Biological sources of CO2 (like termites) DO NOT increase atmospheric concentrations of GHG which CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE.

[robosmith]

11 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Not true, my slow witted democrat; the quotes don't have to. What we've established with Marx is that he believed his own happiness has nothing to do with God, therefore, God could go pound sand. He didn't actually say God could go pound sand, but he may as well have said it. 

You see dumba$$, Karl Marx, was anti-Christian. Had he been presented with the  bullshit climate change propaganda that you perverts keep peddling, I'm sure he would have been 100% onboard with it. But since you're a dumba$$, and since you are virtually incapable of following contingency thinking, all you can do is stand there like a confused 6 year old and talk about what's standing right in front of your face. You see your keyboard, you see your monitor, you see my arguments beating the ever loving sh*t out of your arguments, and that's all you can see.  

Not so, my stunted friend. 

You're a pervert. Go repent. 

OTC, I am following your "contingency thinking" and see it for what it is: speculative BULLSHIT with NO EVIDENCE to support it.

BTW, Marx was anti-RELIGION not JUST Christian; so, you misrepresented THAT, too.

[WestCanMan]

On 7/18/2023 at 7:55 AM, Aristides said:

Obviously you are incapable of understanding both are caused by heat  

Obviously you are incapable of understanding that your fires 100 feet from floods are unlikely. 
 

It’s leftists that invented them, don’t blame me. 

[Deluge]

42 minutes ago, robosmith said:

OTC, I am following your "contingency thinking" and see it for what it is: speculative BULLSHIT with NO EVIDENCE to support it.

BTW, Marx was anti-RELIGION not JUST Christian; so, you misrepresented THAT, too.

I have all the evidence I need. You degenerates align yourself with Marx, and you same degenerates all peddle bullshit climate change. Being that you and Marx are politically aligned, HE also would've been a climate activist by that connection alone. 

It goes without saying that Marx was anti-religion, so once again, you boldly display the stupid endeavor to reveal the obvious. 

 

[robosmith]

14 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I have all the evidence I need. You degenerates align yourself with Marx, and you same degenerates all peddle bullshit climate change. Being that you and Marx are politically aligned, HE also would've been a climate activist by that connection alone. 

Your prediction about what Marx "would've been" is entirely SPECULATIVE and LACKS CREDIBILITY.

14 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It goes without saying that Marx was anti-religion, so once again, you boldly display the stupid endeavor to reveal the obvious. 

I detailed YOUR MISREPRESENTATION to serve YOUR AGENDA.

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Your prediction about what Marx "would've been" is entirely SPECULATIVE and LACKS CREDIBILITY.

I detailed YOUR MISREPRESENTATION to serve YOUR AGENDA.

In your dreams. It falls right in line with the rest of you bozos. lol

Leftists are the agenda whores. I'm just here to explain how stupid your agendas are.

[robosmith]

10 minutes ago, Deluge said:

In your dreams. It falls right in line with the rest of you bozos. lol

Leftists are the agenda whores. I'm just here to explain how stupid your agendas are.

You're LYING and PUSHING YOUR AGENDA. The FACT is you don't know what Marx "would've done" despite your lame CLAIMS.

[Aristides]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Obviously you are incapable of understanding that your fires 100 feet from floods are unlikely. 
 

It’s leftists that invented them, don’t blame me. 

So now leftists invented fires and floods. You get loonier every day.

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, Aristides said:

So now leftists invented fires and floods. You get loonier every day.

It was actually herbie, but he's as valid a source as any other leftist news outlet/medical org/scientific org, etc... You're all equally 'valuable' sources.

Brother herbie warned us of the day when we'd be "knee-deep in floodwater, 100 feet from a raging fire", all caused by global warming. He never mentioned whether or not there would also be a blizzard raging, or if we'd all be eternally going uphill both ways like our grandparents did back in the day. I can only assume we will, because global warming is very dramatic.  

If you don't think that global warming floodfires are real, you're a racist! ALL SCIENTISTS AGREE!

 

[Aristides]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It was actually herbie, but he's as valid a source as any other leftist news outlet/medical org/scientific org, etc... You're all equally 'valuable' sources.

Brother herbie warned us of the day when we'd be "knee-deep in floodwater, 100 feet from a raging fire", all caused by global warming. He never mentioned whether or not there would also be a blizzard raging, or if we'd all be eternally going uphill both ways like our grandparents did back in the day. I can only assume we will, because global warming is very dramatic.  

