Why Leftists Are So Unhappy

[Black Dog]

17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And spread over a 30 year period no less. The 90's to now. Like - 14 guys spread over 3 decades is representative of all republicans or conservatives.

The bulk of those were over the last 10 years. And that's not even an exhaustive list of insane conservative mass killers. For instance it doesn't include Robert Bowers (2018) Nathaniel Veltman (2021), Anderson Lee Aldrich (2022) to name a few. Nor does it include the single deadliest domestic terror attack in US history which was carried out by far right extremists.

Quote

But this is what a lot of the discussions with the left turn into - instead of addressing the original issue which was why dems are unhappy which he KNOWS he can't address he tries to change the channel to "republicans shoot more people" because he thinks he can make some sort of case for that. But it's not remotely connected. 

I already addressed that and dismissed it as bullshit based on a lack of evidence. 

Quote

Whereas having 26 MILLION democrats and lefties rioting over something that happened to a criminal that has nothing to do with them is actually a reasonable indication some of them are dissatisfied and generally angry people.    

26 Million people rioted? 8 per cent of the entire US population? Wow I'm surprised there's anything left standing at all. Oh wait: you're making shit up again.

Quote

So here's a twist on the op then - we've talked about how dems are unhappy because they base their happiness on what other people think or do -  so are people unhappy becasue they're democrats or are they democrats because they're unhappy?   Are the happy people who got taught to hate others for how they think or behave, or do they just hate those people and found teh dems gave them a home for that kind of thing?

Are you conservative because you're retarded or retarded because you're conservative. We know it's true, it just a question of why.

 

 

Edited February 1, 2024 by Black Dog

[Deluge]

21 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

I truly do pity you

partialobserver pities me when the REAL pity needs to be extended towards democrat shit holes like San Francisco, Detroit and Portland. 

 

[Rebound]

17 minutes ago, Deluge said:

partialobserver pities me when the REAL pity needs to be extended towards democrat shit holes like San Francisco, Detroit and Portland. 

 

Have you been to any of those places? They’re fantastic. 

[Deluge]

30 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Have you been to any of those places? They’re fantastic. 

It is? What do you do there, pervert, point and laugh at the homeless? 

Edited February 1, 2024 by Deluge

[Black Dog]

On 1/31/2024 at 11:59 AM, Deluge said:

I'm unpleasant with fakes like you. I have to be, and we both understand why.

Yes, because you're a bitter, antisocial bigot with no friends and no love in your life and it's everyone else's fault but yours.

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It is? What do you do there, pervert, point and laugh at the homeless? 

 

[Deluge]

8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

1. Yes, because you're a bitter, antisocial bigot with no friends and no love in your life and it's everyone else's fault but yours.

 

1. No, that's you, and don't forget racism. You're the biggest f*cking racists since Jim Crow.

2. black dog loves the plight of the cities. It helps him feel better about being a marxist a$$hole.

Edited February 1, 2024 by Deluge

[Black Dog]

25 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. No, that's you, and don't forget racism. You're the biggest f*cking racists since Jim Crow.

2. black dog loves the plight of the cities. It helps him feel better about being a marxist a$$hole.

LMAO do you think Jim Crow was a real person, you ******?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

The bulk of those were over the last 10 years. And that's not even an exhaustive list of insane conservative mass killers. For instance it doesn't include Robert Bowers (2018) Nathaniel Veltman (2021), Anderson Lee Aldrich (2022) to name a few. Nor does it include the single deadliest domestic terror attack in US history which was carried out by far right extremists.

I already addressed that and dismissed it as bullshit based on a lack of evidence. 

26 Million people rioted? 8 per cent of the entire US population? Wow I'm surprised there's anything left standing at all. Oh wait: you're making shit up again.

Are you conservative because you're retarded or retarded because you're conservative. We know it's true, it just a question of why.

 

 

Where's the list of terrorist attacks that were supported by Fox News, Trump, the GOP, and all of their voters? Can you please provide that, chihuahua?

Do you understand the difference between:

• "Shit that a handful of outliers did in the past 30 years" and
• "Thousands of violent events that Biden, Harris, the Obamas, the DNC, the DNC's media outlets, and all of their voters incited/supported for half of 2014, all of 2015, all of 2016, early 2017 and summer of 2020"? 

Do you know the difference between "Following the leader of a group" and "Doing something that everyone in a group finds repugnant"?

FYI one of those things "A defining characteristic of the group as a whole", the other is not. 

You know that lots of leftists have committed terrorist attacks here too, right? 

