Jump to content

George Santos is the new normal for the MAGA GOP


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Wrong-ola.

Hunter dropped it off, it was fixed, and he didn't come back to pick it up.

The deal that customers sign off on there is that if they don't come back and pay for the services rendered within 90 days then the computer equipment becomes property of the store. 

The fact that there are official Chinese gov't secrets on it is no defence. 

? Lying weasel. 

The Dems are the party of shooting political opponents, threatening beheadings, threats of blowing up the WH, threats of assassinating the POTUS, attacking the WH, assaulting cops, murdering cops, cheering on violent riots at their constituents' homes for months at a time and then crying "!" when they experience 2 hrs of rioting themselves, bailing out violent criminals, harassing political opponents in public, harassing politicians in the bathroom, protesting 24/7 at SCJs' homes, actual election cheating, and actual Russian collusion. 

You party is an abomination. So there's that. 

Your assertion that the Biden family's influence-peddling can hide behind a legal loophole is duly noted. 

“The deal” or “the law”?

You have establish a reputation for making up laws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

“The deal” or “the law”?

Hunter signed the deal and he's a grown man. In fact, he's "the most intelligent man that Joe Biden knows", and Joe Biden rubs shoulders with top officials from the CIA, AG dept, Pentagon, etc.

You know what else he is?

An attorney (lawyer).

If he didn't want that in the contract then he shoulda scratched it off. Lawyers do that kind of thing all the time. It's almost like it's their job. Even laymen do it.

But the most intelligent man in the US got dummied by the fine print ?

As an American citizen you should be more worried about the fact that the POTUS and his family are beholden to the Chinese gov't for tens of millions of dollars and a big, fat diamond than whether or not super-lawyer Hunter got dummied by a blind man. 

Quote

You have establish a reputation for making up laws. 

 HAAAAhahahahahahahaa. Poor little boy doesn't wanna learn a new word. 

Sedition: potting against the gov't with one or more other people, or inciting others to attack.

Treason: Attacking the gov't.

Rebound: "But I wanna use the word my way!!!!! MOOOOOMMMYYY!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Wrong-ola.

Hunter dropped it off, it was fixed, and he didn't come back to pick it up.

The deal that customers sign off on there is that if they don't come back and pay for the services rendered within 90 days then the computer equipment becomes property of the store. 

Delaware LAW states that the CONTENTS of computers being repaired are CONFIDENTIAL and it is against the law to disclose them.

Only the HARDWARE is forfeited, NOT THE CONTENTS,  when there is a failure to pick it up. 

Do you need ANOTHER CITE for that Delaware LAW?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2023 at 12:05 PM, WestCanMan said:

1) But they did the wrong thing, so there's that...

(We know they were wrong with the benefit of hindsight.) 

2) The FBI had the laptop for 11 months, they knew it was all true. Their lackeys said the opposite. The FBI let that slide for weeks.

You think they did the wrong thing because you hoped that you could use stolen computer data AGAIN to win a Presidential election.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And now the career fraudster Santos has been arrested and charged with multiple felonies, and not the for the first time in his life either. 
 

Cue up the republican excuse machine to deny another inconvenient reality …let’s all scream “left wing conspiracy” in 3….2…..1….

Edited by BeaverFever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

You think they did the wrong thing because you hoped that you could use stolen computer data AGAIN to win a Presidential election.  

1) I know they did the wrong thing and so do you. The FBI was out lying again to influence another election. 

2) The computer wasn't stolen 

3) Leftards know that the FBI and Dems committed crimes to push the bogus witch hunt and then you all say "The FBI guys felt like they needed to commit those crimes for the right reasons", then you all say "the store owner should have respected the Biden family's privacy and not turned in legitimate evidence of their crimes to the FBI."

So which is it, you slithery little hypocrite? Was it wrong for the store owner to merely hand in legit evidence of the Biden family's crimes against the American people, on the laptop that he obtained legally, or was it wrong for the FBI to falsify emails and use them as bogus evidence to obtain warrants to spy on a duly elected president? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

1) I know they did the wrong thing and so do you. The FBI was out lying again to influence another election. 

2) The computer wasn't stolen 

3) Leftards know that the FBI and Dems committed crimes to push the bogus witch hunt and then you all say "The FBI guys felt like they needed to commit those crimes for the right reasons", then you all say "the store owner should have respected the Biden family's privacy and not turned in legitimate evidence of their crimes to the FBI."

So which is it, you slithery little hypocrite? Was it wrong for the store owner to merely hand in legit evidence of the Biden family's crimes against the American people, on the laptop that he obtained legally, or was it wrong for the FBI to falsify emails and use them as bogus evidence to obtain warrants to spy on a duly elected president? 

The computer data was stolen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rebound said:

The computer data was stolen. 

The computer data was not "Russian disinformation" so the FBI lied to influence an election again. They got Twitter, FB, etc to block info about the Bidens' influence peddling and they banned the NYPost for telling the truth.

