Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

On 11/24/2023 at 11:03 AM, WestCanMan said:

Tons of people on one side supporting, and even calling for the genocide of Jewish people. I don't see anyone decrying this, coming from that side. Why is this?

Well, given the evidentiary standards you people subscribe to I'll need to see proof that it isn't just right wing Zionists pretending to be racists.

 

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Israel has tried the high road before. Didn't work.

The high road was working just fine when lefties were in charge of Israel.

image.thumb.png.6af42c0c8d9a49e5f3a484eb983e6b39.png

 

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

 

Well, given the evidentiary standards you people subscribe to I'll need to see proof that it isn't just right wing Zionists pretending to be racists.

 

The high road was working just fine when lefties were in charge of Israel.

image.thumb.png.6af42c0c8d9a49e5f3a484eb983e6b39.png

 

Still didn't work.

Posted
34 minutes ago, eyeball said:

 

 

Well, given the evidentiary standards you people subscribe to I'll need to see proof that it isn't just right wing Zionists pretending to be racists.

 

The high road was working just fine when lefties were in charge of Israel.

image.thumb.png.6af42c0c8d9a49e5f3a484eb983e6b39.png

 

But then a right wing nut killed the Israeli PM. ?

Posted
On 11/22/2023 at 9:57 AM, Hodad said:

You're insane. There was worldwide outrage over what happened to the Israelis in October. They had near-universal support.

That empathy, sympathy and support does get eroded quickly as the retaliation blows up civilians day after day. What we're actually observing is an example of recency bias. We can all look at what Hamas did in October and say that was wrong. But what the Israelis are currently doing is active and ongoing--they are killing civilians day after day--

I love it when leftards try to use their shiny new terms like "cognitive bias", "recency bias", "sedition", etc ?

What do you think 'recency bias' even means hodad? Does it even make any sense at all that it would refer to people giving extra weight to things that happened further back in time? ?

Israeli supporters are giving extra weight to things based on things like the intent of Palestinian/Israeli actions. The level of evil associated with them. The existence of alternative solutions.

Hamas INTENDED for Israeli women and children to die hideous deaths because it causes grief, fear and anger among Israelis. They wanted the Israelis to retaliate and start a war while weak Joe is president. By contrast, Israel intends to kill terrorists and stop the rain of rockets on their country. 

What Hamas is doing is pure EVIL. By contrast the Israelis are doing something that almost every advanced animal species on the planet does - protecting their children.

The Palestinians had other alternatives available to them, like living in peace for the last 75 years, or moving to other muslim-first countries where they could commit their hate crimes against people of other religions with no governmental interference.  

The Israelis don't have any alternatives. They've been trying to live in peace but they've been attacked constantly this whole time. There are no other Jewish nations for them to go live in. If Israel ceases to exist then the Jews will have no homeland, and they will be forever cut off from their holy places - just like they have been from Temple Mount for the last 1,000 years - after muslims take control of everything.

Over the last thousand pre-1947 years the Jews have faced religious persecution, degradation, humiliation, persecution, violent assaults, murders, genocides, etc in every country that they lived in, in both the ME and Europe, at the hands of Christians and muslims. 

The Jews only want to have 0.001% of the land mass on earth, and 1% of the ME. The muslims want to have 100.00% of the ME under their the strict control of their codified religious bigotry. 

 

Don't worry hodad, I completely understand that all of what I said is way over your head. I don't expect you to be able to think for yourself with all the SJW propaganda that's floating around out there. What I wrote there is for discerning adults to consider. I eagerly await your sandbox insults. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Answer my questions FIRST. Until then I will take your answer as "no, I don't know."

I don't remember your question but sure as shit it was dumb...

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I love it when leftards try to use their shiny new terms like "cognitive bias", "recency bias", "sedition", etc ?

What do you think 'recency bias' even means hodad? Does it even make any sense at all that it would refer to people giving extra weight to things that happened further back in time? ?

Israeli supporters are giving extra weight to things based on things like the intent of Palestinian/Israeli actions. The level of evil associated with them. The existence of alternative solutions.

Hamas INTENDED for Israeli women and children to die hideous deaths because it causes grief, fear and anger among Israelis. They wanted the Israelis to retaliate and start a war while weak Joe is president. By contrast, Israel intends to kill terrorists and stop the rain of rockets on their country. 

