Unelected Joe Biden judicial appointee's husband a descendant of a SLAVE TRADER

[reason10]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ketanji-brown-jacksons-husband-called-out-descendant-slave-owners-involved-slave-trade

Ketanji Brown Jackson's husband called out as descendant of slave-owners: 'Involved in the slave trade'

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s marriage to her husband and familial history was dissected by The Washington Post in an article from Monday about slavery. 

The article was headlined, "Ketanji Brown Jackson’s ancestors were enslaved. Her husband’s were enslavers," and detailed the ancestral history of slavery and enslavement in the families of the justice and her husband, Patrick Jackson.

"When John Greene, believed to be an ancestor of Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, got off a schooner from Trinidad in Charleston, S.C., he was immediately enslaved and dispatched to a plantation, according to family lore. When John Howland, the 10th-great-grandfather of Jackson’s husband, Patrick Jackson, disembarked the Mayflower at Plymouth, Mass., he was given housing and several acres," The Washington Post wrote. 

The Post continued to scrutinize the Supreme Court justice and her husband’s family history, drawing parallels between the two that date back over 100 years. 

"Ketanji Brown Jackson, one of the country’s nine most powerful legal arbiters, tracks her family history through generations of enslavement and coercive sharecropping. Patrick Jackson, a gastrointestinal surgeon in D.C., counts among his ancestors King Edward I of England, four Mayflower passengers and a signer of the U.S. Constitution."

The paper cited Christopher C. Child, senior genealogist with the New England Historic Genealogical Society in Boston, who found that Patrick Jackson's "great-great-great-great grandfather Peter Chardon Brooks was the richest man in New England when he died, having made his fortune insuring ships, including some involved in the slave trade."

In addition, the article explained, "Patrick was raised outside Boston, but his maternal grandfather’s ancestors lived in the South. Based on public slave schedules from 1850 and 1860, Child estimates the family owned about 189 enslaved people at the time. ‘Every male ancestor of Patrick’s maternal grandfather over the age of 21 alive in 1850 or 1860 was a slaveowner,’ Child said. One of his ancestors was also a Confederate soldier."

Gee! Does this mean a Supreme Court Justice (who was chosen based on the color of her skin and  not the content of her soul) is going to owe SLAVE REPARATIONS?

 

 

[Rebound]

It is lunacy to suggest that anyone should be measured against the positive or negative deeds their great great great great great grandfather.
 

A great number of African Americans are descendants of rapist slave owners.  I think you should stop making your cruel, racist comments.  
 

The victimization of African Americans is real.  There’s no gain in rubbing their noses in it or suggesting that their rapist ancestors somehow make them guilty.  Reparations payments are very unlikely, because they are financially impossible. But don’t pretend there was no suffering or that the victims are also the perpetrators.  

Edited June 20, 2023 by Rebound

[reason10]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

It is lunacy to suggest that anyone should be measured against the positive or negative deeds their great great great great great grandfather.
 

A great number of African Americans are descendants of rapist slave owners.  I think you should stop making your cruel, racist comments.  
 

The victimization of African Americans is real.  There’s no gain in rubbing their noses in it or suggesting that their rapist ancestors somehow make them guilty.  Reparations payments are very unlikely, because they are financially impossible. But don’t pretend there was no suffering or that the victims are also the perpetrators.  

There is NOTHING racist about stating the FACTS about that Supreme Court Justice (who was appointed based on her skin color and no other qualifications, you RACIST MOR0N. And it was YOUR FCKING DEMOCRAT PARTY who made those AFRICAN BLACKS into victims. And your same NAZI DEMOCRAT PARTY turns a blind eye to the slave trade that exists in Africa TODAY.

And you are a FCKING HYPOCRITE by wanting slave reparations for people who DIDN'T own slaves and for people today who WEREN'T FCKING SLAVEs.

You're the only racist here.

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, reason10 said:

There is NOTHING racist about stating the FACTS about that Supreme Court Justice (who was appointed based on her skin color and no other qualifications, you RACIST MOR0N. And it was YOUR FCKING DEMOCRAT PARTY who made those AFRICAN BLACKS into victims. And your same NAZI DEMOCRAT PARTY turns a blind eye to the slave trade that exists in Africa TODAY.

And you are a FCKING HYPOCRITE by wanting slave reparations for people who DIDN'T own slaves and for people today who WEREN'T FCKING SLAVEs.

You're the only racist here.

YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR. OVER AND OVER, AGAIN. YOUR OPINIONS ARE NOT "FACTS."

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR. OVER AND OVER, AGAIN. YOUR OPINIONS ARE NOT "FACTS."

LOL...so childish.

You tell 'im Bot!

LOL...

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...so childish.

You tell 'im Bot!

LOL...

Yes, your post ^here is "so childish." Esp the juvenile name calling. Duh.

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Yes, your post ^here is "so childish." Esp the juvenile name calling. Duh.

LOL...Yes Dear...

