85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

[Goddess]

^^^^  THEY LET PEOPLE DIE, FOR MONEY ^^^^

[taxme]

On 11/14/2022 at 3:43 PM, WestCanMan said:

I attached the rolling "death by vaccination status" stats from Aug and Sept of 2022 to this post.

If you compare the totals from the 2 months, you can see that there were 1,082 new covid deaths, and only 155 of them were among the unvaccinated. That's 14.3%.

The % of covid deaths among the unvaxed is basically identical to the % of unvaccinated Canadians who are unvaxed. 

The Aug and Sept charts are attached, plus a Sept Chart with the Aug numbers on it, and the accompanying math to show where the 14.3% stat from. 

 

I also attached the timeline of all the covid deaths in Canada, plus a color-coded one to help people compare the number of deaths in the summer seasons and flu seasons of the 3 years we've had covid around. 

The small light-blue boxes show how many covid deaths occurred during the original outbreak year, and in the 2021 summer which started out with zero dbl-vxed and ended with 50% dbl-vaxed Canadians, and the 2022 summer season when 85% of us were either dbl-, triple-, or quadruple-vaxed. You can clearly see that summer of 2022 had the most covid deaths, by far. If the jab was actually a vaccine that would not be the case, at all.

The light pink areas are to highlight the flu seasons. Data for the fall of 2022 isn't in yet, so I blanked out that area of the chart in each year. You can clearly see that the number of covid deaths didn't go down in 2022, despite forcing millions of Canadians to vaccinate.

 

In short, 85% of our deaths now are coming from the multi-vaxed, which makes it seems as though it's not really working all that well.

The overall number of deaths hasn't decreased either, it has actually gone up quite a bit, which is the main indicator of whether or not the vax campaign was a success.

Regardless of what anyone says, these numbers absolutely prove that forcing people to take the jabs was unsuccessful, and discriminating against the unvaxed didn't save a single life.

Vax-Naziism was always unjustified, now we know it was an abysmal failure. 

The truth about the lies and bullshit about covid is starting to become known. Covid 19 was one of the biggest hoaxes ever played on mankind. There were millions of vaccine injuries and there were tens of thousands of innocent people that were murdered thanks to the covid vaccinations. It was never about a covid virus at all, but more about big pharma globalists raking in hundreds of billions of dollars from we the sheeple who were being FORCED to take the covid jab. This covid lie was one hell of a gigantic conspiracy. Believe it or not. 😇

Edited April 23 by taxme

[Goddess]

14 minutes ago, taxme said:

murdered thanks to the covid vaccinations.

....and murdered thanks to suppression of therapeutics, like ivermectin.

See my last post on previous page.

Yes, @eyeball eyeball...."millions" of people died.  But they didn't have to.

[Goddess]

On this one issue alone - the deliberate and lying suppression of IVM, which caused the deaths of millions of people - I will never understand the ones who are not FURIOUS about that and who still call us "conspiracy theorists".

It's clear who the real conspiracy theorists were and are.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

On this one issue alone - the deliberate and lying suppression of IVM, which caused the deaths of millions of people - I will never understand the ones who are not FURIOUS about that and who still call us "conspiracy theorists".

It's clear who the real conspiracy theorists were and are.

The covid10ts here all have Stockholm Syndrome.

They still love the people who lied to them and forced them to take it up the arms, and they're mad at us for proving that they were lied to. 

[Goddess]

18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The covid10ts here all have Stockholm Syndrome.

They still love the people who lied to them and forced them to take it up the arms, and they're mad at us for proving that they were lied to. 

A couple months before my ex-hubby passed form the heart attack, he had visited me and told me he has not felt good since he got the jabs for work.  He mentioned the heart attack studies and said, "Those jabs will likely give me a heart attack."

At the time, I told him not to talk like that, then a few months later, he died of a heart attack.

I'm furious for him.  He knew what was going to kill him.

The doctor told us that his heart misfired but that they had no explanation for why - no blockages, nothing to indicate any heart distress.

Edited April 23 by Goddess

[taxme]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

A couple months before my ex-hubby passed form the heart attack, he had visited me and told me he has not felt good since he got the jabs for work.  He mentioned the heart attack studies and said, "Those jabs will likely give me a heart attack."