What Hamas is doing is pure EVIL. By contrast the Israelis are doing something that almost every advanced animal species on the planet does - protecting their children.

The Palestinians had other alternatives available to them, like living in peace for the last 75 years, or moving to other muslim-first countries where they could commit their hate crimes against people of other religions with no governmental interference.  

The Israelis don't have any alternatives. They've been trying to live in peace but they've been attacked constantly this whole time. There are no other Jewish nations for them to go live in. If Israel ceases to exist then the Jews will have no homeland, and they will be forever cut off from their holy places - just like they have been from Temple Mount for the last 1,000 years - after muslims take control of everything.

Over the last thousand pre-1947 years the Jews have faced religious persecution, degradation, humiliation, persecution, violent assaults, murders, genocides, etc in every country that they lived in, in both the ME and Europe, at the hands of Christians and muslims. 

The Jews only want to have 0.001% of the land mass on earth, and 1% of the ME. The muslims want to have 100.00% of the ME under their the strict control of their codified religious bigotry. 

 

Don't worry hodad, I completely understand that all of what I said is way over your head. I don't expect you to be able to think for yourself with all the SJW propaganda that's floating around out there. What I wrote there is for discerning adults to consider. I eagerly await your sandbox insults. 

Some of us are highly educated and have those words, phrases and concepts as part of our operational vocabulary. If you need a definition of recency bias because it's a "shiny new word" to you, just go look it up.

And you start a post with "leftwards" (because you people apparently can't have a conversation without childish nicknames) and end by pre-complaining about "sandbox insults." You're a real piece of work. Shoddy work, but still...

 

 

Oh, and I guess we have an answer to this question:

"B. Are you lying or wildly misinformed about the revised death toll for the hospital explosion? It wasn't revised TO thirty, it was revised BY thirty. Which is reasonable and normal, and a pretty good indicator that the numbers are in good faith. Go look up that factoid. Whether you are man enough to admit you've spamming misinformation will reveal the answer to the first question."

Apparently just lying. I assume you'll post it again in a few days the way you continually spam the same debunked misinformation all the time.

Edited by Hodad
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I don't remember your question but sure as shit it was dumb...

What's really dumb is ^your DRIVEL and  inability to read the questions YOU QUOTED.

Another six pack today?

How do you survive in the modern world when you can't even navigate this site? LMAO

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

What's really dumb is ^your DRIVEL and  inability to read the questions YOU QUOTED.

Another six pack today?

How do you survive in the modern world when you can't even navigate this site? LMAO

Successfully. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
18 hours ago, Hodad said:

Some of us are highly educated and have those words, phrases and concepts as part of our operational vocabulary.

Whereas for you the source seems to be the 'word of the day' calendar.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
On 11/23/2023 at 12:26 AM, Hodad said:

You've gone round the bend, dummy. If denying support for Hamas means one supports Hamas then you clearly support Hamas ?

Sorry, vagisil, but your ongoing outrage against Israel and your silence on Hamas is what gives you away. ;)

Edited by Deluge
Posted
On 11/25/2023 at 3:02 PM, eyeball said:

The high road was working just fine when lefties were in charge of Israel.

image.thumb.png.6af42c0c8d9a49e5f3a484eb983e6b39.png

 

No, Clinton was working just fine when Dole and Gingrich were keeping him in line. ;)

Posted
9 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Sorry, vagisil, but your ongoing outrage against Israel and your silence on Hamas is what gives you away. ;)

You can't hide your support for Hamas. You keep decrying Hamas, so you must REALLY love them. Have you officially signed up? You can deny it, but it will only mean you support them even more. 

(This is what it feels like to read your childish posts.)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Deluge said:

No, Clinton was working just fine when Dole and Gingrich were keeping him in line. ;)

I'm pretty sure Republicans were also against a peace that was negotiated by secular lefties.

 

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
2 hours ago, eyeball said:

I'm pretty sure Republicans were also against a peace that was negotiated by secular lefties.

Secular lefties want compliance, not peace. There's no such thing as a peaceful nation when lefties are in charge. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Secular lefties want compliance, not peace.