[Americana Antifa]

Even if this is true, who cares? Are you saying she shouldn't be allowed on the SCOTUS because of her husband's ancestry? 

[reason10]

20 hours ago, robosmith said:

YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR. OVER AND OVER, AGAIN. YOUR OPINIONS ARE NOT "FACTS."

Once again with the namecalling when  you lose an argument.

You are  nothing but an uneducated clown and a troll.

Crawl back under your rock, cockroach.

[reason10]

18 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Even if this is true, who cares? Are you saying she shouldn't be allowed on the SCOTUS because of her husband's ancestry? 

The NAZIS here are  calling for SLAVE REPARATIONS from whites who NEVER OWNED SLAVES to be given to blacks who WERE NEVER SLAVES.

If we're going to be consistent, (blaming innocent people TODAY for the sins of the past) then this Scotus nominee (who was nominated ONLY for her color) should be forced to  pony up the reparations.

Normally, sane people wouldn't be even talking about slave reparations,  since only NAZIS AND RETARDS continue to talk about it. But the Nazi state of California has crafted legislature to pull it off, giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to  single black families, from taxes that will be levied on the grandchildren of people who haven't been born yet.

[Deluge]

On 6/20/2023 at 6:58 AM, Rebound said:

The victimization of African Americans is real.   

Which African Americans? I mean, talk about the African Americans who are being victimized over and above everyone else. 

[WestCanMan]

Kamala Harris's dad's maternal grandmother was a slave owner. 

[eyeball]

57 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Which African Americans? I mean, talk about the African Americans who are being victimized over and above everyone else. 

What's more important is who is doing the victimizing. The actual human individuals who owned slaves may be dead but there are still several institutions around that existed when slavery did that may have benefited from the fact slavery existed.  Institutions like churches, corporations and governments, most of which long outlive the people who created them, are designed to represent and transport values, benefits and responsibilities into the future. These responsibilities include liabilities.

Given many institutions are owned by the public it's entirely appropriate to allocate public funds to meet their responsibilities when required.

Edited June 21, 2023 by eyeball

[Deluge]

10 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What's more important is who is doing the victimizing. The actual human individuals who owned slaves may be dead but there are still several institutions around that existed when slavery did that may have benefited from the fact slavery existed.  Institutions like churches, corporations and governments, most of which long outlive the people who created them, are designed to represent and transport values, benefits and responsibilities into the future. These responsibilities include liabilities.

Given many institutions are owned by the public it's entirely appropriate to allocate public funds to meet their responsibilities when required.

Let's get specific. Which churches, corporations and governments are oppressing blacks? We're talking churches, corporations and governments located here in the US. 

[reason10]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What's more important is who is doing the victimizing. The actual human individuals who owned slaves may be dead but there are still several institutions around that existed when slavery did that may have benefited from the fact slavery existed.  Institutions like churches, corporations and governments, most of which long outlive the people who created them, are designed to represent and transport values, benefits and responsibilities into the future. These responsibilities include liabilities.

Given many institutions are owned by the public it's entirely appropriate to allocate public funds to meet their responsibilities when required.

Name a church that benefited from 19th Century slavery. Name a corporation that benefited from slavery. As far as a government goes, I can name CHINA, Mauritania, and several other African countries who are ENGAGING IN SLAVE TRADE TODAY. I don't see you goose steppers going after them.

But give us the names of churches and corporations YOU CAN PROVE WITH A RELIABLE LINK were made possible by slavery.

When you find these (and we know you won't) what values benefits and responsibilities did they transport into the future? What liabilities?  Can you prove liability on any single human from historical records, (from superior RED STATE schools I might add, since the blue ones are underachieving educational ghettos)? Got any names?

What public institutions owned by the public benefited from 19th Century slavery? Name them.

Public education? It was integrated BY LAW, around 1969. RACIST LIBERALS back then decided the only way to improve the education of black children is to force SUPERIOR WHITE CHILDREN to be in the same classroom. Of course, black parents wanted no part of that whatsoever.

What else?

You can't name anything because you are just repeating what some uneducated left wing mor0n MADE UP.

(Sometimes, suggesting people to GROW A BRAIN doesn't quite cut it.)

 

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Which African Americans? I mean, talk about the African Americans who are being victimized over and above everyone else. 

While we're at it, why don't we also admit that most blacks are being victimized by other blacks?

[Deluge]

19 hours ago, reason10 said:

While we're at it, why don't we also admit that most blacks are being victimized by other blacks?

Excellent question. I was thinking along the same lines. 

[Americana Antifa]

On 6/21/2023 at 9:14 AM, reason10 said:

The NAZIS here are  calling for SLAVE REPARATIONS from whites who NEVER OWNED SLAVES to be given to blacks who WERE NEVER SLAVES.

So you're saying that you're a NAZI too? Alright, if you say so.

Anywho, I disagree with you nazis. I don't think someone should be punished for what their ancestors did.