WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 (edited) 1 hour ago, impartialobserver said: Again.. I have stated three times now that those liberals/democrats who I have met and interacted with exhibit consider variance in their view. Your anecdotal/unproven evidence is interesting, but video evidence of violent groups destroying communities based on false narratives for months and months on end, supported by Dem politicians is far more compelling evidence than what a random internet poster claims to have seen from the end of his own nose. Quote I am not sure how you can't comprehend this. I can comprehend it just fine, I'm just not overestimating the worth of your opinion. I can prove that M Brown was a violent criminal, and that Dems and the MSM made him out to be a gentle soul who shouldn't have been bothered by cops. I can prove that Demi politicians supported violent riots for months based on that false narrative. How does that stack up to what you claim to have seen? Quote You paint everyone with the same paintbrush. And yet you're a vax-apologist of the lowest order... a blind believer, and a stone-faced denier of facts and stats. You belong in that cultist boat, so why should I believe that all the people you consider to be fine and rational are any less devoted to the cult than you are? The people who were throwing Jews into the ovens felt like their fellow Jew-chuckers were normal people, right? I feel like the people who I agree with are normal. Right? "So what do they believe?", you ask... Mainly - THEY BELIEVE IT'S F'ING WRONG TO FORCE YOUNG, HEALTHY PEOPLE TO TAKE A DANGEROUS, EXPERIMENTAL VAX THAT THEY DON'T NEED! And yes, the word 'dangerous' is perfectly suited for that spot in that sentence because a lot of scientists believed that mRNA vaccines actually weren't safe yet. Quote I could say that all UI claimants are braindead because the few that find their way to me are generally lacking brain power.. ie, spelling their own name incorrectly or thinking that I can add zeros to their benefit amount because we are "bros" or such. But most are not braindead and can follow simple instructions. "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twian It's funny, but sometimes generalizations are just unfortunate observations. For example, a lot of people said "mostly peaceful protests" but they were all lying. They all knew that the peaceful protest next Friday at 4pm would turn into a riot at 10, but their handlers told them to use that phrase - so they did, unquestioningly. How many times in a row could all those retards be surprised that another riot followed the 'mostly peaceful protest'? At some point you'd think they'd figure out that there was some kind of a pattern... Nope. They just kept on saying: "These are mostly peaceful protests and we need money to bail people out of jail on Monday morning again, for whatever reason. I dunno, maybe they keep ending up in there because all cops are racist? Solution? Easy peasy... Defund police." Yeah, your peeps are just fine, io. 😂 Edited April 24 by WestCanMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Lol...so silly. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/world/europe/22biden.html I had to snap this screenshot before the paywall went up so it's not perfect... Here's another screenshot: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/russia-s-ukraine-war-foreshadowed-biden-nato-speech-ncna1292539 Leftards: "Nah, Biden pimping Ukraine in NATO had nothing to do with Crimea or the current war..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Sure - he cleans a lot but that's no reason to insult him! oh... vacu OUS. right. That's my bad. Vacuous is a great descriptor for a posting-bot with the intelligence of a Roomba. A poster called something liiiiike.... Roombosmith 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 (edited) 27 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: And yet you're a vax-apologist of the lowest order... a blind believer, and a stone-faced denier of facts and stats. Another example of your passion/zealousness getting in the way of you saying something true. I have never stated a pro-vax statement. I have said dozens of times that I did not care... "did not care" is not the same as "vaccinations are/were good"... You must have some dyslexia. Also, my comment is on how they vary in their views.. not riots. Even Chatgpt can see those two are not the same. As always, its a good thing that you are not in my office. Your irrational passion would preclude from even getting close to doing the job correctly. We are paid to get it right not be right.. How many initial claims are there in a given month is not the same as many initial claims should there be.. but you demonstrate that you could not separate the two. Edited April 24 by impartialobserver 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 Biden may be the only guy dumb enough to start a war when he wasn't even the president, then those f-tards went and 'elected' him, now they act surprised when wars spring up all over the place. 😂 "Uhhh, Crimea was Twumpie's fault! 🧐 " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 Meh...I'm not sure Brandon can even remember what Biden said back in 2009. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Another example of your passion/zealousness getting in the way of you saying something true. I have never stated a pro-vax statement. I have said dozens of times that I did not care... "did not care" is not the same as "vaccinations are/were good"... You must have some dyslexia. You spend an awful lot of time obfuscating threads that you don't care about... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 (edited) 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: You spend an awful lot of time obfuscating threads that you don't care about... I made a point (not in response to you.. easily proven), you responded and every time you respond.. you go off into the weeds. Pretty simple stuff honestly. why you respond is both amusing and pathetic. Edited April 24 by impartialobserver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Meh...I'm not sure Brandon can even remember what Biden said back in 2009. I never thought I'd see the day that G W Bush looked like an upgrade in the WH. Hell, his cat would be an upgrade. I'd rather see GWBush's equally retarded cat swatting at goldfish in the nuclear briefcase than see Joe toting it around. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: I made a point (not in response to you.. easily proven), you responded and every time you respond.. you go off into the weeds. Pretty simple stuff honestly. why you respond is both amusing and pathetic. People need their welfare and UI. Get back to work, great one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: The people who advocate for forcing people to vax are obviously far more cult-like, right? Maybe in this scenario. