Black Rights Activist on Canadian $10 bill

[taxme]

On 12/16/2016 at 10:17 AM, Wilber said:

KKK in Canada

 

Canada has an extensive history of racism against many different peoples in its past. FN residential schools, Chinese head tax, Japanese internment camps in WW2, Sikhs Komagata Maru, Segregation of Blacks in the Maritimes and other races elsewhere etc.

Maybe one today would call it racism in those days but maybe then the founders of this country just wanted it to be or stay majority Caucasian. Nothing wrong with that is there? Non whites didn't discover Canada, and built, and put their efforts, time and money into the new Canada as much as white people did. And what we are seeing today, if it were not for appearing "racist" in those days Caucasians today would probably be in the minority or worse. Canada among many other Caucasian countries are finding out today that if the rate of non-white immigration is allowed to continue in the numbers that are happening today, they will become a minority. Today, all Caucasian countries are in a fight for preservation of their race.

Today, the KKK in Canada will never happen. There are not enough white people in Canada who care about their race or survival anyway. Canada has many of it's own white people who face homelessness and are in poverty but to most white people they would prefer to concern themselves with and take care of the rest of the non-white world. I am pretty sure that if the white people were starting to invade Pakistan and China as an example today racism would come about by those people.

It's human nature or should be human nature to want to preserve your species. But for the Caucasian countries too want to do so it always becomes a racist thing. 

 

[taxme]

On 12/16/2016 at 11:19 AM, Omni said:

A little reading for you.

http://www.peoplescommission.org/files/poped/05. A History of Racism.doc.pdf

I have done enough reading. I will stand by my words and beliefs, and if you don't like them well too bad for you. 

[Omni]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Maybe one today would call it racism in those days but maybe then the founders of this country just wanted it to be or stay majority Caucasian. Nothing wrong with that is there? Non whites didn't discover Canada, and built, and put their efforts, time and money into the new Canada as much as white people did. And what we are seeing today, if it were not for appearing "racist" in those days Caucasians today would probably be in the minority or worse. Canada among many other Caucasian countries are finding out today that if the rate of non-white immigration is allowed to continue in the numbers that are happening today, they will become a minority. Today, all Caucasian countries are in a fight for preservation of their race.

Today, the KKK in Canada will never happen. There are not enough white people in Canada who care about their race or survival anyway. Canada has many of it's own white people who face homelessness and are in poverty but to most white people they would prefer to concern themselves with and take care of the rest of the non-white world. I am pretty sure that if the white people were starting to invade Pakistan and China as an example today racism would come about by those people.

It's human nature or should be human nature to want to preserve your species. But for the Caucasian countries too want to do so it always becomes a racist thing. 

 

Our species is human. And those people escaping a war zone are human. Apparently we have to start at the very basics with you.

[August1991]

On 12/15/2016 at 11:44 AM, Benz said:

I have this feeling that if PET would have the chance to come back alive just for 5 seconds, he would slap the back head of his son and say "stop making me ashamed".

Justin est un produit de la doctrine de son père et non un intellectuel penseur comme lui.

I have a similar opinion.

[?Impact]

10 hours ago, Argus said:

In fact, she got a $26 fine. But do exaggerate. Was she the only Black person who ever got mad at racial discrimination and complained about it? I doubt it. Was she the first and only black person who was ever charged with one of these things and pleaded innocent? I doubt it. So what, in the end, was her accomplishment?

Again the refusal to look at her entire life, but focus on one small event and dismiss the total person. Of course she is a black lady, so obviously the entirety of her life can be so easily dismissed.

[-1=e^ipi]

12 hours ago, Omni said:

Our species is human. And those people escaping a war zone are human.

There might be some otherkin escaping war. They certainly don't identify as human. Your comments are otherkinphobic and deeply triggering.

[Argus]

17 hours ago, WestCoastRunner said:

Of course. He's a man!  

Your sexism is appalling.

[Argus]

17 hours ago, dialamah said:

Your objections whenever a person who isn't white and isn't male is given some recognition in Canada clearly identifies the source of your 'logic' and 'common sense'.   

