Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Maybe you perverts should stop weaponizing federal departments against your political rivals. 

Don't need no "weaponization" when there is a PLETHORA of EVIDENCE against Trump. Duh

Of course you'll never hear about that on FOS LIES. Just as well; we don't want the CULT to get riled up and vote.

Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Did I hear correctly that James, Hunter AND old Joe have been subpoenaed?

By this time next year, Joe will be an albatross around Libbie necks, and Republicans will be enjoying a lot of "payback".

well i think that's exactly what the dems are worried about.  IF trump can assemble the right group of people then he can do to them what they did to him and crawl up every single nook and cranny looking for ANY HINT of wrongdoing and then prosecuting it  relentlessly.

This is why it's always been taboo to do what the dems have done.  Serious crimes are one thing, i think people might have let the documents issue slide and said it was a fair investigation but pretty much everything else is contrived bullcrap.  So he'll do that back.

And i have to think biden is sitting there thinking  - "hutner's a prety responsible guy right? He wouldn't have left any evidence behind that could be traced to me right?"

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump and allies plot revenge, Justice Department control in a second term

We won't see "weaponization" of the DoJ without EVIDENCE unless Trump gets elected again.

Of course Trump has already convinced the MAGA CULT that there is no evidence against HIM.

The DOJ HAS BEEN FUGGING WEAPONIZED, you mor0n. That's the ONLY way people who LEGALLY protested on Jan six are in prison with no due  process.

The fact that Hillary KKKlinton is NOT in  prison and most of the Department Of Justice denizens were NOT fired after Trump was legally elected means he doesn't play the revenge card. He was too busy fixing the flusterfuq that Obama left him. He gave America the greatest economy of all time and gave the world PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST for the first time in history.

Most of us in the mainstream conservative majority of America WISH Trump was vindictive and out for revenge. He could have locked up most of the creeps who today are committing FELONIES and getting away with it from our government.

If you disagree you're an

image.thumb.png.b34386203e9904676c18e8079f9dd579.png

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

Don't need no "weaponization"

Sure you do. It's mostly bullshit charges that would never have been laid if he wasn't in politics.  The dems ABSOLUTELY weaponized it. They are trying to twist and turn the law every way possible to try to trip him up going into the next election. And people know it, which is why it's making trump MORE popular.

And now it's going to get weaponized right back at them. By trump or someone more subtle.  Those gloves are off now and that glass has been broken.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

Its so typical.

Quote

Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you

Unfortunately..."getting back at" Americans for criticizing then intel community...isn't really their job. In doing so, they've abused the legal system and started down a very shitty path. Is it surprising that conservatives feel some consequences are due? No.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

That being said, whether President Trump or President Biden is elected in 2024, nobody can say they didn't know who they were voting for. 

Well that's certainly true at least :)

Quote

They are going to get the government they want.

Well....  they've got the two choices.  I'm not sure those two encompass EVERYONE'S  "wants".  But - they'll get the gov't they vote for at any rate.

 

Quote

The rest of the world will have to deal with that. It might be a good idea for Canada to start laying the ground work to ensure good relations with the next Administration. In other words, be careful what you say.

Well considering both biden and trump walked all over justin i'd say job one on the prep list is 'regime change' in Canada.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Now Trump is telling his supporters there is NO NEED TO VOTE. He's got plenty of votes. LMAO

AKA, he's off his rocker, or CHEATING on a scale grand enough to flip the election. ?

Hilarious.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Did I hear correctly that James, Hunter AND old Joe have been subpoenaed?

By this time next year, Joe will be an albatross around Libbie necks, and Republicans will be enjoying a lot of "payback".

No, you didn't hear that correctly, probably on account of the steady diet of infogarbage. In fact, congress has never subpoenaed a sitting president for testimony. Separation of powers really muddies the water there, so it's unlikely they have any power to compel an appearance. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Its so typical.

Unfortunately..."getting back at" Americans for criticizing then intel community...isn't really their job. In doing so, they've abused the legal system and started down a very shitty path. Is it surprising that conservatives feel some consequences are due? No.

^This from the college dropout who believes he know NYS law better than a sitting judge.

You are so far out of the loop, you can't even see it. LMAO

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^This from the college dropout who believes he know NYS law better than a sitting judge.

You are so far out of the loop, you can't even see it. LMAO

Pot - this is kettle.  Kettle - let me introduce pot.  :)

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, robosmith said:

Only conviction was for modifying an email wrt Carter Page not being a CIA asset

Yeah, just that one little crime by the FBI lol.

Sad thing is, if you read about that, you'll find out that Clinesmith wasn't the only person in the FBI who knew that Page was a CIA asset. 

Multiple FBI agents were informed of that via an email from the CIA before the first FISA warrant was even requested, and that application had Page listed as "individual #1" on it: still they never informed the judge that they knew he was actually working for the CIA.

FBI: "Hey judge, this guy is meeting with all these dodgy Russian types for no good reason [tee hee hee], we think it has to do with *loud Biden-style whisper* Russian collusion... Russian collusion... Russian collusion... Is there an echo in here? Therefor we need a warrant to spy on him for the good of the American people, and we're gonna publicly shame the POTUS for a couple of years based mainly on this [inside voice: and a few other lies], again, for the good of the American people. for the good of the American people. for the good of the American people. Yup, there's definitely an echo.. echo... echo..."