At the time, I told him not to talk like that, then a few months later, he died of a heart attack.

I'm furious for him.  He knew what was going to kill him.

The doctor told us that his heart misfired but that they had no explanation for why - no blockages, nothing to indicate any heart distress.

Sorry to say this but your husband was another victim of the big pharma globalists. Today, there are way too many people just dropping dead and the doctors do not know why. Many doctors now know why.

Many innocent people have been dying by the dozens from what the doctors call now SAS or Sudden Adult Syndrome. The big pharma globalists know as to what is going on here, and their pathetic and psycho plans to depopulate the world from injecting their poisonous covid vaccines into innocent victims apparently is working quite well.

Covid was one big planned scamdemic, and those filthy rotten globalists needs to be all arrested and executed for their crimes against humanity. Nothing less will do. Just my opinion of course. 😇

[Goddess]

The doctor in the ICU where he was, told me it was a 21 bed ICU with 30 patients and that they were busier then than at any time during the pandemic.  There were a lot of young-age heart attacks up there at the same time as him.

This was Thunder Bay ICU.

[taxme]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

^^^^  THEY LET PEOPLE DIE, FOR MONEY ^^^^

Sadly, in this make believe world, everything is and always will be all about the money. Our politicians make money for themselves and for the globalists, while at the same time, steal our tax dollars away from us and try and make us poor. 

Can anyone here tell me as to what politicians have done to make our lives better? I do not see my life getting any better. It appears to me to be getting worse, and all with the help of our dear leader politicians. 

Canada could be one of the greatest countries on earth, but yet, our politicians of today are trying their hardest to make Canada worse and not better off. Canadians should be a bunch of filthy rich bunch of bastards here in Canada, but we are not, thanks in part to those many thieves and liars in our governments that run and try and ruin our once great country. 

Government "IS" the problem, and never the solution. Everything they touch, they wreck. That is a fact. 😒

[WestCanMan]

23 hours ago, Goddess said:

The doctor in the ICU where he was, told me it was a 21 bed ICU with 30 patients and that they were busier then than at any time during the pandemic.  There were a lot of young-age heart attacks up there at the same time as him.

This was Thunder Bay ICU.

This kind of thing can't stay hidden forever. Either it's going to bust out, or something has to happen to make the covid jab seem successful all of a sudden.

I wonder if the jab actually does protect people from something, but that 'something' hasn't been released yet. Something called the 'onlycultistsareallowedtosurvive' variant

[Goddess]

24 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I wonder if the jab actually does protect people from something, but that 'something' hasn't been released yet.

Quite a few scientists wondering the same thing:

Have we been CRISPRed for the coming Cas-9? (substack.com)

 

I have two questions in my head. How readily would integration events with PAMs occur in any given transfected cell, and did anyone actually have this in mind? If a Cas-9 protein were to be instructed to be made as part of another ‘vaccine’, would the interaction with the Cas-9, the sgRNA (also introduced exogenously) and the integrated fragment result in cutting? Or is this about gene silencing or activation? Theoretically, you could introduce stop codons or alter a mutated gene using this method. You could also add transcriptional activators to the Cas-9 to activate transcription machinery of specific genes, ie: the modular aspect I mentioned previously. You could also inactivate transcription to physically block a gene. The possibilities are wide-ranging.

 

Questions to ponder: Why is this conserved fragment (1252-1289) in all of these products/vectors/sequences? Why are they sitting upstream from a PAM (CGG)? Could they be a target DNA for subsequent gRNA-Cas-9 system administration?

Pretty dark questions. What would possibly be the purpose, if the outcome of ‘installing’ this hardware in the genome - logistically - could never really be predictable or reproducible? Is it not predictable/reproducible?

 

With regard to using the gRNA-Cas-9 system to get rid of HIV, you can also use it eat certain bits of the integrated HIV-1 genome to disable it. Take that, HIV. In a paper published in 2013, a codon-optimized gRNA-Cas-9 system was used to target the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of HIV-1. The designed gRNA was complementary to the LTRs. Using transfection, the gRNA along with a humanized Cas-9 was introduced into mammalian cells using plasmids.19 This idea is reminiscent of the trojan horse technology of the LNPs that, according to recent findings, also contain plasmids and plasmid DNA fragments.

