Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, User said:

Once again... you did not read that article. 

 

Sure I did. I just understand that Zelinsky is about to start peace negotiations with Russia and am pretty darn sure Ukraine is gonna lose the Donbas and Crimea. That retired Ukrainian general qouted in the article  sees that eventuality as well.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Sure I did. I just understand that Zelinsky is about to start peace negotiations with Russia and am pretty darn sure Ukraine is gonna lose the Donbas and Crimea. That retired Ukrainian general qouted in the article  sees that eventuality as well.

Since you refuse to own up to what the article actually said or admit you didn't read it... here is what was said:

"He added that Ukraine could push Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the conflict, but only if Kyiv was coming from a "strong position" - once again calling on his Western allies to strengthen the Ukrainian army."

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, User said:

Once again... you did not read that article. 

 

And I quote...

"Ukrainian military expert and retired colonel Kostyantyn Mashovets warned his fellow Ukrainians they had to be "psychologically prepared" for the loss of Selydove, Toretsk and Vuhledar in the eastern region of Donbas.

"I would love to be wrong," he wrote on Facebook.

"But from the information I have... this is a very likely scenario of events in the near future."

Also...

"The president of the Czech Republic, Petr Pavel, told the New York Times that Ukraine would have to be "realistic" about its prospects of recovering the areas in the east of the country which Russia has managed to gain over the last 31 months of war.

He added that the most likely outcome of the war was that a part of Ukrainian territory would remain under Russian occupation for a number of years."

Plus.. 

"Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the war with Russia could end sooner than some people think.

"I think that we are closer to peace than we think," he told US broadcaster ABC News.

He added that Ukraine could push Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the conflict, but only if Kyiv was coming from a "strong position" - once again calling on his Western allies to strengthen the Ukrainian army.

The Ukrainian president is in the US this week to speak at the United Nations General Assembly and to present what he has called a "victory plan" to his Western allies, including US President Joe Biden.

In a statement ahead of the visit, Zelensky said the plan included further weapons donations, diplomatic efforts to force Russia to agree to peace, and holding Moscow accountable for its full-scale invasion in 2022.

In his interview with ABC News, Zelensky said his victory plan was not about negotiating with Russia, but rather it was "a bridge to a diplomatic way out, to stop the war".

On Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia was being cautious about media reports of a Ukrainian plan and added that the conflict would only end when Russia's aims were achieved.

Zelensky has for some time been asking Western countries to allow Ukraine to ease restrictions on the use of long-range missiles which could be used to strike deep into Russia. He is expected to do so again this week as he visits the US.

On Sunday, Biden said he had not yet decided whether to give Ukraine the green light. Zelensky said the US would need to lead the decision: "Everybody's looking up to [Biden], and we need this to defend ourselves," he told ABC."

Well...Brandon has not approved long range missiles for Ukraine thus...

Zelinsky knows...as do you I suspect...that Brandon is not gonna risk nuclear war with Russia over Donbas and Crimea. Nobody want it. They will strike a deal that will be sold to western media as "a bridge to a diplomatic way out, to stop the war"...but not a surrender of the land Russia will walk away with.

I'm sorry that rubs you the wrong way...but it is what it is.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I'm sorry that rubs you the wrong way...but it is what it is.

What do you think rubs me the wrong way?

You just quoted the whole article and made no argument or effort to support what you originally asserted here. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, User said:

What do you think rubs me the wrong way?

You just quoted the whole article and made no argument or effort to support what you originally asserted here. 

Because the whole article supports exactly what I've been saying. And now Zelinsky is starting to admit it.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Because the whole article supports exactly what I've been saying. And now Zelinsky is starting to admit it.

No, it doesn't. Zelinsky was clearly saying they would force Russia to negotiate from a position of strength, he was not as you claimed:

"Comic-Boy sees the inevitable."

Unless, by inevitable, you mean NATO countries keep giving him the weapons he needs to force Russia to negotiate with him on their terms... 


 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
9 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You can't see the trees for your desires. Ok...time will tell.

Like, I'm not saying your prediction isn't a possible outcome of this war, but you are incredibly biased. You have this smug sense of superiority that you know exactly how this war is going to end, and you interpret everything you see in the most supportive way for your viewpoint you can even if you have to make shit up to do so. The simple fact of the matter is, the article you linked does not support your viewpoint beyond the simple fact that the President of Ukraine is considering a negotiated peace, although it preconditioned that negotiated peace on Ukraine being in a position of strength that would allow it to get want it wants in the peace settlement, which is not at all supportive of your beliefs. Now, your fantasy is that it's just Zelensky making efforts to make "Russia's inevitable Victory" more acceptable to the world, but regardless of whether that is the truth or not, the article does not say that and that belief that it's the true meaning of the article is entirely in your head with no evidence in reality.

