Why Leftists Are So Unhappy

[Rebound]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yes, there were some violent acts on Jan 6th, and I never said that there weren't. You'd know that if your reading comprehension was up to snuff.

I said "a lot of Jan 6thers were locked up for years without trial despite never committing a violent or destructive act", it's just a few posts up. Look again. 

Notice that I didn't say "all of the Jan 6thers locked up" at the beginning and I didn't say "no one committed any violent or destructive acts...." at the end.

No conservative that I know of denies that there was violence, and none of them ever said that committing acts of violence was the right thing to do either. That's strictly a leftist phenomenon at this point. Leftists do it a lot.

For 3 of the 6 years from summer 2014 to summer 2020, leftist leaders, their media partners and their brainwashed horde alike universally applauded all of the violence and destruction. It was only on very rare occasions that one of them would break ranks and insert a bit of mild condemnation into their hearty approval of it.  

You’re FOS. The leaders of BML didn’t “heartily approve” of rioting and violence. And Joe Biden isn’t parading violent rioters, it’s that POS Trump who wants to do that.  
 

But here’s what’s gonna happen: Trump will lose this fall, Trump will get convicted of some of the 91 felonies, and Trump will go to prison.  Because he is a f-ing criminal.  He’s a rapist, he’s a fraudster, and insurrectionist, a thief of top secret documents, and an instructor of justice.  He’s going to the Big House, not the White House.  

[Hodad]

11 hours ago, Black Dog said:

My theory as to why conservatives might report being happier is they are, by nature, more deferential to the status quo and more tolerant of social injustice.

 

Ignorance is bliss.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Rebound said:

But here’s what’s gonna happen: Trump will lose this fall, Trump will get convicted of some of the 91 felonies, and Trump will go to prison.  Because he is a f-ing criminal.  He’s a rapist, he’s a fraudster, and insurrectionist, a thief of top secret documents, and an instructor of justice.  He’s going to the Big House, not the White House.  

Dude - i'm telling ya - manage your expectations better, You're going to have an annurism if it goes the other way at this rate and it might.

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

You’re FOS. The leaders of BML didn’t “heartily approve” of rioting and violence. And Joe Biden isn’t parading violent rioters, it’s that POS Trump who wants to do that.  

Do you mean BLM?

BLM edited videos to make police officers look bad in order to create racial strife. 

They weren't cheerleaders, they were orchestrators.

Watch two black professors/activists talk about how seeing the bodycam footage and seeing evidence that was blocked from Chauvin's trial changed their opinion of Floyd's death: 

 

I don't expect you to be as open-minded as these two, but regardless of how you feel, these guys are painfully aware of the fact that they were lied to this whole time. 

Keep in mind that these guys are intelligent enough to be professors, open-minded enough to take in all of these facts even though they completely undermine the narrative that these guys wholeheartedly supported for years, and take note of how conservative these two intelligent men sound while they are discussing all of the pertinent facts of the case that you refuse to acknowledge. 

Quote

But here’s what’s gonna happen: Trump will lose this fall, Trump will get convicted of some of the 91 felonies, and Trump will go to prison.  Because he is a f-ing criminal.  He’s a rapist, he’s a fraudster, and insurrectionist, a thief of top secret documents, and an instructor of justice.  He’s going to the Big House, not the White House.  

Holy TDS Batman, step awaaay from the ledge. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Ignorance is bliss.

Yep. It's when you say things like "There's no inflation" to make yourself feel good. Or when you say "The Afghan withdrawal was a massive success". 

There's no basis in fact behind claims like that - they're blatantly false - but they make people like you feel good. 

[Hodad]

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Yep. It's when you say things like "There's no inflation" to make yourself feel good. Or when you say "The Afghan withdrawal was a massive success". 

There's no basis in fact behind claims like that - they're blatantly false - but they make people like you feel good. 