The gRNA-Cas-9 system can also be used in the context of the ‘shock and kill’ strategy to eliminate HIV from the system. In this case, the gRNA-Cas9 system is used to activate latent HIV-1 viral reservoirs so that drugs (antiretroviral therapy (ART)) can be used to kill latently-infected cells. Kind of like smoking out the bees. A paper was published in 2022 entitled “SARS CoV-2 mRNA vaccination exposes latent HIV to Nef-specific CD8+ T-cells”, where the authors describe what sounds like an unexpected shock and kill result (strategy).20 Basically, the COVID-19 modified mRNA injections shook up (productively-engaged) HIV-Nef-specific CD8+ T cells - the ones that kill virally-infected cells - and resulted in a reduction in cell-associated HIV RNA, which is a measure of HIV persistence.

 

There has been a lot of HIV-related ‘stuff’ in the woodworks with regard to the COVID-19 saga, and it has really left me wondering why. And how. Besides the fact that the spike protein is structurally and compositionally similar to gp120, why was there a specific test group in clinical trials for people who were deemed HIV positive, and why were people being encouraged to be screened for HIV post injection?22 It has been reported that other vaccines can induce increases in cell-associated HIV RNA, and it has also been reported that increases in cell-associated HIV RNA can be accompanied by modest and transient increases in HIV-p24-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, so does this explain why?2324 Were certain people in these fields just curious to know the effects of this new, experimental technology on HIV? Maybe.

To me, there seems to be a lot of ‘surprising’ overlap. I mean, yeah, regular screening was probably reduced because of the psychotic 2-weeks to fatten the wallets thing, but still. The aforementioned paper actually states that the “rate of acute HIV infection (AHI) diagnoses per day was significantly higher during the pandemic compared with the prior 4 years”. I personally don’t buy that this is due to higher frequency testing exactly because routine HIV screening in health care settings was reduced (these likely would have balanced each other out, if anything, in my opinion), so what’s with the higher frequency HIV diagnoses? We’re talking about acute infection - the beginning; new infections - so, what is going on here? Maybe more people were being promiscuous? More IV drug use?

[eyeball]

On 4/23/2024 at 12:04 PM, Goddess said:

Yes, @eyeball eyeball...."millions" of people died.  But they didn't have to.

Well they would have to die to have been called murdered don't you think?

That said, you were murdered and yet here you are.

Dun dun daaa!

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

Quite a few scientists wondering the same thing:

Have we been CRISPRed for the coming Cas-9? (substack.com)

 

I have two questions in my head. How readily would integration events with PAMs occur in any given transfected cell, and did anyone actually have this in mind? If a Cas-9 protein were to be instructed to be made as part of another ‘vaccine’, would the interaction with the Cas-9, the sgRNA (also introduced exogenously) and the integrated fragment result in cutting? Or is this about gene silencing or activation? Theoretically, you could introduce stop codons or alter a mutated gene using this method. You could also add transcriptional activators to the Cas-9 to activate transcription machinery of specific genes, ie: the modular aspect I mentioned previously. You could also inactivate transcription to physically block a gene. The possibilities are wide-ranging.

 

Questions to ponder: Why is this conserved fragment (1252-1289) in all of these products/vectors/sequences? Why are they sitting upstream from a PAM (CGG)? Could they be a target DNA for subsequent gRNA-Cas-9 system administration?

Pretty dark questions. What would possibly be the purpose, if the outcome of ‘installing’ this hardware in the genome - logistically - could never really be predictable or reproducible? Is it not predictable/reproducible?

 

With regard to using the gRNA-Cas-9 system to get rid of HIV, you can also use it eat certain bits of the integrated HIV-1 genome to disable it. Take that, HIV. In a paper published in 2013, a codon-optimized gRNA-Cas-9 system was used to target the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of HIV-1. The designed gRNA was complementary to the LTRs. Using transfection, the gRNA along with a humanized Cas-9 was introduced into mammalian cells using plasmids.19 This idea is reminiscent of the trojan horse technology of the LNPs that, according to recent findings, also contain plasmids and plasmid DNA fragments.