So you yourself are the most explicit example of someone who "cannot see the trees for your desires." You lack the capability to be unbiased, and your conviction that you are correct is so strong as to make you seem insane.

TLDR: The article does not support your beliefs, and you're crazy for being certain it does.

Posted
2 hours ago, Videospirit said:

 The simple fact of the matter is, the article you linked does not support your viewpoint

He doesn't read the articles he links.  He rips them off of Twitter or 4chan and reposts them like a zombie.  

  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
4 hours ago, User said:

No, it doesn't. Zelinsky was clearly saying they would force Russia to negotiate from a position of strength, he was not as you claimed:

"Comic-Boy sees the inevitable."

Unless, by inevitable, you mean NATO countries keep giving him the weapons he needs to force Russia to negotiate with him on their terms... 


 

IF...he gets all the long range missiles he wants. Think Brandon is gonna give them to him?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Videospirit said:

Like, I'm not saying your prediction isn't a possible outcome of this war, but you are incredibly biased. You have this smug sense of superiority that you know exactly how this war is going to end, and you interpret everything you see in the most supportive way for your viewpoint you can even if you have to make shit up to do so. The simple fact of the matter is, the article you linked does not support your viewpoint beyond the simple fact that the President of Ukraine is considering a negotiated peace, although it preconditioned that negotiated peace on Ukraine being in a position of strength that would allow it to get want it wants in the peace settlement, which is not at all supportive of your beliefs. Now, your fantasy is that it's just Zelensky making efforts to make "Russia's inevitable Victory" more acceptable to the world, but regardless of whether that is the truth or not, the article does not say that and that belief that it's the true meaning of the article is entirely in your head with no evidence in reality.

So you yourself are the most explicit example of someone who "cannot see the trees for your desires." You lack the capability to be unbiased, and your conviction that you are correct is so strong as to make you seem insane.

TLDR: The article does not support your beliefs, and you're crazy for being certain it does.

Lol...Zelinsky has no position of strength. He threw a hail Mary for missiles and the ball got dropped.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...Zelinsky has no position of strength. He threw a hail Mary for missiles and the ball got dropped.

Don't quote me if you're not responding to the content of my post. You talking to yourself is kind of creepy and doesn't really add anything to this discussion either, but it's extra creepy when you direct your monologue towards other people.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 10/6/2024 at 3:44 PM, Nationalist said:

No. That I can't see happening. These articles always try to push that narrative but, Ukraine getting all that land back is not likely to happen.

Why don't you just come right out and say that you want Russia to destroy Ukraine and NATO? 

 

Imagine if Nationalist was the President of the USA?

"My President, Russian soldiers have crossed the Bering Strait, and now occupy most of Alaska, and are dropping bombs on Anchorage!"

Nationalist: "Well let's just not send any military aid to Alaska. All would do, is provoke Putin, to invade the mainland."

"OK...Lets give Alaska to the Russians!"

Edited by DUI_Offender
  • Downvote 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Videospirit said:

Don't quote me if you're not responding to the content of my post. You talking to yourself is kind of creepy and doesn't really add anything to this discussion either, but it's extra creepy when you direct your monologue towards other people.

You said...

"the President of Ukraine is considering a negotiated peace, although it preconditioned that negotiated peace on Ukraine being in a position of strength that would allow it to get want it wants in the peace settlement,"

So I most certainly did address your post. But if you feel the need to make up an excuse to stop being rejected by logic and reality...

Then run away little boy.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Why don't you just come right out and say that you want Russia to destroy Ukraine and NATO? 

 

Imagine if Nationalist was the President of the USA?

"My President, Russian soldiers have crossed the Bering Strait, and now occupy most of Alaska, and are dropping bombs on Anchorage!"

Nationalist: "Well let's just not send any military aid to Alaska. All would do, is provoke Putin, to invade the mainland."

"OK...Lets give Alaska to the Russians!"

Lol...what a twit you are. 

Why don't you just come out and admit that you have no value for Ukrainian lives and would be just as happy to see the whole country radiated?

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...what a twit you are. 

