Circuit Court of Appeals Orders Stormy Daniels to Pay Trump $121,962 in Legal Fees

[sharkman]

https://www.republicworld.com/amp/world-news/us-news/trump-indictment-9th-circuit-awards-trump-121962-in-attorney-fees-from-stormy-daniels-articleshow.html
 

“In 2018, December, porn star Stormy Daniels was asked by a judge to pay Donald Trump nearly $293,000 for his attorneys’ fees and another $1,000 in sanctions.…”

“United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday awarded Trump $121,962.56 in attorney fees from American porn star, Stormy Daniels. Taking to his official Twitter handle, Trump's eldest son Donald Trump Jr wrote, "9th Circuit just awarded Trump $121,962.56 in attorney fees from Stormy Daniels. The order was just released. This is in addition to the roughly $500k she already owes him."

 

 

 

 

[WestCanMan]

I woulda had sex with her for way less than $621,962.56 before I was married. 

[West]

Democrats still supporting extortionists. Sad

[sharkman]

The indictments are based on Daniels who has lost twice in court already.  Cohen is also a loser in court.

It doesn’t have a chance, this witch hunt is just another attempt to get the public to look at the side show instead of the real news.  
 

 

[Aristides]

Ya well, if the shoe was on the other foot the Trump Clan would be claiming corruption and going after the judge and his family.

[sharkman]

Yah well.  
 

And which main stream news source reported yesterday that there was a ruling against Daniels and in favour of Trump?

None?  Or buried at the back or bottom of page whatever?  

[Rebound]

1 minute ago, sharkman said:

Yah well.  
 

And which main stream news source reported yesterday that there was a ruling against Daniels and in favour of Trump?

None?  Or buried at the back or bottom of page whatever?  

CNN:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/04/04/politics/stormy-daniels-pay-trump-legal-fees/index.html
 

CBS:

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-awarded-legal-fees-from-stormy-daniels/
 

BBC:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65191465.amp

and NPR, NBC, Associated Press, and on and on.

 

[Aristides]

5 minutes ago, sharkman said:

Yah well.  
 

And which main stream news source reported yesterday that there was a ruling against Daniels and in favour of Trump?

None?  Or buried at the back or bottom of page whatever?  

How would you know if you never look at it?

[sharkman]

No, it was a great exercise for you lefties to actually dig up some real news.  It really happened.  Trump has won court cases vs Daniels and she now owes him over 500,000.  
 

 

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, sharkman said:

No, it was a great exercise for you lefties to actually dig up some real news.  It really happened.  Trump has won court cases vs Daniels and she now owes him over 500,000.  
 

 

And what will happen to her when she can't pay (like Trump who chooses NOT to pay and hides behind his lawyers)? LMAO

[sharkman]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

And what will happen to her when she can't pay (like Trump who chooses NOT to pay and hides behind his lawyers)? LMAO

It doesn’t matter whether she pays.  Trump won 2 cases against her and set a precedent.  Every time your MSM start barking like seals about these Stormy Daniels Indictments, they are lying.

[robosmith]

Just now, sharkman said:

It doesn’t matter whether she pays.  Trump won 2 cases against her and set a precedent.  Every time your MSM start barking like seals about these Stormy Daniels Indictments, they are lying.

Daniels' lawsuits against Trump are COMPLETELY UNRELATED to Trump's FALSE BUSINESS RECORDS AND his use of campaign donations to ILLEGALLY subvert the election.

[sharkman]

2 hours ago, Contrarian said:

Great exercise? 

haha. I was the one that posted the news first via The Independent under Trump's trial thread to show how weak this case is.

Proof:

You probably did a copy & paste, changed the source, but that's ok, as long as you are reasonable, then we can conversate. 

Finally, a MAGA man that does work and starts a thread with a decent language too.

What about her loss in 2018?  At least you posted this latest one…

[Rebound]

20 hours ago, Contrarian said:

Anyhow, you have to recognize @sharkman for starting a reasonable thread. Of course he has his BIAS, as he is a MAGA man. The news was in the mainstream too, I seen it in Europe too. You are correct.

Now, brother @Rebound, if I may ask you:

a) Do you still agree with Cohen working for MSNBC?

b) Do you still think this trial is not benefiting Trump? especially after this ruling in California?

The only thing that can turn this around is Trump's mouth which keeps giving. You go after judges and you think the status quo will let it slide? If his lawyers don't temper him, he might destroy himself instead of taking advantage of this overzealousy gift from this DA in New York.

I think the mainstream media is strongly benefiting Trump.