The gRNA-Cas-9 system can also be used in the context of the ‘shock and kill’ strategy to eliminate HIV from the system. In this case, the gRNA-Cas9 system is used to activate latent HIV-1 viral reservoirs so that drugs (antiretroviral therapy (ART)) can be used to kill latently-infected cells. Kind of like smoking out the bees. A paper was published in 2022 entitled “SARS CoV-2 mRNA vaccination exposes latent HIV to Nef-specific CD8+ T-cells”, where the authors describe what sounds like an unexpected shock and kill result (strategy).20 Basically, the COVID-19 modified mRNA injections shook up (productively-engaged) HIV-Nef-specific CD8+ T cells - the ones that kill virally-infected cells - and resulted in a reduction in cell-associated HIV RNA, which is a measure of HIV persistence.

 

There has been a lot of HIV-related ‘stuff’ in the woodworks with regard to the COVID-19 saga, and it has really left me wondering why. And how. Besides the fact that the spike protein is structurally and compositionally similar to gp120, why was there a specific test group in clinical trials for people who were deemed HIV positive, and why were people being encouraged to be screened for HIV post injection?22 It has been reported that other vaccines can induce increases in cell-associated HIV RNA, and it has also been reported that increases in cell-associated HIV RNA can be accompanied by modest and transient increases in HIV-p24-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, so does this explain why?2324 Were certain people in these fields just curious to know the effects of this new, experimental technology on HIV? Maybe.

To me, there seems to be a lot of ‘surprising’ overlap. I mean, yeah, regular screening was probably reduced because of the psychotic 2-weeks to fatten the wallets thing, but still. The aforementioned paper actually states that the “rate of acute HIV infection (AHI) diagnoses per day was significantly higher during the pandemic compared with the prior 4 years”. I personally don’t buy that this is due to higher frequency testing exactly because routine HIV screening in health care settings was reduced (these likely would have balanced each other out, if anything, in my opinion), so what’s with the higher frequency HIV diagnoses? We’re talking about acute infection - the beginning; new infections - so, what is going on here? Maybe more people were being promiscuous? More IV drug use?

I find it weird to even think about something like that, but that's where my level of trust with this gov't is at.

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I find it weird to even think about something like that, but that's where my level of trust with this gov't is at.

How do you manage to even get out of bed in the mornings?

[WestCanMan]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

How do you manage to even get out of bed in the mornings?

Do you understand that the jab actually kills people, eyeball? Do you understand that every time someone takes the jab, they're rolling the dice with death? 

https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-health-canada-deems-400-deaths-after-receiving-covid-vaccine-low

Our own gov't has acknowledged that the jab kills people. It's just not serious about finding out how many. It's just serious about not finding out how many. Or even burying that information entirely.

Do you understand that there's a massive swath of people in this country who are at absolutely no risk whatsoever of dying of covid? Why should they be forced to take the jab? Why were they forced to choose between economic devastation and a dangerous jab that they didn't need? 

Why do you put laughing emojis on posts about people who were killed by the jab? Are the deaths of children funny to you? 

Officially, over 400 were already killed by Jan 2023. Ten times the number of people killed at Glencoe, which you're still furious about, over 300 years later. Over 10,000 people were seriously injured by the jab Are they also jokes, eyeball? 

I hope that you get caught laughing about this by the father or brother of someone killed by the jab. I'd pay good money to see that. 

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I hope that you get caught laughing about this by the father or brother of someone killed by the jab.

Victim of mass psychosis.

[eyeball]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you understand that the jab actually kills people, eyeball? Do you understand that every time someone takes the jab, they're rolling the dice with death? 

Yes, a mere handful...maybe. Like they do with all other vaccines that have saved hundreds of millions if not billions from disease and death.

I'll take the dice any day of the week and one in each cheek on Sundays thank you very much.

And when it's for an obviously dangerous disease ie, they need excavators to keep up with the dead, I'll happily support lockdowns, someone rolling the dice for you and forcing you to stay away from the public if you refuse.

It's your choice.

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Officially, over 400 were already killed by Jan 2023. Ten times the number of people killed at Glencoe, which you're still furious about, over 300 years later. Over 10,000 people were seriously injured by the jab Are they also jokes, eyeball

🤣

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

they need excavators to keep up with the dead

Doesn't matter how many times things are debunked, you just keep repeating the lies......it's like you are incapable of comprehending anything beyond what you were told initially in 2019-20.

