatred? Not at all, chuds can be a great source of comic relief on occasion.

8 Archie Bunker On Vegetarianism Archie wants no part of it. “It ain't natural. Man was put on this earth to eat meat.” When Mike challenges it, Archie explains, “The Bible says so… all of them old Bible people. They was always eatin' meat, as soon as they found out eatin' apples was wrong...

 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Nope. I have no use whatsoever for government/political machinations no matter who does it.  Nor do I have much sympathy for people who imagine any without hard evidence - a very high-ranked whistle-blower like Jody Wilson-Raybould for example.

I think closed-door in-camera lobbying should be illegal.

"Hard evidence" and democrats don't play very well together. You should know that by now. 

[eyeball]

8 minutes ago, Deluge said:

"Hard evidence" and democrats don't play very well together. You should know that by now. 

Hard evidence rarely plays well with any politician. You should know that by now too.

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Hard evidence rarely plays well with any politician. You should know that by now too.

I do know that.

Democrats are who it REALLY doesn't play well with, as they can't stfu about it - they're simply too juiced up with bias.  

[impartialobserver]

this is disheartening to some but you can't unring the bell. the internet is here to stay. From the internet.. you get wokeness. 

[Deluge]

15 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

this is disheartening to some but you can't unring the bell. the internet is here to stay. From the internet.. you get wokeness. 

And from wokeness you get: DEI and ESG scores. 

[impartialobserver]

21 minutes ago, Deluge said:

And from wokeness you get: DEI and ESG scores. 

so what is your plan for making the internet go away. These items that you so abhor are the inevitable product of it and the first amendment

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Democrats are who it REALLY doesn't play well with, as they can't stfu about it - they're simply too juiced up with bias

That's certainly what a lot of juiced up partisans seem to say.

I'm more interested in stoking greater polarization between the governed and their governments because I'm more biased towards the interests of the former.

Whose side are you on? 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Hatred? Not at all, chuds can be a great source of comic relief on occasion.

Hatred? entirely.

You and most of the left are driven by hatred. And you very obviously don't find any comedy in it.  

[Deluge]

56 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That's certainly what a lot of juiced up partisans seem to say.

I'm more interested in stoking greater polarization between the governed and their governments because I'm more biased towards the interests of the former.

Whose side are you on? 

I'm on the side that works for personal freedoms without destroying society in the process. That means no more tolerance for open drug abuse and petty crimes. It also means no more saddling America's schools, businesses and other organizations with ridiculous social justice policies, and that also includes our governments. 

Talk about your "bias". 

Edited April 15, 2024 by Deluge