I understand the concept of merit flies completely over your head, as do things like justice and integrity, but those of us not wedded to an extremist political ideology of the far left consider them to be important.

[Argus]

7 hours ago, ?Impact said:

Again the refusal to look at her entire life, but focus on one small event and dismiss the total person. Of course she is a black lady, so obviously the entirety of her life can be so easily dismissed.

As far as I'm aware the entirety of her life was concerned with being a beautician, aside from this one event. And it is 'this one small event' which is given as the justification for honoring her by putting her on the bill. In case you forgot that. Would you like to compare her life to that of Lincoln Alexander?

[?Impact]

9 minutes ago, Argus said:

As far as I'm aware the entirety of her life was concerned with being a beautician, aside from this one event. And it is 'this one small event' which is given as the justification for honoring her by putting her on the bill. In case you forgot that. Would you like to compare her life to that of Lincoln Alexander?

The 'beautician' part is not what is relevant, it is the challenges she faced because of her skin colour and how she overcame them.

Again this is not a contest, it is simply a recognition. If you think that Lincoln Alexander has not been properly recognized for his contributions, then I suggest you try and do something about it instead of complaining about Viola Desmond. 

[Argus]

19 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

The 'beautician' part is not what is relevant, it is the challenges she faced because of her skin colour and how she overcame them.

And how did those challenges make her any different than every other black, asian or native person in Canada at the time?

19 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

Again this is not a contest, it is simply a recognition.

It clearly was a contest, and it is recognition and the honoring of someone who did not deserve it.

19 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

If you think that Lincoln Alexander has not been properly recognized for his contributions, then I suggest you try and do something about it instead of complaining about Viola Desmond. 

If anyone was going to be recognized for their contributions to the advancement of blacks in Canada I'm not sure if anyone would be a better choice than Alexander, but it sure wouldn't be a beautician.

[?Impact]

7 minutes ago, Argus said:

And how did those challenges make her any different than every other black, asian or native person in Canada at the time?

She established a fairly successful small business, despite the environment that made that next to impossible. The fallout from the theatre crime against her eventually destroyed that business as well. Again, learn about her before declaring her undeserving.

[Argus]

17 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

She established a fairly successful small business, despite the environment that made that next to impossible. The fallout from the theatre crime against her eventually destroyed that business as well. Again, learn about her before declaring her undeserving.

And she was the only black person to successfully establish a small business? Lincoln Alexander successfully went to law school, where he stood up and challenged the dean in an open classroom of 200 to stop using racist language. 

[?Impact]

7 minutes ago, Argus said:

And she was the only black person to successfully establish a small business? Lincoln Alexander successfully went to law school, where he stood up and challenged the dean in an open classroom of 200 to stop using racist language. 

Again, repeat after me, this is not a contest.

[Wilber]

2 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

Again, repeat after me, this is not a contest.

Actually it is, the rules just aren't clear.

[Benz]

17 hours ago, taxme said:

Maybe one today would call it racism in those days but maybe then the founders of this country just wanted it to be or stay majority Caucasian. Nothing wrong with that is there? Non whites didn't discover Canada, and built, and put their efforts, time and money into the new Canada as much as white people did. And what we are seeing today, if it were not for appearing "racist" in those days Caucasians today would probably be in the minority or worse. Canada among many other Caucasian countries are finding out today that if the rate of non-white immigration is allowed to continue in the numbers that are happening today, they will become a minority. Today, all Caucasian countries are in a fight for preservation of their race.

Today, the KKK in Canada will never happen. There are not enough white people in Canada who care about their race or survival anyway. Canada has many of it's own white people who face homelessness and are in poverty but to most white people they would prefer to concern themselves with and take care of the rest of the non-white world. I am pretty sure that if the white people were starting to invade Pakistan and China as an example today racism would come about by those people.

It's human nature or should be human nature to want to preserve your species. But for the Caucasian countries too want to do so it always becomes a racist thing. 

 

It was racist in those days as well. The difference is that, in those days, racism was something accepted by the majority.

Natives discover Canada first, not the whites. The white founded what Canada is today but, with the use of natives and black slaves as well. The very same whites that kidnap blacks in their homeland in Africa to bring them here in north america for slavery. It is very inappropriate that you say they did not put money, time and efforts.