[Black Dog]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Where's the list of terrorist attacks that were supported by Fox News, Trump, the GOP, and all of their voters? Can you please provide that, chihuahua?

Not sure why that's relevant but if you must know, many of those people have pushed the same rhetoric and conspiracy theories (like the "Great Replacement") echoed by various mass killers (certainly more than any Democrat or leftist encouraged rioting). Can't spend all your time blowing dog whistles and hen act all innocent when dogs show up.

Quote

 

Do you understand the difference between:

• "Shit that a handful of outliers did in the past 30 years" and
• "Thousands of violent events that Biden, Harris, the Obamas, the DNC, the DNC's media outlets, and all of their voters incited/supported for half of 2014, all of 2015, all of 2016, early 2017 and summer of 2020"? 

 

This is a lie so your premise is inoperative, like your brain.

Quote

You know that lots of leftists have committed terrorist attacks here too, right? 

Name five.

Edited February 1, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Not sure why that's relevant but if you must know, many of those people have pushed the same rhetoric and conspiracy theories (like the "Great Replacement") echoed by various mass killers (certainly more than any Democrat or leftist encouraged rioting). Can't spend all your time blowing dog whistles and hen act all innocent when dogs show up.

So you have no examples of terrorist events that were supported by conservatives. Thanks, you could have just admitted to it with class and dignity, but that's not your style.

Quote

This is a lie so your premise is inoperative, like your brain.

You know it's 100% true. You just have no excuse, and you've got no qualms about lying. It's what you're known for.

Quote

Name five.

Every islamic terrorist attack ever here? They all vote Dem/Lib. 

The trans girl who shot up her old school.

The Vegas shooter picked a conservative crowd. 

 

[impartialobserver]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

partialobserver pities me when the REAL pity needs to be extended towards democrat shit holes like San Francisco, Detroit and Portland. 

 

Your purely partisan/tribal attitude keeps you from saying anything rational and logical. 

[Deluge]

24 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LMAO do you think Jim Crow was a real person, you ******?

Required viewing from black dog's CRT 101 course:

 

5 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Your purely partisan/tribal attitude keeps you from saying anything rational and logical. 

The truth feels completely foreign to left-wingers like partialobserver. 

[impartialobserver]

11 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Required viewing from black dog's CRT 101 course:

 

The truth feels completely foreign to left-wingers like partialobserver. 

Objective truth is not partisan. 3^3 = 27 is true no matter the R or D next to one's name. But i know that you are not smart enough to comprehend that. 

Edited February 1, 2024 by impartialobserver

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Your purely partisan/tribal attitude keeps you from saying anything rational and logical. 

Buddy, there are 100 posts/threads a day between Rebound, robo, and Black Dog.

I don't see you reacting/objecting to any of them. 

You really do need to take the 'im' off the beginning of your username. 

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Objective truth is not partisan 3^3 = 27 is true no matter the R or D next to one's name. But i know that you are not smart enough to comprehend that. 

Huh? Look at ^that^ dog's breakfast of a 'paragraph' right there...

Were you raised by wolves? 

[impartialobserver]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, there are 100 posts/threads a day between Rebound, robo, and Black Dog.

I don't see you reacting/objecting to any of them. 

You really do need to take the 'im' off the beginning of your username. 

interesting how you look over my equally pointless conversations with Robosmith. He is another one that is all passion and no intellect. 

[impartialobserver]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Huh? Look at ^that^ dog's breakfast of a 'paragraph' right there...

Were you raised by wolves? 

why ramble on for pages when you can succinct and to the point?

[Black Dog]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

So you have no examples of terrorist events that were supported by conservatives. Thanks, you could have just admitted to it with class and dignity, but that's not your style.

Sure, I do: all of them. There's zero ideological difference between you, the median Fox News viewer and any of these far right maniacs. They just take it to the logical end point.

Quote

You know it's 100% true. You just have no excuse, and you've got no qualms about lying. It's what you're known for.

Nah it's pure unadulterated partisan brainrot on your part.

Quote

Every islamic terrorist attack ever here? They all vote Dem/Lib. 

Radical Islam is a far right conservative ideology, dumb dumb.

Quote

 

The trans girl who shot up her old school.

The Vegas shooter picked a conservative crowd. 

 

the Vegas shooter was a right winger you dildo.