And that was right after they spent four years allowing people to lie about Russian collusion, which the FBI also used to influence an election, and where the FBI committed actual crimes. 

1) You think that if a guy finds out that top-level politicians are peddling influence to China for tens of millions of dollars, they should just respect their privacy and not tell the FBI...

2) You think that the FBI should be committing crimes to get warrants to spy on a president. 

I get it. I know where you loyalties lie and it's not to law and order or even your own country. 

Slither on, Rebound. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

1) I know they did the wrong thing and so do you. The FBI was out lying again to influence another election. 

2) The computer wasn't stolen 

3) Leftards know that the FBI and Dems committed crimes to push the bogus witch hunt and then you all say "The FBI guys felt like they needed to commit those crimes for the right reasons", then you all say "the store owner should have respected the Biden family's privacy and not turned in legitimate evidence of their crimes to the FBI."

So which is it, you slithery little hypocrite? Was it wrong for the store owner to merely hand in legit evidence of the Biden family's crimes against the American people, on the laptop that he obtained legally, or was it wrong for the FBI to falsify emails and use them as bogus evidence to obtain warrants to spy on a duly elected president? 

It was the CONFIDENTIAL CONTENTS which were STOLEN and ILLEGALLY RELEASED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

The computer data was not "Russian disinformation" so the FBI lied to influence an election again. They got Twitter, FB, etc to block info about the Bidens' influence peddling and they banned the NYPost for telling the truth.

And that was right after they spent four years allowing people to lie about Russian collusion, which the FBI also used to influence an election, and where the FBI committed actual crimes. 

1) You think that if a guy finds out that top-level politicians are peddling influence to China for tens of millions of dollars, they should just respect their privacy and not tell the FBI...

2) You think that the FBI should be committing crimes to get warrants to spy on a president. 

I get it. I know where you loyalties lie and it's not to law and order or even your own country. 

Slither on, Rebound. 

"Influence peddling" is NOT ILLEGAL when there is NO PROOF of a QUID PRO QUO. 

Several cases of Republicans getting off of charges of influence peddling.

Quote

Politicians accused of illegal influence peddling, bribe-taking and other crimes have been given fresh hope that a year-old U.S. Supreme Court ruling will get them off the hook.

Ever since the high court reversed a jury verdict against former Virginia Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell, and in doing so tweaked the legal definition of a corrupt act

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The computer data was not "Russian disinformation" so the FBI lied to influence an election again. They got Twitter, FB, etc to block info about the Bidens' influence peddling and they banned the NYPost for telling the truth.

And that was right after they spent four years allowing people to lie about Russian collusion, which the FBI also used to influence an election, and where the FBI committed actual crimes. 

1) You think that if a guy finds out that top-level politicians are peddling influence to China for tens of millions of dollars, they should just respect their privacy and not tell the FBI...

2) You think that the FBI should be committing crimes to get warrants to spy on a president. 

I get it. I know where you loyalties lie and it's not to law and order or even your own country. 

Slither on, Rebound. 

You are flat-out lying. The NY Post was not banned.  You’re just an outright liar. I don’t know if you make this nonsense up or if you read it but you are not truthful.  
 

First, this letter was signed by FORMER government employees.  They have no actual power anymore. And the US government did not impose a gag order or issue any order telling the media they were prohibited from reporting whatever they wanted.  That would be a clear violation of the First Amendment.  The NY Post reporter who wrote the original laptop article even refused to put his name to the article. He obviously thought it was untrue and he didn’t want his name associated with it. 
 

You people wallow in lies like pigs wallow in mud. 

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

You are flat-out lying. The NY Post was not banned.  You’re just an outright liar. I don’t know if you make this nonsense up or if you read it but you are not truthful.

Are you retarded? Twitter banned NYPost for a week https://nypost.com/2020/10/30/twitter-backs-down-agrees-to-unlock-posts-account/ 

Quote

First, this letter was signed by FORMER government employees.  

FBI put the word out before the laptop info was leaked that ""Russian disinformation was about to come out" so that the fascist media and social media outlets could be proactive. Then the former intel members backed the FBI's play after the info came out.

Leftards luvluvluv a good Wushin cowuzhin/disinfermashun" story. You're powerless the resist it, like a pit bull looking at its own puke. 

Quote

They have no actual power anymore. And the US government did not impose a gag order or issue any order telling the media they were prohibited from reporting whatever they wanted.  

This isn't overt fascism, it's hush-hush fascism. Leftards are still too dumb to see it, but the rest of the world knows how f'd up the US is now.

Quote

That would be a clear violation of the First Amendment.  The NY Post reporter who wrote the original laptop article even refused to put his name to the article. He obviously thought it was untrue and he didn’t want his name associated with it. 

It wasn't untrue, but the FBI said Russian disinformation was coming out in advance of that article going out, so of course it was intimidating. Even though the FBI are known to be a bunch of criminals now, they still have real power. 

Quote

You people wallow in lies like pigs wallow in mud. 