If you don't think that global warming floodfires are real, you're a racist! ALL SCIENTISTS AGREE!

 

Yup, loonier every day.

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, Deluge said:

Hodad thinks telling lies about people is actually funny, so let's talk about it! 

First off, point out where I've "thumped" on about "unnatural, deviant, left handed people and whacking their knuckles with oddly sized rulers until they conformed to right-handed writing." 

The point, which seems to have sailed right over you, is that throughout history there have been people raising absurd objections about non-harm variations from an arbitrary "normal" status. And yes, indeed, people in medieval times (and more recently!) have raised the exact same poorly formed arguments about left handedness that you are making about homosexuality: it's different, therefore it is harmful, therefore it must be illegal. 

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Yup, loonier every day.

Sadly you're actually not getting any loonier because there's no room for that.

After covid, vax-fascism, mostly peaceful protests, Wussian cowusion, seditious mobs, global warmingcooling, etc., your tardometer has been has been way past "full-zetard" for years now.

Global warming flood-fires actually look right at home on your laundry list of 'counterintuitive' (stupid), debunked (as if there was ever any doubt) narratives (lies). 

Edited July 19, 2023 by WestCanMan

[Deluge]

14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

The point, which seems to have sailed right over you, is that throughout history there have been people raising absurd objections about non-harm variations from an arbitrary "normal" status. And yes, indeed, people in medieval times (and more recently!) have raised the exact same poorly formed arguments about left handedness that you are making about homosexuality: it's different, therefore it is harmful, therefore it must be illegal. 

Let's talk about "absurd". 

Which sounds more absurd: sitting in the middle of traffic in protest over, say, oil production, or going to work and earning a living? 

[Hodad]

30 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Let's talk about "absurd". 

Which sounds more absurd: sitting in the middle of traffic in protest over, say, oil production, or going to work and earning a living? 

And somehow in your mind this is related to a conversation about gay marriage, non-harm liberties and the nature of free society? Fascinating. 

[BeaverFever]

On 7/17/2023 at 11:31 AM, Deluge said:

I worship God. 

I hate to break it to you but God is not a disgraced, 3 times indicted ex-president with fake hair and a bad spray tan

[BeaverFever]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Let's talk about "absurd". 

Which sounds more absurd: sitting in the middle of traffic in protest over, say, oil production, or going to work and earning a living? 

They aren’t mutually exclusive, people do both. 

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Sadly you're actually not getting any loonier because there's no room for that.

After covid, vax-fascism, mostly peaceful protests, Wussian cowusion, seditious mobs, global warmingcooling, etc., your tardometer has been has been way past "full-zetard" for years now.

Global warming flood-fires actually look right at home on your laundry list of 'counterintuitive' (stupid), debunked (as if there was ever any doubt) narratives (lies). 

An area the size of Newfoundland has already burned this year and it is only the middle of July. Not only have we burned enough trees to fill an area the size of Newfoundland with all that carbon going into the atmosphere, We have lost a carbon sink the size of Newfoundland that won't be able to re capture that carbon for at least 50 years. That isn't a narrative it is fact you refuse to see even when it is put right in from of your face.

Glacier melts are accelerating and ocean temperatures are increasing, that isn't a narrative they are measured and documented facts that you refuse to see when they are put right in front of your face. I don't know what looney toons sources you use for your information but you should do yourself a favour and join the real world for once.

[Aristides]

Phoenix sets record for overnight temperature. A low of 97F (36C)  last night.

[Deluge]

17 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

They aren’t mutually exclusive, people do both. 

They are when it's one or the other:

Will the leftist be responsible and go to work today, or will he lie to his boss about being sick and go obstruct traffic like the true a$$hole that he is?". 

Edited July 20, 2023 by Deluge

[Deluge]

17 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

I hate to break it to you but God is not a disgraced, 3 times indicted ex-president with fake hair and a bad spray tan

He is compared to your zombie of a President. lol

 

[Deluge]

18 hours ago, Hodad said:

And somehow in your mind this is related to a conversation about gay marriage, non-harm liberties and the nature of free society? Fascinating. 

It's all related. Those psychopaths who sit out in traffic make the exact same arguments you do - you're all part of the same hive mind.

And yes, let's talk about gay marriage:

You think gay marriage is a good thing, but you can't really explain why, other than it's some pervert's warped notion of a civil right. 