Quote

Paddock appeared fixated on three pillars of right-wing extremism: anti-government conspiracy theories, threats to Second Amendment rights, and overly burdensome taxes. For instance, one witness told Las Vegas police that Paddock was “kind of fanaticalOpens in a new tab” about his anti-government conspiracies and that he believed someone had to “wake up the American public” and get them to arm themselves in response to looming threats. Family members and associates of Paddock painted a picture of a man who loathed restrictions on gun ownership and believed that the Second Amendment was under siege, according to our review of their statements to investigators after the shooting and other documents compiled by the authorities.

link

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Required viewing from black dog's CRT 101 course:

 

The truth feels completely foreign to left-wingers like partialobserver. 

Do you think the guy in the viedo is actually named Jim Crow?

Edited February 1, 2024 by Black Dog

[Deluge]

24 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Do you think the guy in the viedo is actually named Jim Crow?

Through Jim Crow doctrine, democrats believe that the best way to identify racists, is to become racists themselves. 

And they've done an excellent job at executing this within their stronghold cities. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah and there's nothing there that says what you say it does. The fact you are incapable of providing the relevant quote shows you're lying. Again.

 

Denial. Not just a river in egypt apparently.  And i did provide it, it was right there. What you're doing is called sealioning, its a dishonest debate technique favored by the left where you constantly ask for informaiton you've been provided with or is immediately available to try to deflect and buy time when you don't want to address an issue.

I'm sure that works great on the grade 5 students you normally debate with.

Quote

Maybe or i'll just do what you do and ignore it/move the goalposts. We'll never know unless you actually put up (which you won't).

LOL - so you're saying you'll sealion  

So you know i'm right and i can post the data and you're already explaining how you'll ignore it and somehow that's my fault

Kid - you are in way over your head here.   

Quote

My exact quote was "your guys keep leaving manifestos"

And provided a link that was supposed to prove it.  Only... it wasn't just 'our guys'. Not to mention that it spanned about 30 years.

Sooooo - yeah. Fail.

Quote

That's another no. 

Sorry - repeating a lie doesn't make it true, no matter how many times you do it.

Quote

Interesting the only way you can actually win an argument is to lie about what people say. That or you're actually stupid enough to believe this stuff yourself. Either way, I've wiped things off the bottom of my shoe taht are more intelligent than you.

ROFLMAO - awwwww muffin - the things you have to tell yourself to get to sleep at night are hilarious

Hey -  you brought a stupid argument and said a bunch of stupid things to people who aren't stupid and you got called on it.  Thats on you.

Next time step it up

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Sure, I do: all of them. There's zero ideological difference between you, the median Fox News viewer and any of these far right maniacs. They just take it to the logical end point.

That's just a slithery, verbose lie.

You don't have a single quote, cite, video, or even so much as an anecdote of a conservative downplaying violence, acting like it wasn't happening, saying that they hope the violence continues, telling people who are committing crimes to stay angry and focus their anger, calling a 50+ victim vehicle attack a car crash, calling violence "mostly peaceful", saying that effigies of dead politicians were comedy, calling a speech about committing terrorist attacks a joke, etc. 

You're officially my b1tch now. 

Quote

Nah it's pure unadulterated partisan brainrot on your part.

aka:

Quote

Radical Islam is a far right conservative ideology, dumb dumb.

Radical muslims are all under the liberal tent. You're the ones who accept them and embrace them, you accept their misogyny, you accept their religious bigotry, you pretend that their pro-genocide slogans are about peace, you blame their islamic terrorist attacks on other random things like guns and involuntary celibacy, and they all vote liberal/democrat. 

They are absolutely, positively, 100% part of your crowd. 

There are people who vote conservative who I don't like, but at least I don't pretend that they're swell. 

Quote

the Vegas shooter was a right winger you dildo.

link

This is from your own article, loser:

1. The FBI and Las Vegas police each spent many months searching for a motive in the Las Vegas attack, and both agencies claimed to come up empty in the end. There was “no single or clear motivating factor behind Paddock’s attack,” an FBI panel concludedOpens in a new tab in a report released in January 2019, and it found “no evidence that Paddock’s attack was motivated by any ideological or political beliefs.” The FBI said that “throughout his life, Paddock went to great lengths to keep his thoughts private, and that extended to his final thinking about this mass murder,” much like many violent lone actors before him.
2. Paddock, in our view, fit the profile of a far-right political extremist bent on sowing violence in society.
3. For instance, one witness told Las Vegas police that Paddock was “kind of fanatical” about his anti-government conspiracies and that he believed someone had to “wake up the American public” and get them to arm themselves in response to looming threats. 
4. Family members and associates of Paddock painted a picture of a man

1. The people who compiled all of the evidence said that they found no motive. 

2. FYI "In our view" means "it's just our opinion". It doesn't mean any more than that, dummy. 

3. "One witness". One. And who was that one witness? If the FBI really valued the opinion of that one person over everyone else, why didn't they have some kind of a motive to talk about? Why did they feel that this one person's comment [if it was even real] didn't carry any weight? 