Why don't you just come out and admit that you have no value for Ukrainian lives and would be just as happy to see the whole country radiated?

You are definitely the biggest Russian butt licker on the forum.

7 hours ago, Videospirit said:

Don't quote me if you're not responding to the content of my post. You talking to yourself is kind of creepy and doesn't really add anything to this discussion either, but it's extra creepy when you direct your monologue towards other people.

He is a complete traitor to North America. I would not take anything he says seriously. 

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

You are definitely the biggest Russian butt licker on the forum.

He is a complete traitor to North America. I would not take anything he says seriously. 

Up your ass Tweenkie-Poo.

Can you quote anywhere that I posted that I "support" Russia? No. Why?

Because I don't care about either Russia or Ukraine. 

So go fck yourself you lyin' little fembot.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
14 hours ago, Nationalist said:

IF...he gets all the long range missiles he wants. Think Brandon is gonna give them to him?

IF doesn't matter in regards to what you said about the article not being accurate. 

Also, they have been developing their own:

https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-domestic-ballistic-missile-production-russia-volodymyr-zelensky-1963039

50 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Can you quote anywhere that I posted that I "support" Russia? No. Why?

Because I don't care about either Russia or Ukraine. 

You don't have to say it, your posts here reflect it. You push Russian propaganda, justify their actions, defend them, cheer them on, and want an outcome of this war to end in their favor on the terms that would most benefit them. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

IF doesn't matter in regards to what you said about the article not being accurate. 

Also, they have been developing their own:

https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-domestic-ballistic-missile-production-russia-volodymyr-zelensky-1963039

You don't have to say it, your posts here reflect it. You push Russian propaganda, justify their actions, defend them, cheer them on, and want an outcome of this war to end in their favor on the terms that would most benefit them. 

I just want an end to this pathetic exercise. Realistically, that will require concessions by both Russia and Ukraine. That's how peace negotiation work, traditionally.

What, exactly, do you want?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

I just want an end to this pathetic exercise. Realistically, that will require concessions by both Russia and Ukraine. That's how peace negotiation work, traditionally.

What, exactly, do you want?

No, you don't. This "pathetic exercise" can be ended if Russia quits and withdraws today. 

Yet, you defend them and justify their invasion. You demand Ukraine quit, from a position of weakness... which would be equivalent to complete defeat. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

No, you don't. This "pathetic exercise" can be ended if Russia quits and withdraws today. 

Yet, you defend them and justify their invasion. You demand Ukraine quit, from a position of weakness... which would be equivalent to complete defeat. 

Complete defeat would be the annulment of Ukraine as an independent country. I've never heard the Russians call for that.

And again...within the realm of reality...do you really think Russia is going to just withdraw and leave the annexed lands to Ukraine?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Complete defeat would be the annulment of Ukraine as an independent country. I've never heard the Russians call for that.

And again...within the realm of reality...do you really think Russia is going to just withdraw and leave the annexed lands to Ukraine?

So which is it... is Russia not giving back any land or are they going to let Ukraine be an "independent" country?

I mean, listen to yourself, Ukraine is already an independent country. If Russia was interested in letting them be an independent country... they never had to go to war to do that. 

 



 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

So which is it... is Russia not giving back any land or are they going to let Ukraine be an "independent" country?

I mean, listen to yourself, Ukraine is already an independent country. If Russia was interested in letting them be an independent country... they never had to go to war to do that. 

 



 

Both I would expect. I would think Russia will maintain Crimea and the eastern provinces, and Ukraine will maintain everything west of that.

I also expect that Russia will insist on Ukraine being neutral.

What do you expect...realistically.?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
15 minutes ago, User said:

So which is it... is Russia not giving back any land or are they going to let Ukraine be an "independent" country?

I mean, listen to yourself, Ukraine is already an independent country. If Russia was interested in letting them be an independent country... they never had to go to war to do that. 

 



 

I find it fascinating that in political discussions,  you're quite rational. But when it comes to this...you go off the rails.

Ukraine will most likely remain a country, only a little smaller than it was.

How is that so hard for you to wrap your head around?

And again...what do you expect to happen?

 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I also expect that Russia will insist on Ukraine being neutral.

So... not an independent country after all. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

So... not an independent country after all. 

How would that be not independent?

Is your goal to bring Ukraine into NATO?

What exactly do you expect?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,833
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    maria orsic
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • VanidaCKP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • maria orsic earned a badge
      First Post
    • Majikman earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • oops earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...