The altered email was only trotted out to the FISA court after Carter Page went public, and made his long-standing involvement with the CIA known to the public. [isn't this an example of "revealing sources and methods??? Why did the FBI put him in a position where he would have to go to that extent? Aren't sources and methods sacrosanct?] It was in response to that statement that Clinesmith provided the infamous email to the FISA court to cover all of their tracks, and to discredit Page's public statement. 

Four high-ranking FBI officials all signed off on the application for that FISA warrant, each of them having been notified that Page was a CIA asset on at least one occasion prior. Every single one of those guys is responsible for being aware of what's being presented to the FISA court judge, that's why they sign it. They had months to prepare and overlook those docs before they end up on the judge's desk. They didn't just haphazardly slap these warrant applications together in the back of a cab, on the way to work. 

Why were they all allowed to leave Clinesmith holding the bag, and why was he allowed to say "It was just me" and then skate? Hmmmmm....

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

^This from the college dropout

C'mon dude, we know that you're no college dropout. You never even "garajeeated frum pre-skool."

Quote

who believes he know NYS law better than a sitting judge.

Nope. No one here knows the law better than a sitting judge.

We'd just apply the laws fairly and properly, according to the prevailing statutes, because we're not demonrats. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Yes you are kettle. But you don't know POT.  LMAO

Uhh - didn't really make any sense there big guy :)  

Don't tell me i've broken your brain THIS early in the day? :) LOLOL 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 hours ago, Legato said:

Yet.

The case ONLY gets weaker as time passes. AKA, the fake "evidence" disappears because the phonies can't remember their LIES. LMAO

Meanwhile the case gets STRONGER against Trump as more and more of his cronies flip.

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

The case ONLY gets weaker as time passes. AKA, the fake "evidence" disappears because the phonies can't remember their LIES. LMAO

Meanwhile the case gets STRONGER against Trump as more and more of his cronies flip.

The cases have been getting stronger - more and more information comes out. And as they proved with trump, the fbi is pretty good at manufacturing evidence if they need to

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO - we should maybe tag him?

And it's as simple as that.

Actually a number of trump's enemies HAVE been indicted - the Dems and Hillary got fined as well for being dishonest about the Steel dossier  and of course we know about he convictions at the FBI.

I'm sure there is a REASON you've posted NOTHING which substantiates ^this.  

Turns out it WAS NOT Hillary, but her campaign which was fined $8K for misreporting expenditures. LMAO

Quote

The Clinton campaign agreed to a civil penalty of $8,000 and the DNC $105,000, according to a pair of conciliatory agreements that were attached to the letter sent to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation.

 

20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I  suspect there will be much more to come if he gets back in, which is precisely what they're afraid of

Your suspicions and $5 will buy you a cup of Starbucks. 

I'm sure Hillary is really scared they will find more accounting errors in her campaign. LMAO

Posted
2 hours ago, Hodad said:

No, you didn't hear that correctly, probably on account of the steady diet of infogarbage. In fact, congress has never subpoenaed a sitting president for testimony. Separation of powers really muddies the water there, so it's unlikely they have any power to compel an appearance. 

Oh so it's just the kid and his brother. Ok.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

C'mon dude, we know that you're no college dropout. You never even "garajeeated frum pre-skool."

You're the one who writes like a Kindergartner. LMAO

Meanwhile my MSEE says you're WRONG, as USUAL.

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Nope. No one here knows the law better than a sitting judge.

We'd just apply the laws fairly and properly, according to the prevailing statutes, because we're not demonrats. 

You don't even know the law in Canada cause you never went to law school, let alone NYS nor practiced law enough to know the precedents. Duh

Dunning-Kruger in action. Thanks for demonstrating that research valid AGAIN.

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

^This from the college dropout who believes he know NYS law better than a sitting judge.

You are so far out of the loop, you can't even see it. LMAO

Meh...obvious is obvious.

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Yes, it is hilarious that you don't even know what Trump is saying.

Trump told his fans they 'don't have to vote'

 

Yes you are kettle. But you don't know POT.  LMAO

No kidding man. I get suck a kick oitta your posts.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Meh...obvious is obvious.

Dunning & Kruger are on to your SCAM.

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No kidding man. I get suck a kick oitta your posts.

Because my posts provide that kick to your butt. Thanks for admitting how great it works.

Posted
10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Dunning & Kruger are on to your SCAM.

Because my posts provide that kick to your butt. Thanks for admitting how great it works.

Well you gotta try to kick someone's butt, yours has fallen off.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Sure - because everyone knows  it's true.

Quote

Turns out it WAS NOT Hillary, but her campaign which was fined $8K for misreporting expenditures. LMAO

ROFLMAO -   Ohhh my god :)   do you have ANY idea how stupid you look right now?  :)    That sound you hear is the sound of your credibility splattering on the floor accompanied by peals of laughter from pretty much everybody :)  -  i literally spit up coffee,  thanks :)  

Quote

Your suspicions and $5 will buy you a cup of Starbucks. 

Your stupidity and $10 dollars will buy you a cup as well.  They charge you more for having to listen to stuff that dumb.

 

Quote

I'm sure Hillary is really scared they will find more accounting errors in her campaign. LMAO

I'm sure she's concerned about a number of things - But i think there's a lot of people higher up on trumps lists that are absolutely frantic about some of this.

They should never have decided it was ok to weaponize the courts and fbi for political reasons. Its going to cost them

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...