4. "Family members and associates of Paddock"...

Who? Which ones? 3rd cousins and a guy he worked with when he was 17?

"...came to a conclusion"... that the FBI and police don't share, at all, and they're the ones who had access to all of the interviews. They didn't just get the quotes off a piece of paper, with no idea whatsoever who the quotes came from and how well those witnesses even knew Paddock. The police and FBI know exactly who said these things, how well they knew Paddock, how credible their testimony actually was, who said things to the contrary, and who came back to them and said "No, the things that these witnesses told you were false because...."

 

We - you and I - only know two things for sure:

1. Paddock picked a group of people to mass murder who were almost guaranteed to be 95% conservatives, and

2. his attack was probably the best argument FOR gun control ever made. 

 

I could also add that if the attacker was conservative, the FBI would have released/leaked everything they had to that effect. They always do.

It's only when the shooter is a muslim (Dems' protected class) or some other member of the alt-left tent that their reasons for killing are kept from the public, and try to deflect blame away from that person's membership within a group.

Here's a perfect example of the shooter's identity being protected: 

The shooting was in March, and her manifesto was never released at all. It had to be leaked and it didn't come out 'til November of the same year. 

Here's what NBC said about it initially:

• "A sense of “resentment” might have played a role in a 28-year-old’s deadly attack on the private Christian school they once attended, Nashville police said Monday".

 

"Might have played a role". Hmmmmm. Nice try. They already knew, 100%. They had the manifesto:

 

• “We have some writings that we’re going over that pertain to this date, the actual incident,” Drake told reporters hours after the shooting. “We have a map drawn out of how this was all going to take place.”

11th paragraph contains this little morsel: "He said Hale was transgender." Oh, that's kinda also-ran info, hey? Makes sense that when a trans person shoots up a Catholic school we'd assume that the 'trans' part was barely worth mentioning, right? 

Officials “feel that she identifies as trans[🤣], but we’re still in the initial investigation into all of that and if it actually played a role into this incident,” Drake said.

They only feel that? They don't know? It's pretty weird that they didn't know that, seeing as they had her manifesto already, as mentioned earlier.

Did you see what was in her manifesto yet? Do you know how little it left to the imagination, about what her reasons were??? 

• The pages released by Crowder allegedly reveal the intentions behind Hale's deadly attack.

  Wanna kill all you little c*******," one page from the manifesto reads. "Bunch of little f****** w/ your white privlages f*** you f******."

How much brainwashing did it take to convince her that other white kids who lived in the same town and went to the same school all experienced "white privilege" and she didn't? How is white privilege a thing if some white people don't get it?

Don't worry, it doesn't have to make sense, because only leftards have to believe it.  

Edited February 2, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Black Dog]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Denial. Not just a river in egypt apparently.  And i did provide it, it was right there. What you're doing is called sealioning, its a dishonest debate technique favored by the left where you constantly ask for informaiton you've been provided with or is immediately available to try to deflect and buy time when you don't want to address an issue.

I asked for a specific quote. Your response (three times now? or is it four?) has been "it's right there." If you had something, you'd provide the actual words. But you don't. Because you're a pathetic little liar.

Quote

 

I'm sure that works great on the grade 5 students you normally debate with.

LOL - so you're saying you'll sealion  

So you know i'm right and i can post the data and you're already explaining how you'll ignore it and somehow that's my fault

 

The lengths you go to avoid putting up. What a giant ****.

Quote

 

Kid - you are in way over your head here.   

And provided a link that was supposed to prove it.  Only... it wasn't just 'our guys'. Not to mention that it spanned about 30 years.

Sooooo - yeah. Fail.

 

That proved that there are numerous examples of right wing mass killers? Yeah, I proved that pretty well to the point you had to lie and deflect.

Quote

 

Sorry - repeating a lie doesn't make it true, no matter how many times you do it.

ROFLMAO - awwwww muffin - the things you have to tell yourself to get to sleep at night are hilarious

Hey -  you brought a stupid argument and said a bunch of stupid things to people who aren't stupid and you got called on it.  Thats on you.

Next time step it up

 

The more time we spend on this back and forth the more clear it becomes that you're a sad, stupid, lonely old man who is just living for this attention. Because your "arguments" are either non-exsitent or total shit.

[Black Dog]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

That's just a slithery, verbose lie.