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: People need their welfare and UI. Get back to work, great one. off topic ^^^ as always. You can never address my points directly. I know your types. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, eyeball said: Maybe in this scenario. We're not talking about your sex life. What's wrong with you? Just now, impartialobserver said: off topic ^^^ as always. You can never address my points directly. I know your types. OK, let's play a little game... You make your first on-topic comment, and I'll reply to directly to the merits of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, WestCanMan said: We're not talking about your sex life. What's wrong with you? OK, let's play a little game... You make your first on-topic comment, and I'll reply to directly to the merits of it. I already did... I stated that that the "democrats" that I know have variance in their views and hence not cult-like. If you do not like that... you could be grown up and keep scrolling... really Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 5 minutes ago, eyeball said: TBH, there are a lot of parallels there with the jab. People didn't have a choice, they were killed by a lethal injection, and their loss was considered "OK" by leftists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 1 minute ago, impartialobserver said: I already did... I stated that that the "democrats" that I know have variance in their views and hence not cult-like. If you do not like that... you could be grown up and keep scrolling... really You 'stated' something flawed. Bottom line: A cultist looked around the room at the other cultists and thought to himself "We're all in agreement, and we all get along quite amicably, that's proof that we're normal. Everyone outside of this room is f'ed up." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: You 'stated' something flawed. Bottom line: A cultist looked around the room at the other cultists and thought to himself "We're all in agreement, and we all get along quite amicably, that's proof that we're normal. Everyone outside of this room is f'ed up." And there we go with more assumptions.. you think that I am in agreement. I simply observe and collect data, so to speak. Honestly do not agree with most of them. What would you do if you could not rely on assumptions? I am not sure I want to know the answer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 24 Author Report Share Posted April 24 11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: And there we go with more assumptions.. you think that I am in agreement. I simply observe and collect data, so to speak. Honestly do not agree with most of them. What would you do if you could not rely on assumptions? I am not sure I want to know the answer... I just wonder what would happen if you ever tried to state an actual on-topic fact or stat. Obviously my jaw would hit the floor first, I mean after that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 (edited) 25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: I just wonder what would happen if you ever tried to state an actual on-topic fact or stat. Obviously my jaw would hit the floor first, I mean after that... I just wonder what would happen if you acted like an adult and did not respond if you did not care for the post... I know why you respond... interesting how when i point out that you rely on assumptions.. you never respond. Hmm.. that tells me that you do and just do not care for the fact that I can point it out. Edited April 24 by impartialobserver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted April 24 Report Share Posted April 24 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: We're not talking about your sex life. What's wrong with you? There's nothing wrong with me. Whose this we're you're talking to... 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: TBH, there are a lot of parallels there with the jab. People didn't have a choice, they were killed by a lethal injection, and their loss was considered "OK" by leftists. ...and what on Earth are you guys talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 25 Author Report Share Posted April 25 3 hours ago, impartialobserver said: interesting how when i point out that you rely on assumptions.. you never respond. You're an open book io. Your posts are formulaic. I don't have to assume anything. You pretend to be some kind of authority on a topic, then when you're asked to display some kind of next-level knowledge you say say that you just don't really care about the topic, you cast aspersions, rinse, repeat. Nothing that you say is ever truly on topic. 3 hours ago, eyeball said: There's nothing wrong with me. There's nothing right, that's for sure. Quote ...and what on Earth are you guys talking about? Jabs that kill people. Sometimes death-row inmates, sometimes healthy young Canadians who just wanted to keep their jobs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted April 25 Report Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: There's nothing right, that's for sure. There's a little but for sure it's mostly left. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted April 25 Report Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, eyeball said: There's a little but for sure it's mostly left. Ok - that was funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 25 Author Report Share Posted April 25 9 hours ago, eyeball said: There's a little but for sure it's mostly left. Why did you put the laughing emoji on a post about young people killed by the jab? Do you think it's funny that people were killed by a jab they didn't want or need? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 25 Report Share Posted April 25 15 hours ago, WestCanMan said: You're an open book io. Your posts are formulaic. I don't have to assume anything. You pretend to be some kind of authority on a topic, then when you're asked to display some kind of next-level knowledge you say say that you just don't really care about the topic, you cast aspersions, rinse, repeat. Nothing that you say is ever truly on topic. There's nothing right, that's for sure. Jabs that kill people. Sometimes death-row inmates, sometimes healthy young Canadians who just wanted to keep their jobs. You keep responding... I know why. Second, you assumed that I was in agreeance with them. Assumptions are for the lazy. Well.. your secret is out. Your posts rely on assumptions and if someone points them out, you start with the name-calling and such. Because surely if someone is not you.. they fit your narrowly defined boxes. Now.. where is your usual line about CNN. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.