Dougie93 Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 Bear in mind, I am not impugning anyone for being a Trudeau supporter, because de facto I supported Trudeau when I voted Liberal in my riding. So I say it as a Trudeau supporter, loud and proud; populist blast penetration creative destruction device plus dope delivered to your door convenience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, marcus said: He accused me of not admitting problems with the Liberals, "as a Liberal supporter". I am not a Liberal supporter. The Duck Test doesn't say that you are, more that you presented as one in your flowering praise of the associated CBC state propaganda arm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 In the end Trudeau serves the same purpose as Trump does, which is to wreck the government, so if you support Trump you should be supporting Trudeau, they are simply the same weapon delivered with the same effects from opposite wings of the political spectrum. targeted at the center. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcus Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: The Duck Test doesn't say that you are, more that you presented as one in your flowering praise of the associated CBC state propaganda arm. Your duck test has a lot of holes in it. I praised the CBC, not as a Liberal propaganda arm, but as a media outlet that also received the same funding from the government when Harper was in power. I catch the CBC online from time to time and listen to some of their radio programs when commuting. They frequently grill the current government. They frequently run stories that make the Liberals look bad. Just look at the original post. My fight here is for consistency in outrage. I hate seeing people who hold a double standard. Just so we are clear on where I stand, even though I'm sure I'll be called a Liberal supporter again because I, heaven forbid, call people's hypocrisy and double-standards: I also had a glimmer of hope that Trudeau may end up being different than the usual. Of course, I wasn't surprised when he turned out to be the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 It's not my Duck Test, it was born of an American poet named James Whitcomb Riley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 17, 2019 Report Share Posted January 17, 2019 Bear in mind, the double standard is baked into the cake of the failed state Confederation of Ontario bribing Quebec with Alberta's money, which is part and parcel to a Liberal Party of Canada generation legacy project since about Laurier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 3 hours ago, betsy said: Was there ever a time when a person that's considered a concern to our national security ever granted permanent resident status? So, Betsy is saying this was done deliberately? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 To wit, all you have left now, is a very very good hockey team, and Ontario corrupting all governance in the name of bribing Quebec with Alberta's money. The rest is just balderdash Eskimo Communism fed to the masses as mothers milk from birth, so they won't notice the failed state of affairs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcus Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: Bear in mind, the double standard is baked into the cake of the failed state Confederation of Ontario bribing Quebec with Alberta's money, which is part and parcel to a Liberal Party of Canada generation legacy project since about Laurier. Passed on from one Liberal government to the next Conservative government and on and on. Why do people trap themselves in these team vs team games? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, marcus said: Passed on from one Liberal government to the next Conservative government and on and on. Why do people trap themselves in these team vs team games? The Tories are a prop, they are simply the Washington Generals to the Liberal Harlem Globetrotters. The Tories play the role of the team which is paid to lose, otherwise known as the Patsy. Also employed in boxing, when the mafia pays a boxer to take a dive. Edited January 18, 2019 by Dougie93 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 And the Kneedippers are simply the purity spiraling wing of the virtue signalling media party, and thus, all roads lead to Rome, Rome being the Liberal Party of Canada's dysfunctional generational legacy project which is now reduced to Ontario corrupting all aspects of government, in the name of bribing Quebec with Alberta's money. Plus a very very good hockey team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 The only way to cease and desist this inherent corruption is to either; a) let Quebec go. b) kick them out by you going first By peaceful transfer of power democratic means self determination under the Clarity Act. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 Mind you I also voted Stephen Harper, in the hopes that he might loosen some of the more Kafkaesque draconian gun control laws. Gave him nine years to do it, he didn't do it. So I used Gerry Butt's Sockpuppet Zoolander as a mechanism to fire Harper. I'm not above strategic voting at all, with no partisan loyalty neither, and you can still make incremental progress for your tethered tax jurisdiction, in that if you can't get the Canadian nanny prohibitionist state to lighten up on gun control, then you might as well see if you can get the Canadian nanny socialist welfare state to lighten up on prohibition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeitgeist Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 8 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: Mind you I also voted Stephen Harper, in the hopes that he might loosen some of the more Kafkaesque draconian gun control laws. Gave him nine years to do it, he didn't do it. So I used Gerry Butt's Sockpuppet Zoolander as a mechanism to fire Harper. I'm not above strategic voting at all, with no partisan loyalty neither, and you can still make incremental progress for your tethered tax jurisdiction, in that if you can't get the Canadian nanny prohibitionist state to lighten up on gun control, then you might as well see if you can get the Canadian nanny socialist welfare state to lighten up on prohibition. What is with the long-winded disinformative rants? Canadians appreciate gun control for the safety it provides and we hope the US finds a way to manage the fact of high powered weapons falling into too many wrong hands. There has been a great human cost for this. Canada never had prohibition of alcohol and now pot is legal. There is simply no reason for civilians to own machine guns, fully automatic hand guns, and perhaps any handguns at all, except now as a protection against other people who have them. If Canadians or Americans make such recommendations for gun control, it’s to save lives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 An internet forum is simply an online self publishing service wherein you adhere to the terms and conditions in order to publish your thoughts ideas to the world wide web, what you choose to write in terms of content is entirely up to you and not subject to anyone, other than in right of the moderator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 In terms of machine guns, I did not advocate for gun control laws allowing for non military usage of belt fed sustained fire automatic weapons crew served nor otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 Nor submachine guns. Nor machine pistols. Handguns I am open to under restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 But breed bans are not the issue, The issue is rather despite your charter right to it, the Liberals will have you charged if you attempt to defend your life limb or property with force. That's unconstitutional and subject to juries with often overthrow it, none the less you shouldn't have to be charged at all, and even if, they shouldn't be able to invoke Section 33 when and if you win the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 (edited) And Canada did have prohibition, you are as usual simply ill informed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_Canada Edited January 18, 2019 by Dougie93 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeitgeist Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: And Canada did have prohibition, you are as usual simply ill informed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_Canada You’re right on that, but it was short-lived nationally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 Well it simply got to the solution faster than the Americans, which was a Nanny Temperance Lady LCBO which is now nothing more than a life support system for a public sector union. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said: You’re right on that, but it was short-lived nationally. Canada also banned cannabis before the United States...nationally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 Prohibition in America was like America's version of Canadian Confederation, in that it fundamentally corrupted the entire governance of the nation in order to prop it up, and so eventually it had to be overthrown by market force. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 Prohibition did however serve a purpose, which was to turn America from a nation of drunkards, to a nation of limited government libertarians who just happened to also be drunk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeitgeist Posted January 18, 2019 Report Share Posted January 18, 2019 29 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Canada also banned cannabis before the United States...nationally. So when will the feds down there legalize it? I want to smoke up then walk along the beach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.