Actually, Biden was perfectly accurate in relating the factual economic data regarding inflation. Your inability to understand it is on you. 

The second point is a matter of opinion rather than fact, but I'm not aware of anyone saying that.

You're not very good at arguing facts, so you tend to make up straw men.

Edited January 30, 2024 by Hodad

[Deluge]

13 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Maybe we should add: "Always having to watch conservatives bringing facts to debates which leftists can only lie about" to the laundry list of reasons why they're so unhappy. 

That's a very good reason, as it explains their incessantly rabid responses in this thread. 

[Rebound]

8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you mean BLM?

BLM edited videos to make police officers look bad in order to create racial strife. 

They weren't cheerleaders, they were orchestrators.

Watch two black professors/activists talk about how seeing the bodycam footage and seeing evidence that was blocked from Chauvin's trial changed their opinion of Floyd's death: 

 

I don't expect you to be as open-minded as these two, but regardless of how you feel, these guys are painfully aware of the fact that they were lied to this whole time. 

Keep in mind that these guys are intelligent enough to be professors, open-minded enough to take in all of these facts even though they completely undermine the narrative that these guys wholeheartedly supported for years, and take note of how conservative these two intelligent men sound while they are discussing all of the pertinent facts of the case that you refuse to acknowledge. 

Holy TDS Batman, step awaaay from the ledge. 

Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. If the evidence actually showed that he did not kill George Floyd, he would not have been convicted. His fellow police officers didn’t want to turn over evidence proving his guilt. 

Your YouTube won’t overturn that.

[Deluge]

28 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. If the evidence actually showed that he did not kill George Floyd, he would not have been convicted. His fellow police officers didn’t want to turn over evidence proving his guilt. 

Your YouTube won’t overturn that.

Translation: Ignore the ongoing BLM riots across the country and look at my pitiful little examples of what I think is racism. 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Actually, Biden was perfectly accurate in relating the factual economic data regarding inflation. Your inability to understand it is on you. 

Good job, Mr. Fake President; you've identified the problem. So can you fix it, or are you just going to keep siting on your ass eating chocolate chip ice cream? 

[Deluge]

Donald Trump is another reason for left-wing unhappiness. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. If the evidence actually showed that he did not kill George Floyd, he would not have been convicted. His fellow police officers didn’t want to turn over evidence proving his guilt. 

Your YouTube won’t overturn that.

It's a recurring theme that Democrat judges and the FBI ban evidence from these political trials.

In Chauvin's case the judge prevented the jury from being shown the training video that taught Chauvin to do the exact thing that he did to Floyd.

I'm just gonna pre-emptively shut down your next stupid comment right now: no, the video doesn't say "Only do this to black people".

So why is it that people can stand in that courtroom and say things like "Chauvin just kneeled on his neck like that because he's a racist" but the defence can't say "Chauvin did exactly what he was trained to do - look at this video that shows exactly what you're supposed to do in the situation that Chauvin was in"? 

Why did the court allow lies and inflammatory, divisive statements and disallow the truth? Why did that judge disallow such a central truth to that trial, Rebound?

Why did the judge in the 2nd Whitmer trial disallow evidence from the first trial which proved that the FBI used an entrapment scheme?

Why did the FBI withhold evidence from the first 3 applications at the FISA court that Carter Page was a CIA asset? Why did they alter evidence to say that Page wasn't a CIA asset on the 4th application?

Why is justice blind, Rebound? Oh, I'll tell you, dummy, because there's zero chance that you figure this out on your own: because the Dems put a blindfold on her. That's how she works now... She wears a blindfold and the Dems tell her their side of the story. Look:

 Right now she's saying: "Jurors: listen to CNN's story about the Gentle Giant and the cop who decided to kill him by kneeling on his neck, purely because he was a vile racist. Only that. That's all you get to see and and hear. Go now, and make your decision."

[Deluge]

I may as well post this video here, as well. 