You're the one who was busted for lying (or being way more stupid than the avg leftard), and you're still carrying on like it's worse for a citizen to give the FBI information about a crime than it is for the FBI to commit actual crimes themselves. 

Talk about wallowing in the mud. I'm not sure if you graduated from slithering or hit a new low. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Are you retarded? Twitter banned NYPost for a week https://nypost.com/2020/10/30/twitter-backs-down-agrees-to-unlock-posts-account/ 

FBI put the word out before the laptop info was leaked that ""Russian disinformation was about to come out" so that the fascist media and social media outlets could be proactive. Then the former intel members backed the FBI's play after the info came out.

Leftards luvluvluv a good Wushin cowuzhin/disinfermashun" story. You're powerless the resist it, like a pit bull looking at its own puke. 

This isn't overt fascism, it's hush-hush fascism. Leftards are still too dumb to see it, but the rest of the world knows how f'd up the US is now.

It wasn't untrue, but the FBI said Russian disinformation was coming out in advance of that article going out, so of course it was intimidating. Even though the FBI are known to be a bunch of criminals now, they still have real power. 

You're the one who was busted for lying (or being way more stupid than the avg leftard), and you're still carrying on like it's worse for a citizen to give the FBI information about a crime than it is for the FBI to commit actual crimes themselves. 

Talk about wallowing in the mud. I'm not sure if you graduated from slithering or hit a new low. 

Clearly, your deranged mind thinks that Twitter is the Federal government. They are not.  Twitter is allowed to ban or not ban anyone they want because they are not the government.  
 

The NY Post published their laptop story, unsigned, and you’re crying like a little bi-atch that Twitter wouldn’t re-post it… but what about Tucker, and Hannity, and the rest of Fox News, which owns the NY Post? They obviously didn’t believe the laptop story either, did they? So you create a Twitter conspiracy and not a Fox News conspiracy.  
 

Go home. 

Edited by Rebound
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

Clearly, your deranged mind thinks that Twitter is the Federal government. They are not.  

You're the person who was stupid enough to say that the NYPost wasn't banned when everyone else in NA knows that they were.

Everyone at Fox and everyone around the world knows that the laptop info is valid. Tucker had Tony Bobolinski on his show to talk about Hunter's involvement at length. They've gone into detail about the meetings that were arranged with Joe, etc.

Rebound: "The FBI's crimes were ok because they felt like they were doing the right thing when they falsified evidence and presented it to a judge."

Also Rebound: "When a concerned citizen finds proof that the VPOTUS is selling out to Chinese gov't officials, he should keep that to himself. He shouldn't send the info to the FBI because that's a crime. If he does, and he finds that the FBI just want to cover it up, then he should have to keep it a secret. It is a serious crime for that citizen to release information about a crime to the public."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You're the person who was stupid enough to say that the NYPost wasn't banned when everyone else in NA knows that they were.

Everyone at Fox and everyone around the world knows that the laptop info is valid. Tucker had Tony Bobolinski on his show to talk about Hunter's involvement at length. They've gone into detail about the meetings that were arranged with Joe, etc.

Rebound: "The FBI's crimes were ok because they felt like they were doing the right thing when they falsified evidence and presented it to a judge."

Also Rebound: "When a concerned citizen finds proof that the VPOTUS is selling out to Chinese gov't officials, he should keep that to himself. He shouldn't send the info to the FBI because that's a crime. If he does, and he finds that the FBI just want to cover it up, then he should have to keep it a secret. It is a serious crime for that citizen to release information about a crime to the public."

You just QUOTED me for things I did not say.  
You are a f-ing liar.  
You live in fantasy and make believe. 
You just made up words I never said and put quotes around them.  
Welcome to my Ignore List, troll.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Rebound said:

You just QUOTED me for things I did not say.  

It's a perfect summation of all your stuoid comments rolled into one.

Can you deny that you feel like what Kevin Clinesmith did was ok? Of course not. Leftists still love that guy. They don't care that he didn't go to jail and that he wasn't even disbarred.

But you sit here and try to act like turning in the laptop was the wrong thing to do. You act like releasing that info to the public was the wrong thing to do.

You don't have the spine or the guts to come out and say it but you 100% believe what I posted there. It's you. That's exactly how stupid and hypocritical you are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a perfect summation of all your stuoid comments rolled into one.

Can you deny that you feel like what Kevin Clinesmith did was ok? Of course not. Leftists still love that guy. They don't care that he didn't go to jail and that he wasn't even disbarred.

But you sit here and try to act like turning in the laptop was the wrong thing to do. You act like releasing that info to the public was the wrong thing to do.

You don't have the spine or the guts to come out and say it but you 100% believe what I posted there. It's you. That's exactly how stupid and hypocritical you are. 

It is COMPELETELY DISHONEST to put QUOTE MARKS around YOUR INTERPRETATION unless you're quoting YOURSELF. LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,714
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    wopsas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Venandi went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...