You're saying the Oslo Accords called for compliance as opposed to peace?

Given your mangling of the generally accepted definition given to the word progressive, compliance could mean just about anything. Did you think it means death to the Jews or something?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You're saying the Oslo Accords called for compliance as opposed to peace?

Given your mangling of the generally accepted definition given to the word progressive, compliance could mean just about anything. Did you think it means death to the Jews or something?

The Oslo Accords have been a complete waste of time. Palestine (along with the rest of the Arab world) still wants Israel vaporized, and Israel is still standing its ground. 

What I'M saying, is you perverts want two classes: the ruling class, and the peasant class under global rulership. 

The fact that you think ANYTHING that you support is "progressive" is scary comical. 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The fact that you think ANYTHING that you support is "progressive" is scary comical.

So like, a school hot lunch program for example? That's like a first step on the slippery slope to a Gulag or something?

  • Haha 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
51 minutes ago, eyeball said:

So like, a school hot lunch program for example? That's like a first step on the slippery slope to a Gulag or something?

Yes. The more the government takes from producers to give to non-producers the worse things get.

What if the government started a program to help parents become self-sufficient? Do you think that would be OK, or are you too much of a government slut to advocate for such a thing? 

Posted
7 hours ago, Deluge said:

Yes. The more the government takes from producers to give to non-producers the worse things get.

You're right, the abuse of in-camera influence by powerful wealthy lobbyists on politicians is disgraceful.

7 hours ago, Deluge said:

What if the government started a program to help parents become self-sufficient? Do you think that would be OK, or are you too much of a government slut to advocate for such a thing? 

I'd prefer the free market solution our grandfather's enjoyed when workers were paid their fair share of the capital gains stemming from the goods and services they produced.

I don't know why you wouldn't like that too or are you the sort of butt-sniff that would kiss a 1-percenter's ass like a politician under the influence?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
11 hours ago, eyeball said:

You're right, the abuse of in-camera influence by powerful wealthy lobbyists on politicians is disgraceful.

I'd prefer the free market solution our grandfather's enjoyed when workers were paid their fair share of the capital gains stemming from the goods and services they produced.

I don't know why you wouldn't like that too or are you the sort of butt-sniff that would kiss a 1-percenter's ass like a politician under the influence?

I at least like having a shot at being among the one percent. That's why people come here - to live the American dream.

Tired burnout Marxists like you have no business being here. 

Why don't you find a nice little communist country to settle down in? You'll be so much happier. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

I at least like having a shot at being among the one percent. That's why people come here - to live the American dream.

Tired burnout Marxists like you have no business being here. 

Why don't you find a nice little communist country to settle down in? You'll be so much happier. 

But I do live in a nice little communist country and I'm slowly but surely still getting ahead - compared to some we're practically farting in silk to be perfectly honest. I'm happy enough for the moment at least, I mean, shit can happen but we've done our best to be ready for it. 

How's the battle working out for you?  I have to say you sound kind of miserable.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

But I do live in a nice little communist country and I'm slowly but surely still getting ahead - compared to some we're practically farting in silk to be perfectly honest. I'm happy enough for the moment at least, I mean, shit can happen but we've done our best to be ready for it. 

How's the battle working out for you?  I have to say you sound kind of miserable.

You say you're practically farting in silk, but yet, you're still crying about the 1%. Why?

Why are you such a goddamn crybaby? lol

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You say you're practically farting in silk, but yet, you're still crying about the 1%. Why?

Why are you such a goddamn crybaby? lol

I'm pretty concerned about the undue amount of influence they're able to exert on our governments to further their own interests.  Do you believe your shot at being like them should include having the same chance to influence the government as they do?  This isn't about the distribution of wealth its about the distribution of power. You figure the 1% earned their wealth by simply rolling up their sleeves, sharpening their pencils and cutting coupons to get ahead?

Richest 1% bag nearly twice as much wealth as the rest of the world put together over the past two years

https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/richest-1-bag-nearly-twice-much-wealth-rest-world-put-together-over-past-two-years#:~:text=%2442 trillion of new wealth,the top 1 percent bracket.

It's all so completely unsustainable how everyone taking-their-shot is from an environmental perspective.

Have you got grandkids?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,909
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...