It DOES help explain the plight of the wokeness disciple:

 

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I may as well post this video here, as well. 

It DOES help explain the plight of the wokeness disciple:

 

"Over-represented by white Christians" lol.

Just look at all the woketards around her trying not to visibly cringe as she runs her racist mouth. 

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

"Over-represented by white Christians" lol.

Just look at all the woketards around her trying not to visibly cringe as she runs her racist mouth. 

Lol, yup. One of those bed-wetters is even kissing her a$$. 

Edited January 30, 2024 by Deluge

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a recurring theme that Democrat judges and the FBI ban evidence from these political trials.

In Chauvin's case the judge prevented the jury from being shown the training video that taught Chauvin to do the exact thing that he did to Floyd.

I'm just gonna pre-emptively shut down your next stupid comment right now: no, the video doesn't say "Only do this to black people".

So why is it that people can stand in that courtroom and say things like "Chauvin just kneeled on his neck like that because he's a racist" but the defence can't say "Chauvin did exactly what he was trained to do - look at this video that shows exactly what you're supposed to do in the situation that Chauvin was in"? 

Why did the court allow lies and inflammatory, divisive statements and disallow the truth? Why did that judge disallow such a central truth to that trial, Rebound?

Why did the judge in the 2nd Whitmer trial disallow evidence from the first trial which proved that the FBI used an entrapment scheme?

Why did the FBI withhold evidence from the first 3 applications at the FISA court that Carter Page was a CIA asset? Why did they alter evidence to say that Page wasn't a CIA asset on the 4th application?

Why is justice blind, Rebound? Oh, I'll tell you, dummy, because there's zero chance that you figure this out on your own: because the Dems put a blindfold on her. That's how she works now... She wears a blindfold and the Dems tell her their side of the story. Look:

 Right now she's saying: "Jurors: listen to CNN's story about the Gentle Giant and the cop who decided to kill him by kneeling on his neck, purely because he was a vile racist. Only that. That's all you get to see and and hear. Go now, and make your decision."

If those facts of yours were relevant to his case, then Chauvin can bring them up on appeal and win. 
 

FYI, since you’re clueless about the USA, the U.S. Senate has been stacking Federal courts with ultra-conservative judges for a long time now.  It’s not a “liberal conspiracy.” 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Rebound said:

If those facts of yours were relevant to his case, then Chauvin can bring them up on appeal and win. 
 

FYI, since you’re clueless about the USA, the U.S. Senate has been stacking Federal courts with ultra-conservative judges for a long time now.  It’s not a “liberal conspiracy.” 

Wow.  "ultra" conservatives.  Those are the ones who can joint to create MEGA-CON right? They're not just republicans, they're transformers  

Dude, you're getting over the top.  Deep breaths, And i haven't seen the senate 'stacking' the courts - what evidence do you have of this?

[Black Dog]

On 1/29/2024 at 7:01 PM, CdnFox said:

sure - they usually go where they're familiar.  You're aware his manifesto made it clear that he was there to kill kids with white privlidge etc and that he was a dem supporter right? That was the point. I was asked for an example - here's a trans male shooting up a school with full remediation who's a known dem supporter who specifically offered left wing talking points about white privledge and the like as his reasoning.  Mischief managed i'd say  

This is exactly the same logic you reject when it comes to shooters with right wing beliefs, but its clear you're a hypocrite. And it's funny that your one example is exactly the same one I predicted you'd use because you nitwits are nothing if not predictable.

 

Quote

Nope. that angle has been disproven many many many times.  He belonged to far left groups, was a hemp farmer and nudist, and while he might well get sucked in to qanon theories the fact is that happens to democrats more often than you'd think. Sorry.

The stuff about falling down right wing conspiracy rabbit hole is literally straight from the perpetrator's mouth.
 