The whites preserving their race? No races are endangered on this planet of 7 billions of people. The diversity is a good thing and that includes the existence of the white skin. Which is not better or worst than any others. There are no will or plan to make desapear the white race. You fear something that is mathematically impossible to happen unless there is a law that forbids white people to have children with white people. You are not racist because you want to preserve the white skin attributes, you are racist because you think your race is endangered by the others. It is ironic because if you take a look at your ancestors, you will find that all humans on this planet find their origins in Africa. You do not even understand why your skin is white. It's the evolution. The skin adapts to its environment. The race is just a concept based on the skin characteristics. The whites are 30% of the total population, more than a billion. Alot of animal species are more endangered than that.

[taxme]

19 hours ago, Omni said:

Our species is human. And those people escaping a war zone are human. Apparently we have to start at the very basics with you.

I am politically incorrect, and I try to use common sense and logic in everything I say, and that seems to be a problem with you here. From where I am sitting, you appear to know only the basics. When you know only one side of the story, than you know nothing at all. Is that basic enough for you? 

[Argus]

Just now, taxme said:

I am politically incorrect, and I try to use common sense and logic in everything I say,

Try harder.

[Omni]

5 minutes ago, taxme said:

I am politically incorrect, and I try to use common sense and logic in everything I say, and that seems to be a problem with you here. From where I am sitting, you appear to know only the basics. When you know only one side of the story, than you know nothing at all. Is that basic enough for you? 

It seems to be basic enough for you. As Argus recommends, try harder.

[taxme]

3 hours ago, Benz said:

It was racist in those days as well. The difference is that, in those days, racism was something accepted by the majority.

Natives discover Canada first, not the whites. The white founded what Canada is today but, with the use of natives and black slaves as well. The very same whites that kidnap blacks in their homeland in Africa to bring them here in north america for slavery. It is very inappropriate that you say they did not put money, time and efforts.

The whites preserving their race? No races are endangered on this planet of 7 billions of people. The diversity is a good thing and that includes the existence of the white skin. Which is not better or worst than any others. There are no will or plan to make desapear the white race. You fear something that is mathematically impossible to happen unless there is a law that forbids white people to have children with white people. You are not racist because you want to preserve the white skin attributes, you are racist because you think your race is endangered by the others. It is ironic because if you take a look at your ancestors, you will find that all humans on this planet find their origins in Africa. You do not even understand why your skin is white. It's the evolution. The skin adapts to its environment. The race is just a concept based on the skin characteristics. The whites are 30% of the total population, more than a billion. Alot of animal species are more endangered than that.

That is right, racism was probably acceptable in those days. The native Indians here may have been here for a number of centuries but where did they come from? When one looks closely at the features of the North American Indian they appear to look quite Asian. There have been studies that there may have been Europeans living in NA long before the Indians came along, and they knocked them off. Who really knows of course. None of us alive today knows either. The so-called experts are not quite sure. Ever heard of the Kennewick man? 

The whites did not kidnap the blacks from Africa. It was the blacks themselves that were kidnapping blacks. Arabs kidnapped blacks and used blacks as slaves for centuries also. And in order for those slaves to get to NA they used ships that apparently were owned by Jews, and those ships were used to bring those slaves to NA. Lots of people involved in the slave trade business. A big business way back then. I said that the whites were the biggest contributors to the development of NA, not non-whites. That came later. 

The white people maka up approx. 9% of world population, and thus that makes the white people already a minority in the world. With the many anti-white programs and agendas going on like multiculturalism,feminism,promoting the gay/lesbian lifestyle and massive 3rd world invasion in to white countries, interracial couples/marriage, no one can argue that those programs and agendas are destroying the Caucasian race, slowly but surely. A master plan implemented in the 60's by an elite certain ethnic gang of white dispisers. 

I have read that there were three human known species created.  They were Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. So, what you say as far as everybody basically coming from Africa maybe be true but it would appear as though the Negroid were not where everyone originated from. If skin adapts to the environment than why are black people still black looking after living in North America for all these centuries. The only way they can change their color is by mixing it up with another color just like in painting. 

