jacee Posted October 18, 2016 Report Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 57 minutes ago, TimG said: It is not about vulnerable children and you know that. This is just the latest excuse to get money from the government. If it was not 'vulnerable children' it would have been something else. These native bands constantly harping about how they want self government but only if someone else pays for it. Yet despite having their lifestyle subsidized for years they refuse to show any flexibility when Canada decides it needs to develop the industry that is needed to pay for those benefits. Sorry, I don't have much sympathy. I don't have any sympathy for your 'white nation' ideology either. Edited October 18, 2016 by jacee Quote
TimG Posted October 18, 2016 Report Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 5 hours ago, jacee said: I don't have any sympathy for your 'white nation' ideology either. Yawn. Native zealots screaming racist whenever someone expresses an opinion they don't like. Pathetic and tiresome. I take this as an admission that you have no rational argument to refute my point that there is a reciprocal relationship where natives enjoy the subsidies provided by (increasingly non-white) Canada in return for flexibility when it comes to developing the resources that pay the bills. Edited October 18, 2016 by TimG Quote
Smallc Posted October 18, 2016 Report Posted October 18, 2016 7 hours ago, jacee said: I don't have any sympathy for your 'white nation' ideology either. Because Canada is all about being a white nation. Quote
overthere Posted October 18, 2016 Report Posted October 18, 2016 white, brown, green. Everybody will get the same percentage of benefit from the LNG industry in Canada: 0%. Anybody taking odds on whether or not this plant gets built in the next 20 years? I say 'no chance'. When you dither and dick around long enough on regulatory delays, it is possible to both pretend you support something and stop it dead. Justin is just taking a page from Dads playbook on the Mackenzie Valley pipeline, the current Canadian and World record holder for wankery(Large Government Division). That one was proposed in about 1974, and received cabinet approval in 2011, about 38 years later. Despite having local First Nations support by the end, the peole who would actually finaqnce it had forgotten entirely about it. Same thing here. See you in 2060 or so. Quote Science too hard for you? Try religion!
?Impact Posted October 19, 2016 Report Posted October 19, 2016 5 hours ago, overthere said: Justin is just taking a page from Dads playbook on the Mackenzie Valley pipeline, Actually Joe Clark had the first shot to do something about it, and failed. When Dad was returned to government he did in fact approve construction from Norman Wells to Zama, but land claim settlements still needed to be resolved. Quote
Smallc Posted October 19, 2016 Report Posted October 19, 2016 It's far easier to blame a Trudeau. I just overlooked my eggs - I blame Trudeau. Quote
jacee Posted October 19, 2016 Report Posted October 19, 2016 On 18/10/2016 at 11:21 AM, Smallc said: Because Canada is all about being a white nation. TimG's world is. Quote
TimG Posted October 19, 2016 Report Posted October 19, 2016 16 minutes ago, jacee said: TimG's world is. No. Jacee's world is. Nothing in my statements had anything to 'white nation'. That is racist garbage you invented because you are incapable of responding to arguments made and prefer to simply call people racist if they disagree with you. The only racists are people like you who are obsessed with identity politics. Quote
jacee Posted October 19, 2016 Report Posted October 19, 2016 On 18/10/2016 at 8:51 AM, TimG said: Yawn. Native zealots screaming racist whenever someone expresses an opinion they don't like. Pathetic and tiresome. I take this as an admission that you have no rational argument to refute my point that there is a reciprocal relationship where natives enjoy the subsidies provided by (increasingly non-white) Canada in return for flexibility when it comes to developing the resources that pay the bills. The disbursements currently made to Indigenous Nations are, in theory, those negotiated by treaty in exchange for use of traditional lands, access to resources, etc. They are, again in theory, supposed to provide the same level of funding for education, health care, child welfare, senior care, etc. as for all Canadians. In reality, the payments are a drop in the bucket compared to Canada's unfulfilled legal treaty obligations, and the level of funding for (eg) Indigenous children's education, health and wellbeing is seldom consistent with that of other Canadian children. That funding is sometimes used to threaten the wellbeing of children further, to extort submission of communities to corporate demands for resource extraction (poisoning environments), etc. Imagine the outcry if our government threatened to withhold education funds from a municipality to force through a pipeline, etc. It wouldn't happen to us, but it does happen to Indigenous communities. Quote
TimG Posted October 19, 2016 Report Posted October 19, 2016 1 minute ago, jacee said: The disbursements currently made to Indigenous Nations are, in theory, those negotiated by treaty in exchange for use of traditional lands, access to resources, etc. As I said. It is a reciprocal relationship. If aboriginal groups seek to block development of resources they are not living up to their side of the deal. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 19, 2016 Author Report Posted October 19, 2016 Ok, let's please back off from calling each other racists personally. Certainly the issue can be framed in a cultural context, and you can recognize those contexts in various viewpoints but you all must be civil. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
PIK Posted October 21, 2016 Report Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) It is time for the natives to join Canada. This idea that we must stay true to our ancestors way of life is a crock. How many more poor kids need to off themselves before the natives get thier act together. Edited October 21, 2016 by PIK Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
Michael Hardner Posted October 21, 2016 Author Report Posted October 21, 2016 2 hours ago, PIK said: It is time for the natives to join Canada. This idea that we must stay true to our ancestors way of life is a crock. How many more poor kids need to off themselves before the natives get thier act together. I think this would make a good new thread. Note that an MP is getting a lot of traction by demanding immigrants have "Canadian values" which is another way of saying "Traditional Canadian Way of Life" General question for MapleLeafWeb members - when is it ok to demand that people change their culture, or alternately when does culture need to be protected ? There are lots of exmples to explore: CanCon, Quebec Language laws etc. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 21, 2016 Report Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) Deleted > Moved to new topic Edited October 21, 2016 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.