So let's do some exploring:

1. Talk about the history of gay marriage, and then explain how gay marriage has established and stabilized civilizations throughout the ages. 

Edited July 20, 2023 by Deluge

[WestCanMan]

15 hours ago, Aristides said:

An area the size of Newfoundland has already burned this year and it is only the middle of July. Not only have we burned enough trees to fill an area the size of Newfoundland with all that carbon going into the atmosphere, We have lost a carbon sink the size of Newfoundland that won't be able to re capture that carbon for at least 50 years. That isn't a narrative it is fact you refuse to see even when it is put right in from of your face.

We lose trees like that every year, and every tree that we lose has the same "50-year setback".

Eventually we were going to set a new record, especially when we have hundreds of climate activists going around and setting bush fires like they did in Australia (183 people were charged with intentionally lighting bush fires when they had their record season). 

Quote

Glacier melts are accelerating and ocean temperatures are increasing, that isn't a narrative they are measured and documented facts that you refuse to see when they are put right in front of your face. I don't know what looney toons sources you use for your information but you should do yourself a favour and join the real world for once.

The Laurentide ice sheet stretched as far south as the 38th parallel - way into the US. It was up to 2 miles thick. Times change, right? 

[OftenWrong]

-Never mind the bollocks. Where is Trudeau's promised Tree Planting program? 

Canada has only planted 29 million of the 2 billion trees promised by 2030

"Spread out over the 10-year commitment, the government would need to plant an additional 200 million trees a year beyond current tallies. That’s nearly 548,000 trees a day, however, tree planting is a seasonal effort and can’t be done year-round, instead taking place during four to five months of the year."

More empty promises and posturing from this liberal government.

Trudeau the emperor fiddles while Canada burns.

 

[OftenWrong]

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

It's all related. Those psychopaths who sit out in traffic make the exact same arguments you do - you're all part of the same hive mind.

And yes, let's talk about gay marriage:

You think gay marriage is a good thing, but you can't really explain why, other than it's some pervert's warped notion of a civil right. 

So let's do some exploring:

1. Talk about the history of gay marriage, and then explain how gay marriage has established and stabilized civilizations throughout the ages. 

It doesn't really matter if gay marriage is a "good thing." That's not the way free societies make law. Whether you or I think something is good or bad is wholly irrelevant. The only relevant question is whether some thing or activity is demonstrably harmful to others, at which point society erects laws to protect citizens from harm.

But for the record, yes, there are many societies that historically permitted gay marriage. And heterosexual marriage as we know it today is also somewhat novel. The idea of people marrying voluntarily out of love is fairly radical, when our recent traditions were far more transactional and used as a means of gaining or consolidating wealth and power, with children traded as tokens of good will. And, of course, that's still the case in some societies. Indeed, marriage has taken many forms in different societies over the years.  Plural marriages were and still are quite popular. So maybe you're the deviant with your 1 man, 1 woman preference. 

Anyway, the historical precedent is interesting in the it highlights the myopia of the man+woman crowd but, as before, it's ultimately irrelevant. Even if other versions of marriage were entirely novel, it shouldn't have any bearing on the law. If it's not hurting you--or anyone else--those consenting adults should be free to marry. 

 

[Deluge]

10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

It doesn't really matter if gay marriage is a "good thing." That's not the way free societies make law. Whether you or I think something is good or bad is wholly irrelevant. The only relevant question is whether some thing or activity is demonstrably harmful to others, at which point society erects laws to protect citizens from harm.

But for the record, yes, there are many societies that historically permitted gay marriage. And heterosexual marriage as we know it today is also somewhat novel. The idea of people marrying voluntarily out of love is fairly radical, when our recent traditions were far more transactional and used as a means of gaining or consolidating wealth and power, with children traded as tokens of good will. And, of course, that's still the case in some societies. Indeed, marriage has taken many forms in different societies over the years.  Plural marriages were and still are quite popular. So maybe you're the deviant with your 1 man, 1 woman preference. 

Anyway, the historical precedent is interesting in the it highlights the myopia of the man+woman crowd but, as before, it's ultimately irrelevant. Even if other versions of marriage were entirely novel, it shouldn't have any bearing on the law. If it's not hurting you--or anyone else--those consenting adults should be free to marry. 

 

You receive an "F" - you didn't address the questions directly, and you failed to cite any sources for the irrelevant bullshit that you did post. 

Now it's your turn to ask me questions. 

 

Edited July 20, 2023 by Deluge