You don't have a single quote, cite, video, or even so much as an anecdote of a conservative downplaying violence, acting like it wasn't happening, saying that they hope the violence continues, telling people who are committing crimes to stay angry and focus their anger, calling a 50+ victim vehicle attack a car crash, calling violence "mostly peaceful", saying that effigies of dead politicians were comedy, calling a speech about committing terrorist attacks a joke, etc. 

You're officially my b1tch now. 

Half that stuff either never happened or is so' lame that its not worth addressing. Like you're actually still crying about some D list comedians' stunt? Unreal.

Quote

 

Radical muslims are all under the liberal tent. You're the ones who accept them and embrace them, you accept their misogyny, you accept their religious bigotry, you pretend that their pro-genocide slogans are about peace, you blame their islamic terrorist attacks on other random things like guns and involuntary celibacy, and they all vote liberal/democrat. 

They are absolutely, positively, 100% part of your crowd. 

There are people who vote conservative who I don't like, but at least I don't pretend that they're swell. 

 

Radical Islam is a right wing conservative ideology. Sorry shitbird, thems the ways it is.

Quote

 

I could also add that if the attacker was conservative, the FBI would have released/leaked everything they had to that effect. They always do.

 

You basing a dumb conclusion on another dumb belief you have just makes you double stupid.

Quote

 

Here's a perfect example of the shooter's identity being protected: 

The shooting was in March, and her manifesto was never released at all. It had to be leaked and it didn't come out 'til November of the same year. 

 

You stupid c*nt, your own link shows they released information about the shooter's gender ID almost immediately, how is that "protecting their identity?" You absolute dimwit.

Quote

The shooting was in March, and her manifesto was never released at all. It had to be leaked and it didn't come out 'til November of the same year

Let me guess: the families of the victims and the Christian school are opposing the release of the "manifesto" because they are Democrat Deep State operatives. That sounds retarded enough for you to believe.

Quote

They only feel that? They don't know? It's pretty weird that they didn't know that, seeing as they had her manifesto already, as mentioned earlier.

This article was the same day the attack took place do you think they went through every piece of evidence and would go public with what they found within hours of the shooting? Plenty of times they don't even release the shooter's name that early. The only way to see this as evidence of a cover up or conspiracy (and we know how left wing the police are) is if you're a suffering from some form of paranoid schizophrenia, which you have all the hallmarks of. Get help or k__l yourself already. 

 

[CdnFox]

26 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I asked for a specific quote.-exsitent or total shit.

I don't give a shit what  you asked for - it was in the line above which was pretty damn short.

Like i said - when you know you're wrong you sealion.  Next it's  "I DEMANDED the predicate, you gave me the sujbect!"   LOL  Eff off loser. Any m0r0n can see it and as i noted there's frequent other examples. 

 

Quote

The lengths you go to avoid putting up. What a giant ****.

It's really no effort.  It's like pushing urkle when he's trying to act tough.  I barely even notice  

And to be honest watching you do your little salty leftie dance when people don't play your game is pretty amusing  

Quote

That proved that there are numerous examples of right wing mass killers?

What,  14 in 30 years?  In a population of hundreds of millions? If anything it proves they were almost non existent.

Quote

The more time we spend on this back and forth the more clear it becomes that you're a sad, stupid, lonely old man who is just living for this attention. Because your "arguments" are either non

*munches popcorn*  -  you keep going little guy! You've almost got me i'm sure  of it !!   ROFLMAO!!!

[Legato]

18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Half that stuff either never happened or is so' lame that its not worth addressing. Like you're actually still crying about some D list comedians' stunt? Unreal.

Radical Islam is a right wing conservative ideology. Sorry shitbird, thems the ways it is.

You basing a dumb conclusion on another dumb belief you have just makes you double stupid.

You stupid c*nt, your own link shows they released information about the shooter's gender ID almost immediately, how is that "protecting their identity?" You absolute dimwit.

Let me guess: the families of the victims and the Christian school are opposing the release of the "manifesto" because they are Democrat Deep State operatives. That sounds retarded enough for you to believe.

This article was the same day the attack took place do you think they went through every piece of evidence and would go public with what they found within hours of the shooting? Plenty of times they don't even release the shooter's name that early. The only way to see this as evidence of a cover up or conspiracy (and we know how left wing the police are) is if you're a suffering from some form of paranoid schizophrenia, which you have all the hallmarks of. Get help or k__l yourself already. 

 

You sound very angry and a little desperate, have you been taking your Balance of Nature. Also don't forget the beetroot juice, it's good for hypertension.