Quote

Ohhh - sorry little guy it's happened many times.  Here's one

Your claim was, specifically, that in such events, the media wouldn't cover any racist movtives, but this is from your article:

 

Quote

 

Samson, who used to attend the church, is black and the victims are white. Hunter explained that a note in Samson’s car cited white supremacist Dylann Roof’s massacre at a black church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015. It also referenced the red, black and green Pan-African flag, sometimes called RBG.

“Dylann Roof is less than nothing,” the note read, Hunter said. “The blood that 10 of your kind will shed is that of the color upon the RBG flag in terms of vengeance.” The note included an expletive and ended with a smiley face, Hunter said.

 

Ooops! 

Quote

Ahhh - so i said left leaning, and you're trying to change it to "politically motivated'.   I"m going to have to ask you to get back here with those goalposts  

Yes because the political beliefs are irrelevant unless they are the motivation for the actions, you simpleton.

Quote

I've posted one which is a great example.

Even if I were to accept the Nashville shooting as an example of a left wing politically motivated attack, the scoreboard is still heavily slanted in favour of right wing murderers because right wing beliefs are fundamentally violent.

 

Quote

 

Sorry kiddo, once again you've been proven wrong.  If you took the time to do the research before making statements that are clearly not real you'd be better off.

As it is, i can tell you're thinking about transiting into full on sealion mode.  Just remember there's no surer way to say you're wrong with thout saying it than that  

 

Nothing sadder than seeing someone try and strut around like a winner after sh*tting their pants in public lol.

[Black Dog]

On 1/29/2024 at 5:04 PM, WestCanMan said:

Everybody with an IQ over 80 is a "G Floyd truther" now. You're only a couple standards of deviation away being part of the "in" crowd>

It was definitely an injustice, so if you don't care, that's just a sad reflection of your abysmal character.

It's the height of hypocrisy for you to call other people ignorant you willing little mushroom. 

You just acknowledged that you have no clue what happened in the G Floyd killing, which is arguably one of the main events within our culture in the last 20 years. You have zero room to talk. 

FYI people like me are here trying to educate you but you're too busy own-ass spelunking to take advantage of the information being presented to you. 

If you wanna get back on topic, this thread is about the reasons that leftards cite for their own unhappiness, and it seems to be well-established here now that, for the most part, they're butt-hurt whiners who prefer blaming society at large for their own issues instead of taking accountability.

Got it, puppy? Good boy. Go chew a slipper. 

MFW I see Derek Chauvin got stabbed in the prison he'll spend the next 22 years in:

[Deluge]

12 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

MFW I see Derek Chauvin got stabbed in the prison he'll spend the next 22 years in:

black dog celebrates violence in all its forms.

[WestCanMan]

47 minutes ago, Deluge said:

black dog celebrates violence in all its forms.

I wonder how many of his 14,600 posts would lose meaning if you just swapped them out for this:

[Deluge]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I wonder how many of his 14,600 posts would lose meaning if you just swapped them out for this:

I don't think any would lose meaning. I wish there was a way to test it out. 

[Black Dog]

56 minutes ago, Deluge said:

black dog celebrates violence in all its forms.

Nah just against murdering pigs.

[Deluge]

On 1/29/2024 at 7:22 PM, Rebound said:

You’re FOS. The leaders of BML didn’t “heartily approve” of rioting and violence.

Of course they did and still do. Those a$$holes think ALL black behaviors are good and just. 

Disagree? Prove it. 

[Black Dog]

Another happy right winger:

Man arrested after claiming severed head in YouTube video was his father – a federal worker – amid Biden administration rant

Quote

In the video posted on YouTube, the man identifying himself as Mohn apparently reads from a written statement and at one point holds up what appears to be a bloodied head inside a clear plastic bag. He says his father, who was a federal employee for over 20 years, was a traitor to his country.

“America is rotting from the inside out as far left, woke mobs rampage our once prosperous cities,” he says in the video.

Rhetoric literally indistinguishable from some this board's RWNJs.

Edited January 31, 2024 by Black Dog