[taxme]

28 minutes ago, Argus said:

Try harder.

It is you who needs too try harder. I am doing just fine and dandy. 

[taxme]

24 minutes ago, Omni said:

It seems to be basic enough for you. As Argus recommends, try harder.

I am God's gift to mankind. I know all. Now it is your turn to know it all by trying a lot harder than what you are doing right now. It will work if you give it a try. Worked for me. 

[Omni]

16 minutes ago, taxme said:

I am God's gift to mankind. I know all. Now it is your turn to know it all by trying a lot harder than what you are doing right now. It will work if you give it a try. Worked for me. 

If you think whites didn't capture blacks for the American slave trade, you really do need to try harder.

[taxme]

28 minutes ago, Omni said:

If you think whites didn't capture blacks for the American slave trade, you really do need to try harder.

You were not even around at the time. How do you really know what happened? Are you an expert on history? 

[Benz]

 

39 minutes ago, taxme said:

That is right, racism was probably acceptable in those days. The native Indians here may have been here for a number of centuries but where did they come from? When one looks closely at the features of the North American Indian they appear to look quite Asian. There have been studies that there may have been Europeans living in NA long before the Indians came along, and they knocked them off. Who really knows of course. None of us alive today knows either. The so-called experts are not quite sure. Ever heard of the Kennewick man? 

I did not but, I see they solve the mystery in 2015. He was closer to native americans than any others. Native americans come from Asia. We know that now. The first whites that arrived here were the Vikings but, they did not last long. However, I do not know why you talk about that. It is irrelevent.

 

39 minutes ago, taxme said:

The whites did not kidnap the blacks from Africa. It was the blacks themselves that were kidnapping blacks. Arabs kidnapped blacks and used blacks as slaves for centuries also. And in order for those slaves to get to NA they used ships that apparently were owned by Jews, and those ships were used to bring those slaves to NA. Lots of people involved in the slave trade business. A big business way back then. I said that the whites were the biggest contributors to the development of NA, not non-whites. That came later. 

That is like buying child porn and saying it is not you that force the kid to do that. When you buy it, you consent. Even if the whites also did take the blacks from Africa, you are right, most of the time, they were just buying them from others that capture them. Blacks were enslaving blacks, then selling them to the whites. So the owners of the boats shipping them in NA were all jews? Look, whether what you say is 10% or 50% or 100% true, it is irrelevant. The whites in north america bought them. They are in the front line of the blame. You can accuse the jews as well if you want. As long as you do not deny the facts. Remember, you were saying that only the whites were investing money and efforts. Also, do not forget that the whites have kick most of the natives out of their land.

 

39 minutes ago, taxme said:

The white people maka up approx. 9% of world population, and thus that makes the white people already a minority in the world. With the many anti-white programs and agendas going on like multiculturalism,feminism,promoting the gay/lesbian lifestyle and massive 3rd world invasion in to white countries, interracial couples/marriage, no one can argue that those programs and agendas are destroying the Caucasian race, slowly but surely. A master plan implemented in the 60's by an elite certain ethnic gang of white dispisers. 

Hey boy. Does that conspiracy is giving you nightmares? Destroying the caucasian race... nothing less. How many races do you define? You count only 9% whites? Who do you exclude and include?

 

39 minutes ago, taxme said:

I have read that there were three human known species created.  They were Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. So, what you say as far as everybody basically coming from Africa maybe be true but it would appear as though the Negroid were not where everyone originated from. If skin adapts to the environment than why are black people still black looking after living in North America for all these centuries. The only way they can change their color is by mixing it up with another color just like in painting. 

The change needs alot of time. Minimum is 1000 years and can take alot more than that.

In what category do you put the people having parents from two groups? A Negroid mother with a Mongoloid father. How do you classify that? If the little girl of that union, later gets a child with a Caucasoid father, what happen then? Even if we could classify the humans into that 3 race categories,  those are just made up of a point in time. Those 3 are all coming from the same root. We are not even talking about another branch of humanoids like the Neanderthals who desapeared few thousands years ago.

When you have a child, half of your genes are mixed up with the one coming from his mother. Whether she is caucasian or negroid, it does not change anything.