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Doesn't matter how many times things are debunked, you just keep repeating the lies......it's like you are incapable of comprehending anything beyond what you were told initially in 2019-20.

That's a bit of a running theme with him. You can prove that two plus two equals four all you like but at the end of the day if it doesn't fit his narrative he's not going to buy it

[Goddess]

I wonder why they're doing this, when the claim is that there are NO issues, limitations or risks with the current genetic therapy injections?

If there ARE issues, limitations and risks, perhaps this should have been done first before mass use?

 

Researchers affiliated with Temple University School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania as well as Acuitas Therapeutics involving mRNA specialist and Noble Prize winner Drew Weissman investigated ways to advance the mRNA platform---to overcome the issues, limitations and associated risks present with current mRNA-based medicinal products including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized COVID-19 vaccines. 

It’s a matter of perspective, given the ongoing “central challenge” faced by the vaccine makers, for example, “the lack of clear pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic relationship, in part due to the significant delay between the kinetics of RNA delivery and the onset of pharmacologic response.” Such fundamental preclinical-focused research represents a core prerequisite for safe and effective vaccines and therapies.

Edited April 25 by Goddess

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Doesn't matter how many times things are debunked, you just keep repeating the lies...

What debunking? You keep repeating there's a bunch going on that's pointing at deliberate murder and widespread conspiracies that are on par with 9/11 and chemtrail nonsense. You're all batshit crazy.

What little you've got is so little it's exactly what we expected going in. Something less than perfect but the best anyone could expect...especially given the high number of nutbars like you trying their best to interfere with the response.

The worst offenders though are the political entrepreneurs that pandered to you. Those dumb fu cks truly cost us lives. Any that were actually injured or died as a result of vaccine are a drop in the bucket in comparison.

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, Goddess said:

If there ARE issues, limitations and risks, perhaps this should have been done first before mass use?

I don't think so.  I think the gov't was right to put it out there and offer it to people. In certain at risk groups i think it was a life saver more than a life risker.   There was no time to finish proper testing.

BUT!! - in my mind that means they SHOULD have sent a clear message - "there could be lots of side effects we don't know. This is PROBABLY safe but we can't be sure - you should think careful about taking this unless you're in an at-risk group for covid deaths"  and then not forced people to take it.

It would have been as wrong to deny people who were at risk the choice as it was t deny people the choice about taking it when they weren't.

They should have been as honest about the risks (including that they were unknown and could be worse than expected) as possible, then respected people's decisions.

[Goddess]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I don't think so.  I think the gov't was right to put it out there and offer it to people. In certain at risk groups i think it was a life saver more than a life risker.   There was no time to finish proper testing.

BUT!! - in my mind that means they SHOULD have sent a clear message - "there could be lots of side effects we don't know. This is PROBABLY safe but we can't be sure - you should think careful about taking this unless you're in an at-risk group for covid deaths"  and then not forced people to take it.

It would have been as wrong to deny people who were at risk the choice as it was t deny people the choice about taking it when they weren't.

They should have been as honest about the risks (including that they were unknown and could be worse than expected) as possible, then respected people's decisions.

I've said this from the beginning, that's why I wrote "before mass use".

I also don't think the average person understands what EUA means with regard to a product's safety & efficacy.  With EUA use - it is unlicensed, does not go through normal testing and trials, and when presented to the FDA - they only have to claim "possible" efficacy.  People should have been informed of this and then, as you say, been given the choice.

Instead, even though governments knew it was not true, because they signed the contracts that stated outright that efficacy was unknown - the jabs were publicly presented as 100% safe, 95% effective, conferred lasting immunity, prevented transmission, stayed in the arm, etc.  All of which were very quickly proven to be false claims. 

But all this was warned about by docs and scientists who were censored and silenced.

I think we should stop calling them conspiracy theories and start calling them "spoiler alerts."

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I think we should stop calling them conspiracy theories and start calling them "spoiler alerts."

Snicker  

[Goddess]

24 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Any that were actually injured or died as a result of vaccine are a drop in the bucket in comparison.

You don't know this.  20-25% excess deaths are only starting to be examined now.

And those NOW suffering vax injuries and deaths are people who were NEVER in any danger of dying from covid.

That may be acceptable to you, but it's not to normal people.